Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0247, written 14 Jul 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 14 Jul 2023 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2023-0247 |
| Deceased | Emily Corfield |
| Coroner | Kate Robertson |
| Coroner area | North Wales (East and Central) |
| Category | Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Kate Robertson
Assistant Coroner for North Wales (East and Central)
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
Adferiad Recovery
1
CORONER
I am Kate Robertson, Assistant Coroner for North Wales (East and Central)
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 27 September 2021 an investigation was commenced into the death of Emily
Corfield (DOB 30/12/79) who died on 19 September 2011. The investigation concluded
at the end of the inquest on 11 July 2023. The conclusion of the inquest was an alcohol
related death.
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
The circumstances of the death are as follows :-
Emily Corfield was aged 41 at the time of her death. She had a past medical history of
vitamin B12 deficiency, anxiety, depression and excess alcohol consumption. She had
some support for her alcohol misuse. On 20 April 2021 she was admitted into hospital
with coffee ground vomiting and chronic alcohol misuse. She was discharged on 26
April 2021 with outpatient OGD and was due for review by alcohol liaison as an
outpatient. There was no evidence that she had had an inpatient assessment by the
alcohol liaison team. On 30 May 2021 she was admitted into hospital again with coffee
ground vomiting and alcohol withdrawal. There was no evidence of the alcohol liaison
team involvement whilst an inpatient. Emily discharged herself against advice on 4 June
2021 having the capacity to do so. On 19 September 2021 Emily was found deceased in
her bed at her home
.
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern.
Coroner's Office, County Hall, Wynnstay Road, Ruthin, LL15 1YN
|
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows –
Firstly, evidence was heard during the Inquest that Emily had self-referred on a number
of occasions for support to Adferiad (formerly Cais). It could not be established
whether or not Emily had received written correspondence from them relating to
appointments and/or offer of support as correspondence was not retained by Adferiad.
Emily was on occasion closed to the service for not having responded to
correspondence. The system at the time was that communicating with service users
was in writing only.
It appears that more recently, policies and procedures have been established to ensure
that correspondence relating to those who require support and / or contact the service
is now retained though these were not provided at the Inquest. Without clear and
thorough policies and procedures relating to all contact with service users or those who
seek support, the organisation will not be able to adequately monitor the support
processes.
Secondly, it was indicated that due to resource restrictions that communication cannot
be by telephone with those requiring support / service users (in writing only) and the
waiting time for support sessions / counselling is long. This will have a detrimental
impact and deaths may occur if the treatment and support is not afforded in a timely
manner.
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have
the power to take such action.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely 8 September 2023. I, Kate Sutherland, the Coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the Family of the Deceased and to the Chief Coroner.
I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it
useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of
Coroner's Office, County Hall, Wynnstay Road, Ruthin, LL15 1YN
|
your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief
Coroner.
9
Dated 14 July 2023
Signature
Assistant Coroner for North Wales (East and Central)
Coroner's Office, County Hall, Wynnstay Road, Ruthin, LL15 1YN
|
Kate Robertson
Assistant Coroner for North Wales (East and Central)
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (BCUHB)
1
CORONER
I am Kate Robertson, Assistant Coroner for North Wales (East and Central)
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 27 September 2021 an investigation was commenced into the death of Emily
Corfield (DOB 30/12/79) who died on 19 September 2011. The investigation concluded
at the end of the inquest on 11 July 2023. The conclusion of the inquest was an alcohol
related death.
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
The circumstances of the death are as follows :-
Emily Corfield was aged 41 at the time of her death. She had a past medical history of
vitamin B12 deficiency, anxiety, depression and excess alcohol consumption. She had
some support from alcohol liaison services to assist in her overuse of alcohol. On 20
April 2021 she was admitted into hospital with coffee ground vomiting and chronic
alcohol misuse. She was discharged on 26 April 2021 with outpatient OGD and was due
for review by alcohol liaison as an outpatient. There was no evidence that she had had
an inpatient assessment by the alcohol liaison team. On 30 May 2021 she was admitted
into hospital again with coffee ground vomiting and alcohol withdrawal. There was no
evidence of the alcohol liaison team involvement whilst an inpatient. Emily discharged
herself against advice on 4 June 2021 having the capacity to do so. On 19 September
2021 Emily was found deceased in her bed at her home
.
