Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020

Peter Cole

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0123, written 28 Feb 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report28 Feb 2020
Reference2020-0123
DeceasedPeter Cole
CoronerGeoffrey Sullivan
Coroner areaHertfordshire
CategoryAlcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Other related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Signed by Geoffrey Sullivan
Title Senior Coroner
Jurisdiction Hertfordshire

_

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Sir Simon Stevens - Chief Executive NHS England
1 CORONER

| am Geoffrey Sullivan Sentor Coroner for Hertfordshire

2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

| make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations
28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
http://www. legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph,

http://www. legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made

3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 19/09/2019 | commenced an investigation into the death of Peter COLE. Following a post mortem and
toxicology analysis the cause of death provided was:

1a) Drug Overdose

it} Ischaemic Heart Disease

The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest 27th February 2020.

The circumstances of the death recorded:

On 14 August 2019 Peter Cole was found collapsed at his home address by a neighbour. He was
unresponsive and CPR was started which was continued by ambulance crew and a return of output was
achleved. Peter was transported to Lister Hospital where a CT chest showed bilateral lower lobe
collapse/consolidation and multiple rib fractures from CPR. Following discussion with family, doctors
decided no further resuscitation would be given and Peter died later that day.

The conclusion of the inquest was: Prescription Drug Related

4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

Mr Cole was an older person with a diagnosis of dementia. He was in receipt of numerous prescription
drugs, on repeat prescription. One of the drugs he was recelving was Tramadol, on a repeat prescription
of 100 capsules per month over an extended period. The drug upon which he overdosed was Tramadol.

| did not find 2 probable contribution to Mr Coles death as a result of the large quantity of repeat
prescription drugs but heard that he had amassed a large quantity of prescription medication that he was
simply not taking and was building up In his house.

As a result of concerns raised about the extent of the drugs prescribed to him, | heard evidence from an
experienced Mental Health Nurse.

She outlined in her evidence that Mr Coles’ case was far from unusual. That she frequently visited
patients who had amassed vast quantitles of unused medication and medical supplies. Often these
patients were older and with varying degrees of mental Impairment. These drugs were Invariably on
repeat prescription and the continued need for the drugs and/or compliance with the prescribed regime
was not adequately supervised. One patlent had a ‘cupboard full’ of unused medication.

=

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion
there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action Is taken. In the circumstances it Is my statutory
duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. —

(1) That repeat medication is not being adequately monitored, leading to many (often older and/or
mentally infirm) patients bullding-up dangerous quantitles of prescribed medication.

(2) That the inadequate supervision of prescribed (repeat) medication is so widespread that the
consequent waste of resources has an adverse Impact on the overall provision of healthcare.

(3)

| ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

tn my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you Sir Simon Stevens, Chief
Executive NHS England, have the power to take such action

“YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 27
April 2020. |, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for
action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

| COPIES and PUBLICATION

| have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner

| am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish elther or both ina complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a
copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make

representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of
your response by the Chlef Coroner.

28/02/2020

—_p>
Signature_ =
Geoffrey Sullivan Sehior Coroner Hertfordshire

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from NHS England (PDF)
Geoffrey Sullivan, Senior Coroner 
Hertfordshire Coroner Service 
The Old Courthouse 
St Albans Road East  
Hatfield  
Hertfordshire 
AL10 0ES 

                                    Professor Stephen Powis 
                                    National Medical Director 
                                                    Skipton House 
                                                 80 London Road 
                                                              SE1 6LH 

                                                     30th  June 2020 

Dear Mr Sullivan,  

Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Peter Cole 14 August 
2019  

Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report dated 28 February 2020 concerning the 
death of Peter Cole on 14 August 2019. Firstly, I would like to express my deep 
condolences to the Cole family.  

The regulation 28 Report concludes Peter Cole’s death was a result of drug 
overdose and Ischemic Heart Disease.   

Following the inquest, you raised concerns in your Regulation 28 Report to NHS 
England and Improvement regarding:  

• 

• 

repeat prescriptions not being adequately monitored, leading to many 
patients building up dangerous quantities of prescribed medication; and  
that as a result the inadequate supervision of repeat prescriptions is so 
widespread that the consequent waste of resources has an adverse impact 
on the overall provision of healthcare.  

