Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020

Dereck John Chapman

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0165, written 27 Aug 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report27 Aug 2020
Reference2020-0165
DeceasedDereck John Chapman
CoronerAlan Wilson
Coroner areaBlackpool & Fylde
CategoryCare Home Health related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:  

Registered Manager, 
Rossendale Nursing Home, 
96, Woodlands Rd 
Ansdell, 
Lytham St. Annes 

1 

CORONER 

I am Alan Anthony Wilson Senior Coroner for Blackpool & Fylde 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 
28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 04/06/2020 00:00:00 I commenced an investigation into the death of Dereck John CHAPMAN, known 
to his Family as John. 

I concluded an inquest on 26th August 2020.  

The medical cause of John’s death was as follows: 
1 a Acute cardio-respiratory failure, due to 
1 b Lobar pneumonia and coronary heart disease 

2 Osteoparotic fracture of left neck of femur  (operated on 16th January) 

The conclusion to the inquest was a narrative conclusion as follows: 
John Chapman died as a result of pneumonia and heart disease at a time when he was recuperating in 
hospital following a surgical repair of a fractured neck of femur received during a recent fall at the 
nursing home where he resided. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

The circumstances were summarised In box 3 of the Record of Inquest where I determined as follows; 
John Chapman was known to have a medical history which included chronic obstructive pulmonary 
disease, atrial fibrillation and osteoarthritis. He had previously been diagnosed with dementia and had 
reduced capacity. He had recently been prone to falling and was mobilising less frequently. He was 
prone to putting himself on the floor. On 13/01/20 at 10.10 pm he was witnessed by staff to fall in the 
dining area at the nursing home where he resided. He was observed overnight. At 3.00 am on 14th 
January 2020 a motion sensor indicated John had left his bed and he was found on the floor by his bed. 
His presentation was not concerning until around 8.00 am later that morning when he was observed to 
be in pain. Later that morning an ambulance was contacted and he was transferred to hospital arriving 
at around 4.00 pm where investigations revealed a left neck of femur fracture which was surgically 
repaired on 16/01/2020. The procedure was uneventful following which he remained settled.  On 
17/01/2020 he was noted to have a reduced level of consciousness. Over subsequent days his 
condition deteriorated. By 24/01/2020 after discussions with his family John began to receive end of 
life care and was kept comfortable until he died on the 03/02/2020. A subsequent post mortem 
examination confirmed that John died from the combined effects of heart disease and pneumonia.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion 
there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory 
duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

(1)  Response of staff at the nursing home: John had previously been diagnosed with dementia. He 
was at high risk of falling. His cognitive difficulties were such that he could not fully understand 
questions put to him, and nor could he reliably describe his symptoms. On 13th January 2020 he 
was seen to fall and as he did so his crown made contact with a wheelchair. The contact was felt 
to be minor. Some five hours later he was found face down on the floor by his bed. He was not 
felt to be in pain and was returned to his bed until approximately 8am on 14th January 2020 
which resulted in a transfer to hospital later that day. Having considered all of the evidence I felt 
that the response from nursing home staff was insufficient and did not appear to have 
appropriately taken into account his dementia, that he may be experiencing symptoms but was 
unable to reliably communicate this to staff. As it transpired he did undergo a CT head scan 
which confirmed he had not suffered a significant head injury but this cannot have been obvious 
to staff at the relevant time. I did determine that the response from the nursing home staff did 
not contribute to the eventual outcome for John but this may not be the case in the future. I am 
concerned that such an insufficient response raises a risk of future deaths.  

(2)  The quality of record keeping: during the course of the coronial investigation the court was 

provided with nursing home records and documentation. The quality of that documentation was 
unimpressive. Consideration of that documentation did not provide an accurate or reliable 
narrative as regards John’s care or the events that had taken place during the latter stages of his 
residence at the nursing home. By way of illustration the Nursing Home Manager had provided a 
document to the court which made reference to John having been found on the floor out by his 
bed at approximately 5.30am on the 14th January 2020 but the source of that information could 
not be identified, There was no evidence to support this within the documentation provided and 
when asked in evidence the Manager could no longer recall from where / whom she had 
learned of that information and therefore the court felt unable to place any weight upon it. 
Nursing Home documentation needs to be accurate, detailed and reliable. If a potentially 
significant event occurs in relation to a patient it needs to be recorded so that other staff are 
aware of it and can take it into account. An accurate and reliable account of events is essential 
in order to ensure that in the event of an investigation / review of a significant incident or 
fatality such investigation needs to have access to the relevant information in order to ensure 
lessons are learnt and  appropriately reflected upon. When this is not possible it poses a risk 
that other deaths may arise in the future.   

