Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2021
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0013, written 19 Jan 2021. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 19 Jan 2021 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2021-0013 |
| Coroner | David Urpeth |
| Coroner area | South Yorkshire (West) |
| Category | Other related deaths · Road (Highways Safety) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: Highways England; and Secretary of State for Transport 1 CORONER I am David Urpeth, Senior Coroner, for the Coroner Area of South Yorkshire West 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 27th June 2019, investigations into the deaths of JASON LEE MERCER AND ALEXANDRU MURGEANU commenced. The investigations concluded at the end of the joint inquest on 18.1.21. The conclusions were unlawful killing, copies attached. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATHS On 7.6.19 a minor collision in the outside lane occurred between vehicles drive by Mr Mercer and Mr Murgeanu on the M1 Northbound between Junctions 34 and 35. This section of the M1 is an “all lane running” motorway, commonly referred to as a “Smart Motorway”. The drivers pulled over to the left lane to exchange details. They stopped in what was an active lane even though a “refuge” was available a mile further up the road. About 6 minutes later, after other vehicles had managed, albeit with some difficulty, to avoid their parked vehicles, they were struck by a Mercedes Goods Vehicle. Both Mr Mercer and Mr Murgeanu died at the scene. Whilst the main cause of the tragedy was the careless driving of the driver of Mercedes goods vehicle, the inquest heard and accepted evidence that the lack of a hard shoulder due to the road being a smart motorway contributed to their deaths. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – During the inquest, evidence showed:- • The obvious and foreseeable risk posed by the absence of a hard shoulder on smart motorways; • The confusion caused to motorists posed by a mixture of smart motorways and traditional motorways 1 • The need for better driver awareness on the use of smart motorways • The need to for Highways England to be better able to identify stationary vehicles • The need for better driver awareness of the need, where possible, to get over the crash barrier on all motorways, not just smart motorways • The need for a wider review / inquiry into Smart Motorways for the following reasons: o Coroners only conduct inquests for deaths that occur in their coronial area ( unless there is a body transfer ) and given smart motorways exist across England and Wales, coroners do not and cannot have an effective and consistent overview of the whole of England and Wales o An inquest is confined to consider the facts insofar as they relate to the death(s) before him or her in order to answer the four statutory questions. It must not consider wider issues. o An inquest cannot say what government policy should be o A wider review would not be constrained by the above and could consider all issues relevant to its remit and has the opportunity thereby of saving lives. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you [AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 7th April 2021. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to all Interested Persons :- 1. Family of Mr Mercer 2. Family of Mr Murgeanu 3. Highways England 4. - driver of the HGV I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete, redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 2 9 Dated: 19.1.21 DAVID URPETH SENIOR CORONER 3
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
D J Urpeth Esq HM Senior Coroner South Yorkshire (West) The Medico-Legal Centre Watery Street Sheffield S3 7ES From the Secretary of State The Rt. Hon. Grant Shapps Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR Web site: www.gov.uk/dft 7 April 2021 Thank you for your letter of 19 January enclosing a copy of your Regulation 28 report also sent to Highways England, following the Inquest into the deaths of Alexandru Murgeanu and Jason Mercer. Firstly, I would like to place on record my sincere condolences for the deaths of Mr Mercer and Mr Murgeanu. It is a tragedy when any person dies on our roads and despite Great Britain having some of the safest roads in the world I remain concerned about the 1752 who were killed on our roads last year.1 I note that your Inquest found the primary cause of the fatal accident was the driving of a third-party driver and that this driver pleaded guilty to causing death by careless or inconsiderate driving. I take the safety of our roads very seriously. The Government and Highways England continually work hard to improve road safety. Smart Motorways were originally introduced under former Secretary of State John Prescott in 2001. Although per hundred million miles driven there appear to be fewer deaths on Smart Motorways than conventional ones2, I have shared the public’s unease about whether Smart Motorways could be made safer still. As a result, one of my earliest actions as Secretary of State for Transport in Autumn 2019 was to commission a review into Smart Motorways. 