Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0164, written 18 May 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 18 May 2023 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2023-0164 |
| Deceased | Akash Bhudia |
| Coroner | Nadia Persaud |
| Coroner area | East London |
| Category | Other related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
MISS N PERSAUD HIS MAJESTY’S AREA CORONER EAST LONDON East London Coroners, Queens Road Walthamstow, E17 8QP REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: • Medica Reporting Services Ltd, Sixth Floor, One Priory Square, Hastings, East Sussex TN34 1EA 1 CORONER I am Nadia Persaud, Area Coroner for the coroner area of East London 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 30 May 2022, I commenced an investigation into the death of Akash Dinesh Bhudia, age 28 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 16 May 2023. The conclusion was that Mr Bhudia died as a result of natural causes. The inquest however heard evidence in relation to non-causal concerns in relation to the reporting of chest radiographs. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Akash Bhudia suffered from a persistent cough from December 2021. On the 17 January 2022 he attended A&E where he underwent blood tests, chest Xray and medical reviews. The impression at this time was that he was suffering from community acquired pneumonia. He 1 received a dose of intravenous antibiotics and intravenous fluids and was discharged from hospital with a course of oral antibiotics. Akash attended for a follow-up chest Xray on the 28 February 2022. This Xray showed progression in his left lung consolidation and showed a new consolidation in his right lung. The inquest heard that the primary diagnosis based on this Xray should have been tuberculosis. On the 4 March 2022, an emergency ambulance was called when Akash was found to be coughing and vomiting blood. Paramedics attended and provided emergency assistance. They could not however resuscitate Akash and his life was pronounced extinct by a paramedic. A post-mortem examination revealed a pulmonary abscess which was most likely to have been caused by tuberculosis. There is no evidence that any acts or omissions in the care provided to him, contributed to his death. The chest radiograph was not sent for analysis until 8 March 2022. The lack of an alert did not therefore contribute to Akash’s death. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – The Xray on the 28 February 2022, which was carried out following treatment for pneumonia, showed an obvious progression in lung consolidation and was highly suggestive of tuberculosis (a new clinical diagnosis). Akash was not an in-patient in hospital at the time of the follow-up Xray. He had been discharged and was therefore not under the active management of a clinical team. The inquest heard that such significant, unexpected, and important changes should have been highlighted to the referring clinician. This was not done. There does not appear to be a process in place for an alert to be added to the normal communication method to ensure that such significant, unexpected, and important findings are acted upon in a timely manner. The inquest also heard that the incidence of TB is rising in certain areas of the UK and that it is important that radiologists recognise TB changes and that these are duly highlighted to the referrer. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 14 July 2023. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the Interested Persons to the Inquest. I have also sent it to the local Director of Public Health, to the CQC and to the Royal College of Radiologists who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. 2 I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response. 9 18 May 2023 3
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Subject: In the matter of Akash Bhudia Attachments: Regulation 28 (PFD) Report.Bhudia.pdf Dear Miss Persaud Thank you for your email dated 19/5/23 and the enclosed Regulation 28 Report (attached as reference). Since the inquest Medica have edited the Medica Alerts policy to include a potential new diagnosis of TB as a reason to raise an urgent notification to referrers. The alert and the report should advise the referrer that a change of treatment may be required. This new policy has been circulated to all reporters and a communication from me has highlighted the findings of the inquest to all reporters. Medica will work with Clients to enact the Academy of Royal College/RCR Alerts guidelines 2022 as Clients wish to/are able to integrate the process locally. I note the Academy of Royal Colleges advice that ‘open TB’ should receive a Critical Alert. This is not a process in place in any NHS Trust to my knowledge at this time. Medica will raise Urgent Findings until Clients adjust their internal processes. I would like to respond to the following areas of the Regulation 28 Report: Section 5. The CXR was reported in a way that raised the possibility of atypical pneumonia. At the time of reporting the CXR the reporter had no knowledge of the additional information available in the court, there were no red flag symptoms for TB given in the clinical request and the CXR findings could have been caused by a number of pathogens including TB and COVID amongst others including fungi and less common bacteria. Therefore, the Xray was reported in what I would consider a standard way. Section 5. At the time of the CXR in question, I would consider Akash to have been under the care of his GP. My comment regarding a clinical team was meant to indicate primary, secondary and tertiary care if there is an element of active management/follow up. IRMER 2017 regulations place onus on the referrer to read and act appropriately on imaging reports of studies they have initiated. Section 5. There is an agreed Medica Alerts policy and an agreed Medica/Barts Alerts policy in place now and at the time of the reporting of the CXR. This did not overtly specify a need to alert TB. Yours sincerely MB ChB (Hons), BSc (Hons), MRCS, FRCR, PGCE Group Medical Director www.medica.co.uk This message and associated attachments is likely to contain confidential, proprietary information, trade secrets and release of any of it would prejudice substantially our commercial interests and must not be disclosed to any further parties without our prior written consent. If it has been sent to you in error please do not forward it or copy it or act upon its contents, but report it to postmaster@medica.co.uk. Medica Group has the right lawfully to record, monitor and inspect messages between its employees and any third party. Your messages shall be subject to such lawful supervision as Medica Group deems to be necessary in order to protect its information, its interests and its reputation. Medica Group prohibits and takes steps to prevent its information systems from being used to view, store or forward offensive or discriminatory material. If this message contains such material please report it to abuse@medica.co.uk. Medica Group does not normally accept or offer business instructions via email unless prior agreements are in place. Any action that you might take upon this message might be at your own risk. Medica Group Plc (Company No. 08497963) and Medica Reporting Ltd (Company No. 05026045) are companies registered in England and Wales. Registered Office: Sixth Floor, One Priory Square, Hastings, East Sussex, TN34 1EA. Website: www.medica.co.uk.
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Nadia Persaud, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.