Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022

Ernest Bacon

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0246, written 6 Aug 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report6 Aug 2022
Reference2022-0246
DeceasedErnest Bacon
CoronerAlison Mutch
Coroner areaManchester South
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedTameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published2

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:  Secretary of State for Health and 
Social Care, Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation 
Trust 

1  CORONER 

I am Alison Mutch, Senior Coroner, for the Coroner Area of Greater 
Manchester South 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and 
Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners 
(Investigations) Regulations 2013 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 20th  January 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of 
Ernest Bacon. The investigation concluded on the 26th  July 2022 and the 
conclusion was one of Narrative: Died from sepsis contributed to by 
the complications of an accidental fall. 

The medical cause of death was 1a) Sepsis; 1b) Bronchopneumonia; 
II) Fractured Neck of Femur, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary
Disease, Ischaemic Stroke

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Ernest Thomas Bacon had an accidental fall at his home address. He 
was admitted to Tameside General Hospital where it was identified he 
had a fracture to the neck of femur. He was operated on. He had an 
ischaemic stroke whilst an inpatient. On 16th  January 2022 at 19:50, his 
NEWS score was recorded as 7. He was prescribed fluids but not 
intravenous antibiotics. The Trust Policy was not followed in relation to 
intravenous antibiotics being given within 1 hour. He was not given 
intravenous antibiotics until about 22:38. The decision not to follow the 
Trust Sepsis Policy was not recognised and not escalated. He continued 
to deteriorate. On 17th January 2022 he died from Sepsis at Tameside 
General Hospital. 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the Inquest the evidence revealed matters giving 
rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur 
unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to 
report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  – 

1. The Inquest heard that when Mr Bacon became unwell on 16th

January the Trust was staffed at weekend/OOH doctor numbers.
This meant that there were a very limited number of doctors
available within the hospital when the ward staffed asked for a
clinical review when Mr Bacon triggered for sepsis on the NEWS2
system. The Inquest heard that the staffing numbers of doctors
and reliance on junior doctors at weekend to cover the wards is
part of the national staffing model;

2. As a consequence of the availability of doctors he was not

reviewed face to face but via telephone. His notes were not seen.
The seriousness of his condition was not recognised and he was
not flagged up on handover;

3. The Trust Policy required he be treated for Sepsis. However he

was not placed on the Sepsis pathway and a further review did not
take place until a further doctor was asked to examine him at
about 22.30 despite his NEWS2 score continuing to trigger for
Sepsis;

4. The nursing team recognised that he was triggering for Sepsis but
the notes were not flagged and the failure to follow the Sepsis
policy was not escalated in accordance with Trust Policy. The
reason for non-escalation was unclear.

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I 
believe you have the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date 
of this report, namely by 1st  October 2022. I, the coroner, may extend the 
period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be 
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain 
why no action is proposed. 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following 
 on behalf of the Family, who may 
Interested Persons namely 
find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your 
response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted 
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who 
he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make 
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about 
the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

Alison Mutch 
HM Senior Coroner 

06.08.22 

3

Responses

2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Department of Health and Social Care (PDF)
• Department 

of Health & 
Social Care 

Alison Mutch 
HM Senior Coroner 
Manchester South Coroner's Court 
1 Mount Tabor Street 
Stockport 
SK13AG 

Dear Ms Mutch, 

20/12/2022 

Thank you for your letter of 6 August 2022 about the death of  Ernest Thomas Bacon.  I am 
replying  as  Minister  with  responsibility  for  Mental  Health  and  Women's  Health  Strategy, 
including patient safety, at the Department of Health and Social Care. 

Firstly,  I  would like to say how  saddened  I  was to read of  the  circumstances  of  Mr  Booth's 
death,  and I offer my sincere condolences to his family and loved ones.  The circumstances 
your report describes are very concerning and I  am grateful to you for bringing these matters 
to my attention. 

In preparing this response, Departmental officials have made enquiries with NHS England and 
the Care Quality Commission (CQC). 

I understand that several actions have been taken by Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care 
NHS Foundation Trust following Mr Bacon's death.  A retrospective Root Cause Analysis was 
conducted  into the  clinical  care  of  Mr  Bacon  and  in  particular  the  response  to  his  raised 
National  Early Warning Score  and recognition  of  sepsis.  A number of  learning points were 
identified as a result of the investigation and the findings have been used to inform the Trust's 
sepsis improvement plan. 

