Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0179, written 2 Jun 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 2 Jun 2023 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2023-0179 |
| Deceased | Nigel Harper |
| Coroner | David Reid |
| Coroner area | Worcestershire |
| Category | Suicide (from 2015) |
| Organisation named | Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1) The Chief Executive, Herefordshire & Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust, 2 Kings Court, Charles Hastings Way, Worcester WR5 1 JR; 2) The Chief Executive, Gloucestershire Health & Care NHS Foundation Trust, Edward Jenner Court, 1010 Pioneer Avenue, Gloucester Business Park, Brockworth, Gloucester, GL3 4AW. CORONER I am David Donald William REID, HM Senior Coroner for Worcestershire. 2 CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www. legislation. gov. u k/ukpga/2009/25/schedu le/5/parag raph/7 http://www. legislation .gov. uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7 /made 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST [the details below are fictional] On 27 July 2022 I commenced an investigation and opened an inquest into the death of Nigel Harper. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 15 May 2023. The conclusion of the inquest was that Mr. Harper died as the result of suicide. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH In answer to the questions "when, where and how did Mr. Harper come by his death?", I recorded as follows: 'O n 8.7.22 Nigel Harper, who had over the previous month been experiencing severe depression and anxiety, and living with thoughts of self-harm, took an intentional overdose of prescribed sedative and hypnotic medications. He was taken to Worcestershire Royal Hospital where, despite treatment, he continued to decline, and died on 23.7.22. " Mr. Harper lived in Scotland, but in the period leading up to his death had been staying with his sister near Malvern. He had a lengthy mental health history, which included a recent inpatient admission to a psychiatric hospital in Edinburgh. 5 CORONER'S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty t? report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. - (1) On 4 July 2022 Mr. Harper attended the Emergency Department at Gloucester Royal Hospital, and was seen by a nurse from the Mental Health Liaison team there, who recorded that he was very anxious and distressed, and voicing onaoina thouahts of suicide. The nurse felt that Mr. Haroer would benefit from a l period of treatment under the care of the Home Treatment Team, and because Mr. Harper was living in Worcestershire at the time, and because it was now in the early hours of the following day, he called the Worcestershire Crisis Team to arrange that. The nurse concerned was under the impression that by making this phone call, and passing on Mr. Harper's details to the Crisis Team, he was referring Mr. Harper's case to them. He told the inquest that he was expecting mental health services in Worcestershire to arrange a further urgent assessment of Mr. Harper, and he therefore ensured that Mr. Harper was told to expect the Crisis Team to contact him to arrange a further assessment. (2) The Clinical Lead for the Crisis Team in Worcestershire gave evidence to the inquest that whilst the Crisis Team did receive a request from the nurse at Gloucester that night, they interpreted it only as a request for further assessment ( but not an urgent one ), and not as a request that Mr. Harper be referred to the Home Treatment Team. (3) In the event, an urgent assessment was not arranged, and Mr. Harper's case was only considered by the Home Treatment Team in Worcestershire when his temporary GP in Worcestershire, out of further concern for Mr. Harper's mental health, made a new and separate referral to them. (4) I have concluded that the events described above arose out of a lack of understanding between the two N HS Trusts concerned ( Herefordshire & Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust ( HWHCT ) and Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Trust ( GHCT ) ) as to how each other's mental health services are run - otherwise arrangements would have been made for Mr. Harper's mental health to be assessed urgently, as was intended. (5) If staff at HWHCT and GHCT do not understand how to make urgent mental health referrals or requests for urgent mental health assessments to each other, there remains a risk that other deaths may occur in similar circumstances in the future. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you, as the Chief Executives of HWHCT and GHCT have the power to take such action . 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 28 July 2023. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: ( Mr. Harper's widow ); ( Mr. Harper's sister ). I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your respetive responses. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 2 June 2023 2 David REID HM Senior Coroner for Worcestershire 3
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Edward Jenner Court
Pioneer Avenue
Gloucester Business Park
Brockworth
Gloucester
GL3 4AW
25 July 2023
Mr D.D.W Reid
His Majesty’s Senior Coroner
Martins Way
Stourport on Severn
Worcestershire
DY13 8UN
Dear Mr Reid
Ref: The Late Nigel David Harper -9131813
I am writing on behalf of
containing the Regulation 28 Prevention of Future Deaths Report relating to this case.
, Chief Executive, in response to your letter of 5 June 2023
On conclusion of the inquest, you established that there was a lack of understanding between
Gloucestershire Health & Care NHS Foundation Trust and Herefordshire & Worcestershire Health & Care
Trust regarding how each other’s urgent care services are run; and that there was a lack of clarity
concerning process for urgent referrals or requests. The Trust has now had opportunity to reflect on its
practice and I am pleased that we have been able to identify improvements which will minimize the risk
of a similar tragic event recurring in the future.
The learning from Mr Harper’s death has focused on two key strands.
1. Improving understanding between both trusts regarding how their mental health urgent
care services operate.
In terms of improving understanding between the two organisations, I can confirm that senior managers
from both trust’s urgent care mental health services have met to discuss this matter in detail and shared
each other’s Crisis Teams Operational Policies. These documents describe the purpose and scope of the
individual services involved and include detail concerning referral and triage.
2. Strengthening the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) of our Mental Health Liaison Team
regarding inter trust referrals and transfers of care.
Our Mental Health Liaison Team has reviewed its SOP and made the following additions under the
Discharge section of the document. I enclose a copy for your information and these changes can be seen
on Page 17.
