Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022

Philip Day

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0351, written 4 Nov 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report4 Nov 2022
Reference2022-0351
DeceasedPhilip Day
CoronerAlison Mutch
Coroner areaManchester South
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:  Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 
CORONER 

1 

I am Alison Mutch, Senior Coroner, for the Coroner Area of Greater Manchester 
South 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice 
Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 
2013 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 22nd April 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of Philip 
Geoffrey Day. The investigation concluded on the 19th October 2022 and the 
conclusion was one of Narrative: Died from complications of necessary 
medical therapy. The medical cause of death was 1a) Multi-organ Failure; 1b) 
Neutropenic Sepsis and Colitis; 1c) Methotrexate treatment of Psoriatic 
Arthritis 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Philip Geoffrey Day had psoriatic arthritis. He was prescribed methotrexate for 
his condition. Blood tests on 10th April 2022 showed that he had neutropenia 
and a raised CRP. He was advised to go to hospital due to the risk of 
neutropenic sepsis a rare but recognised complication of methotrexate. He 
went to Stepping Hill Hospital. Triage occurred approximately 50 minutes after 
his arrival and he was reviewed by a doctor at 04.56 almost 7 hours after his 
arrival. Antibiotics and fluids were prescribed for his neutropenic sepsis. This 
was outside the recommended timeliness guidelines. He was admitted to 
Stepping Hill Hospital and continued to be treated for neutropenic sepsis. He 
developed ileitis and colitis. He continued to be treated. On 15th April the 
combination of the neutropenic sepsis and inflammation led to a cardiac arrest 
and multi organ failure. He died at Stepping Hill Hospital on 15th April 2022. 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to 
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action 
is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  – 

1.  When Mr Day arrived in ED, it was struggling to cope with a large 

backlog. Waiting times on that night /morning were significant. Triage 
wait times were approximately 1 hour. The time to see a doctor rose 
through the night to 7 hours and 38 minutes by 6am. The inquest heard 
that this was due to sheer volumes and that this is a situation that still 
arises. The impact is a delay in patients being seen, assessed and treated 
promptly; 

2.  In relation to Mr Day the inquest heard that the community OOH Doctor 
had correctly recognised the risk of neutropenic sepsis and had rung 
through to speak to a doctor at the hospital. At the inquest there was no 
documentation to assist in tracking that conversation or any evidence it 
had been recorded or acted on. It was clear from the evidence at the 
inquest that the sharing of information between community clinicians 
and secondary care was important and that there appears to be no 
recognised way for this to happened due to varied IT systems and no 
national recommendations for best practice in this scenario. As a 
consequence vital information is not available to ED teams. 

3.  The Inquest heard that Mr Day’s first EWS score in ED was 2. He did not 
trigger on EWS for sepsis. However the blood tests in the community 
had shown a very low neutrophil level and a rising CRP. Had those 
factors been recognised along with his immunosuppression then he 
would have been treated under the neutropenic sepsis pathway earlier. 
The evidence suggested that there is a lack of awareness of the guidance 
and red flags for neutropenic sepsis which delays treatment. Greater 
awareness and triage questions that prompt for neutropenic sepsis 
would reduce the risk of neutropenic sepsis symptoms being missed at 
triage. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you 
have the power to take such action. 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this 
report, namely by 30th December 2022. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, 
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action 
is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following 
Interested Persons namely Mr Day’s Family and Browne Jacobson Solicitors, 
who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or 
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he 
believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, 
the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication 
of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9  Alison Mutch OBE 
HM Senior Coroner 

04.11.2022 

3

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Department of Health and Social Care (PDF)
From Helen Whately MP 
Minister of State for Care 

39 Victoria Street 
London 
SW1H 0EU 

Alison Mutch  
Senior Coroner for the Coroner Area of Greater Manchester South 
Coroner's Court 
1 Mount Tabor Street 
Stockport 
SK1 3AG 

2 May 2024 

Dear Ms Mutch,  

Thank you for your letter of 4 November 2022 to the Secretary of State for Health and Social 
Care Steve Barclay, about the death of Philip Day. I am replying as Minister with responsibility 
for urgent and emergency care. Please accept my sincere apologies for the significant delay 
in responding to this matter. I would like to assure you that the department is mindful of the 
statutory  responsibilities  in  relation  to  prevention  of  future  deaths  reports  and  we  are 
prioritising responses as a matter of urgency. 