1 https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/reported-road-casualties-great-britain-annual-report-2019 Road deaths per million inhabitants is lower in the UK than the majority of countries within Europe https://etsc.eu/14th-annual-road-safety-performance-index-pin-report/ 2 Page 15 para 1.14 - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/smart-motorway-evidence-stocktake-and- action-plan The Smart Motorway Safety Evidence Stocktake and Action Plan report (‘2020 Action Plan’), which was published in March 2020. One year on, I have received a progress report on existing actions and I am pressing Highways England to accelerate safety measures recommended in the 2020 Action Plan where possible to ensure that all lane running (ALR) motorways are the safest roads in the country. Highways England will publish this report shortly. The safety improvements in the 2020 Action Plan consisted of a package of 18 measures, costing £500 million, including the rollout of a radar-based stopped vehicle detection (SVD) system across the ALR motorway network and an increase in the number of Highways England traffic officers to reduce the attendance time from an average of 17 minutes to 10 minutes. Furthermore, we have changed the law to enable automatic detection of Red X violations. Highways England is upgrading cameras across the smart motorway network to enable automatic detection of Red X violations which can then be enforced by the police. Moreover, I believe that a lack of consistency on different types of smart motorways might cause confusion and we have already committed to abolishing the "dynamic hard shoulder" (DHS) motorways, where the hard shoulder operates only part-time and is a live running lane the rest of the time. Highways England is converting all DHS smart motorways into all lane running to provide a less confusing environment for motorists. The stocktake also recognised the importance of raising awareness about what to do in the event of a breakdown and Highways England launched a £5m national campaign to remind road users to ‘Go Left’ last month. Highways England is also updating The Highway Code with new and improved safety information for users of motorways and other high-speed roads, with and without a hard shoulder, and the national consultation on this closed on 29 March 2021. You will have noted that the House of Commons Transport Select Committee announced on 26 February 2021 a new Inquiry into the roll-out and safety of Smart Motorways. My Department will be providing written evidence to help the inquiry in its work too. I understand that Highways England is addressing the points you raise in further detail. Rt Hon Grant Shapps MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS RESPONSE IS BEING SENT TO:
The Senior Coroner for the Coroner Area of South Yorkshire West, Mr
David Urpeth of The Medico-Legal Centre, Watery Street, Sheffield, S3 7ES
in response to a ‘Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths’ following an
inquest hearing into the deaths of Jason Lee Mercer and Alexandru Murgeanu
that concluded on 18 January 2021.
1 HIGHWAYS ENGLAND
, Safety, Engineering and Standards Executive Director, and
I am
Chief Highways Engineer, responding on behalf of
, Acting Chief
Executive of Highways England Company Limited of Bridge House, 1 Walnut
Tree Close, Guildford, Surrey, GU1 4LZ.
2 CORONER’S MATTERS OF CONCERN
The MATTERS OF CONCERN were identified as follows: –
• The obvious and foreseeable risk posed by the absence of a hard shoulder
on smart motorways
• The confusion caused to motorists posed by a mixture of smart motorways
and traditional motorways
• The need for better driver awareness on the use of smart motorways
• The need for Highways England to be better able to identify stationary
vehicles
• The need for better driver awareness of the need, where possible, to get over
the crash barrier on all motorways, not just smart motorways
• The need for a wider review / inquiry into smart motorways.
3 DETAILS OF ACTION TAKEN
Highways England is the Government-owned company charged with operating,
maintaining and
improving England's motorways and major A-roads.
Responsibility for the road network in other parts of the UK rests with the
devolved administrations. This response accordingly addresses the position in
England.
The introduction and continuing roll-out and development of smart motorways in
England has been Government policy since 2008. Smart motorways provide
substantially more road capacity than conventional motorways. In the face of
increased traffic volumes, they reduce congestion, congestion related incidents
and allow faster and more reliable journeys, without the greater disruption, cost
and environmental impacts of traditional road widening. At the same time, the
Government’s evidence demonstrates that smart motorways have in fact
improved overall safety compared to the conventional motorways they have
replaced. But not in every way, hence we are taking forward an Action Plan to
further improve safety.
1
Safety is Highways England’s top priority. According to the 2019 performance
report published by CEDR (Conférence Européenne des Directeurs des Routes
/ Conference of European Directors of Roads), motorways in the UK have by
some margin the lowest rate of fatal accidents of any roads in Europe1. And
smart motorways are statistically the safest roads in England.
The design standard
following a
comprehensive safety assessment and hazard analysis which demonstrated that
they would be at least as safe as, or safer, than the conventional motorways they
replaced.
for smart motorways was adopted
Each smart motorway scheme must also meet this same strict test: to be at least
as safe as, or safer than, the traditional motorway it replaced. We carefully
monitor all schemes after delivery to ensure that this standard is met in all cases.
