Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0173, written 26 May 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 26 May 2023 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2023-0173 |
| Deceased | Conrad Colson |
| Coroner | Nadia Persaud |
| Coroner area | East London |
| Category | Suicide (from 2015) |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 4 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
MISS N PERSAUD HIS MAJESTY’S CORONER EAST LONDON Walthamstow Coroner's Court, Queens Road Walthamstow, E17 8QP REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. 2. 3. 4. , Chief Executive Officer, South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLAM), Michael Rutter Centre, London SE5 8AZ Foundation Trust Acting Chief Executive Officer, North East London , President, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London Office, 21 Prescot Street, London, E1 8BB National Medical Director, NHS England 5. Rt Hon Steve Barclay MP, Ministerial Correspondence and Public Enquiries Unit, Department of Health and Social Care, 39 Victoria Street, London, SW1H 0EU 1 CORONER I am Nadia Persaud, Area Coroner for the coroner area of East London 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 1 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 11 March 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of Conrad Richard James Colson, aged 34 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 18 May 2023. The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative conclusion: Conrad Colson took his own life whilst suffering from severe body dysmorphic disorder. At the time of his death, he was accessing aesthetic dermatology treatments; he was not receiving a therapeutic level of medication and he was not in receipt of any professional mental health support for his body dysmorphic disorder. He had been discharged from mental health services without any robust risk assessment and without the safety net of a fully considered risk management/relapse plan. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Conrad Colson suffered from severe body dysmorphic disorder (BDD). The symptoms from this condition had led to a serious suicide attempt in February 2020. In 2021, following several months on the waiting list, Conrad received highly specialised therapy from the Centre for Anxiety Disorders and Trauma (CADAT). He made significant progress in managing his BDD symptoms during this therapy, however there was a known risk of relapse. He completed the sessions with his CADAT therapist in November 2021. Before and during this therapy, he had also received support from his local mental health trust's Peer Open Dialogue Team. As he had made such good progress with CADAT and as he had requested discharge from the Peer Open Dialogue Team, he was also discharged from this team in November 2021. There was no joint multi-disciplinary risk assessment and risk management plan on discharge from the teams. The practitioners were aware that Conrad was not taking a therapeutic dose of medication at the time of discharge, but no medical review was arranged for him. At the time of discharge from services, Conrad was also accessing treatment from an aesthetic dermatology clinic. This was not taken into account in his discharge risk assessment. Conrad had raised concerns with the skin clinic about his skin and the treatment, in December 2020; January 2021; March and April 2021. On the 27 and 28 February 2022, Conrad again raised concerns about the appearance of his skin, following treatment at the aesthetic dermatology clinic. His friends became concerned for his welfare when they could not reach him on the 2 March 2022. Emergency services attended and sadly Conrad was found deceased within his home address. The evidence at the inquest revealed that Conrad took his own life. CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 5 The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 1. A concern arose at the Inquest hearing in relation to the absence of liaison between the highly specialist services of the CADAT team and the stepdown 2 services provided by NELFT. There was a lack of full information sharing around risk and joint risk assessment/risk management planning on discharge. 2. Both mental health services were aware that Conrad was accessing aesthetic dermatology treatment. There was a concern that neither service adequately highlighted the risks of accessing such treatment to Conrad or attempted to share information with the skin clinic. The inquest heard that patients with BDD should be fully informed of the risks of seeking aesthetic dermatology treatment and wherever possible, clinics who are providing treatment should be made aware of the BDD diagnosis. 3. The Inquest heard that there is a need for training to be provided to step-down service teams in relation to the diagnosis of BDD and the risks associated with it. 4. The inquest heard that there is a lack of national resources for BDD. The highly specialised service at South London and Maudsley has a very long waiting list (several months). This is on a background of concerns of a likely increase in BDD. In light of this concern, I am also providing this report to the Royal College of Psychiatrists, to the Department for Health & Social Care and to NHSE. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you [AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 20 July 2023. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested persons; Family of Mr Colson and the I have also sent a copy to the local Director of Public Health who may find it useful or of interest and to the CQC. Aesthetic Dermatology Clinic. I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. 3 You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response. 9 26 May 2023 4
