Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025

Gareth Tatchell

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0384, written 28 Jul 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report28 Jul 2025
Reference2025-0384
DeceasedGareth Tatchell
CoronerAled Gruffydd
Coroner areaSwansea Neath & Port Talbot
CategoryHospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published2

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:  
CHIEF EXECUTIVE ABMU HEALTH BOARD 
1 TALBOT GATEWAY  
BAGLAN ENERGY PARK  
BAGLAN 
PORT TALBOT  
SA12 7BR 

1 

CORONER 

I am Aled Gruffydd, Senior Coroner, for the coroner area of SWANSEA NEATH & 
PORT TALBOT 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On the 19th of June 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of Gareth Wynne 
Tatchell. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 26th June 2025. 

The medical cause of death is 
1a) pneumonia 
2 squamous cell carcinoma 

The conclusion of the inquest as to how Mr Tatchell came to his death was a narrative 
conclusion and is as follows:- 

the deceased died from the natural cause of pneumonia having undergone treatment for 
squamous cell carcinoma which had returned at the time of death. The delay in 
providing treatment more than minimally contributed to the deceased’s death. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

The deceased was Gareth Wynne Tatchell and he was pronounced dead on the 9th April 
2024 at Princess of Wales Hospital, Swansea. The cause of death was pneumonia. 
Squamous cell carcinoma was a contributing factor in his death. 

Gareth was referred to the maxillo-facial team at Morriston Hospital on the 12th of April 
2023 by his dentist following the discovery of an ulcer in the lower left mandible. The 
referral was classed as an urgent suspected cancer (USC) and Gareth was seen in 
outpatients clinic on the 28th of April 2023. Cancer was suspected at that point, 
specifically a squamous cell carcinoma but it needed to be confirmed by a biopsy. That 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 biopsy took place on 18 May and the result came back on 30 May as a moderately 
differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. Gareth was seen again on the 19th of June and 
further tests consisting of a CT of the thorax, a CT angiogram of the legs and an MRI 
and ultrasound of the neck were undertaken on the 28th. Care was then transferred to 
the treating consultant maxillofacial surgeon who first saw Gareth on the 6th of July, and 
then on the 27 July to discuss treatment, which would consist of surgery and 
radiotherapy. Due to theatre capacity, the earliest date being 13 September. By the 
week prior to surgery Gareth had developed a lump both inside and out, meaning that 
the lump was visible on the outside but it would also have spread to the blood vessels in 
the neck. 
The surgery was able to remove the tumour macroscopically i.e all that was visible to the 
naked eye, but as it was encasing the carotid it would not be possible to remove it all. 

In February 2024 the treating consultant saw Gareth in hospital after he had gone in to 
have the AAA repaired. It was then that Gareth complained of a pain in the neck which 
prompted the CT scan showing an enlargement and a biopsy then confirmed that the 
cancer had returned. Gareth was discharged from hospital following the AAA repair but 
was readmitted to hospital on the 8th of March 2024. He subsequently passed away in 
hospital on the above date.   

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest it transpired that the Suspected Cancer Pathway 
introduced for the whole of Wales in 2019 required a suspected cancer to be diagnosed 
and staged within 31 calendar days of the date of referral and for treatment to 
commence within 62 calendar days from the date of referral. In this case the diagnostic 
and staging phase was completed in 97 days from the date of referral and treatment 
commenced within 144 days of the date of treatment. The result of that delay was that it 
made the carcinoma more difficult to treat in that it would not have had the extracapsular 
spread or the encasement of the carotid that was witnessed at the end of August and 
which was not present around the end of June when treatment ought to have taken 
place. Had the timescales had been complied with then treatment would have been 
administered before extracapsular spread had occurred. Evidence was received from 
the treating consultant that this contributed towards Gareth’s death. 

Evidence was heard that since this incident there had been an improvement in theatre 
capacity with additional theatre sessions having been allocated to oral and maxillofacial 
surgery, and an additional Consultant Maxillofacial Oncological Surgeon has been 
appointed to undertake both surgery and outpatient appointments. 

