Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022

Keith Nottle

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0189, written 14 Jun 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report14 Jun 2022
Reference2022-0189
DeceasedKeith Nottle
CoronerGordon Clow
Coroner areaNottingham City and Nottinghamshire
CategoryMental Health related deaths · Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths
Organisation namedNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published2

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

NOTE:  This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1  Nottinghamshire Healthcare Trust 
2  Turning Point 

1  CORONER 

I am Gordon CLOW, Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Nottingham City and 
Nottinghamshire 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 23 July 2021 I commenced an investigation into the death of Keith Andrew NOTTLE 
aged 48.  The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 13 June 2022.  The 
conclusion of the inquest was that Mr Nottle’s death was by accident, on the basis of him 
having taken an overdose as a cry for help, or to secure secondary mental health 
treatment, but which caused his death. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Mr Nottle experienced a protracted period of poor mental health.  He was successfully 
treated for symptoms of psychosis but many other aspects of his complex mental health 
difficulties were resistant to treatments provided.  On or shortly before 5 July 2021 Mr 
Nottle took an overdose of two of his prescribed medications.  He was discovered by 
emergency services to be extremely unwell and conveyed to hospital.  Despite all 
appropriate treatment being afforded, Mr Nottle died on 5 July 2021 from the effects of the 
overdose of medication. 

Mr Nottle’s mental health and wellbeing had deteriorated in the period leading up to his 
death.  He was experiencing symptoms which may have been the early signs of a relapse 
into psychosis.  He had been upset with the decision to discharge him from the local mental 
health team at the time that he returned to independent living, a decision upon which he 
had not been consulted and which had not been communicated directly to him. 

Both Mr Nottle’s family and a number of other agencies sought to secure the re-
engagement of the local mental health team in the months that followed.  All referrals were 
refused.  Mr Nottle’s GP was not provided with details of Mr Nottle’s diagnosis, advice as to 
how to manage Mr Nottle’s psychiatric medications, or of circumstances in which Mr Nottle 
should be referred back to the local mental health team. 

There were missed opportunities to intervene and assess Mr Nottle in the period leading up 
to his death.  It is not possible to determine whether or not this would have changed the 
outcome.  At this time, Mr Nottle was experiencing a range of other social stressors 
including his isolation arising from the pandemic restrictions, his difficulties with accessing 
employment, and his return to independent living.  He had experienced significant 
psychological difficulties which had not proved amenable to treatement.  Any or all of these 
factors may have played a part in his decision making.  It is also possible that his decision 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 making became affected by delusional thoughts and beliefs. 

Mr Nottle’s behaviour in taking a substantial overdose of his prescribed medication was 
either a cry for help or an attempt to secure the involvement of additional specialist mental 
health services.  He did not intend his own death. 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. 
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken.  In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 
(brief summary of matters of concern) 

Evidence was heard regarding the operation of a triage for patients who may be 
experiencing a mental health crisis.  A practice had developed of bypassing specialist 
mental health assessment by means of telephone workers making their own judgments 
about the level of risk a person presents to themselves and others, and a judgment about 
whether or not they require urgent mental health assessment and / or treatment, based on 
a very limited criteria.  This had the result of only a very small proportion of potentially 
unwell patients being considered by a person with qualifications to assess and treat mental 
health.  This was a culture and practice which stood in conflict with the procedure the Trust 
had in writing for the role of the telephone workers. 

I was also concerned regarding the apparent lack of involvement of a care co-ordinator at 
the Trust, given that a variety of agencies and persons were involved in seeking to assist 
and treat Mr Nottle. 

Lastly, I was concerned that there was evidence of a lack of clarity of thinking within the 
multi-disciplinary team in relation to the decision to discharge Mr Nottle and the apparent 
recalcitrance of the multi-disciplinary team in relation to repeated re-referrals into the 
service.  This may be linked with the lack of care co-ordination or may be a cultural or 
practice issue within the operation of the multi-disciplinary team. 

It is requested that consideration be given to:-

1. Clarifying the role of telephone workers and the steps necessary to ensure that the
government guidance regarding access to mental health services is followed so far
as is possible within the available resources;

2. Steps to ensure that, for individuals with complex mental health needs involving a
range of providers, there is co-ordination of care to ensure that appropriate care is
in place and, where necessary, a consistent approach is taken to patients by
different organisations or teams working with the patient; and

3. Review of the multi-disciplinary team’s decision-making process in light of the

issues identified by Mr Nottle’s circumstances.

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your 
organisations have the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by August 09, 2022.  I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 timetable for action.  Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons 

The family of Keith Nottle 
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust 

 of Cripps (University) Health Centre 

I have also sent it to 

The Care Quality Commission 
The Department for Health 
Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Clinical Commissioning Group 

who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all 
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. 

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or 
of interest. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. 
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of 
interest. 

