Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022

Asher Sinclair

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0272, written 4 Sep 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report4 Sep 2022
Reference2022-0272
DeceasedAsher Sinclair
CoronerLydia Brown
Coroner areaWest London
CategoryChild Death (from 2015) · Community health care and emergency services related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published2

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS  

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  NHS England 
2.  CCG 
3.  Chief Coroner 

1 

CORONER 

I am Lydia Brown, Acting senior coroner, for the coroner area of West London 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.  

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 24 October 2019 I commenced an investigation into the death of Asher 
William Robert Sinclair, age 3. The investigation concluded at the end of the 
inquest on 24 January 2022. The conclusion of the inquest was  

Medical cause of death -  

1a Hypoxic Ischaemic Brain Injury 
 1b Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest 
 1c Displaced Tracheal Tube (Trachael tube dependant) 
 II Neonatal enterviral myocarditis and encephalitis (trachael ventilator dependant 
and cardiac pacemaker) 

Asher died on 8th October 2019 in Great Ormond Street hospital when his life 
support mechanisms were withdrawn. 

Asher Sinclair was entirely dependent on artificial ventilation due to a neonatal 
brain stem injury and required 24 hour care at a ratio of 2:1 at all times. The 
parents provided much of this care, but a complex community package was also 
commissioned and should have been operated to meet his clinical needs. There 
were deficiencies in the training, planning and oversight of the package of care by 
both the care agency and the commissioning body. Near misses and warning 
signs were not escalated appropriately or at all, and the clear problems were not 
addressed, leaving Asher, his parents and those directly responsible for providing 
the care in a repeatedly dangerous situation. Reviews at all levels were 
inadequate, perfunctory and not fit for purpose. On 3rd October 2019 Asher was 
left in the care of a sole nurse. His tracheostomy tube became dislodged and the 
nurse failed to follow the emergency procedure or use the full kit that was readily 
available in the same room. The first aid she did provide was ineffective as she 
did not secure his airway first. He was deprived of oxygen until the paramedic 
crews arrived over 9 minutes later and only then was the airway secured. He 
sustained a hypoxic injury from which he did not recover. 
Asher's death was a direct and foreseeable consequence of the failings in 
delivery of his care package. Neglect by the agency, commissioners and nurse 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 on duty contributed to this tragic outcome. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

See above 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – 

Asher was entirely dependent upon a complex package of care as a highly vulnerable 
ventilator dependent child.  Evidence at inquest was that on numerous occasions he was 
not provided with the prescribed 2:1 care.   

The care package, despite being described as one of the most complex and most 
expensive was not appropriately reviewed and there was no mandatory system of quality 
checks or formal review when there was a significant change in family circumstances.  
Quarterly reviews were not carried out without explanation.  

The primary responsibility fell upon the family members, namely Asher’s parents, who 
were also responsible for other children in the family and employed as teachers.  
Concerns raised by the parents were not taken for discussion to case conference or 
professional’s meetings and essentially not followed up at all, leaving the situation in the 
house dangerous with an ultimately calamitous outcome. 

There was a lack of scrutiny or reconciliation of Asher’s care package, which could have 
identified gaps that needed to be addressed. 

Training for the staff involved was unclear to the court and seemingly not in place or 
inadequate.  A high turnover of staff was cited as one of the reasons, but this should have 
highlighted a need for increased training and scrutiny. 

The court was advised that new structures would be in place by July 2022.  The 
production of this report therefore has been delayed to give the opportunity for those 
systems to be in place and reported to the court.   

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you 
have the power to take such action. 

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 namely by 31 October 2022. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the local safeguarding 
board where the deceased was under 18 and to the following Interested Persons  

•  Family  
•  First Option Healthcare 
•  CCG – 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all 
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. 

I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it 
useful or of interest. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. 

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about 
the release or the publication of your response. 
29th July 2022 
Lydia Brown  

9 

 Acting Senior Coroner 

3

Responses

2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Form NHS England (PDF)
Lydia Brown 
Acting Senior Coroner 
West London Coroner’s Service 
25 Bagley’s Lane 
Fulham 
London  
SW6 2QA 

Dear Ms Brown 

National Medical Director  
NHS England  
Wellington House 
133-155 Waterloo Road  
London 
SE1 8UG 

02 December 2022  

Re:  Regulation  28  Report  to  Prevent  Future  Deaths  –  Asher  William  Robert 
Sinclair who died on 08 October 2019   

Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 29 July 
2022  concerning  the  death  of  Asher  Sinclair  on  8  October  2019.  In  advance  of 
responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my 
deepest condolences to  Asher’s family and loved ones and I am very sorry to hear 
about the tragic circumstances of Asher’s death. NHS England are keen to assure the 
family and the Coroner that the concerns raised about Asher’s care have been listened 
to  and  reflected  upon,  in  the  hope  that  an  incident  such  as  this  one  never  occurs 
again.  