4 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
1st July 2023 Dear Madam Thank you for sending a copy of the Prevention of Future Deaths report dated 26 May 2023 following the inquest into the death of Conrad Colson. We would like to reiterate our condolences to Conrad’s family and friends. The investigation process has provided a valuable learning experience for our organisation and we are grateful for the opportunity to improve our processes. We have noted the concerns raised by you and have considered these within the organisation. Our response to these concerns is set out below. • We have updated our ‘BDD policy’ so that all new patients presenting to the clinic are formally screened for BDD using the validated, and published COPS questionnaire. The COPS score is then clearly documented in a dedicated page of the patient’s electronic medical notes. Further that if there is a COPS score of 30 or more, or if there are any clinical concerns of BDD, that this information is shared with the GP (subject to patient consent). Please find attached updated BDD policy with edits in red font. • We have also updated the policy to ensure that clinical assessment of BDD incorporates communications sent by patients to clinic, for example patient concerns over cosmesis, treatment results or impact on well-being. Please find attached updated BDD policy with edits in red font. • We have ensured that the BDD policy is embedded by: o Delivering in-depth, mandatory training on the revised BDD policy to all our team. Training was carried out on 14th June 2023. o Commencing a daily team brief at the beginning of each day, where all patients to be seen are discussed amongst clinicians and patient coordinators. There is a focus on highlighting all new patients that are to undergo the formal BDD screen. During this Dr Tatiana Aesthetic Dermatology Clinic | 2 Devonshire Place | London W1G 6HJ www.drtatiana.co.uk | +44 7718219145 o meeting, any patient concerns raised by patients, in person or via email/telephone are discussed, and it is checked that these communications have been uploaded into the medical notes. This will help ensure clinicians consider concerns raised by patients during their upcoming consultations and incorporate these concerns into their decision making processes. Discussion summaries and outcomes are recorded. This is outlined in our updated ‘patient journey policy’ (edits in red font). Initiating an annual audit to ensure that the updated BDD policy is being followed. This audit will assess whether: a) patients are being screened appropriately b) whether documentation is adequate c) for patients where there are clinical concerns of BDD, that they are managed appropriately, and relevant information is being shared with GPs/other relevant healthcare professionals. The findings of the audit will be presented during our weekly team meeting and any areas of improvement will be highlighted and relevant action taken. The first audit will be carried out in 3 months (September 2023) • Clinicians have been reminded to ensure that documentation is full including making use of the free text options in the electronic records. This includes all assessments/discussions regarding BDD and patient concerns. This will also include ensuring that communications from patients where concerns are raised are discussed with the patient in a clinical setting, where appropriate, and documented in the electronic records. We will carry out an annual audit of patient consultations. Please find attached the updated ‘patient journey policy’ with edits in red font. • We have now updated our ‘patient journey policy’ so that all communications where patients raise concerns are uploaded into the electronic medical notes. Further that these communications are highlighted to the responsible clinician within 24 hours and patients receive a response within 24 hours. Clinicians must document in the notes how these concerns have been considered and addressed. Please find attached the updated ‘patient journey policy’ with edits in red font. • We have updated our ‘patient journey policy’ to provide clear guidance on when to share/request patient clinical information to/from GPs or other relevant healthcare Dr Tatiana Aesthetic Dermatology Clinic | 2 Devonshire Place | London W1G 6HJ www.drtatiana.co.uk | +44 7718219145 professionals. We have also specified that communication with patient GPs or other healthcare professionals should be in writing and that an electronic copy of correspondence must be kept in the patient’s electronic records. Please find attached the updated ‘patient journey policy’ with edits in red font. • All our clinical team have received training on the revised policies, and we will ensure that our team receive refresher training on at least an annual basis. We hope that this provides reassurance to you of the steps taken by the Dr Tatiana Aesthetic Dermatology Clinic and the steps taken by way of continuous improvement. Yours faithfully Dr Tatiana Aesthetic Dermatology Clinic | 2 Devonshire Place | London W1G 6HJ www.drtatiana.co.uk | +44 7718219145
