Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023

Corinne Haslam

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0266, written 21 Jul 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report21 Jul 2023
Reference2023-0266
DeceasedCorinne Haslam
CoronerChris Morris
Coroner areaManchester South
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedTameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust · Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:  1) Rt. Hon. Steve Barclay MP, Secretary of State for Health and 
Social Care; 2) 

, Chief Executive, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust 

CORONER 

I am Chris Morris, Area Coroner for Manchester South. 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and 
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 8th April 2022, I opened an inquest into the death of Corinne Haslam who died on 18th March 
2022 at Tameside General Hospital, Ashton-under-Lyne, aged 55 years.  The investigation concluded 
with an inquest which I heard between 13th and 16th March 2023. 

The inquest determined that Mrs Haslam died as a consequence of:-

1) a) Acute left ventricular failure; 
b) Myocardial ischaemia and acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 
c) Left ventricular hypertrophy 

d) II) Pulmonary thromboemboli (treated); Agitation arising in the context of severe and enduring 

mental illness 

The conclusion of the inquest was one of Natural Causes. 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Mrs Haslam died on 18th March 2022 at Tameside General Hospital, Ashton-under-Lyne, as a 
consequence of complications arising from myocardial ischaemia and an acute exacerbation of 
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, against a background of undiagnosed left ventricular 
hypertrophy.  Mrs Haslam’s death was contributed to by physiological consequences of pulmonary 
thromboemboli which had been treated, and agitation in the context of severe and enduring mental 
illness. 

Mrs Haslam was admitted to Taylor Ward, Tameside General Hospital in January 2022 following an 
acute deterioration in her mental health which could not be safely managed in the 

 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
  
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 community.  Whilst initially an informal patient, Mrs Haslam was subsequently detained under the 
Mental Health Act. 

Mrs Haslam reported a range of physical symptoms on the ward including chest pain and 
breathlessness, and attended the Emergency Department at Tameside General Hospital on 7th 
March 2022 when an acute exacerbation of COPD was diagnosed and treatment started. 

On 13th March 2022, Mrs Haslam returned to the Emergency Department with similar symptoms, 
and pulmonary thromboemboli were suspected due to abnormal blood results.  Anticoagulant 
treatment was prescribed and continued to be administered following Mrs Haslam’s return to Taylor 
Ward. 

On 17th March 2022, Mrs Haslam became breathless again and was initially managed on the ward by 
means of monitoring, nebulisers and limited oxygen therapy.  Following a significant deterioration at 
around 22:00, Mrs Haslam was transferred back to the Emergency Department by ambulance, dying 
there in the early hours of the following morning. 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion 
there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my 
statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – 

To the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 

1.  The court heard evidence as to the barriers which exist and make it difficult for staff working 
on mental health wards to obtain input from physical health specialists without sending a 
patient to hospital via the Emergency Department. 

Whilst there are occasions where review in an Emergency Department is most appropriate, 
the court also heard evidence that these can be extremely busy and intensive environments 
which may not be a conducive to delivering care for patients experiencing severe and 
enduring mental illness; 

2. 

It is a matter of concern that Mental Health Trusts and Acute Trusts operate different 
(apparently incompatible) electronic records systems.  The absence of such a unified records 
system creates obstacles as to the transfer of important clinical information between mental 
health and physical health specialists (and vice versa), with an inherent risk to patient safety 
arising from such information being held in silos. 

To the Chief Executive of Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust 

3. It is a matter of concern that ward-based nursing staff do not appear to have been provided 
with clear and unambiguous guidance as to the circumstances when a risk assessment for 

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Venous Thromboembolism (‘VTE’) should be undertaken following admission to a ward, and 
the circumstances in which such risk assessment should be repeated. 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you and your 
organisation have the power to take such action. 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 
15th September 2023. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner, 
 and Weightmans LLP. 
with 

 together 

I have also sent a copy to the Care Quality Commission and Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council 
who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may 
send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may 
make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the 
publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

Dated: 

21st July 2023 

Signature:  Chris Morris HM Area Coroner, Manchester South.

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Department of Health and Social Care (PDF)
From Maria Caulfield MP 
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State 
Department of Health & Social Care 

39 Victoria Street 
London 
SW1H 0EU 

9 May 2024  

Chris Morris  
Area Coroner   
1 Mount Tabor Street  
Stockport  
SK1 3AG  

Dear Mr Morris,  

Thank you for your Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths dated 21 July 2023 about 
the death of Corinne Haslam.  I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for mental 
health and patient safety.       

Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Corinne’s 
death and I offer my sincere condolences to her family and loved ones. The circumstances 
your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to 
my attention. Please accept my sincere apologies for the significant delay in responding to 
this matter.  

Your report raises concerns over the provision of physical healthcare in a mental health 
setting and the compatibility of electronic patient records.  

I note that you have also addressed matters of concerns to the Chief Executive of Pennine 
Care NHS Foundation Trust and I would expect the Trust’s response to address those 
issues.  

In preparing this response, Departmental officials have made enquiries with NHS England.   

It is recognised that people living with severe mental illness are dying 15-20 years younger 
than the general population, largely from preventable or treatable physical illnesses. In 
particular people living with SMI are at much greater risk of cardiovascular disease. 
Therefore, it is essential that mental health settings meet patients' physical as well as 
mental healthcare needs either through their own appropriately qualified and experienced 
staff or in partnership with other providers. This requires mental health inpatient staff to be 
provided with adequate training and guidance on monitoring physical health, and 
importantly how to escalate and respond to concerns as needed.  

With regard to the compatibility of electronic patient records, a shared care record joins up 
information based on an individual rather than an organisation, and is a safe and secure 
way of bringing an individual’s separate records from different health and care 
organisations together.   

 
 
 
 
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   
 As of 2021 all primary and secondary care organisations have been able to share a subset 
of the patient information they hold – the core information standard – between providers 
within their own integrated care board footprint. Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust and 
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust are connected to the local 
instance of their shared care record (known as Greater Manchester). Future plans include 
making shared care records link together regardless of where you live or receive care in 
England.  

I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.   

Yours sincerely, 

MARIA CAULFIELD

Related reports

Other reports by Chris Morris

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.