Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0291, written 20 Sep 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 20 Sep 2022 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2022-0291 |
| Deceased | Gary McDonald |
| Coroner | David Reid |
| Coroner area | Worcestshire |
| Category | Suicide (from 2015) · State Custody related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)
NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1.
( Head of Healthcare at HMP Hewell ), Practice Plus Group,
c/o HMP Hewell, Hewell Lane, Redditch, Worcs B97 6QS.
1
CORONER
I am David Donald William Reid, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of
Worcestershire.
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act
2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 28.7.21 an investigation was commenced into the death of Gary McDonald, a
prisoner at HMP Hewell, who died at the prison on 21.7.22, being 49 years of age.
This investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 16.9.22.
The medical cause of death was:
1a hanging.
The conclusion of the inquest was as follows:
“Gary McDonald died as the result of suicide.”
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
At the time of his death Mr. McDonald had spent nearly 4 months on remand at HMP
Hewell awaiting trial. On 21.7.21 he was found deceased in his cell at HMP Hewell
having apparently suspended himself
Although his medical history included a
diagnosis of depression ( dating from 2011 ) and two recorded episodes of overdoses
( in 2012 and 2020 ), he had never given staff at the prison any reason to believe that
he might have been struggling with his mental health throughout his time there.
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern.
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. –
1) During his initial healthcare screening appointment on the evening he arrived
at HMP Hewell ( 25.3.21 ) and his secondary healthcare screening appointment
the following day, Mr. McDonald denied any mental health issues, and denied
any current thoughts of suicide or self-harm. His community GP records were
1
requested and were received by the prison on 30.3.21; these showed a
previous history of depression, and two previous drug overdoses, the most
recent of which had been only 7 months earlier;
2) Despite this history, no appointment was made with Mr. McDonald by the
healthcare or mental healthcare teams to follow this up with him, and discuss
his mental health in more depth;
3)
4)
5)
In his evidence to the inquest, the current Head of Healthcare at the prison
conceded that it might have been appropriate for someone to have visited Mr.
McDonald, raised with him what the GP summary had shown, and asked him
if he would like any help, but that he would only have expected any such follow-
up if there had been any current concerns about his mental health. He further
confirmed that there would have been no automatic follow-up about this, even
if staff believed that Mr. McDonald may have deliberately misled them about
his mental health history during his healthcare screening appointments;
In subsequent correspondence to my office, the Head of Healthcare has
suggested that it might be appropriate to delay a prisoner’s secondary
healthcare screening appointment until his GP records have been obtained and
scrutinised, so that concerns about any history set out in those records can be
raised with the prisoner. That proposal is due to be raised at the prison’s next
Local Quality Assurance Meeting;
I am concerned that there is currently no system in place at HMP Hewell to
follow up with a prisoner any discrepancy between the mental health history
which he has disclosed on arrival at the prison, and that revealed in his
community GP records. Experience suggests that a prisoner with a recorded
history of mental health issues, particularly one which includes a recent episode
of attempted suicide or self-harm through overdose, may be at his most
vulnerable during his first days and weeks at a prison, and having been
reluctant to disclose such issues for any number of reasons ( e.g. fear,
embarrassment ), may be reassured to be told that healthcare staff at the prison
are aware of that history and can provide confidential support. In my view,
without routine follow-up in such cases, there remains a significant risk that a
prisoner’s recent significant history of suicide or self-harm may be overlooked
in those important early days and weeks in prison, and that such prisoners will
therefore be at an increased risk of further episodes of attempted suicide during
that period.
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have
the power to take such action by conducting an investigation into the deficiencies
outlined above.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely by 15th November 2022. I, the coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting
out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons:
2
1)
2)
Chief Executive Officer, Practice Plus Group, Hawker House, 5-6
Napier Court, Napier Road, Reading, Berkshire, RG1 8BW;
solicitors, 180 North Gower Street, London NW1 2NB,
who represent Mr. McDonald’s family;
3) Government Legal Department, who represent HM Prison Service;
4) The Prison and Probation Ombudsman.
I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it
useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of
your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief
Coroner.
9
Signed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. D. W. Reid 20th September 2022
H.M. Senior Coroner for Worcestershire
3
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Practice Plus Group
Hawker House
5-6 Napier Court
Napier Road
Reading
Berkshire
RG1 8BW
practiceplusgroup.com
HM Senior Coroner for Worcestershire
David Reid
BY EMAIL
14 November 2022
Dear Sir
The Inquest touching upon the death of Mr Gary McDonald
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths issued pursuant to Regulation 28 Coroners
(Investigations) Regulations 2013 dated 20 September 2022 and following the inquest touching
upon the death of Mr Gary McDonald, who sadly passed away on 21 July 2021 whilst residing
at HMP Hewell.
