Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2022
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2022-0389, written 1 Dec 2022. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 1 Dec 2022 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2022-0389 |
| Deceased | Mary Nwanonyiri |
| Coroner | Nadia Persaud |
| Coroner area | East London |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
MISS N PERSAUD HIS MAJESTY’S CORONER EAST LONDON Walthamstow Coroner's Court, Queens Road Walthamstow, E17 8QP REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) Ref: 13486020 REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: • Foundation Trust Acting Chief Executive Officer, North East London 1 CORONER I am Nadia Persaud area coroner for the coroner area of East London 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 5th May 2021 I commenced an investigation into the death of Mary Ebere Nwanonyiri, aged 33 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the jury inquest on 25th November 2022. The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative conclusion: Mary died following a cardiac arrest that occurred on the 19th April 2021. Her health declined whilst a resident in the care of Goodmayes Hospital. Had there been evidence of physical observations, this may have prevented her sudden decline. The absence of a care plan contributed to her death. 1 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Mary Nwanonyiri was admitted to Goodmayes Hospital following a deterioration in her mental state on the 9th April 2021. She was an inpatient at the hospital until she was found unresponsive in her room on the 19th April 2021. During the course of the admission, Mary had largely declined medication and vital signs observations. During the course of the 10-day admission to hospital, under section 3 of the Mental Health Act, there was no written care plan for Mary. There was no completed risk assessment document with an associated risk management plan. Mary was found unresponsive in her bedroom on the morning of the 19th April 2021. Post-mortem investigations revealed that she died as a result of Covid-19 infection. The expert witness was unable to fully explain the apparent rapid decline in Mary’s physical condition. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 1. Senior nursing staff who gave evidence at the Inquest did not appear to appreciate the importance of an agreed comprehensive care plan in which the multi-disciplinary ward team, patient and relatives are involved. The nursing staff did not acknowledge the value of a holistic care plan which incorporates the consideration of the many ways in which patients can be supported to engage in their recovery. Such a care plan could also incorporate assessments of capacity to refuse physical observations. There was no clear evidence of assessment of Mary’s capacity to refuse physical observations. 2. A number of nurses failed to recognise the acute clinical severity of Mary’s condition on the morning of the 19th April 2021. They did not respond to her very concerning clinical state with the necessary urgency. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you [AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 26 January 2023 I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons the family of Mary Nwanonyiri, the Care Quality Commission. I have also sent it to the Local Director of Public Health who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. 2 The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response. 9 1 December 2022 [SIGNED BY CORONER] 3
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
Ms N Persaud
HM Coroner
East London Coroners Service
Walthamstow Coroner's Court
Queens Road
Walthamstow
E17 8QP
Acting Chief Executive
Trust Head Office
West Wing
CEME Centre
Rainham
Essex
RM13 8GQ
13 January 2023
Dear Madam
Re: Inquest touching upon the death of Mary NWANONYIRI
I refer to your letter dated 01 December 2022 and the enclosed Regulation 28 report,
issued in respect of your concerns regarding the risk of future deaths.
Concerns
At the conclusion of the hearing into the death of Mary Nwanonyiri, you expressed
concern regarding the matters below:
1. Senior nursing staff who gave evidence at the Inquest did not appear to appreciate
the importance of an agreed comprehensive care plan in which the multi-
disciplinary ward team, patient and relatives are involved. The nursing staff did not
acknowledge the value of a holistic care plan which incorporates the consideration
of the many ways in which patients can be supported to engage in their recovery.
Such a care plan could also incorporate assessments of capacity to refuse
physical observations. There was no clear evidence of assessment of Mary’s
capacity to refuse physical observations.
2. A number of nurses failed to recognise the acute clinical severity of Mary’s
condition on the morning of the 19th April 2021. They did not respond to her very
concerning clinical state with the necessary urgency.
I have provided a summary of the actions we have taken in relation to your concerns. A
detailed action plan addressing specific aspects of the improvement work is attached.
www.nelft.nhs.uk
Senior nursing staff who gave evidence at the Inquest did not appear to appreciate
the importance of an agreed comprehensive care plan in which the multi-
disciplinary ward team, patient and relatives are involved. The nursing staff did not
acknowledge the value of a holistic care plan which incorporates the consideration
of the many ways in which patients can be supported to engage in their recovery.
Such a care plan could also incorporate assessments of capacity to refuse
physical observations. There was no clear evidence of assessment of Mary’s
capacity to refuse physical observations.
The Executive Team currently have oversight of care planning compliance Trust wide.
Compliance with care planning is monitored regularly through the 3 C’s app on our Power
BI performance platform and reviewed by the monthly Acute and Rehabilitation
Directorate (ARD) Quality Leadership Team. Exceptions are escalated to the Executive
Director and presented at the Quality and Safety Committee for assurance to the Board.
