Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0074, written 8 Mar 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 8 Mar 2022 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2022-0074 |
| Deceased | Claire Copeland |
| Coroner | Jeremy Chipperfield |
| Coroner area | County Durham and Darlington |
| Category | Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Other related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
Manager of Boots, Consett:
Director of Human Kind:
1 CORONER
I am Jeremy Chipperfield, Senior Coroner for the coroner area of Durham and Darlington
2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 23 June 2021 I commenced an investigation into the death of
Claire COPELAND
Aged 41.
The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 04 March 2022. The conclusion of
the inquest was that:
On around 17th June 2021, following a break in the continuity of her treatment for drug
addiction, the deceased consumed drugs, including heroin. Claire’s was a drug-related death.
4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Claire Copeland had a history of heroin use and had received opiate substitution therapy in
the months leading to her release from prison on the afternoon of Friday 11th June 2021. She
was given that Friday’s dose upon release and it was planned that she would collect further
doses on the following Saturday and Sunday from Boots the Chemist, Consett.
Current procedure involves delivery of a physical prescription document.
Agents of humankind communicated with an employee at B oots to arrange delivery of the
necessary prescriptions covering the weekend. A paper version of Claire’s prescription was
brought to Consett for delivery that Friday after Boots had closed for the day and
Humankind’s agent attempted to effect delivery via a letter box near Boots’ shopfront; that
letter box did not belong to Boots so Claire could not obtain her medication for the weekend.
No attempt had been made to confirm effective delivery.
The missing prescription was noted by Boots’ pharmacist when Claire attempted to collect it
on the Saturday; at this time Humankind was closed and there was no ready means of
obtaining a further prescription.
Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
The agreed system contained no fail-safe provisions ensuring continuity of care in the event
of failed delivery of prescription.
5 CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:
Arrangements to which you are a party :
•
•
•
•
rely upon delivery of a physical prescription document;
allow that delivery be neither witnessed nor confirmed;
lack effective mechanism immediately to detect failed delivery; and
lack mechanism to remedy failed delivery; and thereby
presents danger to life in that it is capable of causing discontinuity of important medical
treatment.
6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your
organisation) have the power to take such action.
7 YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by May 03, 2022. I, the coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the
timetable for action, otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
8 COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons
•
I have also sent it to
: CEO Boots UK
: CEO Humankind Charity
who may find it useful or of interest.
I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.
Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of
interest.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form.
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of
interest.
You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.
9
Dated: 08-Mar-22
JEREMY CHIPPERFIELD
Senior Coroner for
County Durham and Darlington
END
Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
a Since 1049 03 May 2022 Boots Support Office Superintendent Pharmacist’s Office D90 EF08& Thane Road Nottingham NG90 1BS suptpharmoffice@boots.co.uk Mr Jeremy Chipperfield Senior Coroner for County Durham and Darlington HM Coroner’s Office PO Box 282 Bishop Auckland County Durham DL14 4FY Dear Mr Chipperfield Re: Ms Claire COPELAND, deceased (around 17 June 2021) Boots Pharmacy, Station Yard, Consett, County Durham, DH8 5YB Inquest date: Friday 04 March 2022 Regulation 26 Report to Prevent Future Deaths (dated 08 March 2022) Further to the inquest into the death of Claire Copeland that concluded on 04 March 2022, lam writing on behalf of Boots UK Limited (‘Boots’) in reply to the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths (‘the Report’) dated 08 March 2022. This response addresses (in turn) the four matters of concern highlighted within Section 5 of the Report which, taken together, were held to constitute ‘arrangements’ with no fail-safe provisions ensuring continuity of care in the event of a failed prescription delivery, namely: 1. Arrangements ... rely upon delivery of a physical prescription document The prescription in question for Ms Copeland was for methadone oral solution, a Schedule 2 Controlled Drug, the supply of which from a community pharmacy is governed by the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 and the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001 (as amended). Schedule 2 Controlled Drugs can be prescribed via the NHS Electronic Prescription Service; however, methadone and other treatments for managing