In addition, since July 2022, the Trust has increased the medical rota to include a further junior 
doctor to provide additional support and in recognition of the acuity and activity of the out of 
hours medical provision.  The CQC also continues to engage with the Trust and has received 
assurance regarding a review of the sepsis pathway and the associated retraining for all staff. 

Sepsis  can  be  a  devastating  condition  and  patients  rightly  expect  the  NHS  to  be  able  to 
recognise  and diagnose it  early  and  provide the  highest  quality  treatment  and  care.  Over 
recent years, the NHS has become much better at spotting and treating sepsis quickly.  This 
means that more people are being identified as at risk of sepsis and mortality rates are falling. 
However, we know that some patients who deteriorate with sepsis are still not being diagnosed 
quickly enough. 

In  April  2018,  a  National  Early  Warning  Score  patient  safety  alert  was  issued  to  support 
providers to adopt the revised National  Early Warning  Score (NEWS2) to detect deterioration 
in adult patients, including those with suspected sepsis.  However, it is recognised that sepsis 
guidance  could  be  improved  to  ensure  appropriate  room  for  diagnostics  and  clinical 
judgement. 

In response to growing evidence of the need to update sepsis guidance, the Academy of Royal 
Medical  Colleges  (AoMRC),  in  partnership  with  the  Faculty  for  Intensive  Care  Medicine,
Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care (PDF)
'1'7:kj

Tameside and Glossop 
Integrated Care 
NHS  Foundation Trust 

· 

Tameside and Glossop Integrated  Care NHSFT 
Fountain Street 
Ashton  Under Lyne 
Tameside 
OL69RW 

Integrated Governance Unit 
Silver Springs 
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHSFT 
Ashton Under Lyne 
OL6 9RW 

27th September 2022 

Private and confidential 
To  be opened  by the addressee only 
HM  Coroner,  Miss A Mutch 
Via  Email 

Dear Miss Mutch 

I am writing further to the inquest touching upon the death of Earnest Bacon  (who died  on 17th 
January 2022) which  concluded  on  25th  July 2022  and  the  subsequent Regulation  28  Notice 
issued to the Trust.  I hope to be able to build upon the issued raises within your report,  and set 
out below my respon'se.  I have outlined these in  order of the concerns raised. 

In  response to the concerns raised, the Trust instigated an  immediate strategy meeting with all 
the Divisional Directors -to  collaborate,  assess and  understand the actions requireq to  address 
the issues raised.  · 

Concern 1:-
The  inquest  heard  evidence  that  there  staffing  numbers  of doctors  and  a  reliam;e  on 
junior doctors to cover wards at the weekend was part of the  national staffing model. 

/ 

17th

On  Sunday  night  15th 
January  2022,  the  night  when  Mr.  Bacon's  condition  sadly 
deteriorated, the level of junior doctor cover for the medical wards overnight exceeded that set 
out  in  national  guidance  by  the  Royal  College  of Physicians  (2018).  The  actual  number of 
doctors on call  at that time were three Tier 1 doctors and one Tier 2 doctor covering non-covid 
medical  beds. _At  the  time  that  Mr:  Bacon  died  the  Trust  were  experiencing  a  significant 
increase in  clinical activity as they were responding to the Omicron Covid wave. 

Medical staffing is continuously monitored and is reported to the Trust wide bed meeting, which 
occurs 5 times  per day,  this  includes weekends.  Any known  shortfalls  in  the  rota  are  known, 
and  proactive action is taken on these to  provide cover. 

Whilst the Trust d.oes acknowledge that the junior doctor rota meets national_ guidance it does 
need to be strengthened furtherto support increased activity and acuity in the ward areas. The 
Trust is  currently progressing  a business  case to  increase the  level  of junior doctor provision 
which alsb aims to  reduce reliance on  locum and  agency doctors. 

M 
Cl) 
ll0 
ro 
a.. 

