Prevention of Future Deaths reports

Hadley Savory

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2021-0270. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Reference2021-0270
DeceasedHadley Savory
CoronerIan Brownhill
Coroner areaNorth East Kent
CategoryAlcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Other related deaths · Mental Health related deaths · Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedEast Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

North East Kent Coroners  
Cantium House 
2nd Floor 
Maidstone 
Kent 
ME14 1XD 

Telephone:  
New and Current Cases: 03000 410502 
General Enquiries: 03000 410503 
Email: KentandMedwayCoroners@kent.gov.uk  

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:   

1.  The Director of Adult Services at Kent County Council 

1 

CORONER 

I am Ian Brownhill, assistant coroner, for the coroner area of North East Kent  

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.  

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

Hadley John Savory was found dead at his home address in Margate on 13 December 
2019.  An  investigation  into  his  death  was  commenced.  The  investigation  concluded  at 
the end of the inquest on 11 August 2021. My conclusion was that his death was drug 
related,  in  addition,  a  short  narrative  conclusion  was  given  as  explained  further  under 
section 4 below.  

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Hadley John Savory was discharged from Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother Hospital 
on  25  September  2019. A  multi-agency meeting did not take  place  prior his  discharge 
from  hospital.  The  plan  for  Mr  Savory’s  care,  support  and  treatment  in  respect  of  his 
substance misuse, physical health, mental health and social care needs is unclear. 

Mr Savory’s presentation declined in the community. Safeguarding referrals were made 
but no multi agency meetings were convened pursuant to safeguarding duties under the 
Care Act or as per the Kent and Medway Multi-Agency Policy and Procedures to Support 
People that Self-Neglect or Demonstrate Hoarding Behaviour. 

Police made entry into Mr Savory’s home address on 13 December 2019, he was found 
to be deceased. Toxicological evidence indicated that Mr Savory had taken a lethal dose 
of methadone. There was no evidence that Mr Savory had intended to take an overdose.  

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. 
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  – 

(1)  There was no evidence of a multi agency planning meeting prior to Mr Savory’s 
discharge from Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother Hospital on 25 September 
2019.  Nor  was  there  evidence  of  what  multi-agency  procedures  are  in  place 
relating  to  the  safe  discharge  of  patients  with  concurrent,  mental  health, 
substance misuse, social care and physical health needs; 

(2)  There  was  no  recording  (or  available  evidence  of  recording)  of  attempts  to 
escalate internal disagreements as to which team Mr Savory should have been 
allocated  to.  Nor  did  the  evidence  establish  how  internal  disagreements  as  to 
allocation of cases are recorded; 

(3)  The evidence was not clear as to how eligible care needs under the Care Act are 
met when a service user is transferring between services. In Mr Savory’s case he 
was  assessed  as  having  eligible  needs  but  no  care  and  support  plan  was 
developed; 

(4)  The  evidence  demonstrated  that  there  was  a  lack  of  clarity  as  to  the 
interrelationship  between  safeguarding  duties  under  the  Care  Act  and  the 
operation  of  the  Kent  and  Medway  Multi-Agency  Policy  and  Procedures  to 
Support People that Self-Neglect or Demonstrate Hoarding Behaviour; 

(5)  It was unclear as to how information sharing operated in respect of service users 
who are identified as potentially having fluctuating mental capacity in respect of 
their care and support needs.  

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the 
power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,  
namely by 6 October 2021. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to: 

The Chief Coroner  
The family of Hadley John Savory 
The Chief Executive of the East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust 
The Chief Executive of The Forward Trust 
The Chief Executive of Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust 

The legal representatives of the above. 

In addition, I have sent this to: 

The Independent Chair of the Kent and Medway Safeguarding Adults Board 

I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 useful or of interest. 

The  Chief  Coroner may publish  either  or  both  in  a  complete or  redacted or  summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. 

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of  your response, about 
the release or the publication of your response. 

