Prevention of Future Deaths reports

Mina Topley-Bird

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0100. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Reference2021-0100
DeceasedMina Topley-Bird
CoronerJames Thompson
Coroner areaCounty Durham and Darlington
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths · Mental Health related deaths · Suicide (from 2015)
Organisation namedSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published2

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1 CORONER

2

1 Rt Hon Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and
Social Care, Richmond House, 79 Whitehall, London

I am James E THOMPSON, Assistant Coroner for the area of County Durham and Darlington

2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On Fifteenth May 2019 I commenced an investigation into the death of Mina TOPLEY-BIRD aged
24. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on First April 2021. The conclusion of
the inquest was Narrative Conclusion.

Mina Topley-Bird died on 8th May 2019 in Bedroom 4, Elm Ward, West Park Hospital, Darlington
by means of hanging by a scarf. Mina had a variety of mental health issues due to past trauma and
had previously attempted to take her own life. Mina experienced an episode and was taken to
Darlington Memorial Hospital on the night of the 5th of May where she was assessed and then
admitted to West Park Hospital in the early hours of the 6th May. The information/documentation
from SLAM was not sent on to West Park Hospital, nor did they request this information from
Darlington Memorial Hospital or SLAM. This lack of information sharing therefore led to West Park
Hospital not having a full understanding of Mina's mental health.

Was there a failure on 8th May 2019 to appreciate that Mina was at increased risk of suicide/self
harm following her interaction with a nurse at approximately 2.50pm? YES

Was there a failure on the 8th May 2019 to take precautions against that increased risk in
particular, further engagement with her and checks on her? YES

Did the absence of Mina's historic medical records at West Park Hospital hinder staff from
appreciating the nature and extent of Mina's implusive behaviour and the risk of rapid deterioration?
YES:

I a Hanging

I b

I c

II

4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

The deceased suffered from a severe and enduring mental illness. She lived in London and

 received treatment from the South London & Maudsley NHS Trust (SLAM) from 2017. She
had attempted suicide/self harm on previous occasions. She was prone to impulsive
behaviour in terms of her suicide/self harm attempts.

She travelled to the North East of England in May 2019 to perform and after an event in
Newcastle Upon Tyne she returned to London by train on 5th May 2019. She suffered a
mental health episode and left the train at Darlington. She attempted to run in front of
moving traffic and was taken to Darlington Memeorial Hospital. Whilst awaiting treatment
she attempted to stab herself in the neck with a pen.

She was assessed and admitted feeling suicidal. She agreed to be admitted to West Park
Hospital (part of the Tees Esk & Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust - TEWV) for
treatment. Prior to assessment process SLAM on TEWV request sent the deceased's
recent medical history and information regarding previous self harm and other
safeguarding information. A total of 3 documents were sent attached to an email. Only 1
attachment was read. The information was précised and added to the TEWV medical notes
system - PARIS. The 3 documents were not forwarded to any staff at West Park Hospital. 

The TEWV staff were unable to print the information they received from SLAM due to the
IT system operated by TEWV not being able to allow it to print on other NHS Trusts
hardware when they share premises.

When the deceased was a patient at West Park Hospital, attempts were made to locate a
bed for the deceased in London, but none were available.

On 8th May 2019 at approximately 2.50pm the deceased approached a nurse at West Park
Hospital and enquired if a bed had been found for her in London. When informed none was
available, the deceased replied words to the effect 'I may as well kill myself'. The deceased
was spoken to by the nurse as a result of her statement. The deceased ended the
discussion and returned to her room. She was discovered hanging by a scarf secured in
the hinge of the bathroom door in her room at approximately 3.55pm and pronounced
death at 4.33pm.

5 CORONER’S CONCERNS

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (brief summary of matters of concern)

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my
opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is
my statutory duty to report to you

On the evidence heard at inquest, it appears when a patient is admitted to a bed within a Mental
Health Trust out of their normal locality (in this case County Durham, when the patient lived in
London) there was no national policy to co-ordinate the transfer of patients back to their 'Home'
area. It appears there was no agreed escalation policy when a bed could not be obtained and no
agreed process to 'apply' for a bed in another Trust area. It is of concern as the arrangements at
the present time seem to be ad Hoc in nature and may as such create delay in any transfer of
patients.