substance dependency are prescribed in instalments. The prescribing of such medication in instalments must be effected using a designated prescription form (FPIOMDA). There is currently no electronic equivalent for this form, so the paper prescription remains the only legal mechanism for instalment prescribing for the treatment of addiction in England. To comply with the regulations, a community pharmacist must receive an appropriate FPIOMDA form before making a supply of methadone for the treatment of addiction. The Human Medicines Regulations 2012 do not permit the making of an emergency supply of a Schedule 2 Controlled Drug under Sections 224 or 225 (those governing emergency supply). Boots UK Limited. Registered office: Nottingham, NG2 3AA - Registered in England & Wales: Number 928555 Since 1849 2. Arrangements ... allow that delivery be neither witnessed nor confirmed This would be within the power of individual treatment clinics or the service commissioners, who could require all clinics posting FPIOMDA forms to use recorded in-person delivery and also put in place an administrative system to monitor for failed deliveries of prescription forms. There are no steps that Boots can take independently to address this concern, but Boots will support individual treatment clinics that seek confirmation of receipt. 3. Arrangements ... lack effective mechanism immediately to detect failed delivery Patients have a free choice regarding the community pharmacy that they attend for the dispensing of their prescriptions. It is therefore not possible for pharmacies to detect any failed deliveries. However, Boots will encourage clinics to contact the pharmacies to confirm receipt where FPIOMDA forms are posted to try and avoid the risk of future failed deliveries. 4. Arrangements ... lack mechanism to remedy failed delivery As noted under (1) above, the supply of a Schedule 2 Controlled Drug from community pharmacies is governed by the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 and the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001 (as amended). A pharmacy is not permitted in law to provide medication (including an emergency supply), where there is a failed delivery of an FPIOMDA form, unless a replacement paper FPIOMDA form is provided. Community pharmacies typically provide dispensing services, including the dispensing of methadone for the treatment of addiction, for more hours each week than clinics are available. When a problem with an FPIOMDA form (including a missing prescription) is detected outside of clinic hours, there is no route for a pharmacist to contact one of its prescribers (who will be familiar with the patient’s medical history) and request an urgent replacement prescription. Boots will remind its pharmacists that, where any problems regarding FPIOMDA forms are reported outside of clinic hours, patients must be directed to the Accident & Emergency team at a local hospital, so that an appropriate prescriber can review the patient’s circumstances and consider providing an interim prescription, pending the clinic reopening. Reflection on the death of Ms Copeland Given the seriousness of the incident involving Ms Copeland and the tragic circumstances which prevailed in this case, Boots has taken the opportunity to reflect carefully on any different actions that could be taken at individual pharmacy level and from a Company-wide perspective to help prevent recurrence. Ms Copeland’s clinic (Human Kind) was closed on Saturday 12 June 2021 when she arrived at the Boots pharmacy in Consett, expecting to collect her medication. On reflection, the pharmacist has considered whether direct contact with the Accident & Emergency team at the local hospital (to explain the unique circumstances and ascertain whether they would review the patient’s prescription needs) could have addressed the lack of other ‘out-of-hours’ support for Ms Copeland. As a Company, we have taken the opportunity to renew our focus on Controlled Drug Stewardship, with the development of a dedicated resource to support all our pharmacy teams’ understanding of the need for compassionate, person-centred care when managing supplies of Controlled Drug medication. Boots UK Limited. Registered office: Nottingham, NG2 3AA - Registered in England & Wales: Number 928555 Since 1849 | hope this letter provides the necessary assurance that Boots has duly noted the gravitas of the concerns raised during the course of the inquest into Ms Copeland’s death, reflected on the circumstances of this sad case and shared its insights appropriately. As a founder member of the (external) Community Pharmacy Patient Safety Group, Boots has liaised with its Chair so that further dissemination of our insights from this case can be effected, using an anonymised case study format, at its next meeting. Yours sincerely Deputy a —— - —_ . a Boots UK Limited Boots UK Limited. Registered office: Nottingham, NG2 3AA - Registered in England & Wales: Number 928555
Jeremy Chipperfield
Senior Coroner
County Durham and Darlington
Via E-mail
29/04/2022
Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths, Claire Copeland
Dear Mr. Chipperfield,
On behalf of Humankind, please find below our response to the matters of concern to which Humankind
were deemed as being party following the inquest into the death of Claire Copeland.
