Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0016, written 19 Jan 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 19 Jan 2022 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2022-0016 |
| Deceased | Michelle Whitehead |
| Coroner | Elizabeth Didcock |
| Coroner area | Nottinghamshire |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths · Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Mental Health related deaths |
| Organisation named | Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. Dr , Chief Executive Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust 1 CORONER I am Dr Elizabeth Didcock, Assistant Coroner, for the coroner area of Nottinghamshire 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 7th May 2021, I commenced an investigation into the death of Michelle Whitehead, aged forty five years. The investigation remains open, and the case will come to an Inquest to be held with a Jury, in the next 12 to 18 months I have taken the unusual step of issuing this report at this time, as I consider the risk of future deaths, if there is no mitigation of risk in the relation to the issues identified below, to be high. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Michelle Whitehead died from a hypoxic brain injury, on the 7th May 2021. The Post mortem undertaken on the 18 th May 2021 by Dr Pathologist, identifies the hypoxic brain injury, but is unable to establish the cause of the hypoxic damage. , Consultant She was on a Section 2 of the Mental Health Act (1983), at the Millbrook Unit when the incident below occurred, with the section rescinded only because she was unconscious on ITU at Kings Mill Hospital just prior to her death. The Serious Incident report dated 4.11.21, together with the staff statements provided thus far, reveal a very worrying picture. Mrs Whitehead was formally admitted to Lucy Wade ward at Millbrook Mental Health Unit under Section 2 on the evening of 3 May 2021 following a deterioration in her mental health. On 5 May 2021, her mental health deteriorated further, and she required medication to manage her presentation and risk to self and others. She was likely administered conflicting evidence as to the drug given and the dose given) and later at 16:20, appropriate observations, but these were discontinued too soon. lorazepam was administered IM. She was monitored initially with diazepam orally at 16:00 (although there is 1 At approximately 20:45 staff noticed a change in her breathing pattern which led to initiation of physical monitoring, but by this time her respiration rate was slow, and her oxygen SATS also low. The doctor was called, b ut did not respond, and it was a second night doctor that attended just after 9pm. Mrs Whitehead was reported to have a swollen face, lips, and was shallow breathing with difficulty. There was also a drop in oxygen saturation levels, so she was administered adrenaline.- The treating doctor wondered if her presentation may represent anaphylaxis, as she had a history of allergies, but there were no signs of allergy when the paramedics arrived, nor at post mortem examination. Following this there was not much improvement in physical parameters, so another dose of adrenaline was given, and an iGel was inserted to assist with breathing. The paramedics arrived on the ward, delayed by at least 10 minutes because they could not get into the Unit. They also had to ring back as the nurse contacting 999 had cleared the line. Mrs Whitehead was intubated and transferred to Kings Mill Hospital and admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). She died on 7.5.21. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the Investigation the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – 1. Unclear dose/type of sedation medication given, possible excess dose given, poor documentation 2. Delayed recognition of Mrs Whitehead’s declining condition 3. No medical clerking from admission until her collapse 4. No Consultant involvement after admission 5. Inability to reach Duty Doctor for deteriorating patient 6. Delay in calling paramedics 7. Delay in Paramedics gaining access to the ward Many of these issues have been the subject of scrutiny in at least two previous Inquests, that have followed deaths on inpatient wards of the Trust. I have received reassurance during these Hearings that the issues have been addressed, but this case illustrates that they clearly remain. The issues are very serious in my view. 1 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 2 In my opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by the 16th March 2022. I, the Coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary f orm. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it usef ul or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 19th January 2022 Dr E A Didcock 3
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