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the 
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9  Dated: 14/06/2022 

Gordon CLOW 
Assistant Coroner for 
Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Responses

2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from NHS Nottinghamshire Healthcare (PDF)
Chief Executive’s Office 
The Resource 
Duncan Macmillan House 
Porchester Road 
Nottingham 
NG3 6AA 

Reference: 
E-mail: 

Date:  3 August 2022. 

Private and Confidential 

Mr. Clow 
HM Assistant Coroner for Nottingham and Nottinghamshire 
Nottinghamshire Coroner’s Office 
The Council House 
Old Market Square 
Nottingham 
NG1 2DT 

Dear Mr. Clow, 

Please find below the organisational response to the recently received Preventing Future Deaths 
Report, following the unfortunate death of Mr. Nottle. In responding, we have worked closely in 
conjunction with Turning Point. 

The Matters of concern raised within the report:  

1.  Clarifying the role of telephone workers and the steps necessary to ensure that the 

government guidance regarding access to mental health services is followed so far as is 
possible within the available resources. 

Nottinghamshire Healthcare and Turning Point are jointly commissioned by Nottingham and 
Nottinghamshire Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) to provide a 24-hour Urgent Access Mental 
Health telephone service. The purpose of the telephone line is to provide support, advice and triage 
across Nottingham and Nottinghamshire to people requesting help with any aspect of mental health. 
This includes practical immediate support and guidance or assistance to navigate any further support 
needed; and immediate transfer to Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment (CRHT) staff if required.  

The first point of contact are Recovery Workers employed by Turning Point and co-located in the City 
Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment (CRHT) team office at Highbury Hospital. The staff are co-
located so that they may have immediate assistance from CRHT staff if required. The Turning Point 
Team Leader and CRHT staff have the ability to listen in to calls if necessary. This is carried out via a 
dual listening device that allows a second set of headphones to be plugged in. The UK Mental Health 
Triage Scale (Appendix 1) is utilised to guide staff as to when a call should be transferred directly to a 
CRHT member of staff  

During the evidence at the inquest the Turning Point staff member stated that Turning Point staff may 
be placed on the line within their first week of starting work, after shadowing a small number of shifts. 
It was also stated that there are frequent times when calls are not transferred to CRHT in line with the 
UK Mental Health Triage Scale  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 In order to respond to the PFD senior members of Adult Mental Health and the Deputy Director for 
Mental Health Services have met with national and local senior staff from Turning Point. We have 
sought assurance from Turning Point regarding the training that staff receive. All staff complete the 
Turning Point Mental Health Foundation Programme which includes mandatory e-learning modules 
alongside face-to-face training sessions facilitated by the Turning Point Learning and Development 
Team. 

The Recovery Workers also undertake a competency assessment to ensure they have a high level of 
competence in managing calls, using correct systems and utilising appropriate escalation protocols in 
relation to risk and safety management. The competency assessment has been updated in light of this 
inquest. The updated competency assessment is attached (Appendix 2).  

As well as the Turning Point training, staff also receive a face-to-face training session from the CRHT 
staff as part of their induction. This is based on the Trust’s e-learning package for risk assessment and 
management. 

We have been assured by Turning Point that in her evidence regarding transfers to CRHT the staff 
member was referring to June 2021 when the Urgent Access line was first set up, where there were 
some initial issues with the transfer of calls.  The local guidance for the UK Mental Health Triage Scale 
has been reviewed with a more robust escalation process should there be any difficulty encountered in 
transfer of a call.   

The Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) (Appendix 3) for the Urgent Access line has been reviewed 
and shared with all relevant staff via email and also during supervision and team meetings.  

A new digital telephony system is being introduced into the Trust which will provide greater insight into 
call activity. All calls will be recorded which will enable the roll out of regular audit. It is anticipated that 
the telephony system will be operational by Mid-August 2022.  

An audit system is being introduced whereby telephone recordings of a sample of telephone calls will 
be listened to monthly and utilised for audit and training purposes. This will include monitoring if the 
calls are being handled in accordance with the SOP and taking remedial action if needed.  

2.  Steps to ensure that, for individuals with complex mental health needs involving a range 
of providers, there is co-ordination of care to ensure that appropriate care is in place 
and, where necessary, a consistent approach is taken to patients by different 
organisations or teams working with the patient; and 

3.  Review of the multi-disciplinary team’s decision-making process in light of the issues 

identified by Mr Nottle’s circumstances. 

Our response to issues 2 and 3 will be taken together as these represent issues in regard to the 
decision making within the LMHT. We acknowledge that the team conflated the two issues of Mr 
Nottle living remotely and a clinical decision as to whether secondary care services were the right 
place for Mr Nottle to receive his care. There was not a comprehensive care plan, there was a lack of 

The Resource, Duncan Macmillan House,    
Porchester Road, Nottingham NG3 6AA 

Chair:

,                                 

Chief Executive: 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 liaison with the GP, with Mr Nottle’s parents and with Mr Nottle himself. In addition, multiple re-
referrals of Mr Nottle to the team were not acted upon. These concerns highlighted that expected 
systems and protocols had not been complied with and therefore indicated that a poor culture has 
developed within the team which has led to poor decision making and, at times, a loss of compassion. 