6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your

 organisation) have the power to take such action.

7 YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 02 June 2021.

I, the Coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

8 COPIES and PUBLICATION

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons

Ward Hadaway Solicitors on behalf of Tees, Esk &Wear Valley NHS Foundation Trust
Bevan Brittan Solicitors on behalf of South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
DPG Law on behalf of
Chief Executive, Tees, Esk and Wear Valley NHS Foundation Trust,

And

Care Quality Commission

who may find it useful or of interest.

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may
send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may
make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the
publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

9

James E THOMPSON
Assistant Coroner for
County Durham and Darlington
Dated: 07 April 2021

 Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1 CORONER

1

, Chief Executive, Tees, Esk and Wear Valley

NHS Foundation Trust, West Park Hospital, Edward Pease
Way, Darlington

I am James E THOMPSON, Assistant Coroner for the area of County Durham and Darlington

2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On Fifteenth May 2019 I commenced an investigation into the death of Mina TOPLEY-BIRD aged
24. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on First April 2021. The conclusion of
the inquest was Narrative Conclusion - Was there a failure on 8th May 2019 to appreciate that Mina
was at increased risk of suicide/self harm following her interaction with a nurse at approximately
2.50pm? YES
Was there a failure on the 8th May 2019 to take precautions against that increased risk in
particular, further engagement with her and checks on her? YES
Did the absence of Mina's historic medical records at West Park Hospital hinder staff from
appreciating the nature and extent of Mina's implusive behaviour and the risk of rapid deterioration?
YES:

I a Hanging

I b

I c

II

4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

The deceased suffered from a severe and enduring mental illness. She lived in London and
received treatment from the South London & Maudsley NHS Trust (SLAM) from 2017. She had
attempted suicide/self harm on previous occasions. She was prone to impulsive behaviour in terms
of her suicide/self harm attempts. She travelled to the North East of England in May 2019 to
perform and after an event in Newcastle Upon Tyne she returned to London by train on 5th May
2019. She suffered a mental health episode and left the train at Darlington. She attempted to run in
front of moving traffic and was taken to Darlington Memeorial Hospital. Whilst awaiting treatment
she attempted to stab herself in the neck with a pen. She was assessed and admitted feeling
suicidal. She agreed to be admitted to West Park Hospital (part of the Tees Esk & Wear Valleys
NHS Foundation Trust - TEWV) for treatment. Prior to assessment process SLAM on TEWV
request sent the deceased's recent medical history and information regarding previous self harm
and other safeguarding information. A total of 3 documents were sent attached to an email. Only 1
attachment was read. The information was précised and added to the TEWV medical notes system
- PARIS. The 3 documents were not forwarded to any staff at West Park Hospital. The TEWV staff
were unable to print the information they received from SLAM due to the IT system operated by
TEWV not being able to allow it to print on other NHS Trusts hardware when they share premises.

 When the deceased was a patient at West Park Hospital, attempts were made to locate a bed for
the deceased in London, but none were available. On 8th May 2019 at approximately 2.50pm the
deceased approached a nurse at West Park Hospital and enquired if a bed had been found for her
in London. When informed none was available, the deceased replied words to the effect 'I may as
well kill myself'. The deceased was spoken to by the nurse as a result of her statement. The
deceased ended the discussion and returned to her room. She was discovered hanging by a scarf
secured in the hinge of the bathroom door in her room at approximately 3.55pm and pronounced
death at 4.33pm.

5 CORONER’S CONCERNS

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (brief summary of matters of concern)

1. Evidence was heard that medical records and other important information could not be uploaded
to the Trust's electronic notes system - PARIS when received in PDF form. This meant staff had to
precis notes onto the system, in this case when one person was working alone, on a nightshift was
required to do this whilst dealing with a variety of different tasks. Important documents that cannot
not to be uploaded immediately and in their original form concerns me that attending clinicians do
not have access to these documents and can be hindered in making clinical decisions without
them.