I would like to take the opportunity on behalf of Practice Plus Group to offer my sincere
condolences to Mr McDonald’s family and friends for their loss.
This letter addresses the matters of concern insofar as they relate to Practice Plus Group.
Matter of Concern
Below are the concerns quoted in the PFD report:
1) During his initial healthcare screening appointment on the evening he arrived at HMP
Hewell (25 March.2021) and his secondary healthcare screening appointment the
following day, Mr. McDonald denied any mental health issues, and denied any current
thoughts of suicide or self-harm. His community GP records were requested and were
received by the prison on 30 March 2021; these showed a previous history of
depression, and two previous drug overdoses, the most recent of which had been only
7 months earlier;
2) Despite this history, no appointment was made with Mr. McDonald by the healthcare or
mental healthcare teams to follow this up with him, and discuss his mental health in more
depth;
3) In his evidence to the inquest, the current Head of Healthcare at the prison conceded
that it might have been appropriate for someone to have visited Mr. McDonald, raised
with him what the GP summary had shown, and asked him if he would like any help, but
Practice Plus Group Health and Rehabilitation Services Limited. Registered in England No 10498997
Registered Office: Hawker House, 5-6 Napier Court, Napier Road, Reading, Berkshire RG1 8BW
that he would only have expected any such follow up if there had been any current
concerns about his mental health. He further confirmed that there would have been no
automatic follow-up about this, even if staff believed that Mr. McDonald may have
deliberately misled them about his mental health history during his healthcare screening
appointments;
4) In subsequent correspondence to my office, the Head of Healthcare has suggested that
it might be appropriate to delay a prisoner’s secondary healthcare screening
appointment until his GP records have been obtained and scrutinised, so that concerns
about any history set out in those records can be raised with the prisoner. That proposal
is due to be raised at the prison’s next Local Quality Assurance Meeting;
5) I am concerned that there is currently no system in place at HMP Hewell to follow up
with a prisoner any discrepancy between the mental health history which he has
disclosed on arrival at the prison, and that revealed in his community GP records.
Experience suggests that a prisoner with a recorded history of mental health issues,
particularly one which includes a recent episode of attempted suicide or self-harm
through overdose, may be at his most vulnerable during his first days and weeks at a
prison, and having been reluctant to disclose such issues for any number of reasons
(e.g. fear, embarrassment), may be reassured to be told that healthcare staff at the
prison are aware of that history and can provide confidential support. In my view, without
routine follow-up in such cases, there remains a significant risk that a prisoner’s recent
significant history of suicide or self-harm may be overlooked in those important early
days and weeks in prison, and that such prisoners will therefore be at an increased risk
of further episodes of attempted suicide during that period.
Response
In providing a detailed response to the concern raised we consider that it is important to outline
the current process in place for new prisoners coming into HMP Hewell. This is important
because the arrangements and processes have changed since Mr McDonald’s death.
Changes since July 2021
When a patient is received into the prison he is immediately located onto the Early Days in
Custody (EDiC) unit. This EDiC unit was opened by HMPPS colleagues and has been in
operation since November 2021 and is based on House Block (HB)2. What this provides is a
comprehensive induction period for up to 14 days for all new arrivals. Healthcare services form
a part of this induction programme and are also based on HB2. As part of this ongoing
development since its launch, the current pathway means that the patient undergoes a number
of key assessments. As well as the assessments, day-to-day interventions are provided in
accordance with any identified healthcare need and subsequent care planning.
As part of a national NHS England rollout programme since April 2022, the Healthcare team
and patients alike at HMP Hewell have benefitted from the introduction of the SystmOne
upgrades commonly referred to as GP2GP. GP2GP is a process whereby the entire patient’s
record from the community GP is transferred into HMP Hewell, where in effect the Healthcare
team becomes the patient’s registered GP practice. The GP2GP functionality supports a
number of benefits including:
•
Improved quality of care
• Access to the full GP records
• Continuity of care; past medical history available
immunisations and vaccinations
including drugs, allergies,
Page 2 of 4
Improved clinical safety
•
• Clinical time saving
• Administrative time saving
• Reduced time to summarise
• QOF information readily available
• Reduced risk of transcription errors
The GP2GP no longer requires the need for a GP summary of the patient’s previous GP
healthcare record. GP2GP is the patient’s healthcare record which includes all read coded
entries for reporting and key word search functionality. There is no longer the need for trained
back-office staff to enter the read codes from the GP summary into SystmOne, it is an automatic
process.
