Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025

Maureen Powell

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0293, written 11 Jun 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report11 Jun 2025
Reference2025-0293
DeceasedMaureen Powell
CoronerGordon Clow
Coroner areaNottingham City and Nottinghamshire
CategoryCare Home Health related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:

1 Red Oaks Care Community

1

CORONER

I am Gordon CLOW, Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Nottingham City and
Nottinghamshire

2

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.

3

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST

On 17 October 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of Maureen POWELL aged
95. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 10 June 2025. The conclusion
of the inquest was that:

Maureen Powell died from severe frailty, a natural disease. The pressure ulcer she
experienced contributed to the medical cause of death.

4

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH

After a long and active life, Maureen Powell suffered a series of health problems in the
months leading up to her death, resulting in a very long stay in hospital. She had suffered
a stroke and a fractured neck of femur, as well as other medical problems, and was unable
to fully recover. She moved from hospital into a nursing home.

Maureen Powell’s death was from severe frailty but this was contributed to by a large and
serious pressure ulcer. That ulcer developed and worsened whilst Maureen Powell was in a
nursing home during the period following her discharge from hospital.

It was the policy of that nursing home to provide a high standard of care for residents at
risk of pressure damage as well as those who had suffered pressure damage. Suitable
equipment and caring regimes were available to provide this support to reduce the risks of
the damage worsening or to heal damage which had occurred. Many aspects of the care
which was indicated for the pressure damage were not implemented. This more than
minimally contributed to the development of the sacral pressure ulcer which, in turn,
contributed to the death.

5

CORONER’S CONCERNS

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern.
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:
(brief summary of matters of concern)

1. Repositioning was undertaken, but recording and implementation was, at times, patchy;

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

 Care plans were not updated regularly in line with good practice and were not

There was a delay in putting an appropriate bed surface in place;
On at least one occasion the airflow mattress was incorrectly adjusted, reducing its

2. There was widespread non-compliance with the regime of daily skin inspections in the
period of time that Maureen was a resident at the Nursing Home. Not one skin inspection
was recorded during Maureen’s stay;
3.
always updated when the circumstances required;
4.
5.
efficacy;
6.
7.
got beyond the ability of the in-house nursing staff to manage and treat the wound;
8.
9.
10.
11.
pressure damage was identified.

The family were not kept up to date about deterioration in the wound;
The referral to tissue viability was made too late as it occurred after the wound had

No internal investigation was undertaken;
Key records were not kept or were lost or destroyed;

Inaccurate reports were made to the CQC and social care about the incidents; and

There was an apparent lack of clear guidance to staff as to what to do if or when

6

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or
your organisation) have the power to take such action.

7

YOUR RESPONSE

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by August 06, 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period.

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
COPIES and PUBLICATION

8

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons

Red Oaks Care Community

I have also sent it to

CQC - Care Quality Commission
Sherwood Medical Partnership - Forest Town
Nottinghamshire County Council
Nottinghamshire Healthcare Trust - NHCT

who may find it useful or of interest.

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or
of interest.

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form.
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of
interest.

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner.

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

 9

Dated: 11/06/2025

Gordon CLOW
Assistant Coroner for
Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire

Regulation 28 – After Inquest
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Red Oaks Care Home (PDF)
Red Oaks Care Home 

Dear Coroner,  

We  write  in  connection  with  the  Regulation 28  report  which  was  issued  in  connection  with  the 

Inquest  into  the  death  of  Maureen  Powell,  who  was  a  resident  of  Red  Oaks  Care  Community 

(“the Home”).  

The  Inquest  into  the  death  of  Maureen  Powell  was  held  at  Nottingham  Coroner’s  Court on  12 

May  and  10  June  2025.  Prior  to  and  during  the  course  of  the  Inquest  the  Home  provided 

evidence to assist your inquiry into the care arrangements in place for Maureen Powell whilst a 

resident  at  the  Home,  and  the  reflection  which  has  taken  place  following  Maureen’s  death  to 

further strengthen the Home’s existing procedures moving forward.  

A  Regulation  28  Report  was  however  issued  on  11  June  2025  which  raised  concerns  with 

regard the implementation of the Home’s systems and procedures for the delivery of pressure 

management  care  to  residents,  communications made to  Maureen’s  family and  the  CQC,  and 

the investigation processes followed.  

It  is  relevant  to  explain  at  the  outset  that  we  have  reflected  seriously  on  the  contents  of  your 

Report, and remain saddened that you considered this a necessary step despite the evidence 

given.  

Pressure Management 

The Report acknowledges that it was the Home’s policy to provide a high standard of care for 

residents at risk of pressure damage as well as those who had suffered pressure damage. It is 

also acknowledged that the Home had in place suitable equipment and caring regimes to 

reduce the risks of pressure damage worsening to heal damage which had occurred. It is 

however noted, and accepted, that these systems and procedure were not sufficiently 

implemented in practice on this occasion.  