The evidence could not point to improvements in radiology services however, which is 
needed to undertake staging scans. This case underwent staging scans in May 2023, 
however as recently as May 2025 a letter was sent to the Clinical Lead for Radiology by 
two Associate Medical Directors expressing concerns that delays to staging scans are 
causing unnecessary risk in aggressive cancers that are at risk of progression and 
irresectable. 

I am concerned that delays in undertaking staging scans are allowing such cancers to 
progress to the point that they are irresectable, resulting in poor prognosis for patients 
and reducing survivability rates and life expectancy and there is a risk that future deaths 
will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to 
you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

1.  There was a delay in both the diagnostic and staging phase and treatment 
phase contrary to the timescales in the Suspected Cancer Pathway. 

2.  Part of the delays resolve around the time taken to undertake staging scans for 

2 

 
 
  
 
      
 
 
 
  
 
 
 the purpose of the diagnostic and staging phase. 

3.  Two Associate Medical Directors have communicated that delays in undertaking 
staging scans are ongoing and are having an impact on survivability rates and 
prognoses by making treatable cancers irresectable.  

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you AND/OR 
your organisation have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 22 September 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons 

.  

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

28 July 2025   HM SENIOR CORONER ALED GRUFFYDD

3

Responses

2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Pennine Care (PDF)
Corporate Legal Services
Trust Headquarters
225 Old Street
Ashton Under Lyne
Lancashire
OL6 7SF

29 September 2025 

Private & Confidential 
Chrstopher Morris  
HM Area Coroner 
Coroner’s Court 
1 Mount Tabor Street 
Stockport 
SK1 3AG 

Dear Mr Morris, 

RE: Inquest touching on the death of Sasha Drysdale  

I set out below the Trust’s response to your letter to Pennine Care NHS Foundation 
Trust  (PCFT)  and  the  issuing  of  a  Prevention  of  Future  Deaths  Notice  (Regulation 
28),  arising  from  the  inquest  into  the  death  of  Sasha  Drysdale  and  the  proceeding 
Judicial Review. 

May I take this opportunity to extend my own condolences to the family of Sasha and 
apologise that you had to raise concerns relating to the services she accessed prior 
to her sad death.  

The  Trust  sets  out  its  response  to  the  points  below  raised  by  HMC’s  as  areas  of 
concern: 

Whilst it is understood regular blood tests represent an important monitoring 
requirement for patients taking Clozapine in view of the serious potential side 
effects  of  neutropenia  and  particularly  agranulocytosis,  I  am  concerned  that 
the  emphasis  on  these  complications  raises  a  risk  that  the  potential 
significance  of  other  abnormal  results  may  not  be  readily  or  promptly 
appreciated  or  acted  upon,  and  remain  overlooked  or  possibly  incorrectly 
attributed to Clozapine therapy. 

Full Blood Count monitoring: 

Leucocyte (white blood cells) and neutrophil monitoring is a mandatory requirement 
for all patients treated with Clozapine in the UK. Summary of product characteristics: Clozaril 

In addition to the mandatory white blood cells (WBC) and neutrophil monitoring other 
full  blood  count  parameters  are  currently  monitored  as  standard  either  via  Point  of 
care  haematological  testing  (PoCHi)  or  local  lab  analysis  includingpocH-100i  -  Products 
Detail: 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 •  WBC  (white  blood  cells),  RBC  (red  blood  cells),  HGB  (heamoglobin),  HCT 
(haematocrit),  MCV  (Mean  Corpuscular  Volume),  MCH  (Mean  Corpuscular 
Haemoglobin),  MCHC  (Mean  Corpuscular  Haemoglobin  Concentration),  PLT 
(platelets),  LYM  (#,%)  (lymphocytes),  MXD  (#,%)  (mixed  white  blood  cells), 
NEUT (#,%) (neutrophils), 

These  full  blood  count  (FBC)  parameters  would  be  recommended  as  standard  for 
assessment  of  haematological  cancers  Ref:  Haematological  cancers  -  recognition  and  referral  |  Health 
topics A to Z | CKS | NICE. 