▪ Where referrals are made by the MHLT team to any service either within the trust, or externally,
there will be a clearly defined agreement of what this service will provide and the timeframe of
that intervention.
Main office: Edward Jenner Court, Pioneer Avenue, Gloucester Business Park, Brockworth, Gloucester, GL3 4AW
Chair: Ingrid Barker Chief Executive: Douglas Blair
▪ Any referrals or requested contact must be followed up via a confirmed email immediately
following contact being made (including a copy of the assessment, an outcome of referral made
and agreed timeframe for that contact). A subsequent entry will be made on EPR. (Electronic
Patient Record)
This document is currently in draft but will be ratified at the next Mental Health & Learning Disability
Inpatient & Urgent Care Governance & Performance meeting on 7 August 2023. In the interim it is being
shared with all members of the team via team meetings, and as such, we will be able to evidence that
staff are aware of these important changes. Additionally, in six months’ time, we will undertake a dip
sample audit of Mental Health Liaison Team referrals to test our practice and ensure that learning has
become embedded.
I would be grateful if you could share a copy of this response with Mr Harper’s family and relay our deepest
apology for the gaps in service provision that the inquest identified. We continue to reflect on the learning
from his death and aim to improve the safety of patients through the changes made.
If I can be of further assistance, please let me know.
Yours sincerely
Medical Director
Deputy Medical Director
Chief Executives Office 2 Kings Court Charles Hastings Way Worcester WR5 1JR 27 July 2023 Mr D D W Reid HM Senior Coroner Worcestershire Coroner’s Court Dear Mr Reid, Re: The Late Nigel David Harper - Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths - response Thank you for forwarding on your Regulation 28 report. I have read your report carefully and attempted to address your concerns that you have raised as a result of the coronial inquiry regarding the death of Nigel Harper. In your report, you highlighted the following points of concern:- Concern You concluded that the events in Mr Harper’s case arose out of the lack of understanding between two NHS Trusts concerned (Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust (HWHCT) and Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Trust (GHCT) as to how each other’s mental health services operate – otherwise agreements would have been made for Mr Harper’s mental health to be assessed urgently, as was intended. You were concerned that staff at HWHCT and GHCT do not understand how to make urgent mental health referrals or requests for urgent mental health assessments to each other, and there remains a risk that other deaths may occur in similar circumstances in the future. Firstly, I think it is important to address why this missed opportunity occurred in the first place. Fundamentally, it would appear there was a genuine breakdown in communication between the two organisations. The clinician in the GHCT Mental Health Liaison Team made contact with HWHCT Crisis Resolution Team (CRT) to discuss a patient that they had assessed in their local emergency department. I gather that GHCT assumed this conversation constituted an urgent referral, although this was not the reciprocal interpretation, with HWHCT staff believing that it was for information only initially, awaiting confirmation of the final discharge plan once the GHCT clinician had confirmed with the patient and his family. I wish to reassure you that as a Trust, we have very much reflected upon this missed opportunity. HWHCT raised a Ulysses report regarding the care and treatment received, latterly escalating this to a serious incident review. An investigating officer was identified within the Division, who was responsible for undertaking a detailed investigation using root cause analysis methodology. In addition, the staff involved have been given the opportunity to reflect on the incident via a psychology-led debrief and will have been able to discuss any further issues or concerns in individual supervision. , Deputy Director for Urgent Care Mental Health (GHCT) and On receipt of the joint Regulation 28, , Operational Lead for Urgent Care (HWHCT) met , Solicitor with (HWHCT). The purpose of this meeting was to take a detailed examination of the circumstances surrounding the communication between both organisations and to work collaboratively on a suitable solution. As a result, changes to local policy have been made (outlined below) and communicated to those staff in the affected services by email dated 18 July 2023. In an attempt to prevent reoccurrence, we have reviewed/amended our CRT Operational Policy to include a specific section on inter-Trust referrals and transfers of care. In summary, if a patient presented in crisis to out-of-County emergency services/organisations our standard operating procedure has been updated to address this situation, as below:- Following an assessment, it may be that the patient requires ongoing care and treatment under HWHCT. In these circumstances both providers share responsibility for ensuring that the patient’s referral/transfer of care is seamless and that access to service provision is initiated on the basis of clinical urgency. This process should start with a telephone conversation between the external organisation and staff from HWHCT, seeking to clarify and agree the following: • The exact nature/purpose of the call (i.e. referral or information only) • The degree of urgency and response required (in keeping with NHSE MH Access Standards 2021); - Very urgent: contact with patient within 4hrs (CRT) - Urgent: contact with patient within 24hrs (CRT/Home Treatment Team (HTT)) - Routine: contact with patient within 72hrs (HTT) Once the appropriate response has been mutually agreed, HWHCT will document the outcome of the discussion on Carenotes, our electronic patient record system. In addition, the referrer will provide a comprehensive/documented assessment (to include formulation of risk and management plan) to the receiving service at their earliest convenience. For completeness I have included an updated version of our standard operating procedure. I hope this reassures you that the Trust has learnt from your concern and have ensured we have reviewed this missed opportunity. We now believe there is a robust system in place to ensure that such a situation cannot occur in future. I hope that the information above adequately addresses your concerns. I do not have any submissions to make in respect of publication of this response. I would be grateful if you could kindly send a copy of my response to those to whom you copied your Regulation 28 report. Yours sincerely Chief Executive Enc. 2
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.