2. It became apparent on the evidence that whilst Trust staff were working in premises operated by
another Trust (in this case, County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust - CDDFT) they
could not print medical notes and other documents from the TEWV IT system onto printers in
'shared' premises such as the A&E Department of the CDDFT. This again meant important
documents can be unable to be shared with staff undertaking such tasks as Mental Health
Assessments.

3. The Trust (TEWV) in evidence heard that the Elm Ward at West Park Hospital had been
surveyed for issues related to patient safety such as ligature points. Whilst the evidence was that
the Trust was confident this had been done, no assurance could be given. One such assessment
did not show clearly if the deceased's bedroom had been inspected for issues such as ligature
points.

4. Evidence was heard that within the Durham & Darlington area of the TEWV Trust funding had
been secured for the post of a Bed Manager, who was to manage bed allocation, transfer and
discharges to better manage access to beds for patients across this area of the Durham &
Darlington area of the Trust. It was heard this role would be able to more proactively arrange
transfers of patients from Trust to Trust as was a need raised in this inquest. It was disclosed that
this post only operated in the Durham & Darlington area of the Trust and not across the whole
Trust. On the evidence heard this post has obvious benefits for ensuring patients access to beds
and I raise a concern this post is not one which cover the whole of the Trust, only one region of it.

5. The Trust gave evidence that the Risk Assessment/Safety Summary process for assessing and
protecting patients had been improved, but accepted it was still ' a work in progress' and further
work was required. It is of concern that this aspect of area of patient safeguarding appears on the
evidence given at inquest not to be complete.

6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your
organisation) have the power to take such action.

7 YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 02 June 2021.

I, the Coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.

8 COPIES and PUBLICATION

 I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons

Ward Hadaway Solicitors on behalf of Tees, Esk &Wear Valley NHS Foundation Trust
Bevan Brittan Solicitors on behalf of South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
DPG Law on behalf of

And

Rt. Hon Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
Care Quality Commission

who may find it useful or of interest.

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may
publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this
report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the
publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.
9

James E THOMPSON
Assistant Coroner for
County Durham and Darlington
Dated: 09 April 2021

Responses

2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Dept. of Health and Social Care (PDF)
From Nadine Dorries MP 
Minister of State for Patient Safety, 
Suicide Prevention and Mental Health 

39 Victoria Street 
London 
SW1H 0EU 

Mr James E Thompson 
HM Assistant Coroner, County Durham and Darlington 
HM Coroner's Office  
PO BOX 282 
Bishop Auckland  
DL14 4FY 

1 June 2021 

Dear Mr Thompson, 

Thank you for your correspondence of 9 April 2021 about the death of Mina Topley-Bird. I 
am responding as Minister responsible for mental health services.  

Firstly, I would like to take this opportunity to offer my sincere condolences to the family, 
friends and loved ones of Ms Topley-Bird. 

I have noted carefully your concerns about national policy to co-ordinate the transfer of 
mental health patients back to their 'Home' area, when a person is admitted as an 
emergency to an NHS Trust outside their normal locality.  You also raise concerns about 
escalation policy when a bed cannot be obtained; and also a process to ‘apply’ for a bed in 
another NHS Trust area. 

Your report also notes the ‘ad hoc’ nature of the approach taken by NHS Trusts which may 
create delays in the transfer of patients. 

The Government is committed to eliminating inappropriate out of area placements in 
mental health services for adults in acute inpatient care and in 2016 provided guidance on 
out of area placements1 to NHS Trusts to support this ambition.  

The guidance states an out of area placement may be appropriate when: “the person 
becomes acutely unwell when they are away from home (in such circumstances, the 
admitting provider should work with the person’s home team to facilitate repatriation to 
local services as soon as this is safe and clinically appropriate)”. 

In addition, the guidance advises regular reviews and assessments to enable the patient’s 
return to their local service as soon as possible. 

1 Out of area placements in mental health services for adults in acute inpatient care - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 In preparing this response, my officials have made enquiries with NHS England and NHS 
Improvement (NHSE/I) and the Care Quality Commission (CQC). 