Smart motorways incorporate a number of important features designed to
improve the safety of people using them. These include technology to monitor
traffic flow, set variable speed limits to ease congestion, and give information to
drivers, such as closing lanes via Red ‘X’. And smart motorways are safe, with
the number of fatalities and serious injuries extremely low given the volume of
traffic using them.
However, risk cannot be eliminated entirely from roads. Hard shoulders do not
eliminate the risk of collision and, indeed, 8% (or 1 in 12) of all deaths on
motorways are on hard shoulders. The specific risk posed by the absence of
hard shoulders on all lane running smart motorways, and in particular the greater
risk of collision between stationary and moving vehicles has been recognised
throughout. But that specific increased risk is outweighed by the reduction in
other risks brought about by all lane running smart motorways. The evidence
has demonstrated that all lane running smart motorways lead to fewer, not more,
deaths.
All lane running schemes are designed to, and do, operate extremely safely
without the need for stopped vehicle detection (SVD) technology. But SVD
systems can make all lane running smart motorways safer still, by automatically
detecting stopped vehicles on the carriageway and thereby enabling a more
rapid response. In 2013 the Highways Agency identified an automated SVD
system to further reduce the risks of vehicles stopped in live lanes, and this was
trialled between 2014 and 2016. Following successful trials, in September 2016
it was decided that SVD would be included as standard in all new all lane running
schemes entering the design stage. The standard requires a coverage of at least
95% of the carriageway, with a minimum detection accuracy of 80% and a
maximum time to alert an operator of 30 seconds.
A decision was subsequently taken to retrofit SVD to all existing all lane running
smart motorways. This is an ambitious, highly engaged and complex
programme, which the Government and Highways England have committed to
completing by the end of 2022. Work on the M1 junctions 32-35a, where the
incident occurred, has started and the technology should be operational by
Summer 2021.
1 https://www.cedr.eu/download/Publications/2020/CEDR-Technical-Report-2020-01-TEN-T-
2019-Performance-Report.pdf
2
In October 2019, the Secretary of State for Transport asked his department to
review the safety evidence in relation to smart motorways. In March 2020, the
Department for Transport (DfT) published a Smart Motorway Safety Evidence
Stocktake and Action Plan 2.
The Action Plan set out 18 measures to make smart motorways even safer than
they already are, and to tackle the negative public perception of, and build public
confidence in, their safety:
• Ending the use of dynamic hard shoulders by March 2025
• Faster rollout of stopped vehicle detection - Highways England asked to
deliver this in 36 months, bringing this programme forward by several
years
• Faster attendance by more Highways England traffic officer patrols
• Committing to a new standard for spacing of places to stop in an
emergency
• Delivering ten additional emergency areas on the M25
• Considering a national programme to install more emergency areas on
existing smart motorways
Investigating M6 Bromford viaduct and sections of the M1
•
• Making emergency areas more visible
• More traffic signs giving the distance to the next place to stop in an
emergency
• More communication with drivers (committing an additional £5 million to
national and targeted communication campaigns, including advice on
what to do in case of a breakdown)
• Displaying ‘report of obstruction’ messages
• Places to stop in an emergency shown on your satnav
• Making it easier to call for help if broken down
• Changed the law to enable automatic detection of Red ‘X’ violations and
enforcement (3 points, £100 fine) using cameras
• An update of The Highway Code
• Closer working with the recovery industry
• Reviewing existing emergency areas where width is less than the current
standard
• Reviewing the use of red flashing lights
Highways England, working in partnership with the DfT and other stakeholders,
has made and continues to make good progress in delivering on the Action Plan.
In the 12 months since the Stocktake and Action Plan were published:
• We have progressed our commitment to end the use of dynamic hard
shoulders by March 2025. At the time of this response, 7 schemes are
at the preliminary design and survey stage.
• We are progressing our commitment to install SVD on every all lane
running smart motorway. We have so far installed SVD on the M25
junctions 5-6 and junctions 23-27 (which covers all 25 miles of all lane
running on the M25), M3 junctions 2-4a and M20 junctions 3-5. Work has
also begun on M1 junctions 32-35a. In addition, we have completed a
2https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_dat
a/file/936811/smart-motorway-safety-evidence-stocktake-and-action-plan.pdf
3
large-scale trial of a system that analyses CCTV images to identify
stopped vehicles on the M4 junctions 19-20.
