Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2020-0170, written 3 Sep 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 3 Sep 2020 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2020-0170 |
| Deceased | Laura Parsons |
| Coroner | James Thompson |
| Coroner area | County Durham & Darlington |
| Category | Community Healthcare Death |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. HM Secretary of State For Health 1 CORONER I am JAMES EDWARD THOMPSON Assistant Coroner, for the coroner area of County Durham & Darlington 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 13th February 2020 I commenced an investigation into the death of Laura Eve PARSONS, 36. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 1st September 2020. The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative which found the deceased Laura Eve Parsons died on 5th November 2019 after consuming an excessive quantity of morphine which was prescribed to her, it's toxicity ultimately causing her death. The medical caused of death was; 1a - Morphine Toxicity,Bronchopneumonia 2 - Metastatic Adenocarcinoma Of Tubo-Ovarian Origin 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH On 5th November 2019 police became aware of concerns for the deceased and entry was forced to her home address where she was found dead. An empty 500ml bottle of liquid morphine was recovered from a waste bin inside the address. A subsequent post mortem & toxicological examination revealed fatal levels of morphine in the deceased at the time of her death. 1 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – Ms Parsons was prescribed liquid morphine to treat ‘break through’ pain for cancer. It was first prescribed on 9th August 2019. Ms Parsons was admitted to hospital on 10th August 2019 with an accidental overdose of morphine. It appears 180mls were consumed in a 12 hour period. She recovered and was discharged from hospital. The remainder of the prescribed morphine was discarded. On 31st October 2019 Ms Parsons requested a repeat prescription of liquid morphine from her GP surgery. This was authorised and a 500ml bottle of liquid morphine was dispensed to Ms Parsons. On 5th November 2019 Ms Parsons was found dead due to ingesting a fatal amount of morphine. At inquest evidence was given that information such as recent overdose would be added to the ‘Active Problems’ section on a person’s medical records and would be prominent when any clinician accessed that person’s records. It was explained at inquest that when a patient applies for a repeat prescription so far as the request is within the permitted timescale to issue a repeat of the prescribed item, then the prescription would be issued without any further scrutiny and the electronic systems would not take a prescriber to the patient’s medical records and in particular the ‘Active Problems’ section. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your organisation have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 1st November 2020. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons - Family of Ms Laura Eve Parsons & Queens Road Surgery, Consett, County Durham and the Care Quality Commission.. I have also sent a copy to the NHS North East Commissioning Group. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 2 9 3rd September 2020 James Edward THOMPSON 3
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
ae D ep artm ent Parliamentary Under Secretary pee (or ination of Health & 39 Victoria ae Social Care SWIH OEU Your Ref: Mr James E Thompson HM Assistant Coroner, County Durham & Darlington HM Coroner's Office PO BOX 282 Bishop Auckland DL.14 4FY 01 December 2020 Dear Mr Thompson Thank you for your letter of 3 September to Matt Hancock about the death of Laura Eve Parsons. | am replying as Minister with responsibility for data and technology and medicines and | am grateful for the additional time in which to do so. | would like to say how sorry | was to read of the circumstances of Laura Parsons’ death and | offer my heartfelt condolences to her family and loved ones. | can appreciate how deeply upsetting Laura’s death must be for her family and those who loved Laura and we must do all we can to learn from the circumstances of her death to prevent such tragedies from occurring again. In preparing this response, my officials have taken advice from NHS England and NHS Improvement (NHSEI); NHSx, the body responsible for developing best practice for NHS technology, digital and data; the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the Care Quality Commission (CQC). First, it may be helpful if | explain that prescribers are expected to take account of NICE guidance when making treatment decisions with their patients. NICE National Guideline 46: Controlled drugs: safe use and management’, gives recommendations on the prescribing of controlled drugs that include: e Taking into account the benefits of controlled drug treatment and the risks of prescribing, such as dependency or overdose; e Documenting the regimen (dosing and frequency, quantity to supply) in the patient's care record and including dosage instructions on the prescription (with the maximum daily amount or frequency of doses) so this can be included on the label when dispensed; 1 httos:/Avww.nice.org.uk/quidance/ng46 e Checking a person's clinical needs and if appropriate, adjusting the dose until a good balance is achieved between benefits and harms; and, ¢ Discussing with the person the arrangements for reviewing and monitoring treatment. The guideline recommends that when prescribing a repeat prescription of a controlled drug (such as morphine) for treating a long-term condition in primary care, the prescriber should take into account the person's individual circumstances to determine the frequency of review for further repeat prescriptions; and prescribe enough of a controlled drug to meet the person's clinical needs for no more than 30 days (and if, under exceptional circumstances, a