Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022

Kathryn Millard

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0121, written 25 Apr 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report25 Apr 2022
Reference2022-0121
DeceasedKathryn Millard
CoronerIan Brownhill
Coroner areaMid Kent and Medway
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedMedway NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published2

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Mid Kent and Medway Coroners  
Cantium House 
2nd Floor 
Maidstone 
Kent 
ME14 1XD 

Telephone:  
New and Current Cases: 03000 410502 
General Enquiries: 03000 410503 
Email: KentandMedwayCoroners@kent.gov.uk  

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:   

1.    T h e   C h i e f   E x e c u t i v e   o f   t h e   M e d w a y   N H S   F o u n d a t i o n   T r u s t  

1 

CORONER 

I am Ian Brownhill, assistant coroner, for the coroner area of Mid Kent and Medway 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.  

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

Kathryn  Lynda  Millard  died  on  13  May  2021  at  the  Medway  Maritime  Hospital.  An 
investigation into her death was commenced. The investigation concluded at the end of 
the inquest on 28 March 2022.  

The jury found that the medical cause of death was: 

1a Pulmonary Embolism 

1b Deep Venous Thrombosis 

1c 

II Fractured Spine, Diabetes Mellitus 

The jury’s conclusion was that Ms Millard’s death was an accident.  They gave a short 
narrative conclusion in addition, which read: 

She died from a complication of necessary medical treatment.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

On the 10th May 2021 Kathryn Millard fell backwards down a flight of stairs at a property 
where she was working. She was admitted to Medway Maritime Hospital with a fractured 
spine. 

At Medway Maritime Hospital, she was immobilised upon admission and a decision was 
made  that  she  should  be  prescribed  stockings  to  avoid  deep  vein  thrombosis  and 
dalteparin as prophylaxis. 

The stockings were not applied. In respect of dalteparin, this was decision was initially 
withdrawn due to an identified risk of bleeding and the prospect of surgery. When it was 
determined  that  there  was  to  be  no  surgery,  the  treating  consultant  indicated  that 
dalteparin  should  be  commenced.  That  decision  was  not  recorded  in  Mrs  Millard’s 
medical notes. The dalteparin was not given. 

On  12  May  2021,  Mrs  Millard  began  to  have  green  vomit.  The  nursing  staff  were 
concerned and asked for her to be reviewed by a doctor. An unidentified individual came 
to the ward and saw Mrs Millard. That individual did not record their interaction in Mrs 
Millard’s notes nor did they speak with the nursing staff. 

On the morning of 13 May 2021, Mrs Millard had a cardiac arrest. Despite efforts by staff, 
she could not be resuscitated.   

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. 
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  – 

(1)  The  direction  of  the  most  senior  clinician,  the  orthopaedic  surgeon,  was  not 
documented  in  the  medical  records  and  was  not  implemented.  It  is  concerning 
that this treatment plan was not recorded properly in the deceased’s notes. 
(2)  The  medical  records  indicated  that  at  least  one  doctor  had  indicated  that  Mrs 
Millard  should  have  anti-embolic  stockings  applied.  However,  the  nursing  staff 
gave evidence that they were not aware of this.  

(3)  The nursing staff were concerned on the 12 May 2021 as to the presentation and 
prognosis  of  the  deceased.  Whomever  attended  (if  they  anybody  did  in  fact 
attend), did not make any entry into Mrs Millard’s medical records. It is concerning 
that the Trust were not able to identify this individual and that they did not discuss 
the patient’s presentation and prognosis with the nursing staff.  

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the 
power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,  
namely by 21 June 2022. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to: 
The Chief Coroner  
The family of Kathryn Millard 
The other interested persons within the inquest 
The legal representatives of the above. 

In addition, I have sent this to: 

The Care Quality Commission 

I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it 
useful or of interest. 

The  Chief  Coroner may publish  either  or  both  in  a  complete or  redacted or  summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. 

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of  your response, about 
the release or the publication of your response. 

