Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022

Michael Vince

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0198, written 27 Jun 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report27 Jun 2022
Reference2022-0198
DeceasedMichael Vince
CoronerGraeme Irvine
Coroner areaEast London
CategoryAlcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Mental Health related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published2

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

MRG IRVINE 
ACTING  SENIOR CORONER 

EAST LONDON 

Walthamstow Coroner's Court, Queens Road  Walthamstow, E17 8QP 

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO  PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

Ref: 14161785 

REGULATION 28  REPORT TO  PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS  BEING SENT TO: 

1. 

2. 

Goodmayes Hospital, Goodmayes , llford , IG3  8XJ 

,  Acting  CEO,  North  East  London  Foundation  Trust, 

 - High St Surgery,  219  High  Street,  Hornchurch,  RM11  3XT 

1 

CORONER 

I am Graeme Irvine,  acting  senior coroner,  for the coroner area of East London 

2 

CORONER'S LEGAL  POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph  7,  Schedule 5,  of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and  Regulations 28 and  29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 
http://www.legislation .gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/S/paragraph/7 
http://www.legislation .gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 

3 

INVESTIGATION and  INQUEST 

On  19th  June  2021  I commenced  an  investigation  into  the  death  of Michael  John  Vince, 
62  years old . The  investigation concluded  at the end  of the  inquest on  22nd June 2022. 
I made a determination of a Open  conclusion along with  a short narrative; 

"On  19th  June  2021  Mr  Michael  John  Vince  was  found  unresponsive  at  his  home 
address having taken  a  voluntary overdose 
.  Despite  the  best efforts of his 
friends  and emergency services he  was declared dead 
later that day. It has not been possible to  determine Mr Vince's intent." 

The medical cause of death was: 
1 a. 

 toxicity 

1 

 
 
 
 4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE  DEATH 

Mr Vince was a patient of the community mental health team , receiving treatment for 
schizo-affective disorder.  One of Mr Vince's medications was 
insomnia. 

, prescribed for 

In  the days prior to  his death,  Mr Vince appeared low in  mood and  during  an 
assessment by  a paramedic,  complained  about his inability to  sleep and  his anxiety 

On  19th  June 2021  Mr Vince was found  deceased  having apparently taken  an  overdose 

 Toxicology found  a level 

  in  Mr Vince's bloodstream twenty 

times  higher than  therapeutic levels. 

5 

CORONER'S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed  matters giving  rise to  concern . In 
my  opinion there  is a risk that future deaths could  occur unless action  is taken . In the 
circumstances it is  my  statutory duty to  report to you . 

The  MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows .  -

1.  The NICE guidelines for 

 indicate that it is a suitable  medication for the 
short term treatment of insomnia, it advises against prolonged  use due to  risk of 
tolerance and withdrawal symptoms.  Mr Vince is said to  have been  prescribed 

 for 20 years. 

2.  No evidence exists to  support that Mr Vince's GP or community  mental health 

team  meaningfully reviewed  his prescription 

3.  Evidence of Mr Vince 's dependence upon 

was not shared by  his GP 

with the mental health  trust. 

4.  The frequency with wh ich  Mr Vince was administering his PRN 

 was 

never monitored. 

6 

ACTION  SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In  my opinion action should  be taken to prevent future deaths and  I believe you 
[AND/OR your organisation]  have the power to take such action. 

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You  are  under a duty to  respond  to this report with in 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely  by  18th August 2022. I, the coroner, may  extend the period . 

Your response  must contain details of action taken  or proposed to  be taken , setting out 
the timetable for action . Otherwise you  must explain why no action  is  proposed . 

8 

COPIES and  PUBLICATION

I have sent a copy of my  report to the Ch ief Coroner and to the following  Interested 
Persons:  The family  of Mr Vince,  The Care Quality Commission , The General Medical 
Council,  The Secretary of State for Health & Social Care. I have also sent it to the  local 
Director of Public Health who may find  it useful or of interest. 

I am  also  under a duty to  send  a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and  all 
interested  persons who in  my  opinion  should  receive  it. 

I may  also send  a copy of your response to any other person who I believe  may find  it 
useful or of interest. 

2 

 
 
 The Chief Coroner may  publish  either or both  in  a complete or redacted  or summary 
form.  He  may  send a copy  of this report to  any  person who he  b  lieves may find  it useful 
or of interest. 