Your report notes that medical information received from South London and Maudsley 
NHS Foundation Trust (SLAM) was not sent on to, or requested by, West Park Hospital – 
part of The Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (TEWV) – upon Ms 
Topley-Bird’s admission as an emergency patient. This information would have provided a 
full understanding of Ms Topley-Bird’s mental health and previous attempts to take her 
own life.  

NHSE/I acknowledged to my officials the increased risk to patient safety and the negative 
impact on experience and outcomes associated with patients being placed out of their 
usual local network of care for acute mental health treatment.  NHSE/I has assured the 
Department it is working to eliminate all inappropriate acute mental health out of area 
placements (OAPs) as soon as possible.  

NHSE/I has told my officials that the decision to admit Ms Topley-Bird to hospital in 
Darlington was appropriate in the circumstances of her requiring emergency inpatient 
admission away from home.  NHSE/I notes that the decision about when to transfer Ms 
Topley-Bird back to London should have been clinically-led with clinicians able to access 
her full medical history during the interim period to ensure her care was as safe and 
effective as possible.  

Mental health services provided by TEWV are locally commissioned and therefore 
operational processes, such as those described, are the responsibility of local NHS 
providers and their clinical commissioning group (CCG) system partners, which 
commission the services.  

However, NHSE/I has noted your concern about an apparent lack of robust information 
sharing and established transfer protocols and will use the learning from your report to 
work with its regional teams to consider whether any further guidance or escalation 
processes should be developed to support local NHS staff to reduce the risk of similar 
tragic events reoccurring.  

I understand Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust are to respond to you 
directly on the matters raised at the inquest.  TEWV has informed NHSE/I of local action 
taken following Ms Topley-Bird’s death, notably: 

• 

•  where admission is indicated to a local bed, any information from the home Trust 
will be forwarded by email directed to the Nurse in Charge of the admitting ward; 
the Trust is exploring compatible electronic solutions to enable staff to print 
information at non-TEWV sites, with an interim system set up whereby staff follow 
the Out of Trust Patient Checklist on information sharing; and a new electronic 
system to be introduced by June 2022 to allow for the printing of medical notes in 
premises shared with another Trust; 

•  ongoing work at TEWV to focus on bed management and facilitate patient transfers; 
•  on admission of a new patient, comprehensive risk profile information is obtained 
from the admitting team and the home Trust Ward with a checklist to support this, 

 
 
 approved by the Adult Mental Health Speciality Development Group in August 2020 
and implemented by all wards during September 2020. 

The TEWV’s Harm Minimisation Lead has incorporated learning from this case into the 
Trust’s mandatory risk assessment training, with an emphasis on the importance of 
ensuring that historical risk information is included in the formulation of risk, risk 
management and contingency planning. 

My officials also approached the Care Quality Commission (CQC).  The CQC has sought 
assurances from the Trust in relation to its investigation and has concluded that there is no 
ongoing risk to service users and that enforcement action was not required.  

CQC requested, and was provided with, further information from the Trust to assist 
with its review of the Trust. In light of your report, the CQC has since written to the 
Trust to request further information in relation to the incident.  This information was 
provided on 4 May 2021 which is I understand is currently being reviewed by the CQC.   

I hope this information is helpful and explains the actions being taken to address the 
matters of concern.  Thank you for bringing these matters to my attention. 

NADINE DORRIES
Response from West Park Hospital (PDF)
Executive Suite 
West Park Hospital 
Edward Pease Way 
Darlington 
Co Durham 
DL2 2TS 

28 May 2021 

Mr James E Thompson 
H M Assistant Coroner for 
County Durham and Darlington 
H M Coroners Office 
PO Box 282 
Bishop Auckland  
Co Durham  
DL14 4FY 
Dear Mr Thompson 

Dear Mr Thompson 

Re:   Mina Topley-Bird, deceased 
Regulation 28 Report 

Further to your letter of 09 April 2021, I write to detail the actions the Trust has taken 
and  those  that  we  continue  to  implement  to  address  the  concerns  you  identified 
during the inquest into Mina Topley-Bird’s (MTB) death.  I would like to reassure you 
that as an organisation we have taken your concerns very seriously and for ease of 
reference I will address each of these in turn: 

Concern 1 

Evidence was heard that medical records and other important information 
could not be uploaded to the Trust's electronic notes system - PARIS when 
received in PDF form. This meant staff had to precis notes onto the system, in 
this case when one person was working alone, on a nightshift was required to 
do this whilst dealing with a variety of different tasks. Important documents 
that cannot not to be uploaded immediately and in their original form concerns 
me that attending clinicians do not have access to these documents and can 
be hindered in making clinical decisions without them. 