• We are on target to deliver the roll-out of changes to our traffic officer
patrols to increase traffic officer presence on smart motorway sections,
where the average distance between places to stop in an emergency is
more than one mile. This supports the aim, by July 2021, to reduce the
average time it takes traffic officers to attend incidents from 17 to 10
minutes.
• We have published a new design standard for the provision of places to
stop in an emergency. The new design standard (GD 301), which applies
to all schemes entering the design stage, means that a place of relative
safety will be spaced at ¾ miles apart, with a maximum of one mile where
¾ mile spacing is not feasible3
• We have installed 10 additional emergency areas on the M25 and we
have begun a programme to monitor their impact on live lane breakdown
rates to understand if they have reduced the level of live lane stops
• We are developing delivery programmes for additional safety measures
for the M6 Bromford viaduct and four sections of the M1 (including the
location of this incident). To inform this programme we commissioned
independent reports and have undertaken feasibility studies of potential
additional measures.
• We have upgraded all existing emergency areas on smart motorways to
have bright orange surfacing and marked stopping areas.
• We have completed initial surveys in readiness for installing more signs
in between places to stop in an emergency. We expect to install around
1,000 new signs.
• We have continued to run public information campaigns focusing on
specific elements of motorway driving. In 2020 these included activity
urging drivers not to drive in lanes closed by Red ‘X’ signs, to adhere to
variable speed limits and to keep left (February/March); a summer
campaign encouraging drivers going on holiday or day trips to check their
the risk of breakdowns
vehicles before setting out,
(July/August); and a campaign discouraging tailgating, a factor in around
1
in 8 casualties on England’s motorways and major A-roads
(September/October).
to reduce
• We have also committed an additional £5 million this year on a campaign
to improve driver awareness further. On 10 March 2021 we launched a
national targeted campaign to increase road user confidence and
awareness of what to do in the event of a breakdown. This included TV
advertisement, additional short films, and print and digital advertising to
ensure maximum reach amongst the target audience. The campaign
launch was subject to changes in Government travel guidance and was
accordingly postponed from January 2021. Key messages conveyed by
the campaign includes:
The advice to drivers who experience a problem with their vehicle is to leave the
motorway if possible. But if that is not possible Highways England recommends
found on our website here:
the
https://highwaysengland.co.uk/road-safety/breakdowns/
following, which can also be
3 with some exceptions where not feasible to construct additional emergency areas, such as
where junctions intersect or on bridges
4
If your vehicle has a problem, or you get into trouble on a motorway, stay calm
and try to exit at the next junction or motorway service area. If that’s not possible:
Go left
o put your left indicator on and move into an emergency area, onto
a hard shoulder, motorway service area, left-hand verge or A-
road lay-by.
o switch your hazard warning lights on, even during the day. If it’s
dark, use side lights and in poor visibility use fog lights as well
o on a motorway without a hard shoulder, it should be possible for
most vehicles experiencing a problem to reach an emergency
area. These are spaced regularly, and are marked by a clearly
visible orange road surface and blue signs featuring an orange
SOS telephone symbol.
Get safe
o
if it is safe to do so, and you can get out with any passengers,
exit your vehicle on the side furthest from traffic. If it is not safe
to do so, stay in your vehicle and wait for help.
o keep well away from moving traffic and your own vehicle. Get
behind a safety barrier where there is one, and where it is safe to
do so. If you’re on a verge, be aware of any unseen hazards such
as uneven ground or debris.
Get help
o contact Highways England on 0300 123 5000 and then a
o
breakdown recovery provider.
if you are unable to exit your vehicle and get to a safe place, have
stopped in a live traffic lane or feel your life is in danger, stay in
your vehicle with your seatbelts and hazard lights on and call 999
immediately.
The Highways England website also includes information on how to drive
on motorways: https://highwaysengland.co.uk/road-safety/how-to-drive-
on-motorways/
• We have begun rolling out automated “report of obstruction” messages
on signals when SVD technology identifies a potential incident. “Report
of obstruction” messages were enabled on the M3 junctions 2-4a in
December 2020.