ElH'a disability
B t:. confident 

EMPLOYER 

 
 
 
 fi'7:kj

Tameside and Glossop 
Integrated  Care 
NHS  Foundation Trust 

Concern 2:  -
As a result of the availability of the doctors Mr Bacon was not reviewed face to face but 
via a telephone call. His notes were not viewed and the seriousness of his condition was 
not recognised. 

Please  may  I refer this  point to  the  narrative which  we  have  provided  for concern  3,  where  I 
have described the improvement work and on-going actions to support the recognition of sepsis 
across the Trust. 

Concern 3:-
The Trust policy required that Mr Bacon be treated for Sepsis, but he was not placed on 
the  Sepsis  pathway and  a further reviewed  did  not take  place  until  another doctor was 
-
asked to review him, despite his  NEWS score continuing to trigger for sepsis. 

Immediately  following  the  inquest  touching  the  death  of  Mr.  Bacon  the  Trust  completed  a 
retrospective  root  cause  analysis  investigation  into  the. clinical  care  of  Mr  Bacon,  and  in 
particular the response to his raised  National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and  recognition of 
sepsis.  This  was  also  retrospectively  reported  on  the  Trust's  incident  reporting  electronic 
system.  A  number of learning  points  were  identified  as  a  result  of the  investigation  and  the 
findings have been used to  support a Trust wide sepsis improvement plan. 

The sepsis improvement project is being led by the Head of Nursing for Professional Standards 
and Assurance and the Trust Medical Lead for Patient Safety. The improvement plan builds on 
previous actions taken by the Trust to support the early detection and application of the Sepsis 
6 care bundl~.  The comprehensive plan  include~ a number of workstreams which will  support 
improvement on: 

' 

•  Recognition of sepsis 
•  Application of the Sepsis Care Bundle 
•  Prescribing of antibiotics  -
•  Blood  Cultures 
•  Medical assessment of deteriorating' patients. 

The  Trust  has  had  a  Trust  wide  a  focus  on· World  Sepsis  Day  which  was  held  on  the  13th 
September 2022.  The Trust's Safer Care team  have  held  a focus on  sepsis week which took 
place over the week of 12th  -18th  September 2022.  The'objective of the week was to  raise the 
profile of sepsis throughout the organisation  and  to  reiterate  recognition  and  management of 
suspected sepsis.  During the week results of the sepsis audit and a detailed action plan on the 
sepsis  improvement  work  was  shared  at  the  Trust's  Grand  Round  and  the  Managing 
Deteriorating  Patient Group.  In  addition  to  this,  ?-minute  briefings  on  recent sepsis  incidents 
have been  developed and  are being  shared across the Trust. The Safer Care team have also 
created  sepsis  related  scenarios  to  engage  teams  in  identifying  red  flags  for  sepsis  and 
encourage adherence to the  use of sepsis care bundles. 

N 
fili 

Throughout September the Safer Care team has been visiting the wards a11d  community bases 
to carry out interactive tool box talks.  Information regarding the use of the sepsis care bundles 
and  the use of the sepsis trolley (for inpatient clinical areas) has also been shared with clinical 
teams. Clinical teams have been participating in sepsis scenario sessions,  which supports the 
identification of red  flags for sepsis. 

mm disability 
B!i confident 
EMPLOYER 

 r.!7:kj

Tameside and Glossop 
Integrated Care 
NHS  Foundation Trust 

The key messages for the Trust wide project are: 

'Think could this be sepsis' 
Identification of sepsis 
Implementation of sepsis .care bundle 

• 
• 
• 
•  The seJ?sis  six 

To provide internal assurance spot check audits have been implemented to  specifically look at 
compliance with the sepsis pathway. The audits have commenced  and  include a review of 1 0 
patients each  month.  Where compliance  with  the  pathway has  not been  present, an  incident 
form will  be completed contemporaneously. 

The  sepsis improvement work has also  been  report~d  to the Trust's Quality and  Governance · 
Committee,  which  is  chaired  by  a  Non-Executive  Director.  A's  a  direct  action  following  this 
meeting  additional  nursing  posts were  agreed  which  will  specifically support clinical teams in 
sepsis identification, training and  compliance across the organisation. 

Concern 4:-
The nursing team recognised that Mr Bacon was triggering for sepsis but the notes were 
not flagged and the failure to follow the Sepsis policy was not escalated in  accordance 
with Trust Policy. The reason for non-escalation was unclear. 

