Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0247, written 23 May 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 23 May 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2025-0247 |
| Deceased | George Fraser |
| Coroner | Nadia Persaud |
| Coroner area | East London |
| Category | Mental Health related deaths · Community health care and emergency services related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
MISS N PERSAUD HIS MAJESTY’S CORONER EAST LONDON East London Coroners Court, 124 Queens Road, Walthamstow, London E17 8QP REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) Ref: REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. , CEO, North East London Foundation Trust (NELFT), CEME Centre, March Way, Rainham, Essex, RM13 8GQ Sent via email: Cc: 1 CORONER I am Nadia Persaud, Area Coroner for the coroner area of East London 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 27 November 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of George Kenneth Fraser, aged 37 years old. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 14 May 2025. The conclusion of the inquest was an open inquest, as the cause of Mr Fraser’s death was unascertained. 1 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Mr. Fraser was a 37-year-old gentleman who had suffered from schizophrenia, hypothyroidism and misuse of alcohol. He required admission to a mental health hospital under a section of the Mental Health Act from 20 February 2024 to 18 March 2024. On discharge, he received very regular input from the Home Treatment Team until 9 May 2024, when he was transferred to the Mental Health & Wellbeing Team. There was no clear care plan in place whilst he was under the care of the Mental Health & Wellbeing Team. A new Care Co-Ordinator was allocated on the 5 June 2024. This Care Co-Ordinator met with Mr. Fraser on only one occasion (19 June 2024). Mr Fraser did not converse with the care co-ordinator at this time, so a meaningful risk assessment could not be completed. The last recorded contact with Mr. Fraser by the NHS services was an administrative call on the 9 July 2024. Family last had contact with him on the 8 July 2024. Visits were made by the mental health and wellbeing team on 16 July 2024, 22 July 2024 and the 24 July 2024 but there was no response. The family were informed that Mr. Fraser was "denying entry". The team did not make it clear to the family that they had received no response at all from Mr. Fraser - either to home visits or telephone calls. The mental health team did not notify the family that a friend had also raised concerns about a lack of contact with Mr Fraser on the 18 July 2024. When a further failed visit occurred on the 29 July 2024, the mental health and wellbeing team requested that the family assist them in gaining access to Mr. Fraser. Mr. Fraser's sister attended his home address and found him clearly deceased within the premises. A paramedic attended and pronounced his life extinct on scene. Police attended and deemed the circumstances as non-suspicious. A post-mortem examination was carried out. Despite a post-mortem examination, which included specialist tests for toxicology and neuropathology, a cause of death could not be identified. The pathologist considered that Mr. Fraser had likely passed away a few weeks before he was found. There was a lack of clear risk assessment, risk management and care planning by the Mental Health and Wellbeing Team, but it is not possible to reach a conclusion about the causal effect of this, as both the date when Mr Fraser passed away and the cause of death are unascertained. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (1) There was no clear and documented care plan in place whilst Mr Fraser was under the care of the Mental Health and Wellness Team. There was a lack of structure to the care provided to Mr Fraser by the Mental Health and Wellness Team. (2) There was no robust risk assessment carried out by the Mental Health and Wellness team. (3) The Mental Health and Wellness Team had been unable to reach Mr Fraser from the 16 July 2024. On the 18 July 2024 a friend contacted the mental health team to raise concern about his lack of contact with Mr Fraser. No action was taken at this time to review the risk of harm to Mr Fraser or to determine whether the Trust’s missing person procedure should be activated. There was no meaningful contact with the family to report the concerning lack 5 2 of contact with Mr Fraser, until the 29 July 2024. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you [AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 22 July 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons, the family of Mr George Fraser, the Care Quality Commission and to the local Director of Public Health who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response. 9 23 May 2025 3
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
Ms Nadia Persaud
HM Coroner
East London Coroner’s Service
124 Queens Road
Walthamstow
London
E17 8QP
By email only to:
coroners@walthamforest.gov.uk
Your ref: 28676512
Trust ref: 1576
Dear Madam
Trust Head Office
West Wing
CEME Centre
Rainham
Essex
RM13 8GQ
23rd July 2025
Re: Inquest touching upon the death of George Fraser
I am writing in response to your Prevention of Future Deaths report, dated 23 May 2025, detailing
your concerns about the risk of future deaths following the findings of the Inquest.