In March 2021, we made location information for all smart motorway
emergency areas available to satnav providers
•
• We have engaged with car manufacturers to help build greater
awareness of eCall (SOS, which has been fitted to new cars as standard
from April 2018) and bCall (roadside assistance) functions in newer cars.
• We have begun to upgrade HADECS enforcement cameras and
associated technology to provide automated detection to facilitate the
enforcement of Red ‘X’ violations across the whole smart motorway
network. As at the date of this response we have upgraded 39% of all
cameras. The Road Traffic Offenders (Prescribed Devices) Order 2019
came into force on 10 June 2019 to enable recordings to be used in the
enforcement of Red 'X' violations (3 points, £100 fine).
• We have drafted new provisions for The Highway Code to provide more
guidance for motorists driving on high-speed roads, including smart
5
motorways. A 4-week consultation on these proposed amendments
commenced in early March 2021 and finished end of March 2021.
• We have signed a strategic partnership agreement to strengthen our
relationship with the independent recovery industry, setting out a
common and agreed set of safe operating procedures for use across the
industry when helping road users who get into difficulty on smart
motorways.
• We have commissioned an independent review of the widths of
operational emergency areas. This found that 13 were less than 4.4
metres wide, but that all 13 are wider than the 3.3 metre width of a hard
shoulder. We are now working on completing safety risk assessments to
help guide our next steps for widening any narrow emergency areas.
• The Department for Transport has completed its review of existing
evidence relating to the use of red flashing lights. Ministers have agreed
to implement off-road trials to understand the likely impact of allowing the
use of red flashing lamps for road recovery operators, and to work with
the recovery industry to promote best working practices and develop
specific industry guidance on vehicle lighting.
On 26 February 2021, the Transport Select Committee publicly announced that
it would conduct an inquiry into the roll-out and safety of smart motorways, with
a particular focus on:
• The benefits of smart motorways, for instance to reduce congestion on
busy sections of motorway, and how necessary they are
• The safety of smart motorways, the adequacy of safety measures in
place and how safety could be improved
• Whether all lane running motorways are the most suitable type of smart
motorway
• Public confidence in smart motorways and how this could be improved
• The impact of smart motorways on the usage and safety of other roads
in the strategic road network
• The effectiveness of Highways England’s delivery of the smart
motorways programme, the impact of construction works, and the costs
of implementation
Highways England welcomes this inquiry, and is committed to assisting the
Committee in whatever way it can.
Highways England has attended two previous smart motorway Transport Select
Committees in 2016 and 2019.
4 DETAILS OF FURTHER ACTION PROPOSED
Highways England is committed to ensuring that all roads for which it is
responsible remain extremely safe and, indeed, to continuing to make them safer
still. As part of this, we will continue to deliver on the Smart Motorway Safety
Action Plan. One year on from its publication we have made good progress and
we will continue with this important programme of work.
• We will end the use of dynamic hard shoulder motorways by March 2025
by converting the current 63 miles of dynamic hard shoulder into a
permanent traffic lane providing greater consistency for motorists and
reducing the potential for confusion.
6
• We will continue to retrofit SVD to all existing all lane running motorways
and will complete this programme by the end of 2022.
• We will continue with our programme to increase traffic officer presence
on smart motorways, where the average distance between places to stop
in an emergency is more than one mile, and reduce the attendance times.
• We will continue to ensure that all newly designed smart motorways
starting design from November 2020 conform to the new design
standard, including in relation to the spacing of places to stop in an
emergency.
• We will continue to monitor and assess the evidence relating to live lane
breakdowns, and to safety on smart motorways in general, and make
necessary design changes (including increasing the frequency of places
to stop) if the evidence supports it.
• We will complete our programme of installing more signs in between
places to stop in an emergency.
• We will continue to invest to improve driver awareness.
• We will we will work with the DfT to review whether the emergency area
data we made available to satnav providers is being shared with drivers.
• We will continue to work with stakeholders to agree the key messages
for a public information campaign focusing on the use of eCall (SOS) and
bCall (breakdown assistance) buttons in vehicles which will run later in
2021.
• We will, in partnership with the DfT, publish the updated Highway Code
by March 2022.
• We will continue rolling out changes to automate “report of obstruction”
messages on variable message signs when SVD technology identifies a
stopped vehicle.
• We will complete, by July 2023, our programme to upgrade HADECS
enforcement cameras and associated technology to provide automated
detection to facilitate the enforcement of Red ‘X’ violations across the
whole smart motorway network.