Office Ref: 1208
Action Plan Title: D150069
Action Plan Owner :
Target Date: 01/12/2023
Safely NELFT Action Plan: 12/06/2023
Priority: High
Service/Team: Mental Health Services
Business Unit: Waltham Forest
Directorate: Waltham Forest
Start Date
Source: Complaints
Serious Incident X Medicines Management
External Inspection
Clinical Audit
Dashboard
Other x Regulation 28
External Inspection
Infection Control
Internal Inspection
H&S
QPS
Internal Audit
Serious Case Review
Safeguarding
Safety Thermometer
Concerns of the Coroner:
1. Joint working (information sharing): A concern arose at the Inquest hearing in relation to the absence of liaison between the highly specialist
services of the CADAT team and the stepdown services provided by NELFT. There was a lack of full information sharing around risk and joint risk
assessment/risk management planning on discharge.
2. Risk management: Both mental health services were aware that Conrad was accessing aesthetic dermatology treatment. There was a concern that
neither service adequately highlighted the risks of accessing such treatment to Conrad or attempted to share information with the skin clinic. The
inquest heard that patients with BDD should be fully informed of the risks of seeking aesthetic dermatology treatment and wherever possible, clinics
who are providing treatment should be made aware of the BDD diagnosis.
3. Training: The Inquest heard that there is a need for training to be provided to step-down service teams in relation to the diagnosis of BDD and the
risks associated with it.
Concern raised by
the Coroner
Act
ion
no.
Action (short
form)
Action
(long form)
By Whom
By When
Regulation 28 action plan
• Joint working protocol to be developed between the CADAT
team and the stepdown services provided by NELFT. This
should highlight the need for full information sharing around risk
and joint risk/management planning and discharge.
• The joint working protocol to be shared with all staff and
discussed in team business meetings.
31 /09/2023
Assistant
director
31/09/2023
Joint working
(information
sharing): A concern
arose at the Inquest
hearing in relation to
the absence of liaison
between the highly
specialist services of
the CADAT team and
the stepdown services
provided by NELFT.
There was a lack of
full information
sharing around risk
and joint risk
assessment/risk
management planning
on discharge.
1)
Improve working
relationship
between the
highly specialised
services of the
CADAT team and
the stepdown
services provided
by NELFT. This
should include
the need for full
information
sharing around
risk and joint
risk/management
planning and
discharge
Regulation 28 action plan
Assistant
Director
31/08/2023
05/07/2023
Assistant
Director
30/09/2024
2) Learning event to
be arranged on
BDD for all staff
Short Term
• Learning event to be arranged on this case with specific reference
on BDD and the importance of working with partner agencies.
• Learning event on completing risk assessments arranged for
05/07/2023. This learning event will cover updating risk, the
parameters to consider when completing a risk assessment and
when to update a risk assessment.
Long Term
• The Trust is planning to undertake a Quality Improvement Project
on understanding why there are gaps in risk assessment and risk
management processes (a couple of examples of reoccurring
themes), particularly when there are poor outcomes associated
with care provided. The project will focus on working with users
of service, clinical and operational teams, as well as senior
leadership and other identified key stakeholders to understand
the structural, process and cultural factors which contribute to
poor outcomes and use
improvement methodology and
framework to address the areas which can result in process
changes to improve outcomes. It may be that a break through
series collaborative methodology could be used across various
teams at NELFT. This approach could potentially standardise
variation through testing a change package which includes
evidence based approaches to ensure care provision meets
those standards and teams have a realistic chance of providing
the care that is required to avoid future untoward outcomes. There
is also a workstream which is leading on the development of risk
implementation of robust risk
formulation
assessment and risk management process to improve patient
safety and move away from the current risk stratification model.
