Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023

Brian Harfield

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0092, written 16 Mar 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report16 Mar 2023
Reference2023-0092
DeceasedBrian Harfield
CoronerPenelope Schofield
Coroner areaWest Sussex
CategoryOther related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

NOTE:  This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

The Rt  Hon Michael Gove 
Secretary of State for Levelling up, Housing and Communities 
2 Marsham Street 
London 
SW1P 4DF 

1  CORONER 

I am Penelope Schofield , Acting Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of West Sussex 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 14th  June 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of Brian George Harfield 
aged 85.  The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 3rd  March 2023.  The 
overall conclusion of the inquest was a short form conclusion of Misadventure. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

On 3rd May 2022 a fire started in the living room of Mr Harfield's flat in the proximity of his 
recliner chair. It is unclear how the fire started but it was more likely than not caused by 
the wiring of a lamp which was located close by. Sadly Mr Harfield was overcome by the 
smoke and was found unconscious in his kitchen. Despite medical intervention by the Fire 
Brigade he sadly did not recover and was pronounced deceased at the scene. 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the investigation, my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my 
opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken.  In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 

The concerns relates to the fact that there is a  lack of compulsory provision for sprinklers 
or other fire safety measures  to protect those who live at home (outside of care homes) 
but are being provided with extra care facilities or those in retirement type provision. 

Due to there being an ageing population and a lack of care home spaces there is a growing 
number of people (who would normally be residing in  care homes) who are now having to 
buy care packages to be delivered either in their own homes or other residential type of 
faciites.  The providers of such accomodation are not subject to any fire safety provisions. 
People who find themselves in this type of facility do suffer declining health and mobility as 
time goes on. They are at a particular risk should a fire occur. They are more at risk than 
those in care homes as there is  24/7 staffing and trained individuals who are well versed in 
responding to a fire situation and evacuating the residents from the affected areas of the 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 premises. 

In an extra care facility it is highly probable that should a fire start that the occupant would 
be unable to leave the room of fire origin/ flat of origin through ill health/ poor mobility, 
and who would be overcome by the toxic products of combustion prior to the Fire and 
Rescue service being alerted. This is exactly what happened in Mr Harfield’s case. 

We heard at this Inquest that whilst a sprinkler controlled fire would still produce smoke it 
would be of a lower level, and there is evidence that on the majority of occasions it does 
not just restrict the fires growth, but actually extinguishes it. 

It is understood that there is currently a Government consultation being undertaken on the 
subject of Sprinklers in Care homes  but the scope of this consultation does not cover the 
specific risk to those in extra care facilities. This is a missed opportunity. 

The consultation can be found here. Sprinklers in care homes, removal of national classes, and 
staircases in residential buildings - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or 
your organisation) have the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 10th  June 2023 I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action.  Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons:-

a)  The family of Brian Harfield 
b)  West Sussex Fire Service 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all 
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. 

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or 
of interest. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. 
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of 
interest. 

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the 
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9  Dated: 16/03/2023 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 Penelope SCHOFIELD 
Senior Coroner for 
West Sussex Coroners Service 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Department for Levelling Up Housing and Communities (PDF)
• 

Department for Levelling  Up, 
Housing & Communities 

Penelope Schofield 
Senior Coroner 
West Sussex Coroners Service 

Rt Hon  Michael Gove MP 
Secretary of State for Levelling up, Housing and 
Communities 
Minister for Intergovernmental Relations 
2 Marsham Street 
London 
SW1P 4DF 

ICJJc  June 2023 

Inquest into the death of Brian  George Harfield:  Regulation 28  report 

Thank  you  for  your  letter and  investigative  report  (dated  16  March  2023)  into  the  death  of Brian 
George  Harfield,  which  was  made  in  accordance  with  Paragraph  7,  Schedule  5,  of the  Coroners 
and  Justice  Act  2009  and  Regulations  28  and  29  of the  Coroners  (Investigations)  Regulations 
2013.  I would  like to offer my sincere condolences to  Mr Harfield's family and friends. 

You  set out matters of concern  and  recommended  that  I,  in  my capacity as the Secretary of State, 
should take action to prevent future deaths.  You  noted  a lack of compulsory provision for sprinklers 
or  other fire  safety  measures  to  protect those  who  live  at  home  (outside  of care  homes)  but  are 
being  provided with  extra  care facilities  or those in  retirement type  provision.  You  expressed  your 
concern  in  terms  of  an  ageing  population  in  which  individuals  may  suffer  declining  health  and 
mobility and,  in  similar circumstances,  could be overcome by the toxic products of combustion prior 
to  the  fire  and  rescue  service  being  alerted;  and  that the  inquest heard  that sprinklers can  reduce 
the  amount of smoke  produced  in  a fire  and  can  often  extinguish  the  fire.  You  also  noted  that the 
scope  of the  sprinklers  in  care  homes,  removal  of national  classes,  and  staircases  in  residential 
buildings  consultation  did  not extend  to extra  care facilities.  That consultation  closed  on  17  March 
2023: 
https://www.gov. u k/gove rn ment/ co nsu ltations/spri n kle rs-in-ca re-homes-rem ova I-of-national-
classes-and-sta i rcases-i n-reside ntia I-bu i Id i ngs/sp ri nkle rs-i n-care-homes-remova l-of-nati ona I-
classes-and-staircases-in-residential-buildings 