Firstly, I should like to extend my sincere condolences to the family of George Fraser. This must
have been a challenging time for them, and I hope that my response provides you and them with
assurance that the North East London Foundation Trust (NELFT) is taking action to address the
issues set out in your report.
The concerns raised were that:
1. There was no clear and documented care plan in place whilst Mr Fraser was under the
care of the Mental Health and Wellness Team (MW&HT). There was a lack of structure
to the care provided to Mr Fraser by the Mental Health and Wellness Team.
www.nelft.nhs.uk
2. There was no robust risk assessment carried out by the Mental Health and Wellness
team.
3. The Mental Health and Wellness Team had been unable to reach Mr Fraser from the 16
July 2024. On 18 July 2024, a friend contacted the mental health team to raise concerns
about his lack of contact with Mr Fraser. No action was taken at this time to review the
risk of harm to Mr Fraser or to determine whether the Trust’s missing person procedure
should be activated. There was no meaningful contact with the family to report the
concerning lack.
I was sorry to hear these concerns. As a Trust we continue to implement changes in a number
of areas that aim to improve our service in these areas, and these are set out below.
Care Plans
Since 2024, we have been undertaking significant improvement work in relation to care planning.
This has been driven by identified quality improvements, including those raised by patients and
carers. In doing so, we have worked in close collaboration with patients and carers.
The Mental Health and Wellness team are now using the DIALOG tool in working with patients
who are presenting to services. This is a quality of life and outcome measure that is completed
by service users, allowing them to focus care planning work on the most important areas of their
life to them across a number of domains, including mental and physical health, relationships, and
accommodation. Staff use the DIALOG questionnaire to understand what matters most to the
service user and this information helps staff and service users collaboratively develop a care plan
tailored to the user's priorities. The questionnaire facilitates a comprehensive assessment of the
user's needs and can be reviewed during care plan evaluations to track progress and establish
future goals. Community team staff have been trained in using DIALOG for over a year, with
refresher training available as needed. We are monitoring the use of this approach, and the
number of plans being developed in this way is increasing as implementation progresses.
Additionally, care planning workshops have been held throughout 2025 and are scheduled to
continue. These workshops aim to support staff to use their skills to co-create individualised care
plans with service users and their support networks. The workshops emphasise the importance
of involving service users in the care planning process, focusing on their preferences and goals.
Chair:
Chief
www.nelft.nhs.uk
By including service users and carers alongside clinical staff, the workshops foster a deeper
understanding of the value of well-structured, recovery-focused care plans.
Mental Health and Wellness Teams in Havering have also started using an electronic system,
the Management and Supervision Tool (MaST). This enables clinicians and managers to
manage caseloads and to monitor the quality of documentation, levels of engagement, and how
documentation reflects risk and the complexity of a patient’s needs. This also enables monitoring
of DIALOG and care planning, allowing staff to clearly identify, where review of the patient is
required.
The patient safety investigation report into Mr Fraser’s sad death also highlighted learning
outcomes in relation to team risk management. When Mr Fraser was not engaging with the
Mental Health and Wellness Team, outcomes from the multidisciplinary zoning meeting were
relatively passive, meaning that there was not an assertive response to support Mr Fraser. To
support improvements in relation to this, we have established a Quality Improvement project to
review zoning practices across the four boroughs. One outcome of this will be a revised template
for teams to use to review cases, that maintains a focus on when the last face to face contact
with a client took place. The implementation of the MaST tool also assists practitioners and
supervisors in ensuring that face to face contact with clients is taking place appropriately.
