Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2020
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0091, written 8 Dec 2020. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 8 Dec 2020 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2021-0091 |
| Deceased | Ann Stillwell |
| Coroner | Graeme Irvine |
| Coroner area | East London |
| Category | Care Home Health related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text recovered by OCR from a scanned PDF. OCR is imperfect: check anything you rely on against the source PDF. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
MISS N PERSAUD SENIOR CORONER EAST LONDON Walthamstow Coroner's Court, Queens Road Walthamstow, E17 8QP Telephone 020 8496 5000 Email REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. Ministerial Correspondence and Public Enquiries Unit, Department of Health and Social Care, 39 Victoria Street, London, SW1H OEU 2. Havering Clinical Commissioning Group, 6th floor, North House, St Edwards Way, Romford RM1 3AE CORONER lam Graeme Irvine, Area Coroner for the coroner area of East London CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS | make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www. legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www. legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 7th July 2020 | opened an investigation touching the death of Ann Doris Stillwell, aged 78 years oid. | opened an inquest on the 15th July 2020. The inquest concluded on the 3rd December 2020. The conclusion of the inquest was accidental death The medical cause of death was; 1a Pneumonia 1b Left Neck of Femur Fracture (operated) ll Frailty, Asthenia CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH On 22nd June 2020 Mrs Stillwell was discharged from hospital to a care home following the surgical repair of a broken right neck of femur sustained in a fall in a care home on 25th May 2020. Mrs Stillwell was at high risk of falls caused by a combination of factors; Mrs Stillweil’s frailty, her dementia which limited her perception of risk, whilst at the same time made her forget her mobility restrictions and her independent and assertive nature. Discharge notes recommended a high level of supervision, noting a significant history of falls, dementia, and mobility issues. Following a pre-admission assessment, the care home manager asked the commissioner to authorise funding for 1:1 care, this was declined. On the morning of 3 July 2020 Mrs Stillwell sustained a fall in her care home whilst subject to general observations. No apparent injury was found. The care home manager renewed her application to commissioner for funding for 1:1 care. On the afternoon of 3rd July Mrs Stillwell sustained another fall and this time suffered a left-sided neck of femur fracture. Despite medical treatment she succumbed to complications of her injuries and died on 5th July 2020. CORONER'S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. — 4. Mrs Stillwell was at high risk of falls during the entirety of the period of 25th May 2020 until the 3rd July 2020. During that period the Commissioner for her care did not authorise 1:1 care. 1:1 care would have been the only way in which the particular risk presented by Mrs Stillwell to herself could have been mitigated. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and | believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action. YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 29" January 2021. |, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION | have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons the family of Mrs Stillwell and the CQC. | have also sent it to the Director of Public Health who may find it useful or of interest. lam also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who | believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he bie may find it useful | or of interest. | You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of you response, about the release or the publication of your response. 8'" December 2020 [SIGNED BY CORONE
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Your ref:
29 January 2021
Mr Graeme Irvine
Area Coroner East London
Walthamstow Coroners Court
By email to:
Dear Mr Irvine
6th floor, North House
St Edwards Way
Romford
RM1 3AE
Tel:
Re:
Inquest touching upon the death of Mrs Ann Doris Stillwell, Regulation 28
Report
I write in response to the Prevention of Future Deaths Report issued to Havering Clinical
Commissioning Group on the 8 December 2020, following the Coroner’s inquest into the death
of Mrs Ann Doris Stillwell.
The CCG director lead and head of service have met to discuss the Coroner’s concerns set
out in the Regulation 28 report and agreed actions to strengthen the management of requests
for 1 to 1 care by care providers.
Some changes to the process had been introduced in November 2020 which will reduce the
risk of a similar incident occurring again and some additional actions have been agreed for
implementation in February 2021.
Please find attached a report for the Coroner on the actions that have been taken.
The CCG strives to learn from incidents and to constantly improve the service provision it
provides. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require any clarification.
Thank you for your helpful insights into this case.
Yours sincerely
Managing Director
cc:
Director of Public Health, London Borough of Havering
Attachment: REGULATION 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths from Graeme Irvine, Area
Coroner East London, 8.12.20.
Accountable Officer:
Managing Director:
Barking and Dagenham, Havering and Redbridge Clinical Commissioning Groups
Chairs:
Dr
Dr
Dr
, Barking and Dagenham Clinical Commissioning Group
, Havering Clinical Commissioning Group
Redbridge Clinical Commissioning Group
Response to: REGULATION 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths from
Graeme Irvine, Area Coroner East London, 8.12.20.
