Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0441, written 28 Aug 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 28 Aug 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2025-0441 |
| Deceased | Kore Padgett |
| Coroner | Charlotte Keighley |
| Coroner area | West Yorkshire (West) |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS NOTE: This form is to be used after an inquest. REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1 Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust 1 CORONER I am Charlotte KEIGHLEY, Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of West Yorkshire Western Coroner Area 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 13 November 2024 I commenced an investigation into the death of Kore Elizabeth PADGETT aged 90. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 13 August 2025. The conclusion of the Inquest was that Kore Elizabeth Padgett died as a consequence of naturally occurring disease contributed to by injuries sustained from an accidental fall requiring immobilisation in a hard collar. Kore struggled to tolerate the placement of the collar with it impacting upon her overall health and ability to swallow, placing her at high risk of aspiration and requiring the assistance of a nasogastric tube for feeding. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH In the early hours of the 8th September 2024, Kore Elizabeth Padgett was admitted to Huddersfield Royal Infirmary following an accidental fall down the stairs at home. In the course of her admission, Kore experienced pain in her neck and was subsequently diagnosed with an unstable fracture to her neck, requiring immobilisation in a hard collar. Kore had previously undergone extensive surgery on her neck and given her age and associated frailty, she struggled to tolerate the placement of the collar, which impacted upon her ability to swallow requiring the aid of a nasogastric tube for feeding purposes. The pressure applied by the collar caused Kore to develop three separate pressure sores and she experienced further difficulties as the collar was noted to move whilst in situ, with the staff on the ward being unable to appropriately adjust the collar as they had not be trained to do so. Kore’s care was managed in part through the tissue viability nurses who experienced difficulties in providing pressure relief as a consequence of the ongoing requirement for Kore to wear the collar. On the 2nd October 2024, advice was sought from the neurosurgical team in Leeds as to the ongoing need for the collar and on the basis of the information provided at the time, advice was given to continue with the use of the collar until Kore could be assessed by the neurosurgical team. A request was made for Kore to be assessed within a week but this was not arranged. Kore’s health continued to deteriorate and she went on to develop aspiration pneumonia, requiring chest physiotherapy which was limited by the placement of the collar. No further contact was made with the neurosurgical team to discuss the ongoing effects of the collar on Kore’s physical health and therefore Kore was unable to make an informed decision as to whether or not she wanted to continue wearing the collar or could remove it and accept any associated risks. Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 Kore went on to develop recurrent aspiration pneumonia and on the 23rd October 2024, despite having previous periods of improvement, her condition rapidly deteriorated and she passed away. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: (brief summary of matters of concern) The absence of communication by the treating clinicians with the neurosurgical The absence of training for staff on the ward in respect of the correct fitting of a i) hard collar; ii) team at Leeds in respect of treatment options for Kore given the significant impact that the wearing of the collar was having on Kore with the development of pressure sores, difficulties with her swallow and increasing risks of aspiration. iii) The absence of any consideration of the risks versus benefits of wearing the collar and consequently the lack of opportunity for Kore to consider the risk versus benefits and make an informed decision as to how she wanted to proceed. iv) the concerns they were raising as to the impact of the collar upon Kore's health and the absence of any consideration of those concerns by those in charge of Kore’s care with no multi-disciplinary approach as to the available treatment options or further assessments which could have been undertaken. The lack of communication between professionals providing care on the ward and 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your organisation) have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by October 23, 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION 8 I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons I have also sent it to The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 Dated: 28/08/2025 Charlotte KEIGHLEY Assistant Coroner for West Yorkshire Western Coroner Area Regulation 28 – After Inquest Document Template Updated 30/07/2021