I am grateful for the further time granted to respond to your Report, and I apologise to 
the family for the delay, as I appreciate this will have been an incredibly difficult time 
for them.  

Following the inquest, you raised concerns in your Report regarding:  

1)  The care package was not appropriately reviewed and there was no mandatory 
system of quality checks or formal review when there was a significant change 
in  family  circumstances.  Quarterly  reviews  were  not  carried  out,  without 
explanation. 

2)  Concerns  raised  by  the  parents  were  not  taken  for  discussion  to  case 
conference or professional’s meetings and were not followed up at all, leaving 
the situation in the house dangerous. 

3)  There was a lack of scrutiny or reconciliation of Asher’s care package, which 

could have identified gaps that needed to be addressed. 

4)  Training  for  the  staff  involved  was  unclear  and  seemingly  not  in  place  or 
inadequate. The high turnover of staff reported should have highlighted a need 
for increased training and scrutiny. 

The National Tracheostomy Safety Project (NTSP) exists to provide a wide range of 
resources  and  materials  to  support  those  providing  care  to  these  patients,  both  in 
hospital and in the community. This also extends to children with permanent/long term 
tracheostomies where it is recognised that care requires significant skill, knowledge 
and training. The NTSP has a bespoke and comprehensive paediatric section relevant 
to this. 

                                                                                                                       
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 I  understand  that  the  incident  described  in  your  Report  occurred  in  October  2019. 
Additional  work  has  been  done  since  then  to  further  improve  tracheostomy  care, 
including  the  2020  Safer  Tracheostomy  Care  program,  which  was  delivered  via  a 
Safety Improvement Programme through NHS England (NHSE). 

As well as this, the child health outcome programme, commissioned by the Healthcare 
Quality  Improvement  Partnership  (HQIP),  on  behalf  of  NHSE,  looked  at  long-term 
ventilation in children and young people aged 0-25 years and published their findings 
in 
https://www.hqip.org.uk/resource/child-health-long-term-
ventilation/#.Yys6bnbMKUk. The recommendations in the report included the need for 
emergency healthcare plans and planning/commissioning integrated care.  

February 

2020: 

I have had sight of  NHS North West London’s (NWL’s) response dated 27 October 
2022, which addresses training and supervision, as well as the planning and oversight 
of care packages. I understand that the NWL children’s continuing care team still work 
within  the  Department  of  Health’s  National  Framework  for  Children  and  Young 
People’s Continuing Care, published in January 2016. In addition, NWL confirm that a 
parental  agreement  has  been  developed  which  sets  out  expectations  and 
responsibilities  in  respect  of  parental  responsibility,  and  how  parents  can  escalate 
concerns regarding the care of their child. 

NWL’s  response  also  explains  the  position  regarding  the  dissolution  of  clinical 
commissioning  groups  (CCGs)  into  new  structures  called  integrated  care  boards 
(ICBs), which took place in July 2022, and how commissioning responsibilities are now 
delivered. I have therefore not addressed this further in NHSE’s response. 

I  would  like  to  provide  further  assurances  on  the  national  NHSE  work  taking  place 
around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by 
the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors and other 
clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings 
and insights around events, such as the sad death of Asher, are shared across the 
NHS at both a national and regional level, and helps us to pay close attention to any 
emerging trends that may require further review and action. 

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please 
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information. 

Yours sincerely, 

National Medical Director 
NHS England
Response from NHS Northwest London (PDF)
Ms Lydia Brown 
HM Acting Senior Coroner 

Ref: 313438 

Dear Ms Brown, 

Chief Nursing Officer 
15 Marylebone Road 
London  
NW1 5JD 

27th October 2022 

Re. Response to regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, following your investigation into the 
death of Asher William Robert Sinclair. 

NHS  North  West  London  have  reviewed  your  findings  in  relation  to  the  sad  death  of  Asher  William 
Robert Sinclair on 8 October 2019.  We are committed to ensure that we learn from Asher’s death, to 
prevent future deaths under these circumstances.   