Abnormal  results,  including  neutropenia  but  also  other  abnormalities  in  FBC 
differentials  obtained  within  a  community  setting  are  escalated  to  medical  staff  for 
review.  Results  for  inpatient  monitoring  conducted  via  local  labourites  would  be 
review  directly  by  medical  staff  and  appropriate  action  taken  for  abnormalities, 
neutropenia or otherwise.  

Medical staff would following NICE guidelines Haematological cancers  - recognition 
and referral regardless of the original indication for Full Blood Count investigation. 

Pharmacovigilance  Risk  Assessment  Committee 
for routine blood count monitoring 

(PRAC) 

recommendations 

PRAC has  recently  endorsed  a  direct  healthcare  professional  communication 
(DHPC)  about  revised  recommendations  for  the  monitoring  of  the  blood  count  to 
minimise the risk of severe neutropenia and agranulocytosis with Clozapine Ref: Meeting 
highlights  from  the  Pharmacovigilance  Risk Assessment  Committee  (PRAC)  7  –  10 July  2025  | European  Medicines Agency 
(EMA) 

New  evidence  from  the  scientific  literature  suggests  that,  although  Clozapine-
induced  neutropenia  can  occur  at  any  time  during  treatment,  it  is predominantly 
observed  during  the  first  year,  with  the  incidence  peaking  in  the  first  18  weeks  of 
treatment. After this the incidence decreases becoming progressively lower after two 
years of treatment in patients without previous episode of neutropenia. 

Therefore, PRAC recommended less frequent blood count monitoring. For example, 
in  patients  without  neutropenia, the  frequency  of  monitoring  is  reduced  to  every  12 
weeks after one year, and to once a year after two years of treatment.  

The product  information for  all  Clozapine-containing  medicines  will  be  updated to 
reflect the monitoring frequency for the risk of Clozapine-related agranulocytosis and 
the  revised  ANC  thresholds  for  treatment  initiation  and  continuation.  This  is 
anticipated in Autumn 2025. 

The  DHPC  for  Clozapine  will  be  disseminated  to  healthcare  professionals  by 
the marketing authorisation holders in September 2025, and published on the Direct 
healthcare  professional  communications page  and 
in national  registers in  EU 
Member States.  

Currently 
the  UK  remain 
unchanged however the emerging evidence for scientific literature is well known by 

the  monitoring  requirements 

for  Clozapine  within 

 
 clinicians and will be circulated clearly to all PCFT prescribers and pharmacists. This 
will further increase the scrutiny of any abnormal full blood count results in patients 
on established treatment due to the known unlikelihood of  Clozapine as a causative 
factor. 

I hope that the information within this response has provided you with the assurance 
that you were seeking in relation to learning from these events. Should you require 
any  further information  or clarification  on  the  details  within  this letter, please do  not 
hesitate to get in touch with me again.  

Yours sincerely 

Chief Executive
Response from Bwrdd Lechyd Prifsgol Bae Abertawe (PDF)
Bwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol Bae Abertawe
Swansea Bay University Health Board

Un Porthfa Talbot | One Talbot Gateway
Parc Ynni, Baglan | Baglan Energy Park
Port Talbot SA12 7BR

Dyddiad / Date: 17th September 2025 

Mr Aled Gruffydd, 
Senior Coroner, 
Swansea & Neath Port Talbot. 

Dear Mr Gruffydd,   

Re: Regulation 28 Response: Mr. Gareth Wynne Tatchell 

Thank you for providing Swansea Bay University Health Board with an opportunity to 
respond to your concerns raised at the conclusion of the inquest of Mr. Gareth Wynne 
Tatchell, on 26th June 2025. 

Before  addressing  your  specific  concerns,  I  would  like  to  extend  my  sincere 
condolences  to  Mr.  Tatchell’s  family  on  behalf  of  Swansea  Bay  University  Health 
Board (SBUHB).  We understand that bereavement and the inquest process can be 
profoundly difficult for families.   Although there has been a considerable time lapse 
and Swansea Bay University Health Board was not involved in Mr Tatchell's end of life 
care, our Care After Death service remains available should his family wish to access 
it.  For further information or support, please contact my office. 