to ensure
the
Risk management:
Both mental health
services were aware
that Conrad was
accessing aesthetic
dermatology
treatment. There was
a concern that neither
service adequately
highlighted the risks
of accessing such
treatment to Conrad
or attempted to share
information with the
skin clinic. The
inquest heard that
patients with BDD
should be fully
informed of the risks
of seeking aesthetic
dermatology
treatment and
wherever possible,
clinics who are
providing treatment
should be made
aware of the BDD
diagnosis.
Regulation 28 action plan
3) Body Dysmorphic
(BDD) training to
be offered to all
staff
Training: The Inquest
heard that there is a
need for training to be
provided to step-down
service teams in
relation to the
diagnosis of BDD and
the risks associated
with it.
• Training department to arrange training on BDD for all staff this
01/12/2023
to be in conjunction with SLAM who offer training in this
specialised area.
Head of
Learning
services
Regulation 28 action plan
Nadia Persaud
The Coroner’s Court,
Queens Road,
Walthamstow
E17 8QP
Dear Coroner,
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
18 July 2023
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Conrad Richard James
Colson who died on 2 March 2022.
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 26 May
2023 concerning the death of Conrad Richard James Colson on 2 March 2022. In
advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to
express my deep condolences to Conrad’s family and loved ones. NHS England is
keen to assure the family and the coroner that the concerns raised about Conrad’s
care have been listened to and reflected upon.
NHS England’s Highly Specialised Severe Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and
Body Dysmorphic Disorder Service
The NHS England Highly Specialised Severe Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD)
and Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) Service (Adults and Adolescents) (hereafter
“Service”) is resourced and commissioned via the provision/service specification
C09/S(HSS)/a
(Publication Date: 2012/2013): https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-
content/uploads/2018/08/Severe-obsessive-compulsive-disorder-and-body-
dysmorphic-disorder-service-adult-and-adolescent.pdf.
The Service is a national service and treats patients with severe BDD who have failed
to respond to evidence-based treatment in locality-based and regional centres
according to need. It comprises five integrated centres based at the following Trusts;
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLAM) adults, SLAM children
and adolescents, Hertfordshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (HPFT), the Priory
Hospital North London and South West London and St George’s Mental Health NHS
Trust (SWLSTG). Each centre is led by a consultant psychiatrist and a multidisciplinary
team specialising in the treatment of BDD, and each centre specialises in different
aspects of care – some offer inpatient care, others residential, home-based or
outpatient-based care. The Service covers children, adolescents, and adults with no
upper age limit.
Referral pathways into the service emanate from secondary or tertiary care. Patients
are ordinarily referred to the Service by a senior member of their local mental health
team. They are expected to have a care coordinator and consultant psychiatrist
actively involved for managing their overall psychiatric care and associated risks at the
time of referral and during the waiting phase. The care coordinator and consultant are
expected to remain involved throughout the care under the service, who liaise closely
with them throughout care planning and discharge.
The national Service operates a monthly case allocation meeting at which new
referrals are allocated to the centre that best meets their clinical need. Following
referral, the patient is assessed, and a decision made as to whether the service is
clinically appropriate. If they are accepted, there may be a further wait before treatment
starts. Waiting times for assessment and for treatment vary across the service,
depending on the centre and the kind of treatment provided. For example, inpatient
care usually has a longer waiting time than outpatient-based care and cognitive
behaviour therapy has a longer waiting time than pharmacotherapy.
Current waiting times for assessment range from 1-4 months (SLAM adults, HPFT,
Priory Hospital, SWLSTG inpatient care) to around 7 months (SLAM child and
adolescents), measured from the date of referral. Waiting times for treatment range
from 1-6 months (HPFT outpatient or home-based care, Priory H outpatient care,
SLAM outpatient care, SWLSTG inpatient care) to around 16 months (SLAM child and
adolescents service, SWLSTG home based care) from referral. Waiting times are kept
under regular review and, where possible, patients are allocated to the centre where
the waiting time is the shortest e.g., for home-based care.