At the time of Asher’s death, the children’s continuing care service was delivered by borough based 
teams, covering North West London’s eight local authorities.  Each team had developed its own local 
processes for managing children’s continuing care.  This led to varying levels of service delivery being 
in  place.    Since  Asher’s  death,  the  national  dissolution  of  clinical  commissioning  groups  (CCGs)  into 
integrated  care  boards  (ICBs)  has  resulted  in  a  number  of  changes  being  made  in  the  way  previous 
commissioning responsibilities are delivered.    

There is now one North West London children’s continuing care team in place that is responsible for 
providing a consistent, safe, effective and equitable service.   

The  Team  comprises  of  registered  nurses,  experienced  in  the  management  of  children’s  continuing 
care,  including  assessment  and  on-going  case  management.  Each  case  manager  has  a  designated 
caseload and is overseen by a senior experienced manager.  All members of the team receive monthly 
supervision and regular caseload review. 

The  Team  continue  to  work  within  the  national  children’s  continuing  care  framework  (2016).    A 
standard operating procedure has been put in place and a clear process for referral, assessment and 
delivery of a package of care has been developed. 

In accordance with the national framework, reviews are undertaken of all children’s packages of care, 
initially at three months from a new package of care commencing and then on an annual basis or more 
frequently  where  there  is  a  need/change  of  circumstance  identified  by  the  family,  care  provider  or 
health/social  care  professional.    All  reviews  are  now  undertaken  with  the  family  and  the 
multidisciplinary team involved in the child’s care. Reviews are now recorded and discussed formally 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 - 2 - 
within  a  multi-disciplinary  panel.      The  responsibility  for  the  performance  monitoring  of  reviews  is 
undertaken by senior managers within the team. 

The children’s continuing care case managers now meet at quarterly intervals with the clinical leads for 
the provider commissioned to provide a children’s care package, within this meeting, the appropriate 
lead  professional  for  the  child  is  also  involved,  to  identify  any  clinical  concerns  and  monitor  the 
provision of the package of care, as well as identifying and ensuring that the child’s clinical needs are 
being safely and appropriately met. 

When commencing a package of care, an NHS standard contract is issued to all providers commissioned 
by NHS North West London which sets out specific key performance indicators, including; 

the requirement to return monthly reports on provision of care 

  quality checks required 
 
  staff competencies assurance required to safely meet the health needs of the child 
 

risk assessments, associated with the provision of the care package  

Senior Managers responsible for children’s continuing care and our care brokerage officer meet with 
commissioned care providers on a quarterly basis to monitor the care packages. 

In addition, an individual care contract is issued for each separate children’s package of care, setting 
out individual requirements, for example:   

the need for 2:1 support and who provides this 

 
  what elements of care are delivered as support to the family as opposed to respite periods? 

Benchmarking  of  care  is  now  undertaken  to  identify  hours  of  support  to  meet  assessed  children’s 
clinical  needs.    This  is  also  peer  reviewed,  to  ensure  safe,  fair  and  consistent  packages  of  care  are 
provided. 

A parental agreement has been developed which sets out expectations and responsibilities in regard to 
parental responsibility.   Where parents feel that they are unable to maintain parental responsibility for 
the  care  of  their  child,  parents  can  escalate  their  concerns  initially  via  their  names  case  manager, 
continuing healthcare senior manager or via NHS North West London’s complaints team.  During the 
initial continuing care assessment and planning stage, all families are now informed of this process for 
raising concerns, in addition to further information provided both in a paper based information leaflet, 
as well as within NHS North West London’s website.   

In my new role as the Chief Nursing Officer for NHS North West London, I am currently meeting along 
with our Director of Nursing, responsible for all age continuing care, with the local Borough Directors 
of Children’s services.  One of the outcomes of these meetings is to ensure that joint care is seamless 
between the NHS and local authority.  NHS North West London acknowledge that this is essential for 
children  with  complex  health  needs,  where  families  have  siblings  that  require  support  from  local 
authority partners, to facilitate parental responsibility for their child’s health needs.   

The NHS procures care packages for children with increasingly challenging complex clinical care needs.  
Supporting children and families to allow care to be provided outside of the hospital setting, continues 
to present risks for care providers and the NHS.  The ability to reduce these risks will continue to be the 
responsibility  of  NHS  North  West  London  and  I  hope  that  the  steps  that  we  have  taken  since  Asha 
Sinclair’s  death  will  assure  you  of  our  commitment  to  provide  children  and  their  families  with  safe, 
effective and consistent care. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 - 3 - 

Yours sincerely 

Chief Nursing Officer  
NHS North West London

Related reports

Other reports by Lydia Brown

See all →

More reports categorised “Child Death (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Child Death (from 2015)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Child Death (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.