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern.
Coroner's Office, County Hall, Wynnstay Road, Ruthin, LL15 1YN
|
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows –
Emily had two inpatient admissions in the year of her death. Whilst the clinician had
noted that she was for referral to the alcohol liaison team there was no evidence that
Emily had in fact received any input from them either as an inpatient or as an
outpatient nor any referrals to external organisations.
It is concerning that there appears to have been no evidence that Emily was receiving
support from the Alcohol Liaison Team whilst an inpatient on either occasion despite
her long history of alcohol misuse and need for support.
In the event that clinicians advise referral to alcohol liaison team, either as an inpatient
or as an outpatient there ought to be systems and processes to ensure that this occurs.
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have
the power to take such action.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
namely 8 September 2023. I, Kate Sutherland, the Coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the Family of the Deceased and to the Chief Coroner.
I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it
useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of
your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief
Coroner.
9
Dated 14 July 2023
Signature
Coroner's Office, County Hall, Wynnstay Road, Ruthin, LL15 1YN
|
Assistant Coroner for North Wales (East and Central)
Coroner's Office, County Hall, Wynnstay Road, Ruthin, LL15 1YN
|
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Meeting the needs of
Bodoli anghen ion pobl sy'n
agored i niwed sy'n wynebu vu lnerable people facing
complex life challenges
heriau by.,vyd cymhleth
Ty Dafydd Alun, 36 Rhodfa'r Tywysog, Bae Colwyn, LL29 8LA
Ty Dafydd Alun, 36 Princes Drive, Colwyn Bay, LL29 8LA
0
V
To:
HM Assistant Coroner, Kate Robinson
North Wales (East and Central) Coroner
Dear Madam,
Response of Adferiad Recovery Ltd to the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths
Inquest touching on the death of Emily Anne Corfield
We write with reference to your Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths ("the Regulation 28
Report") dated 14 July 2023 concerning the inquest touching on the death of Ms Emily Anne Corfield.
On behalf of Adferiad Recovery Ltd ("Adferiad"), may J express our deepest condolences to Ms
Corfield's family and friends.
May we assure you and the family that the matters set out herein have been carefully and thoroughly
considered by Adferiad's senior management team which, we trust, reflects our commitment to place
the health and wellbeing of our patients at the heart of everything we do.
Adferiad is a charity and we are funded through various projects by Betsi Cadwallader University Health
Board ("the Health Board") and the Welsh Government. We are a therapeutic support service and the
service in question provides non clinical help and support for people with mental health, substance use,
addiction and other complex needs. We are not a crisis service. Our Counselling and Motivation for
Addiction Service provides free therapy for those requiring specialist substance misuse psychological
M..ltJ Ad ftr~1d R~co"cry yn
Adfor,Jd Pe-:o· ..cry 1s
).(cf:,dliad corlfott-diy f.!lu~nno• o c h,mt,:,bl~ inccrpor'l)t?'Q
ac ,•,edy ccf re,i ru y ng or43.,n1-;uttc n , ~ 1-.tcrcd •r,
E.l"lglar,ct :-.,,d W.1lcs
Nt3hymru n Llocgr
interventions including: counselling; cognitive behaviour therapy; and access to recovery groups. Our
therapists are qualified counsellors with additional training in substance misuse and recovery.
Individuals can be referred to us by other health and care providers/professionals and/or they can self-
refer.
We set out below our Response to the Matters of Concern insofar as they relate to Adferiad. For ease
of reference, the relevant Matters of Concern appear below in blue type and Adferiad's Response is in
black type.
1.
Matter of Concern 1:
Firstly, evidence was heard during the Inquest that Emily had self-referred on a number of
occasions for support to Adferiad (formerly Cais). It could not be established whether or not
Emily had received written correspondence from them relating to appointments and/or offer of
support as correspondence was not retained by Adferiad. Emily was on occasion closed to the
service for not having responded to correspondence. The system at the time was that
communicating with service users was in writing only.