While there has recently been a perceived increase in the overall number of referrals
to the NHS England Highly Specialised Severe OCD/BDD Service for children and
adolescents at SLAM, a similar pattern of increased BDD referrals has not so far been
seen in the adult Service, but it may simply be a matter of time before the perceived
increased occurrence in younger people filters through to adult mental health services,
highlighting a probable need to consider building greater capacity for treating BDD at
primary and secondary mental healthcare levels, which we will continue to monitor.
The clinicians in the NHS England Highly Specialised Severe OCD/BDD Service
consider this issue highly important because BDD is common, estimated at 0.5-3.2%
in the general population, 1.3-5.8% in student cohorts, 4.9- 21.1% in general
dermatology cohorts, and 2.9- 57% in cosmetic surgery cohorts. It is also a dangerous
condition with a markedly high suicide rate; 0.3% per annum prospectively end their
life and about 25% have made a past attempt on their life, and it can be very difficult
to treat. The Service therefore engages in education and training activities for relevant
healthcare professionals and aspires to expand these education and training activities
as well as the future development of regional specialist centres, to disseminate best
practice more widely, conditional on additional resourcing.
Aesthetic and cosmetic treatment risks and BDD
Regarding your concern that patients with BDD should be fully informed of the risks of
seeking aesthetic dermatology treatment and that, wherever possible clinics who are
providing treatments should be made aware of the BDD diagnosis, there is clear
guidelines from the National Institute for Healthcare Guidance (NICE) on this issue.
The guidelines (NICE Clinical guideline [CG31]) include the following paragraphs:
2.6.5.4 For people known to be at higher risk of BDD (such individuals with
symptoms of depression, social phobia, alcohol or substance misuse, OCD or
an eating disorder), or for people with mild disfigurements or blemishes who
are seeking a cosmetic or dermatological procedure, healthcare professionals
should routinely consider and explore the possibility of BDD.
2.6.5.6 People with suspected or diagnosed BDD seeking cosmetic surgery or
dermatological treatment should be assessed by a mental health professional
with specific expertise in the management of BDD.
2.6.5.9 Specialist mental health professionals in BDD should work in
partnership with cosmetic surgeons and dermatologists to ensure that an
agreed screening system is in place to accurately identify people with BDD and
that agreed referral criteria have been established. They should help provide
training opportunities for cosmetic surgeons and dermatologists to aid in the
recognition of BDD. [GPP]
10.3.1.3 Specialist OCD/BDD teams should collaborate with people with OCD
or BDD and their families or carers to provide training for all mental health
professionals, cosmetic surgeons and dermatology professionals. [GPP]
There can however be barriers to implementation of the NICE guidance, where
patients do not consent for private providers and their mental health professionals to
disclose information to each other.
NHS England’s existing national Clinical Reference Group (CRG) for OCD & BDD is
intending to convene with relevant wider stakeholders in light of the concerns raised
in your Report. This will include consideration at a national level of the issues of
patients with BDD who access aesthetic dermatology treatments.
Other concerns
In terms of the matters of concern specific to Conrad, NHS England are unable to
comment on the absence of liaison between the Centre for Anxiety Disorders and
Trauma (CADAT) team at SLAM and the stepdown services provided by North East
London NHS Foundation Trust (NEFLT), nor the adequacy of communication,
information sharing between the two Trusts or the training of staff employed by NELFT,
who are the appropriate organisations to respond to your concerns. NHS England has
however been sighted on NELFT’s Serious Incident Report into the matters
surrounding Conrad’s death and note that there have been learnings and
recommendations made, including improvements to information sharing. We have
also asked to be sighted on the response to you Report from both NEFLT and SLAM
and will consider these carefully.