9 

Signature:  

Ian Brownhill 
Assistant Coroner  
North East Kent 

11 August 2021

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Kent County Council (PDF)
Mr Ian Brownhill, Assistant Coroner 
North East Kent Coroners 

By email only: 

Adult Social Care and Health 

Sessions House 
Maidstone 
Kent 
ME14 1XQ 

Date:  25th November 2022 

Dear Sir, 

Inquest touching upon the death of Hadley Savory 
Kent County Council response to the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths 

I am providing this further response to the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future 
Deaths that you issued to Kent County Council (KCC) and following my preliminary 
response dated 6th October 2021.  I apologise for the delay in providing a final 
response but have been awaiting the conclusion of the review referenced in my first 
letter in order to fully respond to your matters of concern 1, 4 and 5.  I set out below for 
ease of reference those matters of concern as they appear in your PFD Report together 
with KCC’s responses. 

There was no evidence of a multi-agency planning meeting prior to Mr Savory’s 
discharge from Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother Hospital on 25 September 
2019. Nor was there evidence of what multi-agency procedures are in place 
relating to the safe discharge of patients with concurrent, mental health, 
substance misuse, social care, and physical health needs. 

Multi-agency planning: 

Having reviewed the records, it appears that there were discussions between agencies 
and professionals and with Mr Savory himself regarding his discharge from hospital, but 
it is accepted that there is no evidence of a formal multi-agency planning meeting. 
It has been identified through review that a multi-agency meeting was required due to 
the various needs that Mr Savory had and that all agencies needed to joint work to fully 
consider how these impacted together. Mr Savory required a plan detailing how to 
support him and all the factors that affected his life. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Mr Savory had multiple needs, and these needed to be considered in tandem by all 
agencies. To support this now, there are multi-agency protocols in place around co-
occurring conditions. An ‘Operational Protocol for Co-occurring Conditions (Mental 
Health and Substance Misuse Disorders)’ has been developed by Kent and Medway 
NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust (KMPT) with representatives from Kent and 
Medway Substance Misuse Services (including Forward Trust, Change Grow Live and 
Turning Point) and KCC Public Health. This protocol was published in November 2021 
and states this as its purpose: 

“This operational protocol is designed to give a clear framework within which all 
Kent and Medway Substance Misuse Services and Mental Health providers can 
operate with regard to providing comprehensive service user focused services to 
those with Co-existing Mental Health and Substance Misuse Disorders (Dual 
Diagnosis)”  

When there are disagreements between agencies around decisions being made, the 
Safeguarding Adults Board (SAB) ‘Resolving Practitioner Differences: Escalation Policy 
for Referrals and Adult Safeguarding’ can be utilised. This Policy was reviewed and 
updated in July 2022; the purpose of the policy sets out when and how differences 
must be addressed: 

“Members of the Safeguarding Adults Board are clear that whenever a 
practitioner, agency or service has a concern about the action or inaction of 
another, this must be addressed, and any challenges conducted in a 
professional and respectful manner. Practitioners and managers should 
always be prepared to review decisions and plans with an open mind” 

Links to the SAB website and policies are provided on the KCC Safeguarding webpage. 

Multi-agency procedures for safe discharge of patients with concurrent needs:  

Following the sad death of Mr Savory and due to changes to practice following COVID, 
KCC updated its ‘Hospital Discharge Service Policy and Operating Model’.  This new 
policy and operating model is designed to support the full implementation of discharge, 
and to aide this a set of discharge guidance action cards has been developed to 
summarise responsibilities for key roles within the hospital discharge process. 

The policy sets out three clear stages of discharge and these provide the need for 
acute and community health and social care to work in a fully synchronised way to 
ensure people are discharged in a timely manner but also to ensure that any social 
care assessments can commence at the first opportunity once a person has been 
discharged. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 There will be named leads for each Acute and Community Hospital which will be the 
KCC Short Term Pathways (STP) Team Manager, supported by the Senior Practitioner 
and Social Care Discharge Co-Ordinator in the first instance with escalation if required 
to the area Service Manager within STP. The expectation is that these named leads will 
attend discharge management meetings and together with health colleagues will 
provide social care advice and information, guidance as well as influencing and 
supporting the decision making process of the Multi-Disciplinary Teams (MDTs) for safe 
discharges of people via Discharge to Assess.  