Firstly, I would like to say how deeply sorry I was to read the circumstances of Mr Day’s death 
and I offer my sincere condolences to his family.  I am grateful to you for bringing these matters 
to my attention.  

Your  report  raises  concerns  about  to  the  treatment  provided  at  Stepping  Hill  Hospital, 
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust. In preparing this response, my officials have made enquiries 
with NHS England (NHSE), local NHS services, and the Care Quality Commission (CQC). 

In  relation  to  the  concerns  about  the  identification  and  early  treatment  of  sepsis,  NHSE  is 
committed to finding ways to make awareness of the potential for sepsis, and the response to 
it, ever more consistent. The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AoMRC) has also issued 
advice  to  support  decision  making  on  the  appropriate  treatment  of  Sepsis.  The  AoMRC 
statement sets  out that  there is  any  clinical  concern  or  laboratory  evidence,  such  as  blood 
tests,  it  encourages  escalation  regardless  of  the  patient’s  NEWS2  score.  This  is  already 
reinforced in medical and nurse training widely, but the consistency of application in practice 
is key. NEWS2 is primarily for use in a hospital setting, and the need for an equivalent process 
in the community is recognised, and consideration of this is being taken forward. 

In relation to the concerns raised around the pressures in the emergency department and A&E 
waiting times, NHSE inform me that the local plan in place within Greater Manchester to help 
address A&E waiting times, includes upscaling primary care, increasing the number of 111 
and  999  call  handlers,  improving  the  use  of  the  directory  of  services  and  navigation  of 
alternatives to A&E, and to provide better home support to help reduce pressure on hospital 
bed  capacity  and  enable  faster  patient  flow  through  hospitals.  Locally  work  is  underway  to 
create a shared care record across primary and secondary care meaning pathology results 
will be able to be viewed along with clinical reviews whether undertaken in a community or 
hospital setting. I have asked officials to further raise the processes for information sharing 
between community out-of-hours services and emergency departments, with NHS England  

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The  CQC  has  also  considered  your  report  and  will  continue  to  monitor  waiting  times  in 
emergency departments, delayed admissions and waiting times for surgery with regular trust 
engagement on ongoing risks and pressures. 

I recognise the  pressures  our  A&E  services  are facing  and  the  impact  on  waiting  times  for 
patients.  That  is  why  we  published  our  2-year  Delivery  plan  for  recovering  urgent  and 
emergency care services in January 2023, which aims to deliver sustained improvements in 
emergency waiting times. The ambition is to improve A&E wait times to 78% of patients being 
admitted, transferred, or discharged within four hours by March 2025. 

A  key  part  of  the  plan  has  been  to  increase  hospital  capacity  to  improve  patient  flow  and 
reduce overcrowding in A&E. We have achieved the ambition of delivering 5,000 more staffed, 
permanent  beds  this  year  compared  to  2022-23  plans  -  backed  by  £1  billion  of  dedicated 
funding. Further, we also achieved our target of scaling up virtual ward beds to over 10,000 in 
advance of winter.  

We recognise that a whole-system approach is needed to ensure people get the emergency 
care they need when they need it. This is why we have made £1.6 billion of funding available 
over  two  years  to  support  the  NHS  and  local  authorities  to  ensure  timely  and  effective 
discharge  from  hospital,  helping  to free  up  beds  and reduce  long waits  for  admission  from 
A&E. 

We  have  seen  improvement  in  A&E  waiting  times  this  year  following  the  Delivery  Plan’s 
publication. National A&E 4-hour performance improved by 3.3ppt to 74.2% in March 2024 
from 70.9% in February 2024, and up from 71.5% in March 2023. However we recognise there 
is more to do, and reducing waiting times is a priority for this Government.  

Thank you once again for bringing these concerns to my attention.  

Yours,  

HELEN WHATELY

Related reports

Other reports by Alison Mutch

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.