Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023

Christopher Locke

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0310, written 24 Aug 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report24 Aug 2023
Reference2023-0310
DeceasedChristopher Locke
CoronerAled Gruffydd
Coroner areaSwansea Neath Port Talbot
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:  
JD WETHERSPOONS PLC 
WETHERSPOON HOUSE 
CENTRAL PARK  
REEDS CRES 
WATFORD  
WD24 4QL 

1 

CORONER 

I am Aled Gruffydd, Assistant Coroner, for the coroner area of SWANSEA NEATH & 
PORT TALBOT 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On the 11th August 2022 I commenced an investigation into the death of Christopher 
James Locke. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 24th of 
August 2023. 

The medical cause of death is 
1a) hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy 
1b) cardiac arrest  
1c) cardiac arrhythmia in a man with a fatty heart who had sustained a blow to the head 

The conclusion of the inquest as to how Mr Locke came to his death was a narrative 
conclusion and is as follows:- 

The deceased died from hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, caused by a cardiac arrest, 
which itself was caused by a cardiac arrhythmia in a man with a fatty heart and 
sustained a blow to the head. The emergency services did not instruct the caller to 
initiate chest compressions when given sufficient information to give that instruction, and 
this more than minimally contributed to the deceased’s death 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

The deceased was Christopher James Locke and he was pronounced dead on the 29th 
October 2021 at Morriston Hospital, Swansea. The cause of death was hypoxic 
ischaemic encephalopathy, caused by a cardiac arrest, which itself was caused by a 
cardiac. 

Christopher was admitted to Morriston Hospital via UHW Hospital Cardiff on the 23rd 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 October 2021 having sustained a cardiac arrest at the Lord Cradoc public house, Port 
Talbot during the evening of the 21st of October 2021. The cause of the cardiac arrest 
was found to be a cardiac arrhythmia. The staff at the Lord Cradoc called 999 and 
followed the instructions provided by the Emergency Medical Dispatcher (EMD). The 
EMD did not instruct the staff to undertake CPR. Christopher’s circulation was restored 
12 minutes after the arrival of the paramedics, who arrived 8 minutes after the 
commencement of the call. It was therefore estimated that Christopher had been without 
oxygen for at least 20 minutes. Christopher died from a brain injury caused by this lack 
of oxygen. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest it transpired that there had previously been a scheme 
undertaken by Wetherspoons allowing staff to undertake additional training including 
CPR training. The evidence that was heard from a Consultant Intensivist was that the 
sooner that CPR can be commenced the greater chance that a person is able to survive 
a cardiac arrest, with minimal if no long lasting disabilities. The inquest concluded that 
the EMD should have directed staff at the Lord Cradoc to commence CPR and it is 
understood that compulsory training has been given to all Wetherspoons staff to enable 
them to comply with EMD instructions. This compulsory training dod not extend to CPR 
training. 

It is not the purpose of this report to compel your organisation to provide CPR training to 
its staff but to make such training available to staff who express an interest. It is 
recognised that such situations are stressful situations and that it would be unfair to 
impose compulsory CPR training to staff, however as with all organisations some 
individuals would welcome the opportunity to benefit from such training. No failings were 
found against the staff who attended to Christopher that evening and they ought to be 
commended for their actions.  

I am concerned that in such cases bar staff at pubs will invariably find themselves in 
situations where the administering of emergency CPR treatment ought to be 
administered. The time taken between the beginning of an emergency call and an 
instruction to commence CPR may deprive a patient of a favourable outcome. Whilst 
Wetherspoons staff have been trained to comply with EMD instructions there are 
occasions such as this case where staff could implement CPR of their own accord 
before being instructed to do so by EMD’s. The training would not only teach staff the 
correct techniques but educate them of the situations in which CPR should be used.  

In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  – 

1. 

In a pub environment there is a greater chance for the public to sustain injuries 
that requires emergency treatment 

2.  Ordinary bystanders’ ability to administer emergency treatment may be hindered 

by their own consumption of alcohol  

3.  Whilst the primary responsibility of staff is to comply with EMD directions they 

are deprived of the opportunity to provide lifesaving treatment in circumstances 
that warrant it if that training is not offered 

4.  Staff would not know the circumstances that warrant it without the benefit of 

CPR training. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you AND/OR 
your organisation have the power to take such action.  

2 

 
 
 
      
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 19 October 2023. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

24 August 2023

 [SIGNED BY CORONER] 

3

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Jd Wethersppon Plc (PDF)
Response to Regulation 28 Report – Christopher Locke Deceased  

J  D  Wetherspoon  PLC  (“Wetherspoon”)  was  very  sorry  to  have  learnt  about  the 
passing  of  Mr  Locke.  On  hearing  evidence  at  the  Inquest  we  understand  why  the 
Coroner has raised the Regulation 28 Report.  We  are aware that the Coroner has 
also contacted a trade body to also look into the provision of CPR training across the 
wider licensed industry.  

We note that incorrect evidence was given by Wetherspoon employees at the Inquest 
to  the  effect  that  “there  had  previously  been  a  scheme  offered  to  undertake 
additional training including CPR training”. That position is not correct.  

Wetherspoon  have  a  policy  that  if  any  customers  or  staff  get  into  a  medical 
emergency,  care  is  provided  by  appropriately  trained  medical  professionals.  It  is 
therefore Wetherspoon’s policy that for any injury or medical incident that requires 
immediate attention, emergency services are called and an ambulance is requested. 
Wetherspoon does not provide or offer medical training (which would include CPR 
training)  to  its  staff  as  it  feels  a  qualified  medical  professional  is  best  place  to 
provide it. This policy has been in place for 25 years and has been reviewed by and 
assured advice has been received from Wetherspoon’s Primary Authority. 

Wetherspoon  has  reviewed  the  position  in  relation  to  offering  CPR  training  since 
receiving the Regulation 28 Report but will not be making any changes to the existing 
policy.

Related reports

Other reports by Aled Gruffydd

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.