People/patients who require social care support/assessment will be identified at the 
MDTs and accepted as a referral via the Ready to Transfer (RTT) form. This new policy 
helps to ensure that individuals’ needs are identified and considered pre and post 
discharge from hospital to ensure that physical and social needs are factored in within 
the discharge process. 

The evidence demonstrated that there was a lack of clarity as to the 
interrelationship between safeguarding duties under the Care Act and the 
operation of the Kent and Medway Multi-Agency Policy and Procedures to 
Support People that Self-Neglect or Demonstrate Hoarding Behaviour. 

In the 3 years following the sad passing of Mr Savory, there has been considerable 
work undertaken around the area of self-neglect.  

Kent and Medway Safeguarding Adults Board have recently published their updated 
‘Policy and Procedures to Support People that Self-Neglect or Demonstrate Hoarding 
Behaviour’. Following this update, a briefing was sent to all Adult Social Care staff on 
6th October 2022 and the changes were highlighted within that communication.  

This self-neglect policy now includes clearer categories of low, medium, and high risk. 
The policy makes clear the need for practitioners to have awareness of different duties 
and powers provided by legislation and of enforcement powers where necessary.  
There is also greater clarity around medium risk instances that do not meet the criteria 
for a Care Act 2014 section 42 safeguarding enquiry and how to manage these.  

In addition, KCC is currently developing a new self-neglect workflow within Mosaic 
(KCC information system). It is envisaged that this new workflow can be started at any 
point during Adult Social Care intervention with the person and will provide a complete 
summary of all actions taken related to self-neglect. The implementation of this 
workflow is anticipated by January 2023. 

KCC has also continued to undertake activities to raise practitioners’ awareness 
around the important subject of self-neglect and the importance of acting appropriately 
in response.  These have included: 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 •  Specific self-neglect and hoarding training courses,  
•  A briefing around a published Safeguarding Adults Review (SAR) concerning self-

neglect,  

•  Practitioner events discussing self-neglect with substance abuse and 

homelessness,  

•  A new self-neglect e-learning course and  
•  A section 11 Care Act briefing about when people decline or refuse an assessment 

and there are concerns about abuse, neglect, or mental capacity. 

It was unclear as to how information sharing operated in respect of service 
users who are identified as potentially having fluctuating mental capacity in 
respect of their care and support needs. 

In review, the issue of information sharing appears inter-linked with the multi-agency 
working comments earlier in this letter. As agencies were not working together to 
discuss plans and options, they equally were not sharing the information that they each 
possessed regarding Mr Savory’s fluctuating capacity.  Sharing information in this way 
in addition to breaking down decisions to a micro level should support a better 
understanding of capacity to make macro decisions such as decisions relating to 
residence and care.   

The importance of assessing capacity at a micro level will be added to KCC training 
and learning resources in relation to capacity assessments.  The following measures 
have already been taken to ensure that appropriate training and learning opportunities 
regarding mental capacity assessments and addictions are available to KCC 
practitioners: 

•  There is a Mental Capacity Assessment advanced training course which includes 

completions of complex capacity assessments. Learning and Development 
colleagues have confirmed that Information on substance misuse is included in the 
course content from November 2022, 

•  Within the Adult Social Care Core Skills Programme, ‘Topic 3’ includes an outline 

on responsibilities within the Mental Capacity Act for social care staff, 

•  All Adult Social Care staff can access on the Safeguarding KNet (KCC intranet) 

and Kent Academy Training pages the learning from tragedies and  

•  The Strategic Safeguarding Team have recently completed over 40 internal team 
talks across KCC. As part of these talks, teams were advised of the work that the 
Strategic Safeguarding Team complete and advised of the resources that are 
available on KNet and Training pages. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 T h e  n e e d f or  a g e n ci e s t o  pr o m ot e tr a n s p ar e n c y,  a c c o u nt a bilit y,  e vi d e n c e  of  d e ci si o n -
m a ki n g  pr o c e s s e s,  a n d  pr o m oti n g  a n  a p pr o pri at e l e v el  of i nt er v e nti o n t hr o u g h  a  m ulti -
a g e n c y  a p pr o a c h  ar e  all  k e y  a s p e ct s  of t h e  af or e m e nti o n e d  K M S A B ‘ P oli c y  a n d 
Pr o c e d ur e s t o  S u p p ort  P e o pl e t h at  S elf -N e gl e ct  or  D e m o n str at e  H o ar di n g  B e h a vi o ur’ 
w hi c h  w a s  u p d at e d i n  S e pt e m b er  2 0 2 2.    

