Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023

Keith Hodson

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0119, written 18 Apr 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report18 Apr 2023
Reference2023-0119
DeceasedKeith Hodson
CoronerHugh Bricknell
Coroner areaHerefordshire
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedWye Valley NHS Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

H G Mark Bricknell 
Senior Coroner 
for County of Herefordshire 

REGULATION  28  REPORT TO  PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS  REPORT  IS  BEING  SENT TO: 

, Chief Executive, Hereford County Hospital 

1 

CORONER 

I am  Hugh  Gregory Mark Bricknell, Senior Coroner for County of Herefordshire 

2 

CORONER'S  LEGAL  POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7,  Schedule 5,  of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and  regulations 
28  and  29  of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 . 
http://www. legislation .gov. u k/u kpga/2009/25/sched u le/5/pa ragra ph/7 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 

3 

INVESTIGATION and  INQUEST 

On  20 July 2022,  I commenced an  investigation into the death of Keith  Hodson, aged 68 years. The 
investigation concluded  at the end  of the Inquest on  5 April 2023. The conclusion  of the Inquest was 
narrative (see 4 below). 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE  DEATH 
Mr Hodson had a complex medical history. There were delays prior to an  ambulance being called,  in 
connection with the attendance of the ambulance, on admission to hospital and subsequently in 
connection with appropriate treatment. 

5 

CORONER'S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern.  In  my opinion 
there is  a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is  taken . In the circumstances it is  my statutory 
duty to report to you. 

The  MATTERS OF CONCERN  are as follows.  -

(1)  I am  advised that an  appropriate Triage System  is  not always adopted in  practice at Accident and 
Emergency. 

(2)  Without the adoption of a Triage System taking place escalation of care cannot meaningfully take 
place. 

(3)  I am  advised that on  occasion appropriate senior oversight does not occur, this is  required to identify 
when a patient has not been appropriately assessed . 

(4) S.I.  reports are not signed  off in a timely fashion  by a responsible individual. 

 (5)  Communication with the next of kin  appears not to have occurred in  a timely fashion. 

Evidence given  at the Inquest identified: 
The Ambulance crew pre-a lerted A and  E,  but the patient was  not triaged using the Manchester Triage 
System,  resulting in  missed opportunities to identify the patient's clinical  priority. There was 
subsequently inadequate monitoring. 
The degree of timely candour with the family is  unclear and  clarification is  required in  this regard . 
It is  acknowledged that delays of substance occurred prior to attendance at A and  E,  but this increases 
the importance of early assessment and triage procedure. 

6 

ACTION  SHOULD BE TAl<EN 

In  my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and  I believe you, 
power to take such  action. 

 have the 

7 

YOUR  RESPONSE 

You  are under a duty to respond to this report within 56  days of the date of this report,  namely by 
13 June 2023  I,  the coroner, may extend the period . 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for 
action. Otherwise you  must explain why no action is  proposed. 

8 

COPIES and  PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and  to the following Interested Persons; 

I am  also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form . He  may send 
a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find  it useful or of interest. You  may make 
representations to me,  the coroner, at the time of your response,  about the release or the publication of 
your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

18 April 2023 

Signature  (11 .~  
HG  Mark Br~1, HM Seniof/oroner: Herefordshire

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Wye Valley NHS Trust (PDF)
Trust Head Quarters 
County Hospital 
Union Walk 
Hereford 
HR1 2ER 

13th June 2023 

Dear Mr Bricknell,  

Please consider this letter a formal response to the prevention of future deaths report received by Wye 
Valley NHS Trust on the 18th April 2023 concerning the inquest into the death of Mr Keith Hodson. The 
Trust would like to offer the family of Mr Hodson our sincerest condolences. 

As an organisation we have considered the concerns detailed in the Regulation 28 report with the utmost 
seriousness. This is an opportunity to learn and improve the service for the people of Herefordshire and 
the surrounding areas. The concerns have been investigated fully and hopefully will provide reassurance 
of the improvements made.  

I will address the issues you have raised in turn: 

1)  Concern that an appropriate triage system is not always used in the Emergency Department.  

Initial assessment of patients attending the Emergency Department (ED) is considered critical by 
the Trust.  

The ED at Wye Valley Trust (WVT) utilises clinical streaming, as recommended by NHS England 
and the Royal College of Emergency Medicine for patients attending the department. This 
consists of a rapid assessment by a senior clinician within 15 minutes of the patient presenting 
and has two objectives. Firstly, to identify patients who are unwell and require immediate clinical 
input (similar to that of traditional triage). Secondly, to commence an appropriate plan and 
determine the best location for ongoing specialty care when required. This secondary objective 
reduces the time taken to provide urgent care to those critically unwell and is an improvement on 
the traditional triage model. At times of very high demand, however this aim cannot always be 
met and therefore as a clinically acceptable backstop the nurse based, Manchester Triage 
system is used. This is a nationally recognised tool that is built into our departmental electronic 
patient record and is used to safely manage patient flow. A record of the triage status of all 
patients in the department is recorded, and visible, on the department electronic tracking system.  
As a second safety measure, the Band 6 nurse in charge routinely checks the triage status of 
patients in the department and diverts clinical resource to those patients who have not yet been 
triaged. 

