Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2026
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2026-0040, written 27 Jan 2026. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 27 Jan 2026 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2026-0040 |
| Deceased | Lucy Thornton |
| Coroner | Jason Pegg |
| Coroner area | Hampshire, Portsmouth Southampton |
| Category | Suicide (from 2015) |
| Organisation named | Isle of Wight NHS Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1 Chief Executive, Isle of Wight NHS Trust 1 CORONER I am Jason PEGG, HM Area Coroner for the coroner area of Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 19 February 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of Lucy Ann THORNTON aged 25. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 26 January 2026. The conclusion of the inquest was Suicide. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH The deceased died on 18th February 2025 . The deceased suspended herself The last known contact with the deceased was at 1209 hours. An ambulance arrived at Omega Street at 1233 hours. The ambulance crew did not enter 61, Omega House because the deceased was known to have a knife and the ambulance crew believed the attendance of the police was necessary for their safety. The ambulance service contacted the police at 1236 hours requesting the police to attend . The deceased was found at 1300 hours. It cannot be ascertained when the deceased suspended herself and died. It cannot be ascertained whether there was a missed opportunity to stop the deceased suspending herself. The deceased had a history of suicide ideation. The deceased ingested a substantial quantity of alcohol which impaired the deceased’s judgement and contributed to the death. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (brief summary of matters of concern) The level of training and understanding of relevant call handling procedures and processes by those employed as call handlers in relation to incidents concerning hanging: 1 The procedures direct a Category 1 response (7 minutes) when the person has the means to suspend themselves and has stated that is there present intention. The call handler believes that a Category 1 response is, "When they are going to die now". Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 2 The procedures direct that when the call handler does not have all relevant information they should telephone the person and ask questions in relation to the person's present situation. The call handler was on the Isle of Wight. THORNTON was in Southsea. The call handler did not call THORNTON as she felt she was too remote (geographically). 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your organisation) have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by March 24, 2026. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION 8 I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons Isle of Wight Ambulance Service I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. They may send a copy of this report to any person who they believe may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated: 27/01/2026 Jason PEGG HM Area Coroner for Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
St Mary’s Hospital
Newport
Isle of Wight
PO30 5TG
Date: 23rd March 2026
Private and Confidential
Mr J Pegg
HM Area Coroner for Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton
The Coroner’s Court
1 Guildhall Square
Portsmouth
PO1 2GJ
Dear Mr Pegg,
RE Lucy Thornton - Response to Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths
I am writing in my capacity as Chief Executive of the Isle of Wight NHS Trust in response to the
Prevention of Future Deaths (PFD) report issued following the conclusion of the inquest into the death
of Ms Lucy Thornton on 27th January 2026.
On behalf of the Isle of Wight NHS Trust, I would like to express our sincere condolences to Ms
Thornton’s family and loved ones. We are grateful to the Court for bringing these matters to our
attention, and we have carefully considered the concerns raised within your report.
Your report identified concerns regarding the level of training and understanding of call handling
procedures in relation to incidents involving potential hanging or suicide. In particular:
1. The procedures direct a Category 1 response (7 minutes) when the person has the means to
suspend themselves and has stated that is there present intention. The call handler believes
that a Category 1 response is, "When they are going to die now".
2. The procedures direct that when the call handler does not have all relevant information, they
should telephone the person and ask questions in relation to the person's present situation. The
call handler was on the Isle of Wight. Ms Thornton was in Southsea. The call handler did not call
Ms Thornton she felt she was too remote (geographically).
In response to these concerns, a review and audit of the call established that the call handler did not
make sufficient efforts, in accordance with Isle of Wight Ambulance Service (IOWAS) processes, to
make direct contact with the patient. This has been addressed with the individual concerned.
The call handler did, however, upgrade the incident to a Category 2 ambulance response. This decision
was based on information indicating a possible attempt at hanging and a lack of clarity regarding the
extent of bleeding.
The call handler reported that the perceived geographical remoteness of the patient, alongside a
personal sensitivity to the situation, contributed to the decision not to pursue direct contact with Ms
Thornton.
Following receipt of your report, the Ambulance Service has undertaken a comprehensive review of
current procedures, training, and guidance provided to call handlers. The Trust has taken the following
actions:
1. Review of Call Handling Guidance
Following a letter from Professor Jonathan Benger in April 2021 regarding clinical validation processes,
the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives established a clinical validation process in October
2023 for patients threatening suicide, which has been adopted by the Isle of Wight Ambulance Service.
Calls of this nature are triaged as either Category 3 under NHS Pathways or Category 5 “Hear and Treat”
calls. The Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD) system highlights patients who have deliberately or
accidentally taken an overdose or where there is a potential threat of suicide. If no clinical validation
has taken place within 30 minutes, the system automatically upgrades the incident to a Category 2
response. This functionality has been in place within the Trust since 2023.
At present, there is no NHS Pathways outcome that results in a Category 1 response for a patient
threatening to hang themselves, even where means are present. A Category 1 response is only triggered
where a patient is actively in the process of hanging.
Patients expressing suicidal ideation and access to means (excluding ingestion or overdose) are
escalated to the duty Operational Commander within the control room for further risk assessment,
including liaison with the police control room for additional support and intervention.
This incident and your Prevention of Future Deaths report will be formally reported to the national NHS
Pathways group. It has also been raised at the National Heads of Emergency Operations Centre
meeting, with a request that existing pathways be reviewed to consider whether a Category 1
disposition is appropriate in such circumstances.
Completion date: January 2026
3. Training and Reinforcement of Processes for Suicidal Patients and Remote Callers
Additional training has been introduced for all call handlers to reinforce the appropriate management
of calls involving suicidal patients.
This includes:
Reinforcement of escalation pathways where risk is identified
Clarification of response categories and associated decision-making
Emphasis on proactive information gathering and risk assessment
Training is being delivered through mandatory refresher sessions and updated training materials.
Implementation period: February to April 2026
4. Clarification of Procedures for Contacting the Individual at Risk
Guidance has been amended and strengthened to make clear that where relevant information is
incomplete, call handlers must make reasonable attempts to contact the individual directly, wherever
they are located, in order to obtain information necessary for an accurate risk assessment.
The revised guidance explicitly confirms that:
The physical location of the call handler is not a barrier to contacting the individual by telephone
Call handlers are expected to pursue direct contact wherever appropriate
In addition, clear direction has been issued to the call handling team regarding escalation procedures
where a call handler feels unable to manage a call due to personal sensitivity or other factors. In such
circumstances, the call must be escalated immediately to a senior colleague so that another member
of the team can take over and ensure there is no delay in the patient pathway.
Completion date: January 2026
The Trust remains fully committed to learning from this incident and to strengthening its systems and
processes to reduce the risk of similar occurrences in the future. We will continue to work with national
bodies to ensure that guidance and NHS Pathways appropriately reflect the risks associated with
suicidal patients, including those involving potential hanging.
I hope that the contents of this letter provide appropriate assurance that the concerns raised have been
carefully considered and addressed.
Yours sincerely,
Chief Executive Officer
IWT & PHU
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Isle of Wight NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.