Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0099, written 5 Apr 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 5 Apr 2022 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2022-0099 |
| Deceased | Beatrice Dawkins |
| Coroner | Jason Pegg |
| Coroner area | Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths · Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths |
| Organisation named | Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1 Chief Executive Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust 1 CORONER I am Jason PEGG, Area Coroner for the coroner area of Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 29th September 2020 I commenced an investigation into the death of Beatrice Florence May DAWKINS aged 82. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 4th April 2022. The conclusion of the inquest was that: The deceased died on 20th September 2020 at Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, Hampshire. On 20th September 2020 the deceased suffered an anaphylactic reaction to chloramphenicol administered to treat a urinary tract infection, the reaction is a rare but recognised complication of using chloramphenicol. Records relating to the deceased's sensitivity to chloramphenicol were not readily available and were not identified prior to the administration of the chloramphenicol. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Misadventure 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (brief summary of matters of concern) The deceased's medical notes contained at least seven entries indicating the deceased had a sensitivity to chloramphenicol, the first such entry being recorded in 1997. Those medical notes included notes made by the Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth in which the deceased's recorded allergies included chloramphenicol. Evidence was adduced that had the clinicians involved in the care and treatment of the deceased in September 2020 had knowledge of those notes and/or the deceased's sensitivity to chloramphenicol had been flagged in the medical records during the deceased's September 2020 admission chloramphenicol would not have been prescribed to the deceased. My concern is that relevant, critical information relating to the care and treatment of the deceased was in existence but was not accessible nor flagged up to those involved in the Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 care and treatment of the deceased. In the absence of a process where relevant, critical information is not accessible nor flagged up to clinicians there continues to be a future risk to life. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your organisation) have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by May 31, 2022. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons I have also sent it to Louise Astill Medicare (Instructed by the family) who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated: 05/04/2022 Jason PEGG Area Coroner for Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
r~1:b1
Portsmouth Hospitals
University
NHS Trust
Trust Headquarters
F Level, Queen Alexandra Hospital
Southwick Hill Road
Cosham
PORTSMOUTH, PO6 3LY
Tel:
Dear Mr Pegg,
Response to Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths following the inquest into
the death of Beatrice Dawkins
I write to provide the Trust's response to your regulation 28 report issued following the
inquest into the death of Beatrice Dawkins. For ease of reference the matters of concern
identified by you during the inquest as described in the report are as follows:
.
The deceased's medical records contained at least seven entries indicating the deceased
had a sensitivity to chloramphenicol, the first such entry being recorded in 1997.
Those medical notes included notes made by the Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth in
which the deceased's recorded allergies included chloramphenicol.
Evidence was adduced that had the clinicians involved in the care and treatment of the
deceased in September 2020 had knowledge of those notes and/or the deceased's
sensitivity to chloramphenicol had been flagged in the medical records during the
deceased's September 2020 admission, chloramphenicol would not have been prescribed to
the deceased.
My concern is that relevant, critical information relating to the care and treatment of the
deceased was in existence but was not accessible nor flagged up to those involved in the
care and treatment of the deceased.
In the absence of a process where relevant, critical information is accessible or flagged up to
clinicians, there continues to be a future risk to life.
Trust Response
The risk of mis-transcription of allergies and drug sensitivities is increased by the manual
completion of drug charts, requiring the prescriber to identify historical allergies from
Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Trust HQ, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham,
P06 3LY
Registered charity number: 1047986
Working To drive excellence in care for
together our patients and communities
r~1:b1
Portsmouth Hospitals
University
NHS Trust
available records, including GP referral letters, and document them accurately on the new
drug chart. The records from which this information is obtained for all non-elective
admissions are held electronically, either in the form of historical outpatient correspondence
and discharge summaries, or through the Care and Health Information Exchange (CHIE).
CHIE is populated by primary care held information and accessible to the hospital clinical
teams where a patient has given consent for their records to be included on the system.
CHIE is probably the most reliable resource for allergy identification available to admitting
clinicians who are normally working under significant time pressure, followed by previous
discharge summaries. The pharmacy team also have access to the Summary Care Record
(SCR) which provides an additional resource for reviewing community records. It is not
possible for doctors, other prescribe rs, or the pharmacy team to go through every historical
electronic and paper record available for each patient due to the realistic time constraints
present for all practitioners in a modern acute healthcare system. Thus, where an allergy has
not been transcribed into CHIE or SCA and is not mentioned within recent hospital derived
medical correspondence, risk arises of the sort demonstrated in this case.