The patient safety incident investigation report also highlighted that although a transfer of care
from the Home Treatment Team to the Mental Health and Wellness Team was completed, there
was a lack of follow up from the Mental Health and Wellness Team to support Mr Fraser. In
response to this, we have strengthened both the induction process for new care co-ordinators to
focus on thorough handover of client information to try and maintain continuity of care, and the 7
day follow up process for clients at the point of transfer between teams. This change is intended
to prevent the lack of follow up that took place in Mr Fraser’s case from occurring in future.
Risk Assessments
Since the publication of NICE Guidance NG225 on self-harm was published, focusing on
assessment, management, and preventing recurrence, we have been working to change Trust
practice in relation to the assessment and management of risk. In November 2023, NELFT's
senior clinical leadership established a working group to plan for the full implementation of this
Chair:
Chief
www.nelft.nhs.uk
approach. The working group comprises staff from all professional groups, as well as service
users and carers. To support implementation of this, new training has been developed, electronic
recording systems reviewed and updated, trainers recruited, and team support designed to
ensure that staff are equipped to embed this new way of working. This work programme has
been co-produced with service users and carers, including involvement in training delivery, with
every training day supported by a service user or carer to ensure their voice was heard throughout
the process. This undertaking required considerable preparation before the rollout of the training
began in 2024. The training programme has been delivered locality by locality, with three
localities completed to date (July 2025). Havering staff are due to complete their training at the
end of this month, 2025 and the overall Trust training timelines are outlined in the table below.
Directorate
Training Dates 2024
Training Dates 2025
Acute and Rehab Directorate
Sept – Dec
Barking & Dagenham
Waltham Forest
Havering
Redbridge
January to March
April to June
May to July
July to September
Compliance is monitored in teams through individual supervision, utilising the MaST tool, as well
as team meetings and clinically focused groups, such as the team zoning meeting.
Feedback to date is that risk formulation does enable service users and staff to design care plans
that are more responsive and person-centred to immediate needs and mitigate risk as far as is
reasonably practicable and the outcome of this work will continue to be monitored by teams and
across the trust. This ongoing monitoring (and future development of this approach) is co-
ordinated through the Trust’s Risk Formulation Steering Group and the work of this group
includes supporting directorate and place-based leaders to measure patient and staff
experiences, as well as ensuring the quality of risk formulation. The aim of this is to embed
cultural change and integrate formulation-based approaches into all clinical risk discussions.
Missed Appointments Procedure
The NELFT Missed Appointments Policy is currently under review and the updated version is
expected to be finalised in the Autumn of 2025. The updated policy now includes more robust
Chair:
Chief
www.nelft.nhs.uk
guidance on how to work with patients in more person-centered way when they disengage or
miss appointments, or where attempts to contact the users of the service have been
unsuccessful.
The policy outlines that staff should contact the family and individuals in the service user's social
network, the GP, and any other services which are involved. The policy also provides that a
contact with the Police may be indicated.
The policy also indicates that concerns raised by family or friends should always be taken
seriously, and these should be escalated through management lines if the staff member is
unclear of further action. Where concerned, staff members should liaise with the next of kin
about joint visits to the service user's place of residence or other establishments they may
frequent.
The use of the MaST tool within teams also enables clinicians and clinical managers to easily
see when service users last engaged with the service, providing information to clinicians and
team leaders on where service users are not engaging, or where clinicians are not seeing people
regularly. This information can be addressed in individual supervision and clinical meetings.
I hope that the above reassures the family of Mr. Fraser and the Court that the Trust takes
learning from Inquests very seriously and that it has taken relevant actions to improve its service.
If I can be of any further assistance or if you would like a further update on the progress made to
address your concerns, I would be happy to assist.
Yours faithfully
Chief Executive Officer
Chair:
Chief
www.nelft.nhs.uk
Chair: Eileen Taylor
Chief Executive: Paul Calaminus
www.nelft.nhs.uk
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Mental Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.