. 

As  explained  in  the  narrative  answering  point 3,  a retrospective  investigation  was completed 
following  Mr.  Bacon's  inquest.  The  investigation  report  identified  that  whilst  the  nurse  who 
conducted the set of clinical observations at 19:50 hours on 16th  January 2022 recognised and 
acted  upon  his  raised  early warning  score (which was  scoring  7),  by inserting  a cannula and 
performed  blood tests,  they did  not recognise that Mr.  Bacon was displaying two  red  flags for 
sepsis.  As the  nurse  had  not recognised  the  fact that Mr.  Bacon  had  sepsis,  then the sepsis 
care bundle was not initiated.  Had the red flags been recognised, the sepsis care bundle could 
have  been implemented at an earlier point,  it is also likely that this information would  also had 
been  relayed to the on  call. doctor, which  may have led to a timeiier response.  It is hoped that 
the Trust wide improvement plan and actions that the Trust have taken so far would reduce the 
risk of this occurring again. 

Along  with  the  sepsis ·improvement  project,  the  Trust  has  also  been  reviewing  the  NEWS 
scoring system and  how this is recorded.  The NEWS score is a well established physiological 
scoring  tool  which  was  introduced  at  the  Trust  many  years  ago.  The  NEWS  tool  has  an 
established  training  package  in  place for clinical  staff and  compliance with  the  tool  is  part of 
the  regular Trust audit  program.  Compliance  with  the  tool •is  monitored  via  the  Deteriorating 
Patient group which reports directly into the Executive Lead Service Quality Assurance Group . 

.  . 

m 

When  clinical observations are  performed  as part of NEWS the  staff in  the Trust are  required 
to  manually calculate  and  record  the  score.  The  Trust acknowledge  that  manual ·calculation 
and  recording  can  be open to human error, therefore significant work has been  undertaken to 
improve this and  I can  confirm that the Trust is currently at the Pre-Market Stage of procuring 
a new Electronic Patient Record (EPR) to  replace  Dedalus Lorenzo in  March 2025. 

OHi disability
B !i confident 
. 

EMPLOYER

" 

 
 r.!7:bj

Tameside and Glossop 
Integrated Care 
NHS  Foundation Trust 

Whilst the new EPR may provide a long term  electronic NEWS solution  in  2025,  in the interim 
the  plan  is  to  deliver an  inhouse  electronic solution.  The  Trust  has  an  embedded  electronic 
NEWS application currently in  use across our Emergency Department (eNEWS). The  agreed 
proposal is a_  pilot of the eNEWS application across our surgical wards with a viewto improving 
the  accuracy  and  speed  of  data  recording,  and  to  eliminate  errors  in  early  score  warning 
calculation. We are aiming to  commence the pilot prior to December 2022. 

At  the  time  of  Mr'  Bacon's  death, the  delay  in  recognising  and  treating  his  sepsis  was  not 
reported on the Trust's electronic reporting system. As a result of your concerns outlined--above 
in  relation to incidents, the Trust's incident trigger lists have been circulated widely throughout 
the organisation with  a reiteration of the importance of incident reporting. 

In addition to this, there has been a Trust wide focus on incid,ent reporting throughout the month 
of September 2022. This work has been underway across the organisation and  is being led  by 
the Assistant Director of lr"ltegrated  Governance throughout,  culminating  in the Trust's Patient 
Safety  Conference  on  October 6th  2022.  This  programme  of events  and, activities  s~eks  to 
engage  staff at all  levels  and  focusses  on  identification  of incidents or near misses,  incident 
reporting,  acting on ahd  learning from  incidents. 

I  hope  you  will  feel  that  the  Trust  has  taken  appropriate  action  as  a  result  of your findings, 
however sh_ould  you wish to discuss any aspect of this or seek further assurance please do not 
hesitate to  contact me through the Legal Services Team 
· 

Executive Director of Nursing and Integrated Governance -

Acting on  and behalf of 

, Chief Executive Officer 

QJ 
b.O 
ro 
a.. 

mra msability
EJC'. confid~nt 

EMPLOYER 

S':11 ' .a-- .fflll 
. .  - ,  UJJ

(®)

Related reports

Other reports by Alison Mutch

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.