Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2021

James McKeough

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0414, written 9 Dec 2021. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report9 Dec 2021
Reference2021-0414
DeceasedJames McKeough
CoronerPenelope Schofield
Coroner areaWest Sussex
CategoryRoad (Highways Safety) related deaths · Other related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

Grant Shapps 
Great Minister House 
Horseferry Road 
London 
SW1 

1  CORONER 

I am PENELOPE SCHOFIELD, senior coroner, for the coroner area of WEST SUSSEX 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 11th February 2020  I commenced an investigation into the death of James 
McKeough.  His death occurred following a road traffic collision on 3rd February 2020.  . 

The investigation was concluded with the Inquest being held on 6th December 2021. 

At the end of the Inquest, I concluded that James McKeough died following a Road 
Traf f ic collision. 

At the conclusion of the Inquest, I indicated that I would be making a Regulation 28 
report addressing concerns that were raised at the Inquest regarding the current 
standard of lighting and position of this lighting on Slurrykat and similar  tankers. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

On Monday 3rd February 2020, James McKeough was riding his motorcycle 
south on the A29 at Bury Hill, near Arundel. He came up behind a tractor towing 
a Slurry tanker at the top of the hill, travelling in the same direction. The tractor 
was indicating to turn right. It appears that Mr McKeough was hidden from the 
tractor driver's view and it seems that Mr McKeough did not see the tractor lights 
indicating. As the tractor turned right Mr McKeough collided with the offside of 
the tractor sustaining fatal injuries. 

1 

 5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion 
there is a risk that f uture deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it 
is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

1.  The positioning and size of of the rear mounted flashing LED lights on the  

Slurrykat and other types of similar trailers. 

2.  The f act that these lights emitted a brighter light than the right or left  turn 

indicator light therefore masking the indicator lights. 

3.  These rear f lashing lights are the same colour as the indicator lights. 
4.  The indicator light seems to get lost amongst the other flashing lights or can be 

misinterpreted as an additional non directional warning lamp. 

5.  On this particular trailer (SlurryKat)  the indicator lights are at the same height as 

the indicators.  

It was f ound that this issue may have been a contributing factor in Mr McKeough’s death 
as it appears he did not see the right indicator flashing. 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

6 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your 
organisation have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 2nd March 2022. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons: - 

Forensic Crash Investigators – Sussex Police 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief  Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
f orm. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of  interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 
 Date 9th December 2021 

9 

Penelope Schofield, Senior Coroner 

2

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Department for Transport (PDF)
Penelope Schofield 
Senior Coroner 
County Record Office 
HM Coroners Office 
Orchard Street 
Chichester 
West Sussex 
PO19 1DD 

HEAD OF VEHICLE ENGINEERING 
INTERNATIONAL VEHICLE STANDARDS 
DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT 
3RD FLOOR – GREAT MINSTER HOUSE 
33 HORSEFERRY ROAD 

Web Site: www.dft.gov.uk 

2 March 2022 

Dear Ms Schofield, 

Thank you for your Regulation 28 report dated 9 December, sent to the 
Secretary of State for Transport following the conclusion of your inquest into 
the death of James McKeough. I am also grateful for a copy of the full 
inquest documents provided subsequently. I am replying as Head of Vehicle 
Engineering in the International Vehicle Standards division of the 
Department for Transport, which leads on vehicle construction standards. 

You found that the evidence considered during the inquest revealed five 
matters of concern relating to the configuration of the amber flashing lamps 
mounted to the rear of the impacted trailer. Specifically, you concluded that 
the position, size, colour, and brightness of the lamps may have concealed 
or overwhelmed the active direction indicator and been a contributing factor 
in this collision. 

In Great Britain, vehicle lighting is regulated through the Road Vehicles 
Lighting Regulations 1989 (as amended) (RVLR). In general, the RVLR 
require that lamps fitted to vehicles show a steady light - exemptions to this 
requirement exist for direction indicators and warning beacons. The RVLR 
requires vehicles having a maximum speed not exceeding 25mph or any 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 trailer drawn by it to be fitted with an amber warning beacon if it is to be 
driven on an unrestricted dual-carriageway. A warning beacon is defined in 
regulations as a lamp that is capable of emitting a flashing or rotating beam 
of light throughout 360° in the horizontal plane.  

Having considered the inquest documents provided, it appears that the two 
rear flashing amber lamps fitted to the trailer and implicated by the police in 
the outcome of this collision do not comply with the definition of a warning 
beacon as they are unidirectional and not capable of emitting a beam of light 
throughout 360° in the horizontal plane. 

Based on the evidence supplied, we consider that had a compliant warning 
beacon been fitted appropriately to the trailer in compliance with RVLR it 
may have enabled Mr McKeough to differentiate the warning signal from an 
active direction indicator. 

However, the evidence does suggest a lack of understanding of the 
requirements of the RVLR and I will be writing to the National Police Chiefs’ 
Council, Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency, Society of Motor 
Manufacturers and Traders, Agricultural Engineers Association and National 
Farmers’ Union of England and Wales and the National Farmers Union of 
Scotland to provide guidance and raise awareness of the specific 
requirements for amber warning beacons fitted to agricultural vehicles used 
on the road.         

I hope you find this information helpful and are assured that the Department 
is taking appropriate action to respond to your concerns.  

Yours faithfully, 

Head of Vehicle Engineering 
International Vehicle Standards

Related reports

Other reports by Penelope Schofield

See all →

More reports categorised “Road (Highways Safety) related deaths”

See all →

Track Road (Highways Safety) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Road (Highways Safety) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.