Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2026

Lucy Thornton

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0040, written 27 Jan 2026. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report27 Jan 2026
Reference2026-0040
DeceasedLucy Thornton
CoronerJason Pegg
Coroner areaHampshire, Portsmouth Southampton
CategorySuicide (from 2015)
Organisation namedIsle of Wight NHS Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1 Chief Executive, Isle of Wight NHS Trust

1

CORONER

I am Jason PEGG, HM Area Coroner for the coroner area of Hampshire, Portsmouth and
Southampton

2

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 19 February 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of Lucy Ann THORNTON
aged 25. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 26 January 2026. The
conclusion of the inquest was Suicide.

4

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

The deceased died on 18th February 2025

. The deceased

suspended herself

The last known contact with the deceased was at 1209
hours. An ambulance arrived at Omega Street at 1233 hours. The ambulance crew did not
enter 61, Omega House because the deceased was known to have a knife and the
ambulance crew believed the attendance of the police was necessary for their safety. The
ambulance service contacted the police at 1236 hours requesting the police to attend

. The deceased was found at 1300 hours. It cannot be ascertained when the

deceased suspended herself and died. It cannot be ascertained whether there was a
missed opportunity to stop the deceased suspending herself. The deceased had a history of
suicide ideation. The deceased ingested a substantial quantity of alcohol which impaired the
deceased’s judgement and contributed to the death.

5

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern.
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:
(brief summary of matters of concern)

The level of training and understanding of relevant call handling procedures and processes
by those employed as call handlers in relation to incidents concerning hanging:

1 The procedures direct a Category 1 response (7 minutes) when the person has the means
to suspend themselves and has stated that is there present intention.
The call handler believes that a Category 1 response is, "When they are going to die now".

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

 2 The procedures direct that when the call handler does not have all relevant information
they should telephone the person and ask questions in relation to the person's present
situation.
The call handler was on the Isle of Wight. THORNTON was in Southsea. The call handler did
not call THORNTON as she felt she was too remote (geographically).

6

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or
your organisation) have the power to take such action.

7

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by March 24, 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
COPIES and PUBLICATION

8

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons

Isle of Wight Ambulance Service

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or
of interest.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form.
They may send a copy of this report to any person who they believe may find it useful or of
interest.

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

9

Dated: 27/01/2026

Jason PEGG
HM Area Coroner for
Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Isle of Wight NHS Trust (PDF)
St Mary’s Hospital  
   Newport 
       Isle of Wight  
PO30 5TG 

Date: 23rd March 2026 

Private and Confidential 

Mr J Pegg 
HM Area Coroner for Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton 
The Coroner’s Court 
1 Guildhall Square 
Portsmouth 
PO1 2GJ 

Dear Mr Pegg, 

RE Lucy Thornton - Response to Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths 

I  am  writing  in  my  capacity  as  Chief  Executive  of  the  Isle  of  Wight  NHS  Trust  in  response  to  the 
Prevention of Future Deaths (PFD) report issued following the conclusion of the inquest into the death 
of Ms Lucy Thornton on 27th January 2026. 

On  behalf  of  the  Isle  of  Wight  NHS  Trust,  I  would  like  to  express  our  sincere  condolences  to  Ms 
Thornton’s  family  and  loved  ones.  We  are  grateful  to  the  Court  for  bringing  these  matters  to  our 
attention, and we have carefully considered the concerns raised within your report. 

Your  report  identified  concerns  regarding  the  level  of  training  and  understanding  of  call  handling 
procedures in relation to incidents involving potential hanging or suicide. In particular: 

1.  The procedures direct a Category 1 response (7 minutes) when the person has the means to 
suspend themselves and has stated that is there present intention. The call handler believes 
that a Category 1 response is, "When they are going to die now". 

2.  The procedures direct that when the call handler does not have all relevant information, they 
should telephone the person and ask questions in relation to the person's present situation. The 
call handler was on the Isle of Wight. Ms Thornton was in Southsea. The call handler did not call 
Ms Thornton she felt she was too remote (geographically). 

In response to these concerns, a review and audit of the call established that the call handler did not 
make  sufficient  efforts,  in  accordance  with  Isle  of  Wight  Ambulance  Service  (IOWAS)  processes,  to 
make direct contact with the patient. This has been addressed with the individual concerned. 