In order to address these issues of culture and practice within the team a programme of Quality 
Assurance work is planned. This will consist of a Culture Review and a Quality Standards review. 

The Culture Review will be based on the closed culture indicators set out by the Care Quality 
Commission (CQC) (Appendix 4). This commences on 3rd August 2022 over a 3-month period. During 
this period there will be regular contacts by the Quality Assurance team to monitor improvement.  

The Quality Standards review, led by the Quality Assurance Team, will take place on 19th September 
2022. This will look at the 5 key areas and fundamental standards of the CQC, namely is the service 
Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well Led. 

Both of these reviews will include:   

•  a thematic review of serious incidents and complaints involving the team 
• 

live observation of Multi-Disciplinary team meetings and decisions which are made with in the 
meetings. This will involve how referrals are managed and how discharge decisions are taken  
review of care plans including involvement of patients and carers, and where multiple out of 
hours calls are made to the CRHT 

• 

•  Views of staff, service users and carers about the service 

The Person-Centred Care audit tool (Appendix 5) will be another key element of this review. 

Following both these reviews an improvement plan will be developed to assist the team in making 
required changes in a supportive and achievable manner.  The improvement plan will be monitored to 
completion on a monthly basis, overseen by the local management team (Service Manager, 
Operational Manager and Matron). Once considered complete, the improvement plan will be 
presented at the Quality and Risk meeting and signed off by the General Manager. An audit will then 
be developed and carried out twelve months later in order to understand the efficacy of changes 
made. 

I  hope  the  information  above  provides  the  assurance  that  we  have  and  continue  to  consider  your 
recommendations seriously, that we are actively seeking to clarify and improve the services we provide 
by implementing the actions outlined. The Trust will be able to share the findings of the review and initial 
improvement plan with you by 30 November 2022 and agreement made at that point in relation to any 
further updates on progress of the implementation of the plan you may wish to receive. 

Yours sincerely  

The Resource, Duncan Macmillan House,    
Porchester Road, Nottingham NG3 6AA 

Chair: 

Chief Executive: 

 
 
 
 
                                 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Chief Executive 

Enc  Appendix 1 – UK Mental Health Triage Scale 

Appendix 2 – Access Line Competency Assessment Form 
Appendix 3 – Standard Operating Procedure for the Access Line 
Appendix 4 – CQC Closed Cultures Guidance  
Appendix 5 – Person-Centred Care Self-Audit Tool 

The Resource, Duncan Macmillan House,    
Porchester Road, Nottingham NG3 6AA 

Chair: 

Chief Executive:
Response from Turning Point (PDF)
Turning Point  
The Exchange 
3 New York Street 
Manchester 
M1 4HN  

T 
F 

www.turning-point.co.uk 

9th August 2022 

Prevention of Future Deaths Notice for Keith Nottle – Turning Point Response 

It is our understanding that Turning Point is only being asked to give consideration to paragraph 1 in 
section 5 of the regulation 28 report, jointly with Nottinghamshire Healthcare Trust; we have 
discussed this with colleagues from the Trust and they agree with this interpretation of the report. 

We have reviewed and refreshed the key factors in the role of the helpline (telephone) workers with 
colleagues in Nottinghamshire Healthcare Trust, including when and how referrals are escalated to 
the Crisis Team, training, supervision, monitoring and audit. 

We are also working with commissioners and the Trust to refresh the service specification. 

We have met with our colleagues from Nottinghamshire Healthcare Trust on a number of occasions 
and agreed a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the flow of referrals from the helpline workers 
to the Crisis Team. This SOP is in line with the service specification and national guidance regarding 
access to mental health services. 

We have met with the team of helpline workers and their team leader and ensured that they are 
familiar with the detail of the SOP. 

We have introduced additional monitoring and audits to ensure that all helpline workers are 
following the SOP and any variance is addressed in a timely way. 

The audits will check a sample of cases each month against the SOP and our additional monitoring 
incudes regular listening in to the calls by a manager or team leader. 

We have also agreed a competency framework to provide assurance that our staff are confident in 
their ability to handle calls and the escalation process regarding risk, amongst other areas.  

We, alongside our colleagues in the Trust, are also introducing a new digital telephony system which 
will give both organisations better insight into call activity. 

We believe that these steps will effectively address the concerns that were raised regarding ‘culture 
and practice’ in the helpline service. 

CHIEF EXECUTIVE: LORD VICTOR ADEBOWALE CBE 
TURNING POINT IS A REGISTERED CHARITY, NO. 234887, A REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORD AND A COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE NO. 793558 (ENGLAND & WALES) 
REGISTERED OFFICE: STANDON HOUSE, 21 MANSELL STREET, LONDON, E1 8AA. T:020 7481 7600  F:020 7481 7620  www.turning-point.co.uk

Related reports

Other reports by Gordon Clow

See all →

More reports categorised “Mental Health related deaths”

See all →

Track Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.