As described at the inquest hearing, immediate action was taken by the Trust to 
develop and implement a checklist to support the care and treatment of patients 
presenting at Accident and Emergency departments, who are from outside the area. 
(please see documents  attached at Concern 2 below). This checklist includes: 

  information gathering from the patient's home Trust 
  sharing information with other teams involved in care 
  ensuring any information received is accurately reflected in the Trust's Safety 

Summary 

  where admission of the patient is indicated to a local bed, all information from the 
home Trust will be forwarded by email to the Nurse in Charge of the admitting 
ward. 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Trust headquarters  
West Park Hospital, Edward Pease Way, Darlington, DL2 2TS 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 This issue regarding access to patient information will be fully resolved by the 
implementation of Cito, which is a full electronic records management solution and 
allows documents to be scanned in, uploaded or viewed. This solution will be fully 
implemented by August 2022. 

Concern 2 

It  became  apparent  on  the  evidence  that  whilst  Trust  staff  were  working  in 
premises  operated  by  another  Trust  (in  this  case,  County  Durham  and 
Darlington NHS Foundation Trust - CDDFT) they could not print medical notes 
and  other  documents  from  the  TEWV  IT  system  onto  printers  in  'shared' 
premises  such  as  the  A&E  Department  of  the  CDDFT.  This  again  meant 
important documents can be unable to be shared with staff undertaking such 
tasks as Mental Health Assessments. 

As referenced in the inquest evidence, there is a system in place whereby staff 
follow the Out of Trust Patient Checklist which details how information is to be 
shared. In respect of any Mental Health Act documentation, this is shared with the 
relevant recipients via a secure email route.  

The Trust has also since taken action and increased the staffing establishment of the 
Liaison Team, increasing the number of staff on duty overnight night to two.  This 
means that if a document does need to be printed urgently, one member of staff can 
go to our nearby Trust premises to do this. 

Again the issues highlighted will be fully resolved by the implementation of Cito, 
which is described above and planned to be in place by August 2022. 

Concern 3 

The Trust (TEWV) in evidence heard that the Elm Ward at West Park Hospital 
had been surveyed for issues related to patient safety such as ligature points. 
Whilst the evidence was that the Trust was confident this had been done, no 
assurance could be given. One such assessment did not show clearly if the 
deceased's bedroom had been inspected for issues such as ligature points. 

As described at the inquest, the suicide prevention environmental survey and risk 
assessment was reviewed by the Trust and subsequently changes had been made 
to improve recording. The revised Suicide Prevention Survey and Risk Assessment 
now references each bedroom by the actual number (bedroom 1,2,3,4 etc.), rather  

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Trust headquarters  
West Park Hospital, Edward Pease Way, Darlington, DL2 2TS 

1 Out of Trust Liaison Checklist.pdf4 Referral and Admission OOA Approved SDG.pdf 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 than the Estates identifier (2.01, 2.93, 2.75 etc) which were used at the time of the 
incident. 

For completeness, MTB was in bedroom 4 (identifier 2.04 previously).  The Suicide 
Prevention Environmental Survey and Risk Assessment, attached below, formed 
part of the documentary evidence made available to the Coroner.   This 
demonstrated that the survey in place at the time of the incident had included 
bedroom 4 (2.04). 

The Trust has recently undertaken an extensive ligature reduction programme that 
has included the removal of taps, toilets, shower controls and sinks and replaced 
with anti-ligature sanitary ware.  The Trust is also in the process of installing 
technology that will assist with the detection of movement of patients in high risk 
areas such as bedrooms and en-suites. This technology responds to a patients 
change in vital signs or movements and will send an alert to staff to check on the 
wellbeing of the patient. This technology is already in place in other areas of the 
Trust and has been used effectively to maintain patient safety in this way.  