The Home reflected significantly prior to the Inquest and had taken steps to strengthen the 

processes in place to ensure compliance against the systems and procedures in place. We do 

not seek to repeat the entirety of the evidence given below, but would draw attention to the 

following specific factors in respect of the measures in place for oversight of pressure 

management care:  

 
 
 
 
 
   Care staff are required to complete SSKIN Inspections Records every 24 hours, with any 

concerns reported to the Registered Nurse on duty. The SSKIN Inspection Records are 

now in turn audited by management upon the generation of daily reports.  

  Weekly  and  monthly  audits  are  conducted  by  management  in  relation  to  care  records 

relating to residents’ pressure care and skin integrity, for the purpose of ensuring that all 

actions have been completed in a timely manner, any external professional input required 

has  been  sought  accordingly,  and  that  care  plans  and  risk  assessments  have  been 

reviewed and updated as appropriate.  

  An  audit  schedule  is  in  place  which  captures  all  audits  on  a  daily,  weekly  and  monthly 

basis.  Audits  are  completed  across  the  different  areas  of  the  Home,  to  ensure  that  a 

‘fresh eyes’ review of care delivery is completed. The Home Manager then completes a 

check  of  the  audits  which  have  taken  place  from  a  compliance  perspective,  before 

signing off against these.  

  All  records,  including  for  wound  management,  are  now  held  electronically  on  the  care 

system enabling increased oversight by the management team.  

  The mattress type to be supplied to a resident is determined following the consideration 

of  a  number  of  factors  including  an  assessment  of  the  resident’s  weight,  diet  and  fluid 

intake,  mobility,  skin  integrity  and  capacity.  Airflow  mattresses  are  checked  on  a  daily 

basis  by  the  housekeeper  to  monitor  that  the  correct  mattress  is  in  place,  that  it  is 

functional  and  that  it  is  set  to  the  correct  resident  weight.  These  checks  are  again 

recorded on the care system to enable oversight of compliance against the procedure.  

  Following further reflection at the Inquest, a documented Skin Integrity Protocol has now 

been  introduced,  formalising  the  instructions  which  the  nursing  team  and  carers  have 

received  through  their  respective  training  and  providing  a  single  point  of  reference  for 

them  when  escalating  pressure  concerns.  The  Protocol  encompasses  guidance  on  the 

importance  of  ensuring  that  next  of  kin  are  kept  informed  of  developments,  the 

requirements of the duty of candour and guidance on the delivery of this, amongst other 

relevant matters.  

More broadly, it was explained that a new Registered Manager was appointed to the home on 7 

October 2024, with a new Deputy Manager having since also been introduced. The Registered 

 
                                                          
 
 Manager now conducts daily walk arounds of the Home for the purpose of reviewing resident 

care and ensuring that the correct measures are in place. 

A Clinical Lead role has also separately been introduced to provide additional support with care 

planning, evaluations, audits and the provision of care to residents, amongst other matters.  

In addition, the Operations Manager conducts weekly unannounced visits to the Home to 

provide an additional level of oversight of compliance against the procedures in place. These 

are supplemented by additional focused visits for the purpose of assessing any areas of lessons 

learned across other services, with any learnings and remedial actions identified reported to the 

Registered Managers for dissemination to the staff employed at each home. Full compliance 

visits are separately undertaken on a quarterly basis, capturing all areas of the service. A 

Regional Manager has also now been employed to provide additional compliance support and 

oversight.  

Senior Management meetings are now held on a quarterly basis, and manager supervisions 

completed on a bi-monthly basis again providing an additional layer of oversight and 

management to the service and its management team.  

Additional Observations 

With regard the additional observations made at points 8 to 10 of the Report, we can advised as 

follows:  

  Point  8  –  The  Home  has  in  place  a  documented  policy  concerning  the  requirement  to 

undertake  an  internal  investigation  in  relevant  circumstances.  All  staff  have  received  a 

copy  of  the  policy  and  are  familiar  with  the  requirements  of  this  to  ensure  that  an 

investigation is undertaken in all circumstances that trigger this.   

  Point 9 - The Home utilises an electronic care record system where resident records are 

held.  Electronic  care  records  are  now  checked  by  the  Registered  Manager,  Deputy 

Manager  and  Clinical  Lead  during  each  shift,  for  the  purposes  of  ensuring  that  all 

relevant  documentation  and  entries are  in place for each  resident.  This is  in  addition  to 

the daily walk around checks referred to above.  

Separately, such matters will be considered during the checks and audits undertaken by 

the Operations Manager, providing a secondary layer of oversight to monitor that the 

processes are being followed correctly.  

 
                                                          
 
   Point 10 – Previously it was the responsibility of the Home Manager, as the responsible 

person,  to  complete  any  necessary  safeguarding  or  CQC  notifications.  Following  the 

Inquest,  this  process  has  been  amended  to  require  that  all  serious  injury  notification 

reports must be sent to the Operations Manager for review prior to submission.  

Accordingly, significant steps have been taken by the Home to strengthen the systems and 

procedures in place to monitor the correct implementation of care arrangements for 

residents, which are considered to be appropriate in all the circumstances.

Related reports

Other reports by Gordon Clow

See all →

More reports categorised “Care Home Health related deaths”

See all →

Track Care Home Health related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Care Home Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.