It appears that more recently, policies and procedures have been established to ensure that
correspondence relating to those who require support and I or contact the service is now
retained though these were not provided at the Inquest. Without clear and thorough policies
and procedures relating to all contact with service users or those who seek support, the
organisation will not be able to adequately monitor the support processes.
2.
Response to Matter of Concern 1:
Following a referral to Adferiad, a patient will be placed on our waiting list for an assessment.
Thereafter, at the material time:
2. 1
Our practice was to send hard copy letters to our patients to confirm:
2. 1. 1 They had been placing on the service's waiting list for an appointment;
or
2.1.2 They remained on the service's waiting list but an appointment was not
as yet available (letter sent 6 weeks post referral). This letter would
M.1~ Adfor.tiU Ra-covery yn
,-cfyd i:,,d c:orfforcd ig ~lu ~onnot
Adfod,td RtC:::).\l~.:ry ,,s
.J ~h.JritJb!,:, incc•,::::o,,..t.,.U
.sc wcdy coft(l'!.tftJ yng c rg:.mis,1t1on re;wstcrc-:1 fr,
N ghymru J Uoegr
EJ"lgla,.d and
also ask the patient to confirm within 10 days if they wished to remain
on the service's waiting list; or
2.1.3 The time and date of their appointment.
2.2
A hard copy ofthese letters was not retained on the patient's file, but the date
on which they were posted to the patient was recorded electronically on the
relevant electronic patient file.
At the inquest, Adferiad's
gave evidence that a new, better
system and procedure is now in place, whereby all correspondence is kept electronically on a
database, and all calls are logged. The system is the Adferiad Information Management System
and is accompanied by the Aims User Guide. All staff have received training on this new system
and are aware of Adferiad's requirements. Accordingly, Adferiad's current practice is that: every
letter sent to a patient is scanned and stored electronically on our IT system; and every call
made to/received from a patient is recorded electronically. In addition, concerning the
monitoring ofsupport, the new system, amongst other things, allows a "red flag" to be displayed
for those patients who are considered to be a risk to themselves or others, has the option to
add viewable risk management plans, records signposting that has taken place and has an
internal referral system to refer patients directly to another service. Further, if a patient leaves
the service, staff need to input the exit date, reason and other relevant information. Adferiad is
updating its service specification to incorporate these requirements. The updated service
specification will be implemented and rolled out to all staff by the end of September 2023.
Adferiad had understood from correspondence received from the Coroner's Office on 23 March
2023 that no further documentation was required, and Adferiad was not an Interested Person.
Nevertheless, Adferiad understands that matter can arise during the course of the inquest, and
it is regrettable that the documentary evidence was not before the court. Adferiad is committed
to extending full co-operation to coronial investigations and inquests.
3.
Matter of Concern 2:
Secondly, it was indicated that due to resource restrictions that communication cannot be by
telephone with those requiring support I service users (in writing only) and the waiting time for
M.10- Adfcr.:,1d Uf-<;.ov..:ry ~n
scfydlind ,o:crfforcdig. clu~..,:nnc!
A.dforiJd ~;JCO\IN~ 1~
J c.h:,rh.:,bl(- inc:orpor,>U•d
,1c ·.r.-c d',I cofrc~tru. 't"Y ')f9'Jnis..itu:.,n r'C9 1•~ter'Cd •f\
Nghymn,.1., LI
n 1
Eng!anr:i ;Jnd h
support sessions I counselling is long. This will have a detrimental impact and deaths may occur
if the treatment and support is not afforded in a timely manner.
4.
Response to Matter of Concern 2:
At the material time, our administrators were responsible for sending out the abovementioned
letters to patients. They did not, however, make routine calls to patients as this would require a
different skill set given that in our experience, when patients are spoken to on the telephone,
they often seek therapeutic engagement. Our administrators are not therapists and using our
therapists to make routine telephone calls would add pressure to the service in the context of
current resources and consequently, add to service waiting times.