From:
, Managing Director, BHR CCGS
Date: 29 January 2021
1. This report provides a response to the Report to Future Prevent Deaths from
Graeme Irvine, Area Coroner East London, of 8.12.20.
2. Barking and Dagenham, Havering and Redbridge CCGs have reviewed the
Coroner’s concerns in the report relating to the death of Ann Doris Stillwell. We
have identified that there are some improvements that could be made to the
processes within the NHS Continuing Healthcare Team to strengthen the
decision-making process for 1 to 1s.
3. The process we had been following for managing requests for 1 to 1s required
the hospital discharge team to send the referral directly to the NHS CHC team
prior to discharge, where this has been requested by the care home. Whilst we
believe that the need for 1 to 1 was not flagged up on the care plan for Mrs
Stillwell, this should have been considered as Mrs Stillwell was having an
enhanced level of monitoring in hospital. The fact that the nursing home queried
this before discharge should have prompted the staff member from the
brokerage team to alert a clinician to the possible need for 1 to 1.
4. We have identified that requests for 1 to 1s come through to different people in
the CHC Team and the level of information given is sometimes variable. We
have now introduced a requirement for requests for 1 to 1s to be sent to the
Head of Service and a senior nurse assessor who will provide a response to the
request within 2 hours.
5.
If the information is not complete, then the hospital discharge team is asked to
forward all falls risk assessments, care diaries and behaviour charts as
appropriate to the Head of Service or senior nurse assessor so that they can
confirm a decision. Evidence is needed as to whether this level of support is
required during the daytime only or the full 24 hours. Many people are nursed on
enhanced observations or in a cohort /bay in hospital do not go on to require this
level of support in the care home.
6. The Head of Service/senior nurse assessor will take a view based on the
information received and ask for further evidence if required. The authorisation
for 1 to 1s is normally given for 14 days and prior to this point we request, via the
hospital discharge team, that the care home provides further evidence to warrant
any extension of the 1 to 1. This system has been in operation since November
2020 and appears to be working well.
7. We are introducing an additional safeguard to ensure that any requests for 1 to
1s submitted to the brokerage team directly by a care home are brought to the
attention of a senior clinician. The following actions have been agreed:
•
To confirm with all non-clinical brokerage staff the need to escalate to a
clinician where 1:1 care is requested by a care provider – With immediate
1
effect - and to ensure that this is built into CHC processes. By end
February 2021 to ensure this is built into our electronic systems.
•
To ensure all staff are reminded of the need to activate their out of office
messages and that these should indicate a suitable alternative person who
can respond. Where this is a clinician an alternative clinician should be
named as contact. With immediate effect.
8. Please note that the report was copied to
Health for London Borough of Havering.
, Director of Public
2
Mr Graeme Irvine HM Area Coroner, East London Walthamstow Coroners Court Queens Road London E17 8QP Dear Graeme, From Helen Whately MP Minister of State for Care 39 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU 03 March 2021 Prevention of Future Deaths: Ann Doris Stillwell Thank you for your letter of 8 December 2020 concerning the death of Ann Doris Stillwell, which came to the attention of the Department on 8 January 2021. I am responding as Minister with responsibility for continuing healthcare and I am grateful for the additional time in which to do so. Firstly, I would like to offer my sincere condolences to Mrs Stillwell’s family. Ministers are committed to ensuring residents in care homes receive high quality and safe care. I am grateful that you have brought these matters in relation to Mrs Stillwell’s death to my attention. As you are aware, the Department for Health and Social Care is responsible for Continuing Healthcare policy and in 2018, published the revised National Framework for NHS Continuing Healthcare and NHS-funded Nursing Care1. The guidance sets out in paragraphs 165-180 where responsibility for care planning, commissioning services and case management lies. This includes that clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) should operate a person-centred approach to ensure a care package is tailored to meet the needs of the individual. CCGs are responsible for the commissioning of 1:1 care within their local areas. I understand that Barking and Dagenham Havering, and Redbridge CCGs, have provided a joint response which sets out the actions taken to learn from the findings presented, following Mrs Stillwell’s death. This action includes a requirement for requests for 1:1 care to be sent to the Head of Service and a senior nurse assessor who will provide a response to the request within two hours. The CCGs’ response also sets out further steps to escalate requests to appropriate clinician level staff, where required. The Department has considered the concerns raised in your report and in this instance, we do not consider that a change in national policy is required. However, Departmental officials will work with NHS England, which is responsible for providing assurance on the actions of CCGs, to consider the specific circumstances of this case and whether further regional monitoring may be required. I hope this response is helpful. HELEN WHATELY
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.