You  may  make representations to  me,  the coroner,  at the time 
the release or the  publication of your response. 

9 

[DATE]  27th  June 2022 

[SIGNED  BY CORONER] 

3

Responses

2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from High St Surgery (PDF)
High Street Surgery
219 High Street
Hornchurch

Essex

RM11 3XT

17 August 2022

Graeme Irving

Acting Senior Coroner

East London Coroner’s Service
Adult Learning College

127 Ripple Road

Barking |G11 7PB

Dear Mr Irving,

Re: Inquest Touching the Death of Mr Michael John Vince Regulation 28: Report to
Prevent Future Deaths

Thank you for sending the Prevention of Future Deaths Report regarding the death of Mr
Michael Vince, and providing me an opportunity to comment on the matters of concern
raised.

Before responding, | would like to express my sincere condolences to the family of Mr Vince
for their loss.

| have carefully considered the Report. Actions taken by myself and my practice in response
to the concerns raised are described below. ,

Concern 1:

The NICE quidelines for Zopiclone indicate that it is a suitable medication for the short-term
treatment of insomnia, it advises against prolonged use due to risk of tolerance and
withdrawal symptoms. Mr Vince is said to have been prescribed Zopiclone for 20 years.

Concern 2:

No evidence exists to support that Mr Vince’s GP or community mental health team
meaningfully reviewed his prescription for Zopicione.

Concern 4:

The frequency with which Mr Vince was administering his PRN Zopiclone was never monitored.

Page | of 3

Response to Concerns 1, 2 and 4

In response to the above concerns, the following actions have been undertaken:
A. Clinical Audit of all patients prescribed Zopiclone over the past 2 years:

The report contains concerns as to the monitoring and review of Mr Vince’s Zopiclone. In
response, our practice determined to undertake a comprehensive audit and clinical
review of all patients prescribed Zopiclone.

A review of practice records for all patients prescribed Zopiclone over the last 2 years was
performed. A summary of the results is as follows:

e Acute or one-off prescription of Zopiclone — 22 patients
e Repeat prescription of Zopicione — 16 patients

All patients currently taking Zopiclone were contacted for a structured medication review
undertaken by myself. The review was guided by best practice guidelines for the
prescribing of Zopicione. The result of the medication reviews was that the majority of
patients on repeat prescriptions had their repeat prescribing ended. Some patients were
referred to the Trust’s Mental Health Service for further review and management of their
Zopiclone administration.

After the initial structured medication review, a second cycle review of patients on repeat
Zopiclone prescriptions was undertaken. This showed that only 4 patients remained on
repeat Zopiclone. Two of these patients are scheduled for further review, and two remain
on long term Zopiclone and are scheduled for 6 monthly review.

B. Implementation of Z-Drug Protocol

| have drafted a local practice Protocol for Z-Drugs which has been implemented as at 29
July 2022. A copy of the Protocol is included with this letter.

The protocol was drafted following my review of best practice guidelines for the
prescribing and management of patients on Zopiclone and other Z-Drug hypnotics. The
protocol includes links to relevant NICE guidelines and a comprehensive resource pack
produced by the Greater Manchester Medicines Management Group included as an ©
appendix. It also includes a Good Sleep Guide to assist in advising patients with non-
pharmaceutical methods to manage insomnia.

The policy requires regular review of patients prescribed Z-Drug hypnotics being a
minimum of 4 weeks for newly prescribed patients, and at 6-monthly intervals for patients
on long term treatment and after review by Mental Health Services.

C. Discussion and Education of Practice Staff

Meetings have been held with practice staff to alert them t@ the new protocol, and to
advise them to refer all patients requesting repeat prescriptions of Z-Drugs to myself for
medication review.

Page 2 of 3

A notice has been placed in the practice waiting room for the information of patients
regarding the practice’s Z-Drug protocol.

We will continue to monitor the above actions in our regular practice meetings.
Concern 3:

Evidence of Mr Vince’s dependence upon Zopiclone was not shared by his GP with the mental
health trust.

Response to Concern 3

The North East London Foundation Trust (NELFT) Mental Health Service held a stakeholder
meeting on 14 July 2022 to discuss the Coronial recommendations, as well as the issue of
prescribing of Z-Drugs generally. The meeting included representatives from the NELFT
medication safety team. i was invited and attended this meeting which was a very useful
opportunity to discuss clinical collaboration with the Trust regarding patients on Z-Drug
hypnotics.