The Government recognises that further evidence is  required  on the benefit of sprinklers and  other 
additional  fire  protection  measures  in  specialised  housing  and,  to  this  end,  we  have  a  dedicated 
research  workstream  in  place.  I will  consider future  research  findings  in  light of your concerns and 
the evidence  heard  at  Mr Harfield's inquest,  so that we can  consider what changes  are  necessary 
to  reduce the risk of similar incidents in the future.  We have planned future research that will  inform 
us of the benefit of sprinklers over other policy options such as enhancing fire detection and  alarms 
or additional fire compartmentation. This will generate up-to-date evidence to help us  review current 
building  regulation  policy  and  inform  future  changes. Our research  work  is  being  phased;  stage  1 
has already found  a body of existing evidence for sprinklers in  care homes that enabled  us to bring 
forward  evidence-based  policy  proposals  for  sprinklers  ahead  of  completion  of  the  research 
workstream . 

The scope of the sprinklers in care homes,  removal of national classes,  and staircases in  residential 
buildings consultation did  not extend to  extra care premises because,  at the time of publication, we 
did  not have evidence for their benefit nor could we have readily defined extra care as there are  no 
statutory definitions for such buildings. 

 
 
 We were,  however,  able to make progress with the consultation setting  out proposals for Approved 
Document B to  recommend  sprinklers in  all  new care  homes (regardless of height) to be  designed 
to  the  current  British  Standard.  Stage  2  of the  research  will  generate  evidence  on  the  benefit  of 
sprinklers  and  other fire  protection  measures,  in  specialised  housing;  at  present we  do  not  have 
is  present  across  specialised  housing.  International 
robust 
comparisons  are  difficult  because  of variations  in  overall  fire  strategy  design  for  buildings.  New 
evidence will  inform  us of the  benefit of sprinklers over other policy options,  such  as enhancing fire 
detection and  alarm,  or additional fire compartmentation . 

information  about  where 

risk 

Building  Regulations: sprinklers in  new buildings 
Building  work  must  meet  all  relevant  requirements  of  the  Building  Regulations.  The  technical 
requirements are set out in Schedule 1 (section B3) to the Building Regulations 2010, which includes 
reasonably  necessary: 
inhibiting 
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2010/2214/schedule/1/made 

the  building  where 

the  spread  of 

fire  within 

is 

it 

Approved  Document  B provides  guidance to  meet fire  safety  requirements  set out  in  the  Building 
Regulations 2010: 
https://www.gov.uk/governmenUpublications/fire-safety-approved-document-b 

My  department  and  the  new  Building  Safety  Regulator  keep  guidance  in  Approved  Document  B 
including  sprinkler  provisions  under  close  review.  In  2020,  the  Government  amended  Approved 
Document  B  to  reduce  the  height  threshold  (from  30  metres  to  11  metres)  for  the  inclusion  of 
sprinklers  in  blocks  of flats;  this  included  extra  care  buildings  designed  as  blocks  of  flats . The 
Building  Safety  Regulator  now  has  a dedicated  workstream  to  consider what additional  fire  safety 
measures  may  be  necessary  in  specialised  housing  for vulnerable  people,  including  in  extra  care 
facilities. 

The  sprinklers  in  care  homes,  removal  of national  classes,  and  staircases  in  residential  buildings 
consultation  makes provision for all  new care homes to  be  provided with sprinklers.  It was brought 
forward  following  stage  1  of  our  research  workstream.  Building  Safety  Regulator  officials  are 
reviewing the responses submitted.  We will consider where further evidence is required  to consider 
the effectiveness of additional fire protection measures in specialised housing alongside the ongoing 
research.  Sprinklers  are  only  one  of  a  range  of  potential  fire  safety  measures  which  may  be 
appropriate to  ensure safety.  The  Building  Safety Regulator's  review of Approved  Document B will 
look at wider issues and  measures as part of the overall fire strategy in  these types of building. 

