Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023

John Condron

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2023-0374, written 6 Oct 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report6 Oct 2023
Reference2023-0374
DeceasedJohn Condron
CoronerCharlotte Keighley
Coroner areaCheshire
CategorySuicide (from 2015)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

NOTE:  This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1. Chief Constable of Cheshire police 
2. National College of Policing 
3. National Police Chiefs’ Council 

1  CORONER 

I am Charlotte KEIGHLEY, Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Cheshire 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 08 November 2017 I commenced an investigation into the death of John George 
CONDRON aged 53.  The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 25 
September 2023.  The conclusion of the inquest was that: 

Narrative Conclusion - John George Condron took his own life whilst suffering extreme 
anxiety and stress in respect of allegations made against him which were being investigated 
by the police. This was exacerbated by i) him not having been informed that no further 
action was to be taken in respect of the most serious allegation against him, despite that 
decision having been made 10 days previously; and ii) no enquiries having been made in 
respect of evidence he referred to in his police interviews. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

On the 2nd November 2017, John Condron was found at his home address suspended from 
the roof beams in his loft by a ligature around his neck made from a rope. At the time of his 
death he was under investigation by the Police, allegations having been made against him 
by his ex-partner but prior to these allegations being made, Mr Condron had reported to 
the police that he was the victim of domestic abuse by that same partner. Mr Condron had 
been interviewed by the police on three separate occasions in relation to two different 
allegations. On the 23rd October 2017 the decision was made to take no further action in 
relation to the most serious of those allegations. Mr Condron had not been informed of that 
decision which exacerbated the extreme anxiety and stress he was experiencing at the time 
of his death. 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest, evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my 
opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:-

(1) I received evidence confirming the absence of any agreed protocol relating to 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 timescales for a suspect to be informed by the police of a decision to take no further action 
in respect of allegations made against them. At the conclusion of the Inquest, it was 
confirmed that this was the position both at the time of Mr Condron’s death in November 
2017 and at the conclusion of the Inquest in September 2023. 

(2) I received evidence that at a National Level, the Victim’s Code of Practice provides that 
a victim has a right to be informed of key decisions in an investigation within 5 working 
days, or within 1 working day if they are eligible for Enhanced Rights. This includes a 
decision by the police to take no further action in respect of the allegations they have 
made. There is no such code of practice in respect of informing suspects of the same. 

(3) I have concerns that further self-inflicted deaths will occur in circumstances where a 
suspect is not informed, within a specified time period, of a decision to take no further 
action in respect of allegations made against them. 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or 
your organisation) have the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by December 01, 2023.  I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action.  Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons 

I have also sent it to: 

The Chief Coroner; 
The family of John George Condron 
Chief Constable of Cheshire Police 
National College of Policing 
National Police Chiefs’  Council 

who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all 
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. 

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or 
of interest. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. 
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of 
interest. 

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the 
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9  Dated: 06/10/2023 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 Charlotte KEIGHLEY 
Assistant Coroner for 
Cheshire 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Cheshire Constabulary (PDF)
Your Ref: 2023-0374 
Date: 01/12/2023 

, Assistant Coroner for Cheshire 

Dear Madam, 

Re:  

Inquest in relation to the death of John Condron  
Response to Regulation 28 Report/Prevention of Future Deaths  

Thank you for your report dated 6th October 2023, under paragraph 7, Schedule 5 of the 

Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) 

Regulations 2013 in relation to the death of Mr Condron, whose Inquest was heard between 22nd 

and 25th September 2023.  

Your report contains the following matters of concern:  

(1) I received evidence confirming the absence of any agreed protocol relating to timescales for a 

suspect to be informed by the police of a decision to take no further action in respect of 

allegations made against them. At the conclusion of the Inquest, it was confirmed that this was 

the position both at the time of Mr Condron’s death in November 2017 and at the conclusion of 

the Inquest in September 2023. 

(2)  I received evidence that at a National Level, the Victim’s Code of Practice provides that a 

victim has a right to be informed of key decisions in an investigation within 5 working days, or 

within 1 working day if they are eligible for Enhanced Rights. This includes a decision by the 

police to take no further action in respect of the allegations they have made. There is no such 

code of practice in respect of informing suspects of the same. 

(3)  I have concerns that further self-inflicted deaths will occur in circumstances where a suspect 

is not informed, within a specified time period, of a decision to take no further action in respect of 

allegations made against them’.  

Cheshire Constabulary Headquarters, Clemonds Hey, Oakmere Road,  
Winsford, Cheshire, CW7 2UA - Email: Mark.Roberts@cheshire.pnn.police.uk 

) 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 Response to the Regulation 28 concerns: 

Our responses to the specific matters of concern set out in your Report are detailed below: 

To our knowledge, there is no national protocol in relation to timescales for informing suspects of 

a ‘NFA decision’.  It is correct that victims of certain specified offences are classed as having 

‘Enhanced Rights’ enshrined in the Victim’s Code for Policing, produced by the College of 

Policing, that prescribes that Enhanced Victims are informed of key decisions (when a suspect is 

arrested/interviewed under caution; released without charge; released on police bail or under 

investigation; when a suspect’s bail conditions changed or cancelled; when a suspect is charged; 

or when a decision is made not to investigate, or a decision is made not to prosecute/ or to 

decision to administer an out of court disposal) within 24 hours. 

The Constabulary has now reviewed the existing Suspect Policy and Procedure, that was 

originally introduced in August 2023 (in order to address the management of suspects in line with 

Force Crime Investigation Policy and Authorised Professional Practice), and the policy now 

specifies:  

‘As part of the bail management process all Supervisors must ensure that bail is reviewed in 

terms of appropriateness, ongoing compliance and impending key dates.  In line with 

investigation management policy, supervisors must complete a review after 14 days and then 

every 30 days after however these are latest dates, reviews can be completed more often’, and 

furthermore ‘Where an NFA decision is reached in relation to a suspect, they must be updated at 

the earliest practicable opportunity or within 48 hours and this must be documented on the OEL’. 

The expectation is that all NFA decisions shall be communicated to suspects no later than 48 

hours post-decision (in cases where Officers make that decision, and also those cases where a 

decision is made by the Crown Prosecution Service, as in this instance). This ought to minimise 

the time taken to reduce any delays in informing suspects of an NFA decision. In this case of 

course the CPS had determined that Mr Condron was to be charged with offences of 

Harassment, Assault, and Coercive and Controlling Behaviour and would have faced criminal 

proceedings in any event.  

Cheshire Constabulary Headquarters, Clemonds Hey, Oakmere Road,  
Winsford, Cheshire, CW7 2UA - Email: Mark.Roberts@cheshire.pnn.police.uk 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Yours sincerely, 

Chief Constable  
NPCC Lead Football Policing & Covert Legislation and Guidance Group 

Cheshire Constabulary Headquarters, Clemonds Hey, Oakmere Road,  
Winsford, Cheshire, CW7 2UA - Email: Mark.Roberts@cheshire.pnn.police.uk

Related reports

Other reports by Charlotte Keighley

See all →

More reports categorised “Suicide (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Suicide (from 2015)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.