In terms of the concerns, you have expressed and the assurance you are seeking:  

1.  There was a delay in both the diagnostic and staging phase and treatment 

phase contrary to the timescales in the Suspected Cancer Pathway.  

While the Health Board has made significant progress  in reducing waiting times for 
cancer, we, along with many Health Boards, are not delivering the timeliness of care 
as consistently as we would like.  The challenges of delivering cancer waiting times is 
reflected within the Health Board’s Risk Register. 

        The following actions are in place to address and mitigate this risk: 

•  Monitoring at an individual patient level is in place with weekly or fortnightly review 

meetings depending on the specialty. 

•  There are explicit targets for each stage of the cancer pathway first appointment 
(10 working days) and Decision to Treat (DTT) by Day 31, DTT to First Definitive 
Treatment in 32 days.  This information is collected for each specialty and reported 
monthly. 

•  Action plans for each specialty are in place targeted at addressing areas of non-

compliance. 

Rydym yn croesawu gohebiaeth yn y Gymraeg neu'r Saesneg. Atebir gohebiaeth Gymraeg yn y Gymraeg, ac ni fydd hyn yn arwain at oedi. 
We welcome correspondence in Welsh or English. Welsh language correspondence will be replied to in Welsh, and this will not lead to a delay. 

Cadeirydd/Chair: Jan Williams Prif Weithredwr/Chief Executive: Abigail Harris 

Pencadlys BIP Bae Abertawe, Un Porthfa Talbot, Port Talbot, SA12 7BR  
Bwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol Bae Abertawe yw enw gweithredu Bwrdd Iechyd Lleol Prifysgol Bae Abertawe 

Swansea Bay UHB Headquarters, One Talbot Gateway, Port Talbot, SA12 7BR 
Swansea Bay University Health Board is the operational name of Swansea Bay University Local Health Board 

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 •  Additional support has been provided to histopathology to facilitate improvement 
in the turnaround times, but this is still an area of considerable challenge for the 
Health Board. 

In  order  to  monitor  the  effectiveness  of  the  above  actions  the  following  assurance 
mechanisms have been established: 

•  Development  of  digital  performance  dashboard  to  provide  a  “live”  performance 

status. 

•  Escalation  meetings  are  held  chaired  by  the  Deputy  Chief  Operating  Officer, 

Deputy Medial Director and Cancer Lead Clinician as required. 

•  Monthly  performance  reported  are  provided  to  the  Cancer  Performance  and 
Information Group (chaired by the Deputy MD) and the Planned Care and Cancer 
Board (chaired by the Chief Operating Officer). 

•  Monthly review meetings are in place with Welsh Government to monitor Health 

Board performance. 

The Health Board’s performance for head and neck cancers treated within the 62 days 
required by the Single Cancer Pathway, varies month on month with on average 60% 
of patient meeting the target over the last 12 months. 

There are currently 148 patients on the head & neck cancer pathway in SBUHB.  This 
includes 16 patients who have been waiting longer than the 62-day target.  However, 
all 16 of these patients’ waiting times have been prolonged due to patient unavailability 
-  either  the  result  of  patient  choice  or  fitness  to  undergo  treatment.    Every  effort  is 
being made to ensure that their treatment is delivered at the earliest opportunity, taking 
into account their personal choices and/or the need to ensure that they are well enough 
to receive treatment. 

2.  Part of the delays revolve around the time taken to undertake staging scans 

for the purpose of the diagnostic and staging phase. 

We  have  processes  in  place  that  enable  us  to  track  all  cancer  patients’  progress 
through  the  pathway.    This  includes  patients  who  have  been  referred  to  regional 
specialist services in SBUHB from other Health Boards.  While we act as the centre 
for delivery of the specialist care for these patients, diagnostic testing and staging are 
conducted within their ‘home’ Health Board, as was the case with Mr. Tatchell, who 
was a resident of Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board (CTMUHB). 

Although  we  do  not  directly  manage  elements  of  the  pathway  that  occur  outside 
SBUHB, we have oversight and liaise closely with the parent Health Board to expedite 
tests  if  needed.    For  example,  if  a  scan  has  not  been  booked  by  Day  5  after  a 
diagnostic referral has been made, the cancer tracking team in SBUHB will reach out 
either directly to the radiology department of the referring Health Board or contact the 
local tracking team to escalate on behalf of the patient. 