NHS] Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust Chief Executive's Office The Resource Duncan Macmillan House Porchester Road Nottingham Date: 15 March 2022 NG3 GAA Private and Confidential Dr Didcock HM Assistant Coroner for Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Coroner's Office The Council House Old Market Square Nottingham NG1 2DT Dear Dr Didcock, Please find below the organisational response to the recently received Preventing Future Deaths Report, following the unfortunate death of Mrs. Whitehead. The Matters of concem raised within the report Unclear dose/type of sedation medication given, possible excess dose given, poor documentation. A medication error did occur during Mrs. Whitehead's care. This involved the incorrect dose of administered Oral Diazepam being communicated to the Ward Manager and Duty Doctor. With this incorrect information they agreed to administer Rapid Tranquilisation in the form of an Intramuscular injection of Lorazepam. When writing the above dose in the patient's medication card, the Ward Manager recognised the error, and contacted the Duty Doctor again to assess the likely impact. The assessment was that the dosages given were within British National Formulae guidelines, and as such would not negatively impact on Mrs. Whitehead's physical health. This assessment has been considered by senior medical colleagues within the Trust, who are in agreement with the conclusion of this assessment. Mrs. Whitehead was observed constantly following this, with a member of staff within an arm’s length of her at all times. The staff involved in the medication error engaged in supervision with their manager following the incident and completed self-reflection pieces since this time. They are very aware of the error and Delayed recognition of Mrs. Whitehead’s declining condition Mrs. Whitehead was administered Rapid Tranquilisation with the aim of reducing her acute presentation. Her physical observations were taken every 15 minutes after this, scored using the National Early Waming Scale (NEWS2) and over the following hour remained stable. This was reported to the Duty Doctor who confirmed that the physical observation checks were no longer The investigators were unable however, to see an assessment of consciousness levels within the As a response the Directorate has re-printed new refreshed supplies of the credit card sized NEWS2 quick reference guides (Appendix 1), which identify the physical health parameters and card is to be wom on a lanyard alongside individual identification badges, acting as an immediate within Adult Mental Health Services and have been shared with the other directorates to ensure consistency across sites. Additionally, the Division is rolling out handheld devices that allow staff to immediately enter physical observations into the NEWS2 electronic system (and patient record). This will automatically calculate the NEWS2 scores and alert if interventions or emergency care is required. Confirmation has been received that these have been made available and are in use on all Adult Two senior staff members have been identified to work with individuals and groups from the Lucy Wade Unit to ensure they fully understand how to undertake comprehensive NEWS2 assessments. The key focus of the sessions is about confidence-building, particularly regarding decision-making at the time of an urgent clinical incident. They will additionally ensure that all staff are supported to scenarios to test knowledge and processes in a more realistic, true-life environment. We are initially Prioritising the wards in the north of the county and intend to have this area fully compliant with the training target in this area by mid-April 2022. Additionally, the intention is then for 80 percent completion target in line with the Trust training compliance matrix for all Adult Mental Health by end of May 2022. At this time, 34 staff (approximately one third of the required staff group in the north of the county) have completed the scenario-based training and 59% of AMH inpatient nurses have completed the enhanced NEWS2 training. A copy of the scenario-based aspect of this training package is attached as Appendix 2. A letter dated 27 January 2022 describing the learning from this event has been written and was distributed throughout the Directorate’s in-patient services via formal letter and email copies the week followings its completion. A copy is enclosed with this letter titled Appendix 3. All direct care in-patient staff in the Trust complete Hospital Life Support training every eighteen months, which includes the completion of NEWS2 assessments and associated escalations; plus, recognition of Anaphylaxis and its emergency treatment using Adrenaline. Currently Adult Mental Health services are at 84 percent compliance, which is within target for the directorate. The lesson plan for this core training is being reviewed to confirm that sufficient time is spent on all aspects of ty Making a The Resource, Duncan Macmillan Howes my ay PS Trust Honesty Respect Compassion Teamwork the above, ensuring that staff are appropriately trained and have completed a competency assessment to confirm this. A further update in relation to this will be available by the end of May 2022. The Trust Resuscitation committee is convening (initially on 9 March 2022) to review the Rapid Tranquilisation Policy and will explore, review and determine what actions should be taken should @ patient fall asleep post rapid tranquilisation administration. At the initial meeting it has been agreed that an external intensivist will be consulted to advise as part of this process. A clear understanding of how staff will make the assessment to determine if the patient is sleeping or if the patient