Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022

Malcom Garrett

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0241, written 4 Aug 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report4 Aug 2022
Reference2022-0241
DeceasedMalcom Garrett
CoronerAlison Mutch
Coroner areaManchester South
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses publishednone published

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:  Secretary of State for Health and 
Social Care 

1  CORONER 

I am Alison Mutch, Senior Coroner, for the Coroner Area of Greater 
Manchester South 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and 
Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners 
(Investigations) Regulations 2013 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 30th  September 2021 I commenced an investigation into the death of 
Malcolm John Garrett. The investigation concluded on the 16th  June 2022 
and the conclusion was one of Narrative: Died from Covid-19 acquired 
whilst an inpatient contributed to by the complications of a lung 
transplant. The medical cause of death was 1a) Covid pneumonitis 
and pseudomonas aeruginosa bronchopneumonia; II) Chronic 
immunosuppression (lung transplant 2013), chronic allograft 
dysfunction/bronchiolitis obliterans, non-traumatic thoracic vertebra 
wedge fracture, ischaemic heart disease, chronic kidney disease. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Malcolm John Garrett had a bilateral lung transplant in 2013. He was 
placed on long term medications to avoid rejection of the transplant. He 
was immunosuppressed as a consequence. He also developed chronic 
allograft dysfunction and chronic kidney disease and ischaemic heart 
disease that are recognised long term complications in transplant 
patients. 

He developed severe back pain and was admitted to Stepping Hill 
Hospital on 2nd  August 2021. A MR of the spine showed a traumatic 
wedge fracture of the vertebra at T9. He was given pain relief and 
subsequently fitted with a brace. On 7th August 2021 he had symptoms 
of opiate toxicity and was treated with opiate reversing medications. The 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 toxicity was probably as a consequence of an acute kidney injury. 

He was found to have developed pneumonia and was treated for it. He 
was placed on NIV due to ongoing acidosis. Subsequently he was 
stabilised and was weaned off NIV. On 8th  September he deteriorated 
significantly and was again started on NIV and intravenous antibiotics. He 
stabilised again. 

Subsequently on 17th September 2021 he began to deteriorate again. 
Antibiotics were restarted as he showed signs of infection. On 19th
September 2021 he was confirmed to be Covid-19 positive having 
acquired it whilst in the hospital. He was moved to a Covid ward and 
treated. He subsequently deteriorated further and died at Stepping Hill 
Hospital on 23rd  September 2021. Post-mortem examination confirmed 
the direct cause of his death was a combination of Covid pneumonitis and 
pseudomonas aeruginosa bronchopneumonia. 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise 
to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur 
unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to 
report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  – 

1. The Inquest heard that it was recognised that Mr Garrett was at
high risk of acquiring Covid-19 in a hospital setting as he was
immunosuppressed following his transplant. Despite the risk being
recognised he still acquired Covid-19. The Inquest heard that all
such patients are at high risk in an acute hospital setting but there
is no specific guidance for their management;

2. The evidence before the inquest was that Mr Garratt needed to be
discharged as quickly as possible to reduce the risk of acquiring
Covid-19. However there was no specific guidance about
expediting patients such as him and looking at alternative methods
of treatment;

3. His discharge was delayed in part due to opiate toxicity. That

arose as a consequence of his kidneys not functioning correctly.
The inquest heard evidence that to avoid opiate toxicity is such
situations there needs to be a greater use of and understanding of
the importance of monitoring kidney function.

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I 
believe you have the power to take such action. 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date 
of this report, namely by 29th  September 2022. I, the coroner, may 
extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be 
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain 
why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following 
Interested Persons namely 
Stepping Hill Hospital, who may find it useful or of interest. 

 on behalf of the Family and 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your 
response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted 
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who 
he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make 
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about 
the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9  Alison Mutch 

HM Senior Coroner 

04.08.22 

3

Related reports

Other reports by Alison Mutch

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.