ARD compliance is currently 100% and the expectation is that it will remain at this level.
All patients will have a named nurse and an associate nurse to deputise in their absence.
The Named Nurse/Health Professional Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) will be
amended to make this explicit as it currently states: ‘In most cases the named
nurse/professional will have an associate who will deputise in his/her absence’.
With regard to the quality of care planning, nursing leadership have further reviewed our
processes. The admitting nurse will write an initial care plan and the expectation is that
the named nurse, or associate nurse in their absence, will review the care plan within 72
hours and weekly thereafter. This will ensure timely completion of a multidisciplinary
(MDT) care plan for each patient, which will be co-produced with patients and carers,
with patients’ consent.
Clinical leads will ensure capacity assessments are completed for all patients regarding
their care and treatment, including patients who have declined to participate in their care
planning or are non-compliant with their care plan. Multidisciplinary decisions will be
made in the best interest of patients who lack capacity in consultation with their carer and
the respective stakeholders.
The quality of care planning is monitored through the bi-weekly peer care planning audit.
Audit questions include multi-disciplinary team input, physical health, patients’ views,
carers’ views and capacity in relation to treatment decisions. Results and actions taken
to address findings will be monitored through the monthly Respect Approach meeting,
and any concerns identified will be escalated to the Quality Leadership Team. The
January 2023 Respect Approach Meeting will have a specific focus on care planning and
the care planning audit tool. This has recently been reviewed by a task and finish group,
including our Clinical Effectiveness Team and Audit Team to ensure it remains fit for
purpose.
As indicated in the attached action plan, the Trust has piloted a non-contact vital signs
monitoring medical device (Oxevision) on one of our in-patient wards. The device is
currently being installed in single bedrooms across our wards to complement routine vital
signs checks by nurses, particularly where the service user is uncooperative with their
physical health care plan, or it is unsafe to approach them for physical health checks due
to aggression or violence towards staff.
www.nelft.nhs.uk
Focus groups will be held with Matrons and Ward Managers to look at existing care
plans and emphasise the importance of person-centred care planning to the
patient, carer and staff involved in delivering care. The focus groups will also
involve patients and carers.
The Regulation 28 findings will be shared at the ARD quarterly Serious Incident Learning
Event, with a specific focus on the importance of care planning.
A number of nurses failed to recognise the acute clinical severity of Mary’s
condition on the morning of the 19th April 2021. They did not respond to her very
concerning clinical state with the necessary urgency.
As previously stated, the Oxevision device is currently being installed in single bedrooms
across our wards to complement routine vital signs checks by nurses, particularly where
the service user is uncooperative with their physical health care plan.
Resuscitation drills have been increased from every 2 months to monthly for every ward.
A program of resuscitation drill training/refresher training is being progressed which now
includes all ward managers as well as matrons. 16 managers and matrons have been
recently trained, with 8 outstanding to be trained in January 2023. Resuscitation drill
action plan monitoring is now a standing agenda item on the Quality Leadership Team
Meeting as is Intermediate Life Support training compliance.
A business case will be submitted to the Executive Management Team for increased
capacity for Resuscitation Officers, including a dedicated Resuscitation Officer for ARD.
Funding is approved for a band 6 general nurse to support the physical health needs of
patients on Picasso Ward and to provide training to staff, and recruitment is being
progressed.
The process for auditing the content of our emergency equipment resuscitation trolleys
on our wards has been reviewed and is now inputted via the ‘my kit check’ app. Non-
compliance with daily and monthly equipment checks is automatically emailed to
matrons, managers and the resuscitation officer. The system also automatically re-orders
items that are nearing their expiry date. The app includes a visual display of each item of
equipment being checked.
An emergency response SOP is in place. A new SAS Alarm system with a display panel
indicating the location of an incident has been installed in all clinical areas to expedite
the attendance of the Emergency Response Team (ERT) in the event of a medical
emergency. Furthermore, to enhance current emergency response process, each
cardiac arrest/CPR emergency call is followed by a direct radio message by the lead
Incident Coordinator (IC) to alert the ERT to medical emergencies as distinct from calls
for support with the management of incidents of violence and aggression. A guidance
process is being developed, clearly outlining expectations for all staff involved in incident
response and detailing actions that will be taken for staff who do not respond
appropriately to medical and other emergencies.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for raising your concerns as part of this
inquest. We find learning from inquests extremely valuable and are very grateful for your
www.nelft.nhs.uk
comprehensive investigation, which benefits not only the families of the deceased, but
also the Trust and its service users.
I trust that the above and the attached action plan will reassure you that the Trust has taken
this tragic death very seriously indeed, and that it reflects our commitment to improve care
quality and patient safety.
If I can further assist, please do contact my office
Yours sincerely
Acting Chief Executive
Enc: Action Plan
www.nelft.nhs.uk
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.