Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2021

Pathushan Sutharsan

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0193, written 4 Jun 2021. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report4 Jun 2021
Reference2021-0193
DeceasedPathushan Sutharsan
CoronerPenelope Schofield
Coroner areaWest Sussex
CategoryRoad (Highways Safety) related deaths · Community health care · Other related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

Chief Executive 
West Sussex County Council 
County Hall 
Chichester 
West Sussex 
PO19 1DN 

1 

CORONER 

I am PENELOPE SCHOFIELD, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of WEST SUSSEX 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQU EST 

On 24th September 2020 I commenced an investigation into the death of Pathushan 
Sutharsan which concluded at the end of the inquest on 27th May 2021 

At the end of the Inquest I concluded “Pathushan died as a result of an accident.”  

Following the Inquest, I indicated that I was minded to make a Regulation 28 report 
setting out my concerns surrounding the circumstances of Pathushan’s death. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

On 22nd July 2020 Pathushan was taking part in a charity cycle ride on the Downs link 
in West Sussex. He was cycling on the stretch from Cranleigh towards Southwater when 
he went down a steep slope along the track that approached the junction with the A281. 
As he got close to the A281 it appears that he braked but lost control of his bike 
(probably caused by the gravel surface on the track). This caused him to fall from his 
bike with a forward momentum pushing him out into the road directly into the path of a 
Heavy Goods Vehicle being driven along the A281.  

There is no physical barrier in place and the signage in the lead up to the junction at the 
time to warn users on the Downs link of the immediacy of a major A-road was 
inadequate. 

Following Pathushan’s death a post mortem examination was carried out and this 
showed the cause of death was due to 1a Blunt head injury. 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion 
there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it 
is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

Whilst it was accepted that West Sussex County Council had, following Pathushan’s 
death, made significant improvements to the junction between the Downs link and the 
A281 evidence  was heard from a number of different organisations (speaking on behalf 
of all the  different users of the Downs link) that the junction in question still posed a 
substantial risk for cyclists, pedestrians and equestrians alike.   

This junction is the only part of the Downs Link that crosses a major A-road where there 
is no alternative safe crossing,  a Pegasus crossing or bridge.  Evidence was heard that  
there is no pavement running alongside the A281  and therefore this causes  poor sight 
lines for  horse riders and, in some circumstances,  cyclists who have to put their horse’s 
head  or part of their bike out onto the road before they can see oncoming traffic.  

It is understood that WSCC has identified a need to address the issues at this junction 
and has undertaken (or is about to undertake a feasibility study)  but it appears that at 
this stage there are no definitive plans in place to take this forward. Therefore the 
significant risk to the users of this junction remains.  

The Downs link is actively promoted as a recreational activity  by West Sussex County 
Council.  

       ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your 
organisation have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 24th August 2021. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 
COPIES and PUBLICATION 

8 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons: - 

 and family  

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 
 Date 4th June 2021 

9 

Penelope Schofield, Senior Coroner 

2

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from West Sussex County Council (PDF)
West Sussex County Council response to the Regulation 28: Report to 
Prevent Future Deaths Relating to the inquest into the death of 
Pathushan Sutharsan 

Following the receipt of the covering letter and Regulation 28: Report to Prevent 
Future Deaths issued by Penelope Schofield, Senior Coroner for West Sussex, 
dated 7th June 2020 (
with the comments and actions detailed below. 

), the County Council would like to respond 

Following the police notification of the fatal collision involving Mr Sutharsan the 
authority began its own now well-established investigation procedure.  Based on 
the information available at the time a number of remedial measures were 
implemented to mitigate the occurrence of a similar incident involving cyclists 
travelling on the Downs Link.  The measures were detailed in our report to the 
coroner dated the 7th December 2020.  In summary these works consisted of: 

•  Forming a chicane at the bottom of the downhill approach to the A281, 

compelling users to slow down as they enter the obstacle and to prevent a 
fast approach on to the junction with the A281 

•  Permanent, conspicuous signs have been installed down the slope and on 

the chicane with varying messages warning of the main road ahead 
•  Traffic signs on the A281 warning motorists of the crossing point have 
been standardised in both directions. The new warning signs show 
warnings for equestrians, pedal cyclists and include a ‘Pedestrian Crossing’ 
plate. 

•  Vegetation has been cleared back to improve visibility at the crossing 

point. 

It is considered that the combined above works will mitigate the risk of a similar 
collision to that of Mr Sutharsan occurring in the future at this location. 
With regard to the Matters of Concern raised:  

A feasibility study looking into ways to improve the crossing point is currently 
being undertaken by the authority’s term consultant, WSP.  An options appraisal 
report will be completed by October 2021.  The study is primarily focused on, 
but not limited to, the options for a bridge or traffic light controlled road 
crossing.  
If the report determines that there are appropriate, technically feasible 
solutions, the preferred option will be progressed through the WSCC’s capital 
governance procedures, either as a project to be taken forward in the Local 
Transport Investment Programme or as a major scheme. In either case a full 
business case will be developed, and the scheme assessed against the County 
Council’s objectives and priorities for potential inclusion in a future capital 
programme. 
Following consultation with the BHS, and in addition to those measures 
mentioned above, we have recently altered the height of the Speed terminal 
signs so that they do not block the site line for equestrians. Further planned 
improvements for this summer are enhanced red surfacing to further highlight 
the crossing to drivers and additional hedge cutting to further improve the 
visibility for people crossing the road. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 Regards, 

Chief Executive 
West Sussex County Council 
County Hall Chichester PO19 1RQ

Related reports

Other reports by Penelope Schofield

See all →

More reports categorised “Road (Highways Safety) related deaths”

See all →

Track Road (Highways Safety) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Road (Highways Safety) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.