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Executive Medical Directors Office Huddersfield Royal Infirmary Acre Street Huddersfield HD3 3EA 22 October 2025 VIA EMAIL Ms Charlote Keighley HM Assistant Coroner The West Yorkshire (Western) Division Cater Building 1 Cater Street Bradford BD1 5AS Dear Ms Keighley, Re: Prevention of Future Deaths Report – Ms Kore Padgett Thank you for your Regulation 28 report following the inquest into the death of Ms Kore Elizabeth Padgett. Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust once again extends its sincere condolences to Ms Padgett’s family and acknowledges the concerns raised in your report. In response, a comprehensive multi-disciplinary team (MDT) review was convened on 29 September 2025 to examine the issues identified and to ensure that appropriate learning and improvement actions are taken. The review included senior clinical, governance, legal, and operational stakeholders across relevant specialties, with input from Leeds Teaching Hospitals where neurosurgical care was involved. The MDT focused on four key areas of concern raised in the PFD: 1. Staff training in the application of hard collars 2. Communication with the neurosurgical team regarding treatment options 3. Consideration of risks versus benefits of collar use and informed consent 4. Ward-level communication and multidisciplinary decision-making MDT Conclusion The review highlighted that although specialist teams like Orthotics and Physiotherapy follow well-established training protocols, there is no unified Trust- wide competency framework for the application of hard collars among all relevant staff groups. As a result, staff often depend on informal experience, which can contribute to variability in practice. The review also identified missed opportunities for collaborative decision-making and escalation regarding collar-related complications. Documentation of MDT discussions, patient preferences, and risk-benefit considerations were found to be insufficient, limiting the ability to demonstrate informed consent and person-centred care. Furthermore, the absence of a structured escalation pathway and designated ward for cervical spine injury management contributed to fragmented communication and delayed reassessment of treatment plans. Safety Improvement Actions The Trust has taken proactive and comprehensive steps to ensure the safe and consistent care of patients with cervical spine injuries. In response to concerns raised, we have developed a robust clinical pathway to guide admission, and treatment within dedicated acute orthopaedic wards. This pathway ensures that patients are consistently placed in clinical areas with the appropriate skills and resources to support all aspects of their care. The pathway also incorporates coordinated support from ortho-geriatricians and the multidisciplinary team (MDT). An ongoing audit is evaluating the admitting ward allocation, treatment, and patient outcomes. This work is led by Surgery and Anaesthetics, and Acute Medicine, and is on track for delivery by November 2025. , Consultant and Divisional Director for Consultant and Clinical Director for To support this pathway, CHFT guidance and protocols are being revised to provide clear escalation processes for clinical advice, complications and neurosurgical liaison and involvement relating to cervical spine injury. These revisions are being led by Dr , Consultant in Care of the Elderly, and will ensure that patients are managed consistently in line with updated standards. This work is also scheduled for completion by November 2025 and is progressing as planned. Following implementation of the pathway and protocols, audits will be conducted at 1, 3, and 6 months to assess adherence to best practice and identify any areas requiring further optimisation. The frequency of future audits will be reviewed based on the findings and determined by whether additional improvements are needed. Patients with cervical spine injuries who require management with a neck collar are being admitted to Wards 19 and 21 at Huddersfield Royal Infirmary (acute orthopaedic wards) to support continuity of care and operational efficiency. To ensure safe and effective treatment, competency-based training will be provided to all clinical professionals involved in their care, including Registered Nurses, Allied Health Professionals, and substantive ward based Medical Staff. Led by (Senior Clinical Orthotist) and (Outpatient Therapy Services Manager), the training focuses on validated competency in the application, monitoring, and management of neck collars. Two sessions have been scheduled for Ward 19 staff in December 2025, with further sessions planned for Ward 21 staff in January 2026. Compliance will be monitored through annual audits, beginning one month after training implementation. The initiative remains on track for completion by the end of January 2026. A Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for collar initiation and management is also being developed. This SOP will include guidance on consent, risk versus benefit, informed decision-making, collaborative input from the neurosurgical team, and clear escalation protocols. Led by Dr Surgery and Anaesthetics, the SOP will be embedded within the competency framework and is scheduled for implementation by the end of January 2026. , Matron for In addition, CHFT is further embedding person-centred care principles to support informed consent when a patient has a collar in place. Led by Director of Nursing for Surgery and Anaesthetics and Matron plans are being revised to ensure that discussions around risk and benefit are documented clearly within the Electronic Patient Record (EPR). This initiative will be monitored through EPR audits and Quality Assurance Leadership walk rounds and is scheduled for completion by January 2026. , Associate , care CHFT remains committed to delivering safe, consistent, and person-centred care for patients with cervical spine injuries. All actions are progressing within agreed timelines, with appropriate governance and audit mechanisms in place. We are confident that these measures will prevent future harm and ensure high standards of care across our services. Yours sincerely, Executive Medical Director
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.