If there is a failure to respond within an appropriate timescale there are clear routes of 
escalation via the control measures described above and will include Chief Operating 
Officer level, should it be required. 

Rydym yn croesawu gohebiaeth yn y Gymraeg neu'r Saesneg. Atebir gohebiaeth Gymraeg yn y Gymraeg, ac ni fydd hyn yn arwain at oedi. 
We welcome correspondence in Welsh or English. Welsh language correspondence will be replied to in Welsh, and this will not lead to a delay. 

Cadeirydd/Chair: Jan Williams Prif Weithredwr/Chief Executive: Abigail Harris 

Pencadlys BIP Bae Abertawe, Un Porthfa Talbot, Port Talbot, SA12 7BR  
Bwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol Bae Abertawe yw enw gweithredu Bwrdd Iechyd Lleol Prifysgol Bae Abertawe 

Swansea Bay UHB Headquarters, One Talbot Gateway, Port Talbot, SA12 7BR 
Swansea Bay University Health Board is the operational name of Swansea Bay University Local Health Board 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Recent review of the head & neck single cancer pathway, for patient seen between May 
2034  and  May  2025  (sample  n=50)  has  confirmed  positive  compliance  against  key 
indicators: 

•  Urgent suspected cancer referral to 1st Appointment = 8.9 days 
•  1st Appointment to Biopsy = 11.5 days 
•  Referral to Diagnosis = 36.5 days 

3.  Two Associate Medical Directors have communicated that delays in undertaking 
staging scans are ongoing and are having an impact on survivability rates and 
prognoses by making treatable cancers irresectable.  

Radiology is a national shortage specialty that can be a challenge for recruitment, this 
is further compounded when recruiting sub-specialty interest. 

Radiology provision to the Head and Neck service is not as robust as the Health Board 
would  like  it  to  be.    We  have  several  highly  committed  clinicians  who  deliver  this 
specialist service as part of their roles, including three at consultant level and one at 
Specialty  (SAS)  Doctor  level.    We  have  worked  hard  to  recruit  additional  staff  and 
there is a continuous process of advertising and re-advertising in place to actively seek 
suitable applicants.  Locum cover was in place until May 2025.  We advertised for a 
replacement, anticipating the locum’s departure, and interviewed two candidates - but 
were not able to appoint. 

Another round of advertisement has been completed, and we have now secured locum 
cover for 12 months commencing in October 2025. You can be assured that we are 
making  every  effort  to  recruit  in  a  timely  way,  recognising  that  there  is  a  challenge 
across the UK of recruiting into these highly specialised posts.  

While we recognise that the actions and improvements described above cannot alter 
the outcome for Mr. Tatchell and his family, I trust this demonstrates the Health Board’s 
commitment to addressing the risks identified by his case.  

Yours sincerely, 

EXECUTIVE MEDICAL DIRECTOR & DEPUTY CHIEF EXECUTIVE  
SWANSEA BAY UNIVERSITY HEALTH BOARD 

Rydym yn croesawu gohebiaeth yn y Gymraeg neu'r Saesneg. Atebir gohebiaeth Gymraeg yn y Gymraeg, ac ni fydd hyn yn arwain at oedi. 
We welcome correspondence in Welsh or English. Welsh language correspondence will be replied to in Welsh, and this will not lead to a delay. 

Cadeirydd/Chair: Jan Williams Prif Weithredwr/Chief Executive: Abigail Harris 

Pencadlys BIP Bae Abertawe, Un Porthfa Talbot, Port Talbot, SA12 7BR  
Bwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol Bae Abertawe yw enw gweithredu Bwrdd Iechyd Lleol Prifysgol Bae Abertawe 

Swansea Bay UHB Headquarters, One Talbot Gateway, Port Talbot, SA12 7BR 
Swansea Bay University Health Board is the operational name of Swansea Bay University Local Health Board

Related reports

Other reports by Aled Gruffydd

See all →

More reports categorised “Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths”

See all →

Track Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.