Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0198, written 27 Jun 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 27 Jun 2022 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2022-0198 |
| Deceased | Michael Vince |
| Coroner | Graeme Irvine |
| Coroner area | East London |
| Category | Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths · Mental Health related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
MRG IRVINE ACTING SENIOR CORONER EAST LONDON Walthamstow Coroner's Court, Queens Road Walthamstow, E17 8QP REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) Ref: 14161785 REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. 2. Goodmayes Hospital, Goodmayes , llford , IG3 8XJ , Acting CEO, North East London Foundation Trust, - High St Surgery, 219 High Street, Hornchurch, RM11 3XT 1 CORONER I am Graeme Irvine, acting senior coroner, for the coroner area of East London 2 CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www.legislation .gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/S/paragraph/7 http://www.legislation .gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 19th June 2021 I commenced an investigation into the death of Michael John Vince, 62 years old . The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 22nd June 2022. I made a determination of a Open conclusion along with a short narrative; "On 19th June 2021 Mr Michael John Vince was found unresponsive at his home address having taken a voluntary overdose . Despite the best efforts of his friends and emergency services he was declared dead later that day. It has not been possible to determine Mr Vince's intent." The medical cause of death was: 1 a. toxicity 1 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Mr Vince was a patient of the community mental health team , receiving treatment for schizo-affective disorder. One of Mr Vince's medications was insomnia. , prescribed for In the days prior to his death, Mr Vince appeared low in mood and during an assessment by a paramedic, complained about his inability to sleep and his anxiety On 19th June 2021 Mr Vince was found deceased having apparently taken an overdose Toxicology found a level in Mr Vince's bloodstream twenty times higher than therapeutic levels. 5 CORONER'S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern . In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken . In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you . The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows . - 1. The NICE guidelines for indicate that it is a suitable medication for the short term treatment of insomnia, it advises against prolonged use due to risk of tolerance and withdrawal symptoms. Mr Vince is said to have been prescribed for 20 years. 2. No evidence exists to support that Mr Vince's GP or community mental health team meaningfully reviewed his prescription 3. Evidence of Mr Vince 's dependence upon was not shared by his GP with the mental health trust. 4. The frequency with wh ich Mr Vince was administering his PRN was never monitored. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you [AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report with in 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 18th August 2022. I, the coroner, may extend the period . Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken , setting out the timetable for action . Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed . 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Ch ief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: The family of Mr Vince, The Care Quality Commission , The General Medical Council, The Secretary of State for Health & Social Care. I have also sent it to the local Director of Public Health who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. 2 The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he b lieves may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time the release or the publication of your response. 9 [DATE] 27th June 2022 [SIGNED BY CORONER] 3
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
High Street Surgery 219 High Street Hornchurch Essex RM11 3XT 17 August 2022 Graeme Irving Acting Senior Coroner East London Coroner’s Service Adult Learning College 127 Ripple Road Barking |G11 7PB Dear Mr Irving, Re: Inquest Touching the Death of Mr Michael John Vince Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths Thank you for sending the Prevention of Future Deaths Report regarding the death of Mr Michael Vince, and providing me an opportunity to comment on the matters of concern raised. Before responding, | would like to express my sincere condolences to the family of Mr Vince for their loss. | have carefully considered the Report. Actions taken by myself and my practice in response to the concerns raised are described below. , Concern 1: The NICE quidelines for Zopiclone indicate that it is a suitable medication for the short-term treatment of insomnia, it advises against prolonged use due to risk of tolerance and withdrawal symptoms. Mr Vince is said to have been prescribed Zopiclone for 20 years. Concern 2: No evidence exists to support that Mr Vince’s GP or community mental health team meaningfully reviewed his prescription for Zopicione. Concern 4: The frequency with which Mr Vince was administering his PRN Zopiclone was never monitored. Page | of 3 Response to Concerns 1, 2 and 4 In response to the above concerns, the following actions have been undertaken: A. Clinical Audit of all patients prescribed Zopiclone over the past 2 years: The report contains concerns as to the monitoring and review of Mr Vince’s Zopiclone. In response, our practice determined to undertake a comprehensive audit and clinical review of all patients prescribed Zopiclone. A review of practice records for all patients prescribed Zopiclone over the last 2 years was performed. A summary of the results is as follows: e Acute or one-off prescription of Zopiclone — 22 patients e Repeat prescription of Zopicione — 16 patients All patients currently taking Zopiclone were contacted for a structured medication review undertaken by myself. The review was guided by best practice guidelines for the prescribing of Zopicione. The result of the medication reviews was that the majority of patients on repeat prescriptions had their repeat prescribing ended. Some patients were referred to the Trust’s Mental Health Service for further review and management of their Zopiclone administration. After the initial structured medication review, a