In relation to this specific incident involving Mr Hodson, an ED trained; agency nurse was 
employed for this shift and attended to Mr Hodson. Because of Mr Hodson’s potential infectious 

     Printed on 100% recycled paper to support our commitment to the environment and careful use of resources. 

                         
 
                     
  
   
             
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 2 

illness, he was taken directly to a cubicle for assessment. A full National Early Warning Score 
(NEWS) assessment was undertaken but unfortunately triage did not take place for reasons we 
cannot establish. In addition, the Band 6 triage check on the electronic tracking system was also 
not undertaken leading to Mr Hodson not undergoing full triage and for which we are sorry. 

We would like to provide you with a full written triage and escalation policy (which are currently 
being reviewed in any case as part of our normal processes) by Friday 14th July 2023 if you 
would find that acceptable. 

2)  Without an effective triage system, escalation of care cannot meaningfully take place.  

We hope that the answer to (1) addresses this point. 

3)  On occasion appropriate senior oversight does not occur, this is required to identify when a 

patient has not been appropriately assessed.  

We have addressed this in (1) above but please find below a more detailed explanation. 

The Trust has a departmental electronic patient record, which is a visual tool that can be reviewed 
by senior staff both on site and remotely. This highlights the patients NEWS (National Early 
Warning Score), triage, streaming status amongst other information and can be seen by all staff 
with access to the tool. During the day there is consultant cover in the ED from 08:00 until 19:00. 
After the hours of 19:00, there is an on-call function and there are clear instructions for staff to 
follow if they require the on-call consultant. Band 7 senior sisters/charge nurses provide ED support 
from the hours of 08:00 until 20:30. Overnight the department is overseen by a Band 6 Nurse in 
Charge and middle grade doctor cover. Since this case, the senior doctor rota has been amended 
leading to an increase in substantive staff on duty. Specialty doctors have received enhanced 
training on departmental oversight and leadership and this is repeated in their rolling training 
programme. Furthermore, we have increased the establishment of Band 6 nurses who are 
employed substantively to provide more consistent senior leadership and support to the 
department.  

4)  SI reports are not signed off in a timely fashion by a responsible individual 

The Trust takes the investigation and production of serious incident reports very seriously.  The 
length of time the investigation takes depends on multiple factors such as complexity, the number 
of clinicians involved and whether an independent opinion is required. The Trust endeavours to 
have all reports completed in a timely fashion and apologise if this is not always the case. SI reports 
have a designated investigating officer who is responsible for collating information, collecting 
statements or speaking with staff and writing the report. This involves collating the learning points to 
avoid similar incidents in the future. This report is then sent for divisional sign off by the divisional 
leads. Once the division approve the report this is then sent for executive sign off. This is signed off 
by either the chief medical officer, deputy chief medical officer or the chief nursing officer. Once the 
report is signed off, it is then sent to the ICB for their review and final sign off. SI reports are 
reportable externally to the ICB and only once the ICB have signed off the report is it considered 
complete and closed.  

The Trust would like to stress that the SI process is designed around learning lessons from 
unfortunate events and not apportioning blame. This extends to the sign off process, the ownership 
of which is held jointly by the Trust and the ICS and no one individual. 

With the implementation of the national patient safety strategy, the SI process will change 
significantly and we will be engaging with you to discuss these changes during the next month. 

  
   
             
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 3 

5)  Communication with the next of kin appears not to have happened in a timely fashion 

Duty of candour is a priority and is highlighted to staff whenever an incident is raised. Upon the 
commencement of an SI investigation family should be informed and thus duty of candour 
completed. In this case the investigation was initially commenced by a consultant in ED, he did not 
find any failings in the medical care and handed the review over to the nursing team. During this 
stage of the review, the Band 7 Nurse found failings in the nursing care. This nurse erroneously 
believed duty of candour had previously been exercised. This miscommunication should not have 
happened and we apologise for the delay in speaking with the family.  

We trust this response satisfactorily addresses the concerns raised in your letter, please do not 
hesitate to get in touch if further clarity on any point is required. 

We will submit the triage and escalation policy by 14 July 2023 and ensure the meeting relating to 
the changes to the serious incident process is arranged in due course (we believe dates are 
currently being sourced).  

Yours sincerely, 

Managing Director

Related reports

Other reports by Hugh Bricknell

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Wye Valley NHS Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Wye Valley NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.