Concern 4 

Evidence was heard that within the Durham & Darlington area of the TEWV 
Trust funding had been secured for the post of a Bed Manager, who was to 
manage bed allocation, transfer and discharges to better manage access to 
beds for patients across this area of the Durham & Darlington area of the 
Trust. It was heard this role would be able to more proactively arrange 
transfers of patients from Trust to Trust as was a need raised in this inquest. It 
was disclosed that this post only operated in the Durham & Darlington area of 
the Trust and not across the whole Trust. On the evidence heard this post has 
obvious benefits for ensuring patients access to beds and I raise a concern 
this post is not one which cover the whole of the Trust, only one region of it. 

In the case of MTB, the issue was there were no beds available to transfer her to her 
home Trust. Each locality of the Trust has staff who manage patient flow and beds 
and facilitate patient transfers as part of their daily roles. The Trust has now agreed a 
plan to implement a bed management team. This will be introduced in the following 
phased approach: 

  Phase 1 – introduce locality based bed managers (anticipated  by October 2021) 
  Phase 2  - implement a central bed management hub (2022) 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Trust headquarters  
West Park Hospital, Edward Pease Way, Darlington, DL2 2TS 

Suicide prevention environmental survey 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Concern 5 

The Trust gave evidence that the Risk Assessment/Safety Summary process 
for assessing and protecting patients had been improved, but accepted it was 
still ' a work in progress' and further work was required. It is of concern that 
this aspect of area of patient safeguarding appears on the evidence given at 
inquest not to be complete. 

Following a CQC inspection in January 2021 where concerns were raised regarding 
risk assessment and management, a Rapid Process Improvement Workshop (RPIW) 
was held week commencing 1st February 2021. This was to review, clarify and 
streamline the process for assessing and managing the clinical risk of patients and to 
confirm the standards for risk assessment across all services of the organisation.  

A review of care documentation was undertaken to provide assurance that patient 
risks were being assessed and each patient had a safety plan in place in line with 
the agreed standard. Ward to Board governance arrangements were put in place to 
ensure Executive oversight and the reporting of compliance with the quality 
standards. An ongoing programme of quality assurance was implemented. This 
utilises a range of methods such as clinical audit, Matron walkabouts and direct 
clinical observation to provide assurance to the Trust Board that the actions being 
taken are having a positive impact and addressing the patient safety concerns. 
Community assurance processes have included the development of a dashboard to 
support community caseload reporting and improved clinical supervision processes.  

In line with the CQC enforcement notice, the Trust had a number of agreed actions 
to be completed by 3rd May 2021; implementation of these was achieved within 
timescale.  Leading up to this date and beyond, the Trust had recognised the need 
for further investment in increasing multidisciplinary involvement and oversight, 
improving staffing establishments, further developing our provision of training and 
expertise, ensuring sustainable support and clinical supervision as well as providing 
leadership to our clinical teams as being critical to prioritising a culture of patient 
safety and continuous quality improvement.  

In addition, work is underway to enhance and embed organisational learning from a 
range of internal and external sources.  This includes reviewing, strengthening and 
developing systems and mechanisms for capturing and communicating learning and 
importantly gaining assurance of the impact of our actions to improve care for 
services users and their families. 

A regional Quality Board has been set up by NHS England and Improvement; 
membership includes key external stakeholders such as CQC and members of the 
ICS.  The Trust provides monthly updates and assurance on its progress. We are 
also accessing a range of external expertise to support rapid improvement and 
sustainable changes in practice.  

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Trust headquarters  
West Park Hospital, Edward Pease Way, Darlington, DL2 2TS 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 I trust this provides you with assurance that the appropriate actions are and have 
ben taken to address the concerns raised.  However, should you require any further 
information please do not hesitate to contact me. 

Yours sincerely, 

Director of Nursing and Governance and Deputy Chief Executive 
Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

Trust headquarters  
West Park Hospital, Edward Pease Way, Darlington, DL2 2TS

Related reports

Other reports by James Thompson

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.