is unconscious will be confirmed and any additional learning and development planned. Currently the Directorate are placing patients on constant observations until they are mobile and using a Pulse Oximeter to continuously monitor blood oxygen saturation and pulse rates. This has been communicated to staff members via the aforementioned letter and within ward team meetings and both group and individual supervision sessions. No medical clerking from admission until her collapse On the night of admission, 3 May 2021, Mrs. Whitehead was seen by the duty doctor Dr J clerked her in and made an entry at 23:11. She also completed the core assessment by patients and staff to console her. She did not respond _verbally to Dr to speak to her. She was backing away and visibly frightened. Dr flllunderstood from nursing staff that Mrs Whitehead’s behaviour had been the same since her arrival on the ward and she had not spoken to any staff thus far. Dr [llbttempted to complete a full clerking but because of Mrs. Whitehead’s mental state and clinical presentation, by necessity, much of this information was taken from RIO and also the GP information from the portal, other than the objective observations she could make. She was unable to complete a physical examination, an ECG or bloods because Mrs. Whitehead was too frightened and disturbed. She recorded her reasons in RIO progress notes and she recorded a plan to hand over to the day team to request a re-attempt at completing the missing aspects of the clerking. This is in keeping with the Trust's policy on Physical Assessment and Examination of patients (Appendix 4), which states that a physical examination should take place within the first 24 hours but recognises that sometimes examination is not possible, such as occasions when the patient refuses or is too disturbed, and the situation should be reviewed at appropriate intervals. The Policy also recommends reattempting within the first 48 hours and at regular intervals thereafter. Dr BlEmaiied the ward doctors for the following day, Drang Or This email was received and acknowledged by Dr|ijwho stated she would see the patient the following day. The handover has been reviewed by the Associate Medical Director and by the Director of Medical Education, and they have considered that passing this work to the ward doctor rather than the next day duty doctor was appropriate, given the presentation and physical needs would be ongoing for detail of the handover on the morning of 4 May 2021, as Dr (Finished her shift, has been clarified by the Associate Medical Director and did take place face to face as per advised practice. wtb ey a Trust Honesty Respect Compassion Teamwork The daytime duty doctor for 4 May 2021 was made aware of the patient by nursing staff as Mrs. Whitehead remained very unwell and they recognised that her prescribed PRN medication may have contained lactose. The duty doctor undertook some liaison with pharmacy colleagues about choice of medication given her allergies. There are no further entries in RIO progress notes about consideration of further attempts to complete a physical examination and baseline investigations, but there is a clear description in the notes of Mrs. Whitehead continuing to present as mentally When interviewed by the investigators Drlfstated that on Wednesday the 5 May 2021 she was not able to do a full examination as the patient was very agitated, therefore towards the end of her working time she handed the case over to the on-call doctor. She informed him that Mrs Whitehead was agitated, and he may be called to see her later in the shift. She was examined physically by Dr [EEE duty doctor, on the evening of 5 May 2021. This was after rapid tranquilisation had occurred. He records an entry in RIO at 17:45. He had been asked to see Mrs. Whitehead by ward nursing staff, with concerns about her mental state including agitation, verbal aggression and chaotic behaviour, along with physical symptoms of copious loose stools and nausea. He physically examined the patient including her conscious level, hydration status, most recent physical observations, chest examination, pulse, heart auscultation, capillary have jointly emailed all junior and consultant medical staff in the division to remind them of the intervals if unable to complete it at the point of admission, and the importance of documenting the review of completing the physical assessment in the notes. No Consultant involvement after admission LUCY Va Striec by two consultants, IMME Consuitant Cinical Psychologist and Dr Consultant Psychiatrist. Dr @ fully qualified approved clinician under the Mental Health Act. This is a new role, known as a Non-Medical Approved Clinician or also known as Multi Professional Approved Clinician. In order for medical aspects of inpatient care to be fully provided Dr has a programmed activity in his job plan to support Dr IEE they have a regular Tuesday meeting to discuss her patients, and he sees some of her patients directly if indicated. He provides senior medical input if needed during the rest of the week. He also supervises the clinical work and education of the junior medical staff on the ward. On the week in uestion Dr| was on annual leave, and his annual leave was covered by a colleague, Dr ME onsuran Psychiatrist at The Millbrook Unit. On admission