second cycle review of patients on repeat Zopiclone prescriptions was undertaken. This showed that only 4 patients remained on repeat Zopiclone. Two of these patients are scheduled for further review, and two remain on long term Zopiclone and are scheduled for 6 monthly review. B. Implementation of Z-Drug Protocol | have drafted a local practice Protocol for Z-Drugs which has been implemented as at 29 July 2022. A copy of the Protocol is included with this letter. The protocol was drafted following my review of best practice guidelines for the prescribing and management of patients on Zopiclone and other Z-Drug hypnotics. The protocol includes links to relevant NICE guidelines and a comprehensive resource pack produced by the Greater Manchester Medicines Management Group included as an © appendix. It also includes a Good Sleep Guide to assist in advising patients with non- pharmaceutical methods to manage insomnia. The policy requires regular review of patients prescribed Z-Drug hypnotics being a minimum of 4 weeks for newly prescribed patients, and at 6-monthly intervals for patients on long term treatment and after review by Mental Health Services. C. Discussion and Education of Practice Staff Meetings have been held with practice staff to alert them t@ the new protocol, and to advise them to refer all patients requesting repeat prescriptions of Z-Drugs to myself for medication review. Page 2 of 3 A notice has been placed in the practice waiting room for the information of patients regarding the practice’s Z-Drug protocol. We will continue to monitor the above actions in our regular practice meetings. Concern 3: Evidence of Mr Vince’s dependence upon Zopiclone was not shared by his GP with the mental health trust. Response to Concern 3 The North East London Foundation Trust (NELFT) Mental Health Service held a stakeholder meeting on 14 July 2022 to discuss the Coronial recommendations, as well as the issue of prescribing of Z-Drugs generally. The meeting included representatives from the NELFT medication safety team. i was invited and attended this meeting which was a very useful opportunity to discuss clinical collaboration with the Trust regarding patients on Z-Drug hypnotics. At that meeting the importance of proper communication between local GP’s, the NELFT Mental Health Team and other clinical services was discussed. It was agreed that review of hypnotics was the responsibility of the primary prescriber, but also the prescriptions should be reviewed by the Trust clinicians when in the scope of treatment provided by that clinician. The Trust committed to undertaking a wider audit of Z-Drug prescribing within the NELFT localities which will be led by the Trust pharmacy services. They will also be developing a safe- prescribing training package and will include education of local GP’s in their roll-out of this package. For my part, | have commenced more proactive referral of patients who appear dependent upon Z-Drug hypnotics for review and advice by specialist NELFT Mental Health services. This has been assisted by the response of the NELFT to the Coronial recommendations and the discussion and collaboration that has resulted. My practice’s Z-Drug Protocol includes a requirement for structured medication review for patients on long term Z-Drugs with mental health issues, and a requirement to notify the Mental Health Team for those patients who request additional 2 drugs. Thank you again for your referring your concerns regarding the care of Mr Vince. If you would like any further information regarding our response to the concerns, please contact me on i Yours Sincerely Enclosed: High Street Practice Z-Drug Protocol Page 3 of 3
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
Mr Graeme Irvine
HM Coroner
The Adult College of Barking & Dagenham
127 Ripple Rd
Barking
IG11 7PB
Sent by email to:
coroners@walthamforest.gov.uk; and
@walthamforest.gov.uk
Your ref: G1/sc/14161785
Our ref: 1127
Dear Sir,
Trust Head Office
CEME Centre
West Wing
Marsh Way
Rainham
RM13 8GX
Tel: 0300 555 1298
5 August 2022
Re: Inquest touching upon the death of Mr Michael John Vince
I refer to your letter dated 27th June 2022 and the Regulation 28 report, detailing your concerns
related to the care provided by NELFT NHS Foundation Trust (‘NELFT’) as follows:
1. Mr Vince was prescribed with Zopiclone for 20 years, despite the NICE guidelines
indicating that Zopiclone is not suitable for long term use.
2. There was no evidence that prescription of Zopiclone was meaningfully reviewed by
NELFT’s Community Mental Health team or GP.
3. Evidence of Mr Vince’s dependence upon Zopiclone was not shared by his GP with the
Trust.
4. The frequency with which Mr Vince was administering his PRN Zopiclone was never
monitored.
We have taken the concerns expressed by you very seriously and undertook further consultations
with the Chief Pharmacist and other members of the MDT. On 06/07/22 we arranged a wider
NELFT learning review led by our pharmacy department and developed an action plan to address
the identified further learning following the Inquest. The event was attended by health care
professionals at NELFT and primary care including the practice which was directly involved in the
care of Mr Vince.
Chair:
Acting chief executive:
www.nelft.nhs.uk
The current practice at NELFT is that whoever prescribes the medication, is responsible for
monitoring the compliance with medication administration regime. However, in light of learning
from this inquest we have updated our practice as highlighted within the attached action plan and
will monitor implementation of the updated practice jointly with the chief pharmacist.
We have agreed a number of actions to address concerns raised by you and enclose action plan
detailing the Trust’s efforts to improve the safety and quality of care provided by NELFT.
I would like to express my heartfelt condolences to the family of Mr Vince and sincerely apologise
for the shortcomings in care provided by NELFT identified in our Serious Incident report as well
as at the inquest hearing on 21st June 2022.
I would also like to thank you for your full and fearless investigation and for raising your concerns
with the Trust, enabling us to undertake further learning from the very sad death of Mr Vince.
If you would like to discuss these actions further, please kindly feel free to contact my office on
0300 555 1298.
Yours Sincerely
Chief Executive Officer (acting)
Chair:
Acting chief executive:
www.nelft.nhs.uk
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.