9 

Signature:  

Ian Brownhill 
Assistant Coroner  
Mid Kent and Medway 

25 April 2022

Responses

2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Medway NHS Action Plan (PDF)
Action Plan (KM) PFD REG 28 - 07.06.22

Service

Trust wide 

Action Description 

What will be the final outcome?
(include required KPIs or evidence of delivery)

Executive Lead

Care Group

Action/ Work stream 
Lead

Key milestones to be achieved

Start date

Due date

Revised due 
date

Completion date

RAG

Assurance Mechanisms 

Comment/narrative

Risk Register
number (if 
applicable)

Surgical Services

NO

Share the outcome of the SI investigation report at M & 
M meetings.

The aim is to raise clinician awareness 
around such incidents.  

Divisional 
Medical 
Director 

Orthopaedics

The Prevention of Future death was 
received by the Trust in April.  The 
outcome of the inquest and content 
of the PFD will be shared with the 
Surgical team, Care Group Meeting 
and Divisional Governance Board.

Aug-21

N/A

Jul-22

Complete - 
approved

Minutes from relevant meetings that information 
has been shared to be submitted to the 
governance team.  

The PFD and action plan will 
also be discussed at the 
Divisional Governance Board for 
learning.

N/A

Surgical Services

NO

Change the 'Ward based structure to team based.  This 
will allow hierarchical tree with responsibility on specific 
individuals attending.

Changing the set up of the clinical team on 
the ward will allow the hierarchical tree with 
responsibility on certain individuals attending 
(either that person or their buddy) rather 
than the ghosting that happens with ward 
based cover.

Divisional 
Medical 
Director 

Orthopaedics

Completed

Aug-21

N/A

Nov-22

Complete - 
approved

This is now embedded in practice.

Ward-based structure has now 
been transitioned to team based 
structure.

N/A

Surgical Services

NO

Ensuring good record keeping.  All Consultant ward 
rounds to be dictated and affixed into notes by 
respective secretary Consultant. 

Any advised given by the surgical doctors on 
Ward rounds must be documented and 
communicated to Nurses.  

Divisional 
Medical 
Director 

Orthopaedics

Service 
Manager

None

Aug-21

N/A

Jan-22

Surgical Services

NO

Audit of Consultant ward rounds and post take to be 
undertaken.   

Surgical Services

NO

Nursing training towards routine TED application for all 
inpatients and its application should be the norm, 
unless contra-indicated eg DVT. 

This is to review the completeness and 
thoroughness and effectiveness of 
documentation. Outcome is that there is 
continuity in patient care and high quality 
patient care is maintained.

Divisional 
Medical 
Director 

Orthopaedics

Service 
Manager

Raised awareness and knowledge.  Nursing 
should be aware of when patients require 
TED stocking and should liaise with 
clinicians if not prescribed. This should 
improve patient care and lead to better 
outcome for the patient.

Director of 
Nursing

Orthopaedics

Head of 
Nursing & 
Matron

None

Aug-21

N/A

Jan-22

Complete - 
approved

An audit of documentation on EPR took place in 
January 2022.  An action plan is being complied 
to address the issue identified and EPR 
documentation will be re-audited in the next two 
months (End of August).

Complete - 
approved

An audit of documentation on EPR took place in 
January 2022.  An action plan is being complied 
to address the issue identified and EPR 
documentation will be re-audited in the next two 
months.

Completed

Aug-21

Aug-21

N/A

Aug-21

Complete - 
approved

Compliance with expected practice will be 
monitored during ‘Ward Rounds’ and ‘Drug 
Rounds’ and lessons learned will be shared at 
ward meetings.

Safety messages and local 
teaching have occurred to ensure 
that nurses escalate incidents 
where an appliance has been 
indicated, but not prescribed. 

N/A

N/A

N/A

Surgical Services

NO

Audit of Nursing notes on completeness and handover - 
gaps noted on communication to medics / escalation/ 
failure to document the correct weight of the patient etc.

This will ensure that all actions from the 
clinicians have been completed or escalated 
where needed.  Outcome is that there is 
continuity in patient care and high quality 
patient care is maintained.

Director of 
Nursing

Orthopaedics

Ward 
Manager & 
Matron

The questions on the documentation 
audit 

Jun-22

Monthly

N/A

On track

Compliance with expected practice and lessons 
learned will be shared at ward meetings, Care 
Group Meeting and Divisional Governance 
Board. 

Matron's documentation audit 
utilising 'Gather' is to commence 
from June.