Following the Inquest of Mr McDonald
Since the Inquest, the Head of Healthcare has consulted with other stakeholders within the team
about the concern raised and have considered ways this concern can be alleviated. The
healthcare team have introduced an updated version (V4) of the EDiC pathway and passport.
This “passport” is a document that serves as a checklist to be completed by the healthcare
induction team. By working through such a checklist in a systematic way, assurance is gained
that all identified needs are being met for all patients, and to a consistent standard.
The key change between the previous version and Version 4 of this EDiC pathway is the timing
of the Initial Management Review. It has been moved from Day 3 to Day 5 and now includes
key word searches for suicide/self-harm references and will be undertaken after the GP2GP
transition process has been completed. This key word search of the GP records has been
implemented to identify any discrepancies in the information the patient has disclosed during
the reception screenings. If a patient was to deny a history of mental health illness during the
reception screenings, the key word search would pick this history up in his GP records.
The adoption of version 4 of this pathway continues to provide management reviews of every
patient’s GP record during the first 2 weeks in custody. These management reviews are
undertaken by a Senior Nurse, who provides a quality and assurance check that all actions have
been completed. In summary, the new pathway within v4 means that the patient will now
undergo the following key assessments:
• Day 1 – Initial Reception Healthcare Screen completed, including appropriate referrals
and actions.
• Day 2 – Medication Reconciliation completed (including face-to-face consultation with
the patient)
• Day 2 to 3 - Second Screen completed, including a holistic Wellbeing Assessment.
• Day 2 to 3 – Substance Misuse Assessment (ISMS)
• Day 3 to 4 – GP2GP record transition completed (assuming patient consent).
• Day 5 – Initial Management Review and key word search undertaken by a Senior Nurse
• Day 10 – Final Management Review undertaken by a Senior Nurse
In addition to these key assessments, day-to-day interventions are provided in accordance with
those identified healthcare needs and subsequent care planning.
At the point where the Day 5 management check has been completed, we have introduced new
measures such as the key word search that address those specific concerns raised by the
Coroner. These measures enable identification of previously undisclosed information and
discrepancies about previous suicidal ideation and/or self-harm (irrespective of when). If any
discrepancy is identified a member of the EDiC team (either a nurse or HCA) will return to meet
the patient, informing him of our findings and then proceed to ask him 2 specific questions:
Page 3 of 4
• Question 1: “Does the patient have any current thoughts of suicide or self-harm?”
If Yes, we will then open an ACCT and complete a TAG referral to the MH team.
If No, we then proceed to Q2.
• Question 2: “Does the patient currently require any input or support from the MH team?”
•
•
If Yes, we complete a TAG referral to MH.
If No, then no further action is taken.
These questions serve as a prompt for further discussion and for nursing staff to then evaluate
and assess a patient where any disclosure is made/discovered. For both questions, the EDiC
passport is then updated accordingly and a corresponding entry is made onto the patients
SystmOne record, along with any further action taken.
These improvements have been developed as a result of a systematic process of consultation
and engagement with those key stakeholders, particularly the EDiC and MH teams. The
changes now ensure that any discrepancies are identified and the patient is provided with
another opportunity to discuss their current position with a member of the healthcare team. It
also ensures that healthcare are aware of the patient’s history and can factor this into any
subsequent assessments.
We have also recently undertaken a pilot exercise for mental health triage screening of every
new reception, and that typically was being undertaken on day 2. This pilot exercise took place
during May - July 2022. The results of this pilot exercise were positive from both the patients
and team/clinicians perspectives. On this basis, the introduction of the MH triage on a
permanent basis is now subject to contractual discussions between Practice Plus Group and
Midlands Partnership Foundation Trust (MPFT) as our sub-contracted mental health provider.
As always, we continue to receive large numbers of new prisoners each week and therefore
regular reviews of our EDiC pathway and processes are important to us and our service. Whilst
we are happy that the clinical review found good and equivalence of care in this case, we are
always looking for ways to improve and thank the Coroner for raising his concern with us.
I hope that the above information provides you with reassurance that the concerns expressed
have been addressed. Practice Plus Group is committed to ensuring the high quality provision
of healthcare services to all prisoners at HMP Hewell and Early Days in Custody is something
that is regularly reviewed for improvement and a formal review of the EDiC Passport v4 will take
place by end of December 2022. We will also ensure that any lessons learnt as a result of this
inquest are shared across all of Practice Plus Group’s services.
If I can be of any further assistance you should not hesitate to contact me directly.
Yours sincerely
National Medical Director, Health in Justice, Practice Plus Group
Enc.
Page 4 of 4
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.