Sprinklers in existing buildings 
Fire  safety  in  existing  buildings  is  covered  by  separate  legislation  which  includes  the  Regulatory 
Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (the FSO).  The FSO, which is the responsibility of the Home Office, 
applies  to  the  common  parts  of multi-occupied  residential  buildings  and  requires  the  responsible 
person  (the  person  in  control  of the  premises  - usually the  building  owner,  landlord  or  managing 
agent) to  undertake and  review regularly a fire  risk assessment. The  responsible person  must then 
ensure that adequate and  appropriate fire  precautions that mitigate against the  risk  to  life from  fire 
are  in  place.  It  is  for the  responsible  person  to  determine these  measures,  based  on  the fire  risk 
assessment. 

The  Government makes  guidance  available to  support  responsible  persons  in  meeting  their legal 
duties  under the  FSO  and  they  may also  seek  support from  a  competent fire  risk  assessor.  The 
FSO does not apply to individual private homes. 

Section  6 of the  Fire  and  Rescue  Services Act 2004  requires  fire  and  rescue  services to  promote 
fire safety in  its area,  specifically providing  information, publicity and  encouragement to prevent fire 
and  associated  casualties. Fire  and  rescue  services  routinely  target  those  most  at  risk  from  fire, 
which  included those with mobility difficulties, with  in-home person-centred interventions.  Home fire 
safety visits  see  fire  and  rescue  services visiting  homes and  providing  fire  safety advice tailored to 

 the  household  and  living  arrangements.  This  often  includes  the  free  provision  and  installation  of 
smoke alarms  but,  where the  risk  is extremely high,  it  may also  include the  provision  of other fire 
safety measures such as fire-retardant bedding or smoking  aprons. 

Residents in both new and existing extra care buildings have the right to expect safe, quality, healthy 
environments and there should  be full  consideration of the  risks  in  a building  to determine the right 
protection  to  keep  residents  safe.  My department has  taken  steps to  improve  safety for  people  in 
privately  and  socially  rented  homes .  The  Smoke  and  Carbon  Monoxide  Alarm  (Amendment) 
Regulations 2022 are now in  force and,  as of 1 October 2022,  all private and  social  landlords must 
ensure: at least one smoke alarm is equipped on each storey of their homes where there is a  room 
used as living accommodation; that a carbon monoxide alarm is equipped in any room used as living 
accommodation which contains a fixed  combustion  appliance (excluding gas cookers);  and ensure 
smoke alarms and carbon monoxide alarms are repaired  or replaced  once informed and found that 
they are faulty. 

You  will  also  want  to  know  that  the  Government  amended  the  statutory  guidance  (Approved 
Document J) supporting  Part J of the Building  Regulations to require that carbon  monoxide alarms 
are fitted  alongside the  installation  of fixed  combustion  appliances of any fuel  type  (excluding  gas 
cookers) .  Fire safety guidance for tenants and  landlords and  can be found  on  gov.uk: 
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/fire-safety-of-your-building-advice-for-tenants-and-
residents/fire-safety-of-your-building-for-tenants-and-residents 

https://www .gov.uk/government/collections/fire-safety-legislation-guidance-for-those-with-legal-
duties 

In  addition,  if a  local  authority inspects residential  premises and  identifies a fire  hazard at the most 
dangerous  'category 1'  level,  using  the  Housing  Health  and  Safety Rating  System,  it has  a duty to 
take enforcement action  under the Housing Act 2004.  Landlords must comply with  enforcement or 
can face a financial penalty or prosecution. The presence of a category 1 hazard will also mean the 
Decent Homes Standard,  which  all  social  housing  must meet,  is failed.  Last year,  in  our Levelling 
Up White  Paper,  we committed  to  halve  the  number of non-decent rented  homes by 2030.  In  our 
Private  Rented  Sector White  Paper, we also committed  to  introduce a  Decent Homes Standard to 
the sector for the first time. 

Building Safety Regulator 
Finally, we have introduced a more stringent regulatory regime led by the Building Safety Regulator. 
The Building Safety Regulator has responsibilities for overseeing the safety of all buildings,  including 
identifying patterns of regulatory failure and making recommendations for improving standards. This 
will  drive  continuous  improvement  in  the  performance  of  all  buildings  to  ensure  the  safety  of 
occupants. 
I have forwarded your letter to Philip White who has taken up the role of Director of Building Safety 
at the  Building  Safety Regulator,  pending  recruitment of the next Chief Inspector of Buildings. 

The Government is committed to improving fire safety and to ensuring people are safe and feel safe 
in their own homes. Thank you  once again for providing this report. 

Rt Hon  Michael Gove MP 
Secretary of State for Levelling  Up,  Housing  & Communities 
Minister for Intergovernmental Relations

Related reports

Other reports by Penelope Schofield

See all →

More reports categorised “Other related deaths”

See all →

Track Penelope Schofield

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Penelope Schofield, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.