Mrs Whitehead was assigned to be under the care of Dr [J Or saw her in Ward Round on 5 2021, accompanied by a Clinical Psychologist, Dr and a staff nurse. At this time Dr lwas self-isolating due to testing positive for COVID 19 and was working remotely. She led the Ward Round on MS teams. The Trust position during the pandemic has been for clinicians to work remotely if they test positive and are well enough to work. Dr I was due to end her period of isolation the following day, 6 May 2021. There was a full MDT discussion, but Mrs Whitehead was unwell and unable to engage with Dr [via MS teams. ty Making a eee hy a Trust Honesty Respect Compassion Teamwork The outcome of the Ward Round in relation to consultant involvement was that Drill would attempt to see her again the following day when she was out of isolation. Dr [Jalso planned to consider transfer of consultant care to Dr [J on his return to work because of continuity of care as he had worked with Mrs Whitehead in the community. Or Lon Dr ME could nave accessed consultant psychiatrist support at this point in time from Dr They did not do so as, at the time, they did not think this was necessary. Unfortunately, Mrs Whitehead had suffered the respiratory arrest and had been transferred before the face-to-face consultant review could take place. Clinical Directors of the service plan the balance of workforce need and annual leave, with festivals. Annual Leave will not be agreed unless sufficient cover arrangements are in place, and this has been communicated throughout the workforce via conversations with lead consultants and email correspondence. Dynamic management of unplanned absences are harder to resolve, however the medical workforce has committed to offer flexible cover arrangement in these circumstances, led by the local area lead consultant. To offer Divisional resource oversight, a daily report of all Covid related absences during the Covid spikes is collated for the Associate Medical Director. All cover arrangements are communicated to the ward and management teams, held on a central Inability to reach Duty Doctor for deteriorating patient The Trust takes the difficulty experienced by the nursing team in making contact with the duty doctor for a deteriorating patient extremely seriously. The nursing team describe ‘Tinging continually but the doctor did not answer the phone” from about 20:45 on 5 May 2021 and report inability to leave a message. From investigation of this issue, it is known that the duty doctor had one registered missed call, which he noticed at 21:10 that had been made at 20:55 and no message had been left. He had been seeing another patient, and he had taken blood samples across to the laboratory at Kingsmill Hospital and noticed the missed call as he was walking back. We have explored this further and concluded that the most likely explanation is that he lost mobile signal. In response, this has been reviewed with the Trust Chief Digital Information Officer and the Head of ICT Operations. It has been recognised previously that a number of our sites lack a mobile phone signal, and the solution in place for some years is to ensure all junior doctor smart phones are enabled for Wi-Fi calling. It is highly probable that connection with Wi-Fi calling was lost when he went to the laboratory at Kingsmill Hospital, and he also had no mobile phone signal. The recommendation from the SI report was to have a “crash bleep”. This was considered but discounted as the duty doctor covers a number of geographical sites and cannot provide an immediate response. Therefore, the response to a medical emergency needs to remain as 999. ty Making a "Borchener Rows, Nosmgham NOS BAR Difference Trust Honesty Respect Compassion Teamwork The option of a “back up bleep” to be an alternative contact method if the mobile phone fails was then considered. Advice from IT was that there is a national target to remove bleeps from the NHS, which was to be achieved by the end of 2021. Alternative options include various apps, but they all require a smartphone and a reliable signal or Wi-Fi calling. We have therefore reviewed all first on call rotas to establish all locations where the junior doctor may need to visit as part of their duties. For the duty doctor at Millbrook, in addition to Millbrook itself, this consists of all of Kingsmill Bracken House and the road in between. ICT have now developed a solution using Wi-Fi calling via a specific NHIS wireless network. Staff will need to select this network when inside Kings Mill and there is a requirement for them to register using first name, last name and Trust email address. This is a one-off registration per mobile phone device allowing auto-connect to occur at each should be able to initiate and receive calls when there is no cellular mobile phone signal. This solution is available with immediate effect and extends onto a non-Trust site. The Head of ICT Operations has communicated with medical education to ensure all junior doctors are informed and have the user guide (Appendix 5). Additionally, Millbrook Mental Health Unit is co-located within the grounds of the Kings Mill Acute Hospital. As such, Trust leads have liaised with acute colleagues at Sherwood Forest Hospital Trust to assess whether this proximity is sufficient to allow the Acute Emergency