Adferiad is, however, currently in the process of seeking a range of updated automated
communication routes for the service (such as a text reminder service) and as we proceed with
this initiative, we will, of course, continue to have regard to your concern. However, we are
unable to guarantee that patients will act on appointments; and/or respond to our telephone
calls, messages, visits, or other forms of communication.
We acknowledge your concerns regarding our service's waiting times but , funding decisions
concerning the service are matters for the Health Board and/or Welsh Government.
We trust that this Response provides assurance that action is being taken by Adferiad to address the
matters raised by HM Coroner.
Yours sincerely
Chief Executive
M,1c A<jf•r~1id Re,co'l."P.1y yn
.,d·rdliadeori-for~d ig t-luscnnot
Adfcr1.Jd l::!e:.::,wcry i~
,) r. 1"111rit,1b1e incorpof•'~
.3c wedy cofre~tru )'ng \ltg.Jnis-Jtion rcgl•,tcr<'ct n
En13land .,.nd V'l..il0::;
Ng'1:,mru J lit'C~ r
Bloc 5, Llys Carlton, Parc BusnesLlanelwy, Llanelwy, LL17 0JG ---------------------------------- Block 5, Carlton Court, St Asaph Business Park, St Asaph, LL17 0JG Dyddiad / Date: 12th September 2023 Kate Robertson Assistant Coroner North Wales (East and Central) Coroner's Office County Hall Wynnstay Road Ruthin LL15 1YN Dear Ms Robertson, REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS Emily Corfield I write in response to the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths dated 16 July 2023, issued by yourself to Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, following the inquest into the death of Emily Corfield. I would like to begin by offering my deepest condolences to the family and friends of Ms Corfield for their loss, and to apologise to them for the failures that were identified during the inquest which led to your notice. In the notice, you highlighted your concerns that Ms Corfield had not received input from the alcohol liaison service when an inpatient nor in the community and that you were not assured of the Health Board processes to ensure that referrals to the service are acted upon. In response to the notice, I requested our Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Division (MHLD) consider your concerns and provide details of their plans to make our services as effective as possible, taking into account the learning from the inquest. Firstly, I can confirm there is a Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Liaison Psychiatry Services in Acute Hospitals Delivery Framework (MHLD AC001) that is within date and available on the Intranet for all Health Board staff to access. This document outlines the services provided by Liaison from a multidisciplinary group of staff and includes alcohol liaison staff. The referral process to liaison services is detailed within the framework. During consideration of your concerns, it was identified that the liaison service did not receive a referral from the treating team located in our Integrated Health Community (East). In response to this, a communication has been produced that outlines the referral process to liaison services that will be shared with clinical teams across the Health Board to ensure there is clarity and consistency across all areas. This communication has now been issued. Cyfeiriad Gohebiaeth ar gyfer y Cadeirydd a'r Prif Weithredwr / Correspondence address for Chairman and Chief Executive: Swyddfa'r Gweithredwyr / Executives’ Office Ysbyty Gwynedd, Penrhosgarnedd Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2PW Gwefan: www.pbc.cymru.nhs.uk / Web: www.bcu.wales.nhs.uk Although in date and operational, the MHLD Liaison Psychiatry Services in Acute Hospitals Delivery Framework will be reviewed by a working group of stakeholders, to include liaison team managers and key clinicians, led by a senior manager to ensure the referral process is clear and unambiguous. Once the review is complete, the revised framework will be subject to a period of consultation and will then proceed through the ratification process. Progress on the review and ratification process will be monitored by the Divisional Policy and Procedure Development Subgroup and any potential delays will be escalated to the Divisional Senior Leadership Team. I hope this letter sets out for you the actions we have taken to ensure the concerns raised by yourself are being addressed. We would be happy to meet with you further and discuss our plans in more detail, or provide further information and assurance should that be helpful. Once again, I offer my deepest condolences to the family and friends of Ms Corfield for their loss and I reiterate my sincere apologies to them for the concerns identified at the inquest. Yours sincerely, ______________ Prif Weithredwr Dros Dro Interim Chief Executive c.c. , Interim Deputy Chief Executive and Executive Medical Director , Executive Director of Public Health (Executive Lead for Mental Health) , Deputy Director of Quality
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.