Thank you for raising these important points. Patient safety is the key responsibility 
of all who work for the NHS and is at the heart of NHS system and process, with 
NICE, the Care Quality Commission and the professional regulators and others, 
providing supporting mechanisms. Delivering patient safety is complex as it relates 
to all patient interactions and so ensuring effective delivery is on-going with learning 
from experience and research informing progress.   

Regarding the monitoring of repeat prescribing this is covered in the implementation 
of the Long Term Plan1 which identifies better use of NHS resources as a priority 
area.  Work is ongoing to reduce the use of ineffective medicines as well as other 
programmes relevant to medicines waste which NHS England and Improvement 

1 https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/ 

NHS England and NHS Improvement 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
  
    
 
 
 
 
                                                         
 
 has responsibility for. Several workstreams are currently in place to optimise 
prescribing and reduce medicines waste, these include:  

•  Carrying out Structured Medication Reviews:  As part of the five year GP 

contract Primary Care Networks (PCNS) are able to recruit additional staff to 
work in primary care teams, this includes including clinical pharmacists. 
Clinical pharmacists are increasingly working as part of general practice 
teams. They are highly qualified experts in medicines and can help people in 
a range of ways. This includes carrying out structured medication reviews for 
patients with ongoing health problems and improving patient safety, 
outcomes and value through a person-centred approach.  They will support 
GP practices in prioritising  patients who would benefit from a structured 
medication review. This will include patients in care homes; with complex 
and problematic polypharmacy; on medicines commonly associated with 
medication errors: and, with severe frailty, who are particularly isolated or 
housebound. They will also work with community pharmacies to connect 
patients appropriately to the New Medicines Service which supports 
adherence to newly prescribed medicines. 

•  Supporting medicines optimisation through the Medicines Value Programme2 
to improve health outcomes from medicines through supporting people to 
take medicines as intended and, decreasing or stopping the use of 
medicines which are neither clinically - or cost-effective; 

•  Undertaking a review of over-prescribing in the NHS which is due to report in 
Spring 2020. The review covers: the role of digital technologies; research; 
culture change and social prescribing; repeat prescribing; and transfer of 
care. The report will provide recommendations to reduce overprescribing 
which will help to reduce medicines wastage; 

•  Encouraging Shared Decision Making where a clinician supports a patient to 
reach a decision about their treatment by a conversation that brings together  
the clinician’s expertise: such as treatment options, evidence, risks and 
benefits;  with what the patient knows best: their preferences, personal 
circumstances, goals, values and beliefs. 

• 

•  The Medicines Safety Improvement Programme (MSIP) aims to reduce 

medication related harm in the NHS, focusing on high risk drugs, situations 
and vulnerable patients. The programme will contribute to the WHO 
Challenge target to reduce severe avoidable medication-related harm 
globally by 50% over five years. 

In addition, to support improvement in dementia diagnosis and personalised care 
for people with dementia,  NHS England published The Dementia Care Pathway: 
Full Implementation guidance . This resource sets out recommendations for 
reviewing and managing medication needs and provides examples of step-by-step 
best practice that includes monitoring and reviewing medication in the Appendices 
and Helpful Resources section of the guide. 

NHS England and Improvement also recently refreshed the Dementia: Good 
Personalised Care and Support Planning guide to help further enhance the 
provision of personalised post diagnostic support. The guide emphasises the need 
to include medication reviews to help to reduce poly pharmacy, minimise use of 

2 https://www.england.nhs.uk/medicines/medicinesoptimisation/ 

NHS England and NHS Improvement 

   
 
 
 
 drugs which impair cognition, to ensure that appropriate post diagnostic medication/ 
services are highlighted and accessed or stopped, as appropriate, at the right time 
to improve outcomes for patients. 

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention. I hope 
the extensive work I have outlined reassures you that we are actively addressing 
the points you raise. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any 
further information. 

Yours sincerely, 

Professor Stephen Powis 
National Medical Director   
NHS England and NHS Improvement  

NHS England and NHS Improvement

Related reports

Other reports by Geoffrey Sullivan

See all →

More reports categorised “Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths”

See all →

Track Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.