The call handler did, however, upgrade the incident to a Category 2 ambulance response. This decision 
was based on information indicating a possible attempt at hanging and a lack of clarity regarding the 
extent of bleeding. 

The  call  handler  reported  that  the  perceived  geographical  remoteness  of  the  patient,  alongside  a 
personal sensitivity to the situation, contributed to the decision not to pursue direct contact with Ms 
Thornton. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Following  receipt  of  your  report,  the  Ambulance  Service  has  undertaken  a  comprehensive  review  of 
current procedures, training, and guidance provided to call handlers. The Trust has taken the following 
actions: 

1. Review of Call Handling Guidance 

Following a letter from Professor Jonathan Benger in April 2021 regarding clinical validation processes, 
the  Association  of  Ambulance  Chief  Executives  established  a  clinical  validation  process  in  October 
2023 for patients threatening suicide, which has been adopted by the Isle of Wight Ambulance Service. 

Calls of this nature are triaged as either Category 3 under NHS Pathways or Category 5 “Hear and Treat” 
calls.  The  Computer-Aided  Dispatch  (CAD)  system  highlights  patients  who  have  deliberately  or 
accidentally taken an overdose or where there is a potential threat of suicide. If no clinical validation 
has  taken  place  within  30  minutes,  the  system  automatically  upgrades  the  incident  to  a Category 2 
response. This functionality has been in place within the Trust since 2023. 

At  present,  there  is  no  NHS  Pathways  outcome  that  results  in  a  Category  1  response  for  a  patient 
threatening to hang themselves, even where means are present. A Category 1 response is only triggered 
where a patient is actively in the process of hanging. 

Patients  expressing  suicidal  ideation  and  access  to  means  (excluding  ingestion  or  overdose)  are 
escalated  to  the  duty  Operational  Commander  within  the  control  room  for  further  risk  assessment, 
including liaison with the police control room for additional support and intervention. 

This incident and your Prevention of Future Deaths report will be formally reported to the national NHS 
Pathways  group.  It  has  also  been  raised  at  the  National  Heads  of  Emergency  Operations  Centre 
meeting,  with  a  request  that  existing  pathways  be  reviewed  to  consider  whether  a  Category  1 
disposition is appropriate in such circumstances. 

Completion date: January 2026 

3.  Training and Reinforcement of Processes for Suicidal Patients and Remote Callers 

Additional training has been introduced for all call handlers to reinforce the appropriate management 
of calls involving suicidal patients. 

This includes: 

  Reinforcement of escalation pathways where risk is identified 
  Clarification of response categories and associated decision-making 
  Emphasis on proactive information gathering and risk assessment 

Training is being delivered through mandatory refresher sessions and updated training materials. 

Implementation period: February to April 2026 

4.  Clarification of Procedures for Contacting the Individual at Risk 

Guidance  has  been  amended  and  strengthened  to  make  clear  that  where  relevant  information  is 
incomplete, call handlers must make reasonable attempts to contact the individual directly, wherever 
they are located, in order to obtain information necessary for an accurate risk assessment. 

The revised guidance explicitly confirms that: 

 

The physical location of the call handler is not a barrier to contacting the individual by telephone 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Call handlers are expected to pursue direct contact wherever appropriate 

In addition, clear direction has been issued to the call handling team regarding escalation procedures 
where a call handler feels unable to manage a call due to personal sensitivity or other factors. In such 
circumstances, the call must be escalated immediately to a senior colleague so that another member 
of the team can take over and ensure there is no delay in the patient pathway. 

Completion date: January 2026 

The Trust remains fully committed to learning from this incident and to strengthening its systems and 
processes to reduce the risk of similar occurrences in the future. We will continue to work with national 
bodies  to  ensure  that  guidance  and  NHS  Pathways  appropriately  reflect  the  risks  associated  with 
suicidal patients, including those involving potential hanging. 

I hope that the contents of this letter provide appropriate assurance that the concerns raised have been 
carefully considered and addressed. 

Yours sincerely, 

Chief Executive Officer 
IWT & PHU

Related reports

Other reports by Jason Pegg

See all →

More reports categorised “Suicide (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Isle of Wight NHS Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Isle of Wight NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.