As was described in the evidence adduced at the inquest, an Electronic Prescribing and
Medicines Administration (EPMA) system is currently being rolled out to every inpatient ward
across the Trust and the Emergency Department. It has already been rolled out across
medicine and will be extended to all wards across the Trust by the end of 2022. This system
will retain information regarding any previous documented allergies or drug sensitivities and
will provide that detail automatically when any new prescription is commenced to support
future admissions. There is also a requirement to specify the nature of the allergy at the
point it is documented. The data on drug allergies and sensitivities are flagged up
prominently whenever the electronic drug chart is being reviewed, when new medicines are
being prescribed, and when medicines are being administered by the nursing team. If the
prescriber overrides an allergy or interaction, they will need to state a reason for why this
has been done, which is logged and fully auditable. This will significantly reduce the risk of
drug allergies not being identified going forwards.
Inpatient discharge summaries are sent electronically to GP practices. With the introduction
of EPMA the medicines component of those summaries will now be populated by the EPMA
system to improve their accuracy. For medicines this will require the prescriber to select the
medication to appear on the discharge summary, for allergies this will pull through
automatically. It is already recommended to our teams that any new allergies should be
flagged in the GP Actions section of the discharge summary to ensure that they are
translated effectively into the primary care patient records. To further reinforce this, we will
be making a change to the discharge summary template with the support of the DigiMeds
team (the team supporting the introduction of EPMA into the Trust), to include this as an
option. We will also be looking to remove the 'no action' option to promote clear recording.
Identification of allergies and adverse drug reactions (ADR) is a national focus for the NHS
with NICE guidance on drug allergies aiming to improve the sharing of allergy and
medication intolerance data across the health service in England. An NHS Commissioning
Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Trust HQ, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham,
P063LY
Registered charity number: 1047986
Worki~ To drive excellence in care for
together our patients and communities
r,•t:k1
Portsmouth Hospitals
University
NHS Trust
for Quality and Innovation incentive (CQUIN) for 2022-23 is currently being deployed to
promote the Transfer of Care Around Medicines (TCAM). TCAM requires the pharmacy
team within Acute Hospital Trusts to communicate any high-risk patients to their community
pharmacy, for example if a new drug allergy has been identified. This information will be
transmitted electronically and stored on the records of the community pharmacy for that
patient. The presence of this information held within the database of the community
pharmacy will increase the opportunity for the GP practice to obtain that information and
record it on their own systems. PHU Trust will be supporting this transfer of information using
the PharmOutcomes platform.
A key requirement to prevent further cases of this type, is to work with primary care to
ensure that the GP records can be as complete as possible in relation to Adverse Drug
Reactions (ADR) including allergies. To support that in Portsmouth and Southeast
Hampshire (PSEH), we will share the learning from this case with local GP practices to
reinforce the need for allergies reported by the hospital to be cross referenced with Primary
Care records when patients are discharged. In the case of Mrs Dawkins, the allergy reported
by the patient during previous hospital appointments was included within written
correspondence to the GP but was still not added to the GP record. If this had been done,
then the Chloramphenicol sensitivity would have been available on the GP record and thus
would have been transcribed over to the drug chart either by the admitting doctor or through
medicines reconciliation by the pharmacy team.
Handheld severe allergy cards will also be developed and made available within PHU for
patients who have difficulties remembering their allergies or who have multiple significant
allergies. Upon development, these cards will be shared with the Hampshire and Isle of
Wight Medication Safety Group as recommended best practice for wider adoption.
--...----
----·
===-
'"
DRUG ALLERGY
CO !'JOT Cil\lc ME
PENICILLIN
I~:.., ..1, ("lu-:. u .u•t•l 101<\Kl: ,um
.l~ll :.Oll Mt~0"4: JJ~
i"'i1N PU O(.~,Xt.
In addition to the actions taken locally, there is a national Information Standard being
developed by NHS Digital looking specifically at medicine and allergy/intolerance data
transfer between care settings.
Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Trust HQ, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham,
P06 3LY
Registered charity number: 1047986
Workir-g To drive excellence in care for
together our patients and communities
.. . ,, . .. , .
r~1:k1
Portsmouth Hospitals
University
NHS Trust
The initiatives described will significantly reduce the risk of a recurrence of Mrs Dawkins
case, both immediately and into the future. Given the number of patients that the hospital
cares for each year, the complexity of the information pertaining to them and the fact that the
accuracy of its recording is subject to human error on occasions, unfortunately it will not be
possible to completely eradicate the possibility of an episode of this type occurring again.
However, I hope that the information contained within this response provides you with the
assurance you need that PHU is taking all reasonable steps to minimise that possibility.
Yours Sincerely
Chief Executive
Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Trust HQ, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham,
P06 3LY
Registered charity number: 1047986
· . / ·
~•w••;i._; 1 . • ·, .,
Worki~ To drive excellence in care for
together our patients and communities
1
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.