I nf or m ati o n s h ari n g  s h o ul d  b e  m or e r o b u st  u n d er t h e s e  n e w/r e vi s e d  p oli ci e s  a n d 
pr o c e d ur e s.  I n  a d diti o n,  K C C r e m ai n  c o m mitt e d t o  a p pr o pri at e i nf or m ati o n  s h ari n g  b y 
c o nti n ui n g t o  b e  a  si g n at or y  o n t h e  K e nt  a n d  M e d w a y I nf or m ati o n  P art n er s hi p,  w hi c h 
pr o m ot e s  o p e n n e s s  a n d tr a n s p ar e n c y i n i nf or m ati o n  s h ari n g,  a s  w ell  a s  a p pr o pri at e 
g o v er n a n c e  a n d  s u p p ort,  w hi c h  a s si st s  u s t o  s h ar e  p er s o n al i nf or m ati o n l a wf ull y, 
s af el y,  a n d  s e c ur el y.  

K C C  al s o  w or k  c oll a b or ati v el y  wit h t h e  K e nt  a n d  M e d w a y  S af e g u ar di n g  A d ult s  B o ar d 
a n d  a d h er e t o  all  m ulti -a g e n c y  p oli ci e s  s u c h  a s t h e  K M S A B  g ui d a n c e  c all e d ‘ A  q ui c k 
g ui d e  - l e g al  b a si s f or i nf or m ati o n  s h ari n g  a n d  w h at  c a n l a wf ull y  b e  s h ar e d’.  T hi s  g ui d e 
w a s  u p d at e d i n  M a y  2 0 2 2.  

All  st aff  m e m b er s  wit hi n  A d ult  S o ci al  C ar e r e c ei v e  m a n d at or y  s af e g u ar di n g  a w ar e n e s s 
tr ai ni n g  w hi c h  e m p h a si s e s t h e i m p ort a n c e  of  u n d er st a n di n g t h e  C ar e  a n d  S u p p ort 
St at ut or y  G ui d a n c e f or  s af e g u ar di n g.   I n  a d diti o n, t h er e  ar e f urt h er  v ari o u s  c o ur s e s 
pr o vi d e d ,  w hi c h i n cl u d e i nf or m ati o n  o n l e g al fr a m e w or k s  s u c h  a s t h e  C ar e  A ct  2 0 1 4, 
M e nt al  C a p a cit y  A ct  2 0 0 5,  H u m a n  Ri g ht s  A ct  1 9 9 8,  a n d t h e  D at a  Pr ot e cti o n  A ct  2 0 1 8.  
All  of t h e s e l e g al fr a m e w or k s  will  h a v e r el e v a n c e t o  a  p er s o n’ s  w ell b ei n g  a n d 
e m p h a si s e t h e i m p ort a n c e  of  a p pr o pri at e i nf or m ati o n  s h ari n g.  

I tr u st t h at t h e i nf or m ati o n  c o nt ai n e d i n t hi s  a n d  m y  pr e vi o u s r e s p o n s e t o  y o ur  P F D 
R e p ort  pr o vi d e  a d e q u at e  a s s ur a n c e t o  y o u t h at  K C C  h a s t a k e n  st e p s t o  u n d er st a n d 
a n d  a d dr e s s  y o ur  m att er s  of  c o n c er n,  b ot h i nt er n all y  a n d i n  p art n er s hi p  wit h  ot h er 
a g e n ci e s,  a n d  will  c o nti n u e  stri vi n g t o i m pr o v e t h e  ar e a s i d e ntifi e d.  

Y o ur s f ait hf ull y  

C or p or at e  Dir e ct or  –  A d ult  S o ci al  C ar e  a n d  H e alt h

Related reports

Other reports by Ian Brownhill

See all →

More reports categorised “Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths”

See all →

Track East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.