larger quantity is prescribed, the reasons for this should be documented in the person's care record). NICE National Guideline 46 also gives recommendations on governance arrangements and clear lines of accountability, as well as policies, processes and procedures in relation to safe management of controlled drugs. In addition, there are governance processes that should be followed in relation to patient safety incident reporting. For example, NICE National Guideline 5: Medicines Optimisation? gives several recommendations on systems for identifying, reporting and leaming from, medicines-related patient safety incidents. | am advised by NHSx that electronic clinical systems have the facility to create alerts or warnings linked to coded problems, conditions and diagnoses that launch when a patient record is opened. In some GP systems, additional capability enables the use of system protocols to create pop-ups that launch during the prescribing process. It is not clear if a flag on the risk of overdose was added to Ms Parsons’ patient record. However, GP clinical system best practice is that: e GP practice staff should ensure all incidences of overdose are added to patient GP Clinical system records using the appropriate code; e GP practice staff should utilise GP clinical system functionality to create wamings/alerts linked to coded entry; e Repeat requests for Schedule 2 and 3 controlled drugs, such as morphine, should be subject to a strict Standard Operating Procedure within the GP practice with clear lines of accountability and responsibility for staff: e GP practice staff should review all incoming hospital correspondence relating to incidences of overdose against a patients’ list of repeat medications and remove the medication(s) to prevent the patient from ordering further repeat prescriptions; e GP practice staff should not add controlled drugs to repeat prescribing where clinical risk of an overdose exists; and, ? https://www.nice.org.uk/quidance/na5 e GP practices should carry out an urgent structured medication review of all patients who have taken an overdose. All GP practices are expected to have mechanisms in place to review patient safety incidents internally within their practice. In doing so, GP practices should ensure that they meet the recommendations set out in NICE guidance as described above. The findings of reviews into patient safety incidents will usually be shared with their local clinical commissioning group (CCG) and reported to NHSEI for the purposes of national learning?. | am informed by NHSE] that the GP practice where Ms Parsons was registered has advised that it has reflected carefully on the circumstances of Ms Parsons’ death and the findings of your investigation. This includes a review of its prescribing processes to confirm they comply with NICE guidance, the General Medical Council’s Good Practice Guidance on Prescribing and Managing Medicines and Devices‘, as well as the regional Protocol on prescribing of controlled drugs. in addition to this, | understand that a report on the learning from Ms Parsons’ death has been shared with the local clinical commissioning group (CCG), from which there may be further cascade of learning to the wider GP community. ! note that you copied your report to the CQC. As you may be aware, CQC is responsible for making sure that health and social care providers, and other regulators, maintain a safe environment for managing controlled drugs in England. As part of its responsibilities under the Regulations5, CQC reports annually on its findings through oversight activity and makes recommendations to help ensure the continuing effectiveness of the arrangements for managing controlled drugs in England. | am advised by the CQC that it is aware through its analysis of prescribing data, attendance at controlled drug local intelligence networks (CDLINs), and its wider inspection and regulatory work, that patients need to be regularly monitored before repeat prescriptions are issued for controlled drugs across all Schedules. In its Controlled Drugs Annual Update for 2019°, CQC made the following recommendation to strengthen existing arrangements. 3 https://improvement.nhs.uk/resources/reporting-patient-safety-incidents-general-practice 4 https://Awww.gme-uk.org/ethical-quidance/ethical-quidance-for-doctors/prescribin medicines-and-devices 5 Controlled Drugs (Supervision of Management and Use) Regulations 2013, amended on 1 April 2020 to the Controlled Drugs (Supervision of Management and Use) (Amendment) Regulations 2020. 6 httos://www.cac.org.uk/sites/defaultfiles/The_safer_management_of_controlled drugs Annual update 204 9.odf The level of controlled drug prescribing continues to increase year on year. Unnecessary prescribing for long-term treatment can result in an accumulation of unwanted medicines in patients’ homes, which increases waste and the associated risks of misuse. Furthermore, patients commonly do not fully understand the risk of dependence on long-term treatment with many of the scheduled controlled drugs and the importance of returning them to a community pharmacy once they no longer need them. To address this: o Prescribers should regularly review patients’ clinical needs before prescribing and consider the quantity prescribed, particularly when issuing repeat prescriptions; and, o CQC encourage healthcare professionals to fully explain patients’ medicines at the point of prescribing and supply. This should include giving guidance and warnings of the potential for dependence and actions to take, appropriate to patient need. CQC will continue to recommend and support measures that strengthen the safe use of controlled drugs in ail settings to help improve patient safety. | hope this information is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention. (Gorter - LORD BETHELL With my very best wishes,
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Community Healthcare Death, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.