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you 
the power to take such action.  

 have 

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 23rd 
October 2020. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for 
action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The Family of John Chapman; 
I have also sent it to the Care Quality Commission who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a 
copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make 
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of 
your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

27/08/2020 

Signature__
Alan Anthony Wilson Senior Coroner Blackpool & Fylde

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Rossendale Nursing Home (PDF)
Blackpool & Fylde Coroners 

ALAN  ANTHONY WILSON 
SENIOR CORONER 

PO Box 1066  Corporation Street Blackpool  FY11GB 
Telephone 01253 477128 Email Coroners@blackpool.gov.uk 

Our Ref: 
Date: 

45181 
23  October 2020 

Dear Mrs Chapman 

Re  Dereck Chapman deceased 

Inquest concluding 26th August 2020 

You  will recall that at the conclusion of the inquest that a report was sent to the Rossendale 
Nursing Home because the inquest had  raised concerns about the risk of future deaths. 

This court has  now received email communication from the Nursing Home Manager which  I 
repeat below: 

"Dear Mr Alan Anthony Wilson, 

In  response to the matters of concern at Rossendale Nursing  Home 

Rossendale Nursing Home has made improvements with documentation and staff to ensure 
accuracy and reliability. 

1.  Person Centred Software system has been purchased, staff trained and implemented 

at Rossendale Nursing Home,  March 2020 . Staff up date documentation 
immediately onto the handsets so the information is  time specific, onto the electronic 
system, stored on Cloud,  reviewed daily by the Nurse in  Charge and Manager.  Care 
plans and risk assessments guide staff on the handsets informing staff of the daily 
care plan, keeping everyone informed and up to date, ensuring accuracy and 
reliability. Nurse in Charge writes daily care· notes on the system to ensure 
information is  correct,  up to date and everyone is informed.  Night checks are 
recorded via the handsets scanning a QR code to ensure accuracy and reliable 
information stored. 

Cont/d... 

 Continued page no 2 

23 October 2020 

2.  Walk around handover is given to staff at the start of each shift, written handover 
passed onto Nurse at the beginning of each shift with up to date information.  Full 
handover is given verbally to team of staff so the team can discuss,  organise and 
delegate care. 

3.  Pre-Admission falls risk assessment is undertaken, funding sought for high risk offalls 
prior to admission along with Covid-19 testing, isolation for 2 weeks, requiring one to 
one 24/7for safety. 

4.  Motion sensor in place when resident is alone at night, if no one to one, and hourly 

checks.  Bed at lowest position, crash mat at side of bed, bedrail assessment 
completed. 

5.  Staff member present in Communal areas to monitor residents at risk offalls,  if no 

one to one being funded, for constant supervision. 

6.  Post fall protocol Lancashire County Council being followed if a fall has occurred, post 

fall observations and investigation completed. 

7.  Referral to Falls  team to assess and support to reduce risk offalls. 
8.  Rossendale Nursing Home has purchased and installed CCTV to monitor staff, 

residents and assist in investigations. 

9.  Environmental audits carried out monthly to reduce risk offalls,  trips & hazards. 

Kind regards, 

Registered Nurse 

Rossendale Nursing Home Manager" 

This  letter now brings the  involvement of the  Coroner's  service  to a conclusion.  A copy  of 
this  letter  is  now  being  sent  to  the  Chief  Coroner  of  England  &  Wales  and  to  the 
Care Quality Commission. 

Yours sincerely 

Alan Anthony Wilson 
Senior Coroner 
Blackpool  & Fylde

Related reports

Other reports by Alan Wilson

See all →

More reports categorised “Care Home Health related deaths”

See all →

Track Care Home Health related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.