• We will complete our programme to widen emergency areas which are
narrower than the current standard.
5 TIMETABLE FOR ACTION
Future Action
Date
Publish the findings of our safety reviews for the M6 J5-
6 and M1 J10-13, J30-35, and J39-42.
June 2021
Implement action plans to reduce Traffic Officer
attendance time from an average of 17 minutes to 10
minutes.
July 2021
More communication with drivers – second run of
campaign launched in March 2021
November 2021
Complete the monitoring of live lane breakdowns on
the M25 after the installation of 10 new emergency
areas.
December 2021
7
SVD operational on the M1 J32-35a.
Summer 2021
Deliver a public information campaign communicating
the benefits of eCall and bCall functions to road users
Autumn 2021
Update of The Highway Code
March 2022
Explore the feasibility of a national retrofit programme
of emergency areas
April 2022
Complete national rollout of SVD on existing ALR
sections
Automate the display of 'report of obstruction'
messages
End of 2022
March 2023
Install additional traffic signs giving the distance to the
next place to stop in an emergency
March 2023
Complete the upgrade of HADECS3 cameras to
enforce Red ‘X’ compliance
End the use of dynamic hard shoulders.
Work with the DfT to review whether the emergency
area data we made available to satnav providers is
being shared with drivers
July 2023
March 2025
Ongoing
6 SAFETY OF ROAD USERS
Every road death is a tragic loss of life. We are determined to reduce the number
of fatal incidents, and injuries, on our roads and we want everyone who travels
or works on any of our roads to feel confident and safe.
Although roads, especially high-speed
risk-free
environments, our absolute priority is the reduction of road deaths and serious
injuries on our network.
roads, can never be
This is why we invest in road safety initiatives and public awareness campaigns,
to help prevent death and injury and to help give drivers the information they
need, to have safe journeys. This is in addition to information provided in other
areas, for example The Highway Code.
The Smart Motorway Safety Evidence Stocktake and Action Plan published by
the Government in March 2020 set out 18 measures to improve safety and build
greater public confidence in smart motorways. We welcomed the stocktake and
action plan as an opportunity to further improve the safety of smart motorways.
We are constantly listening to motorists, continually assessing how we can make
motorways safer for those who use them.
We urge road users to act safely and sensibly, including by informing themselves
about what to do in an emergency4, who to contact, and how to avoid dangerous
situations where possible, thereby minimising the risks to themselves and other
4 The Highways England website provides guidance on what to do in case of a
breakdown on any motorway: https://highwaysengland.co.uk/road-safety/breakdowns/
8
road users. We have recently launched our biggest ever, high profile multi-media
road safety campaign to help drivers know what to do if they break down on any
motorway, including one without a hard shoulder.
Respectfully, we would ask that coroners use the means at their disposal to
reinforce this message as appropriate. I have previously written to the Chief
Coroner to make this request of coroners.
Regarding this incident, we understand, following the initial collision, Mr Mercer
drove his car for about 500m, and stopped in a live lane close to a sign indicating
the nearest emergency telephone was one mile away.
Sadly, as you found at the hearing, and as
remarked when passing sentence,
of this tragic incident.
driving was the main cause
We want to prevent further tragedies. We have listed earlier in this report the
measures we have taken since the publication of the stocktake. We believe our
actions are having an effect and will continue to make a difference.
Independent analysis provided by Transport Focus from the National Road
User Satisfaction Survey over the period 2014/15 to 2019/20 demonstrated
year-on-year improvements in the awareness of:
• Emergency areas (58% in 2019/20 compared to 36% in 2014/15);
• Use of the hard shoulder as an extra lane during busy times (74% in
2019/20 compared to 64% in 2014/15);
• Understanding when there is no hard shoulder when it permanently
converts to a traffic lane (64% in 2019/20 compared to 39% in
2014/15).
But we are not complacent. The deaths of Mr Mercer and Mr Murgeanu were
tragic. Our deepest sympathies remain with their loved ones.
We remain committed to improving communication with road users and to taking
steps to further improve the safety of smart motorways.
8
06 April 2021 Signed:
Safety, Engineering and Standards
Executive Director and Chief Highways Engineer,
on behalf of
, Acting Chief Executive of
Highways England
9
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Road (Highways Safety) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.