At that meeting the importance of proper communication between local GP’s, the NELFT
Mental Health Team and other clinical services was discussed. It was agreed that review of
hypnotics was the responsibility of the primary prescriber, but also the prescriptions should
be reviewed by the Trust clinicians when in the scope of treatment provided by that clinician.

The Trust committed to undertaking a wider audit of Z-Drug prescribing within the NELFT
localities which will be led by the Trust pharmacy services. They will also be developing a safe-
prescribing training package and will include education of local GP’s in their roll-out of this
package.

For my part, | have commenced more proactive referral of patients who appear dependent
upon Z-Drug hypnotics for review and advice by specialist NELFT Mental Health services. This
has been assisted by the response of the NELFT to the Coronial recommendations and the
discussion and collaboration that has resulted. My practice’s Z-Drug Protocol includes a
requirement for structured medication review for patients on long term Z-Drugs with mental
health issues, and a requirement to notify the Mental Health Team for those patients who
request additional 2 drugs.

Thank you again for your referring your concerns regarding the care of Mr Vince. If you would
like any further information regarding our response to the concerns, please contact me on

i

Yours Sincerely

Enclosed: High Street Practice Z-Drug Protocol

Page 3 of 3
Response from North East London Foundation Trust (PDF)
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL  
Mr Graeme Irvine 
HM Coroner 
The Adult College of Barking & Dagenham 
127 Ripple Rd 
Barking 
IG11 7PB 

Sent by email to:  
coroners@walthamforest.gov.uk; and  
@walthamforest.gov.uk 

Your ref:            G1/sc/14161785 
Our ref:              1127 

Dear Sir,  

Trust Head Office 
CEME Centre 
West Wing 
Marsh Way 
Rainham 
RM13 8GX 

 Tel: 0300 555 1298 

5 August 2022 

Re: Inquest touching upon the death of Mr Michael John Vince 

I refer to your letter dated 27th June 2022 and the Regulation 28 report, detailing your concerns 
related to the care provided by NELFT NHS Foundation Trust (‘NELFT’) as follows: 

1.  Mr Vince was prescribed with Zopiclone for 20 years, despite the NICE guidelines 

indicating that Zopiclone is not suitable for long term use.  

2.  There was no evidence that prescription of Zopiclone was meaningfully reviewed by 

NELFT’s Community Mental Health team or GP. 

3.  Evidence of Mr Vince’s dependence upon Zopiclone was not shared by his GP with the 

Trust. 

4.  The frequency with which Mr Vince was administering his PRN Zopiclone was never 

monitored. 

We have taken the concerns expressed by you very seriously and undertook further consultations 
with the Chief Pharmacist and other members of the MDT. On 06/07/22 we arranged a wider 
NELFT learning review led by our pharmacy department and developed an action plan to address 
the  identified  further  learning  following  the  Inquest.  The  event  was  attended  by  health  care 
professionals at NELFT and primary care including the practice which was directly involved in the 
care of Mr Vince. 

Chair: 
Acting chief executive: 

www.nelft.nhs.uk 

 
                             
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The  current  practice  at  NELFT  is  that  whoever  prescribes  the  medication,  is  responsible  for 
monitoring the compliance with medication administration regime. However, in light of learning 
from this inquest we have updated our practice as highlighted within the attached action plan and 
will monitor implementation of the updated practice jointly with the chief pharmacist. 

We have agreed a number of actions to address concerns raised by you and enclose action plan 
detailing the Trust’s efforts to improve the safety and quality of care provided by NELFT.  

I would like to express my heartfelt condolences to the family of Mr Vince and sincerely apologise 
for the shortcomings in care provided by NELFT identified in our Serious Incident report as well 
as at the inquest hearing on 21st June 2022.  

I would also like to thank you for your full and fearless investigation and for raising your concerns 
with the Trust, enabling us to undertake further learning from the very sad death of Mr Vince.   

If you would like to discuss these actions further, please kindly feel free to contact my office on 
0300 555 1298. 

Yours Sincerely 

Chief Executive Officer (acting)   

Chair: 
Acting chief executive: 

www.nelft.nhs.uk

Related reports

Other reports by Graeme Irvine

See all →

More reports categorised “Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths”

See all →

Track Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.