Rely upon delivery of a physical prescription document
Unfortunately, the County Durham Drug and Alcohol Recovery Service, along with all other community
drug and alcohol services, must rely on paper prescriptions as pharmacies cannot legally use faxed
copies of prescriptions to dispense from for controlled drugs, including buprenorphine.
Further to this, at this time there is no functionality for the electronic transfer of FP10 MDA blue instalment
prescriptions. This is a national issue and not specific to Humankind/Spectrum/County Durham Drug and
Alcohol Recovery Service. Humankind have continued to escalate this issue, for example with Controlled
Drugs Local Intelligence Networks and the Office of Health Inequalities and Disparities, especially during
the COVID-19 pandemic where the ongoing need for this to be resolved became especially pertinent.
When the functionality for electronic FP10 MDA blue instalment prescriptions becomes available,
Humankind plan to implement this across our services at the earliest opportunity, removing the current
unavoidable need to rely upon delivery of a physical prescription. The timescale for this change
unfortunately sits outside of our control.
Allow that delivery be neither witnessed nor confirmed
A comprehensive standard operating procedure for all team members delivering prescriptions to
pharmacies has been implemented. This includes the mandatory requirement for prescriptions to be
handed directly to a member of the pharmacy staff team, obtaining details of the person taking receipt
and a signature from that person to confirm delivery. Completed paperwork is returned to the service
base and stored for reference and also included within the service’s management information system.
Service managers ensure that only team members authorised to do so deliver prescriptions. The
authorisation process includes written confirmation that the team member is aware of, and understands,
the instructions for prescription delivery.
Lack effective mechanism immediately to detect failed delivery
Humankind Charity (Humankind) is a company registered in England, Registered
Charity No. 515755, Registered Company No 182 0492
VAT 3346763 43, Registered Provider ) 4713
The service’s prescription delivery standard operating procedure states that should it not be possible to
directly deliver and confirm delivery of a prescription, the team member should return to their vehicle and
make telephone contact with a nominated manager who is on-site within the service base.
The nominated manager will be identified before the team member leaves the service base to deliver the
prescription and they will be fully aware that they are the nominated contact in case of a failed delivery.
The team member making the delivery will ensure they have their work mobile phone and the number of
the nominated contact to enable the call to be made immediately upon failed delivery.
Lack mechanism to remedy failed delivery
During the telephone contact between the team member attempting to deliver the prescription and
nominated manager a contingency plan will be agreed. This plan will take into account the individual
circumstances of the delivery including known pharmacy availability and the timescale requirement of
dispensing from the prescription. Continuity of care for the service user and safe prescription
management will be equally paramount in agreeing a course of action. If an effective contingency plan
cannot be immediately agreed, the issue will be escalated to the service Area Manager and Clinical Lead
for further guidance and resolution.
For any failed deliveries on a Friday that cannot be resolved on that day, the service is available on a
Saturday morning, enabling an opportunity to remedy delivery and ensure provision for the weekend.
Any failed delivery attempt of a prescription is recorded as an incident within Humankind’s incident
management system. This system notifies all relevant managers and team members of the incident,
creates a review process and supports identification of learning to prevent further occurrences.
Humankind recognises the importance of learning from Miss Copeland’s tragic death and are committed
to working together with our workforce and other organisations to prevent this from occurring again. We
extend our sincere sympathies to Miss Copeland’s friends and family.
Yours Sincerely,
Director of Community Substance Misuse Services
On behalf of Humankind Charity
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.