Response “Crash* team to attend medical emergencies. This would offer the quickest and highest level of response to medical emergencies in the future. In February 2022 they agreed that this cover is possible. However, before fully operational we have to ensure appropriate additional equipment is in place and develop a list of practical issues to cover off, which is currently being managed by the Head of Development Unit. Throughout March 2022 the operational challenges will be worked through with the aim to implement this process as soon as it is deemed safe to do so. In the interim period the primary action remains to call for an ambulance via 999. Further updates can be provided to the Coroner's office once we can give assurance that this system is fully operational. Delay in calling paramedics As detailed above, colleagues made attempts to contact the Duty Doctor when they recognised that a medical emergency was unfolding. The primary message to staff, is that they must call for immediate support from the Ambulance service when they recognise that someone's physical health is rapidly deteriorating, and a medical emergency is or is likely to occur. This has been included clearly within the notification of learning letter already referred to within this response (Appendix 3). Summoning a local medical response to support their life support interventions is a secondary action. Additionally, senior leads, including the AMH General Manager has liaised with the East Midlands Ambulance Service to ensure they are aware of the nature of our Mental Health Units, the limitations of the life support interventions that can be made, and off site working of medical colleagues. Between them they have agreed that when an emergency response is requested, it ‘The Resource, Duncan Macmillan House, Porchesier Road, Notingham NG3 GAA. Making a Difference Trust Honesty Respect Compassion Teamwork becomes a priority one call, initiating an immediate response. This remains the case until the emergency crash process with Sherwood Forest Hospital Trust is in place and safely operational. Delay in Paramedics gaining access to the ward Once the ambulance response was confirmed, staff focused on carrying out hospital life support No one was allocated to go to the main reception to greet and hurriedly escort the ambulance team through to Mrs. Whitehead. This led to a delay in the ambulance team accessing the site. The Directorate has reviewed the formation and functioning of the Incident Response Team and now added the allocation of an Emergency Services Liaison Responder for each ward. This role is allocated on each ward by the nurse in charge as part of every handover at the start of each new shift. This individual functions within the team during normal incident scenarios, however, when a medical emergency is identified, they will immediately go to the main reception, wait for the emergency services to attend, and will escort them immediately to the casualty. This role will also be used in the event of Police or Fire Service support being required and will be allocated to a This process has been agreed with inpatient staff members and is identified as requiring allocation on the ward handover sheets (Appendix 6). This will be audited on the inpatient units bi-monthly to ensure compliance, and the outcome of the audit fed back to the senior management team. A copy of initial audit will be made available to share with the coroner's office by end of May 2022. The management team is committed to learn from these mistakes and have met with the authors to review each recommendation, their thinking behind them, and to clarify all the details that lie behind the report. By doing this, we have ensured that the actions identified in our Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) effectively respond to the learning identified in the report and are agreed by the investigators, local team based at Millbrook Mental Health Unit and the Directorate leadership team. Some of the themes are out of the Directorate’s sphere of influence and will require Divisional and Trust | —_ ee eee We have made efforts to engage with the family and express our sincere apologies. They have asked not to be approached at this point, but as the QIP develops efforts will be made again to share our leaming and changes with them. | hope the information above provides the assurance that we have and continue to consider your recommendations seriously, that we are actively seeking to improve the services we provide by implementing the actions outlined, on which, if you are in agreement, a full update will be made available to you by the end of May 2022. “y Making a Te Resource, Duncan Macmitan House. 4 Difference Trust Honesty Respect Compassion Teamwork Yours sincerely Dr, Chief Executive Enc Appendix 1- NEWS2 Quick Reference Guide Appendix 2— NEWS2 Scenario Training Package Appendix 3 — Letter detailing learning to inpatient staff members dated 27 January 2022. Appendix 4 — Trust's policy on Physical Assessment and Examination of patients Appendix 5— NHIS wireless network staff user guide Appendix 6 — Ward handover sheet i I Making a The Resource, Duncan Macmillan House, . Porchester Road, Nottingham NG3 6AA << Difference Trust Honesty Respect Compassion Teamwork
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.