N/A

Page 1 of 1
Response from Medway NHS Foundation Trust (PDF)
07 June 2022 

Mid Kent and Medway Coroners 
Cantium House 
2nd Floor 
Maidstone 
Kent  
ME14 1XD 

Medway Maritime Hospital 
Windmill Road 
Gillingham 
Kent 
ME7 5NY 

Dear Mr Brownhill 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

Re: Mrs Kathryn Millard 

I am writing in response to your report dated 26 April 2022, concerning the care provided 
to Mrs Millard whilst at Medway NHS Foundation Trust. Your report highlighted three 
matters of concerns which are listed below. For clarity I will respond to each of your 
concerns in the order they are raised; 

1.  The  direction  of  the  most  senior  clinician,  the  orthopaedic  surgeon,  was  not 
documented in the medical records and was not implemented. It is concerning that 
this treatment plan was not recorded properly in the deceased’s notes. 

In relation to the concern of poor record keeping by the medical doctor, the Orthopaedic 
team  have  discussed  the  outcome  of  the  Serious  Incident  Investigation  report  at  the 
junior doctor’s grand round.  

Medical  doctors  have  been  reminded  of  the  importance  and  principles  of  effective 
healthcare record keeping, which is a minimum standard. The quality of records should 
meet  the  Generic  Record  Keeping  Standard,  General  Medical  Record  keeping 
Standards (Royal Academy of Physicians) and Standards for the structure and content 
of patient records (Academy of Medical Royal Colleges).  

The adherence to national and Trust standards will be audited on a monthly basis and 
the results of the audit will be shared at local and divisional governance board meetings 
to ensure compliance and improvement in practice.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 2.  The  medical  records  indicated  that  at  least  one  doctor  had  indicated  that  Mrs 
Millard  should  have  anti-embolic  stockings  applied.  However,  the  nursing  staff 
gave evidence that they were not aware of this. 

The  Trust  has  also  taken  action  to  ensure  that  Anti-Embolic  Stocking  (AES)  are 
prescribed and applied when indicated by the medical team.  Safety messages and local 
teaching  have occurred  to ensure  that nurses  escalate  incidents  where  an appliance 
has been indicated, but not prescribed.  

Since  the  recipient  of  this  letter,  the  team  has  again  sent  out  safety  message  to  all 
nursing staff as a reminder of the expected standard. Compliance with expected practice 
will be audited monthly, and monitored during ‘Ward Rounds’ and ‘Drug Rounds’ and 
lessons identified will be shared at ward meetings.  

3.  The nursing staff were concerned on the 12 May 2021 as to the presentation and 
prognosis of the deceased. Whomever attended (if anybody did in fact attend), did 
not  make  any  entry  into  Mrs  Millard’s medical  records. It  is  concerning  that  the 
Trust  were  not  able  to  identify  this  individual  and  that  they  did  not  discuss  the 
patient’s presentation and prognosis with the nursing staff. 

As you highlighted, the Trust was unable to ascertain if Mrs Millard was indeed 
assessed by a clinician on 12 May 2021 when her condition deteriorated as there is no 
record of this care taken place. This does not meet the standards we would expect 
and all staff have been reminded that all patient contacts are to be recorded in the 
patient medical record in line with national and Trust guidelines.  

An audit of healthcare record keeping (including compliance with relevant Trust policy) 
will take place on an annual basis Trust wide. In addition, compliance with the 
expected documentation standards are included in the Ward to Board Assurance and 
Accreditation Process, which will be rolling out from 27 June 2022.  

The results of such audits will be reported via the Trust’s Governance structures for 
Quality, including outcomes and exceptions. In addition, ongoing regular audits will be 
undertaken using the Trust ‘Gather’ reporting system by Care Groups to ensure that 
ongoing record keeping is of the required quality. This will help to inform local audit 
programmes and to measure the impact of actions taken, supporting improvement 
activity. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The  Trust  is  committed  to  learning  and  improving  the  standards  and  quality  of  our 
services  and  care  to  ensure  the  best  possible  experience  and  outcomes  for  our 
patients, their families and carers. I hope that my response, in addition to the included 
action  plan  provides  assurance  that  we  have  taken  your  concerns  seriously  and 
responded to them to ensure we implement lessons identified.  

Yours sincerely 

Interim Chief Executive Officer

Related reports

Other reports by Ian Brownhill

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Medway NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Medway NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.