I would also like to provide further assurances on national NHS England work taking
place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed
by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and
other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key
learnings and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both
a national and regional level and helps us pay close attention to any emerging trends
that may require further review and action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
Psychological Medicine & Older Adults (PMOA)
South London and Maudsley
NHS Foundation Trust (SLaM)
1st Floor Reay House
Lambeth Hospital Site
108 Landor Road
LONDON | SW9 9NU
Date: 20.07.2023
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
Ms Nadia Persaud
Walthamstow
Coroners Court
Queens Road, Walthamstow
London. E17 8QP
Dear Ms. Persaud
Regulation 28 Report Response arising from the inquest into the death of Conrad Colson
Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report dated 26 May 2023 setting out your concerns to be
addressed. I would like to begin by expressing my deepest condolences to the family and friends of
Mr Colson.
Following the conclusion of the inquest on 18 May 2023, you requested an update on the matters
outlined below. The concerns you raised in your Regulation 28 Report in respect of South London
and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (‘the Trust’) were as follows:
1. ‘A concern arose at the Inquest hearing in relation to the absence of liaison between the
highly specialist services of the CADAT team and the stepdown services provided by NELFT.
There was a lack of full information sharing around risk and joint risk assessment/risk
management planning on discharge’;
2. ‘Both mental health services were aware that Conrad was accessing aesthetic dermatology
treatment. There was a concern that neither service adequately highlighted the risks of
accessing such treatment to Conrad or attempted to share information with the skin clinic.
The inquest heard that patients with BDD should be fully informed of the risks of seeking
aesthetic dermatology treatment and wherever possible, clinics who are providing treatment
should be made aware of the BDD diagnosis’; and
3. ‘The Inquest heard that there is a need for training to be provided to step-down service teams
in relation to the diagnosis of BDD and the risks associated with it’.
The Centre for Anxiety Disorders and Trauma (‘CADAT’) has updated its discharge policy (enclosed
with this letter), to explicitly state the expectations of liaison between local teams and CADAT. The
updates to this policy confront the issues faced in Conrad’s case. The updated policy was circulated
to all team members at CADAT and was discussed in the clinic’s team meeting on 1 June 2023. This
Our ref: WEB143633 CADAT
Page 1 of 2
policy is also in line with that of the Trust’s Anxiety Disorders Residential Unit. The updated policy
was reviewed and ratified by the PMOA Leadership Team on 12 July 2023. The policy will again be
discussed and shared in CADAT’s business meeting on 3 August 2023.
The updated CADAT discharge policy also includes how staff are expected to communicate with
skin clinics regarding patients seeking aesthetic dermatological/cosmetic treatment which includes
seeking consent from the patient to liaise with local services/GP, and if this is refused how to manage
the situation.
It would not be possible for the CADAT to provide training on BDD to all referring services nationwide
due to the logistics and capacity within the clinic itself. The CADAT clinic is in the process of offering
training on BDD to local services. In addition, the CADAT has agreed to provide more support to
local services who have referred patients. The CADAT will now include a detailed one page BDD
information guide (enclosed with this letter) prepared by Professor David Veale, Consultant
Psychiatrist in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy at the CADAT, to referring services in their
communication following referral.
The PMOA Leadership Team has reviewed the response by North East London NHS Foundation
Trust (‘NELFT’) to your Regulation 28 Report which it received on 17 July 2023. Following receipt of
this document, the CADAT has been in communication with NELFT with regard to recommendations
1 and 3 of its Action Plan (which were contained in its response provided to you) to ascertain how
best the CADAT can assist NELFT going forward in implementing the recommendations it has made.
Please do let me know if you have any additional queries.
Yours sincerely,
PMOA Deputy Director
1. Enclosed: CADAT Draft Discharge Policy
2. Enclosed: Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) Information
CADAT - Discharge
Policy.pdf
BDD Information.pdf
Our ref: WEB143633 CADAT
Page 2 of 2
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.