Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0006, written 2 Jan 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 2 Jan 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2025-0006 |
| Deceased | Alexandra Roberts |
| Coroner | Charlotte Keighley |
| Coroner area | Cheshire |
| Category | Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
ANNEX A REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. NHS England 1 CORONER I am Charlotte Keighley, Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Cheshire. 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 12th July 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Alexandra Bronte Roberts. Alex died on the 14th May 2023. She was 26 years old. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 17th December 2024 when the medical cause of death was confirmed as 1a Insulin Overdose. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Alex had a long history of mental health issues and had a diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes, requiring daily injections of insulin. Alex had a history of self-harm and in August 2022, March 2023 and April 2023 she had attended hospital having intentionally overdosed on her prescribed insulin medication. Following the incident in April 2023, Alex was admitted to an acute Mental Health Ward on an informal basis from which she was discharged on the 10th May 2023. Alex was under the care of the Home Treatment Team and it was recognised at that time, that in order to mitigate the risk of overdose, Alex’s medication should be prescribed for to her to collect every two to three days. This was done in respect of all of Alex’s medication save for her insulin, which could only be prescribed in the form of pre-filled pens providing her with around ten days supply. The Court heard evidence in respect of the efforts that were made by those on the ground to limit the amount of insulin available to Alex at any one time. Consideration was given by the GP as to whether a junior pen could be prescribed in place of a standard pen, the evidence being that the amount of insulin in both the junior and standard pen is the same (300 units). The only difference between the two pens being how much insulin is released at any one time and therefore having no effect upon the overall amount of insulin available to be administered through repeated use. There was agreement from all involved in Alex’s care that what was required was a restriction in the amount of insulin available to her. This was something easily done in respect of her other medication and, the Court heard, something which can be done 1 with other medications, where arrangements can be made for the medication to be prescribed in smaller amounts. On the evening of the 13th May 2023, Alex took an intentional overdose of her prescribed insulin medication, the Court having heard evidence that she had taken all of the insulin in her prescribed pre-filled pens. She was found deceased the following day. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:- 1. The minimum amount of insulin available to be prescribed at the time of Alex’s death was 300 units, amounting to around 10 days of medication for Alex, enabling her to take a large overdose. The Court heard evidence that had it been possible to prescribe a smaller amount, the smaller amount would have been prescribed so as to reduce the risk of overdose. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe your organisations have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 27th February 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons:- The family of Alexandra Bronte Roberts Cheshire and Wirral NHS Foundation Trust I have also sent it to the Earnswood Medical Centre who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 DATE:- 2nd January 2025 SIGNED BY CORONER:- 2 3
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Ms Charlotte Keighley
HM Assistant Coroner
Coroner area of Cheshire
The West Annexe
Town Hall
Sankey Street
Warrington
Cheshire
WA1 1UH
Dear Coroner,
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
24 February 2025
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Alexandra Bronte
Roberts who died on 14 May 2023
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 2
January 2025 concerning the death of Alexandra (‘Alex’) Bronte Roberts on 14 May
2023. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would
like to express my deep condolences to Alex’s family and loved ones. NHS England
are keen to assure the family and the Coroner that the concerns raised about Alex’s
care have been listened to and reflected upon.
Your Report raised concerns over the minimum amount (300 units) of insulin available
to be prescribed at the time of Alex’s death and the risk this poses to patients at risk
of taking an overdose.
NHS England’s National Clinical Directors for Diabetes and Prescribing have
considered your Report and have input into this response.
As your Report notes, the smallest quantity of insulin within a single pen device is
currently 300 units of insulin. You may wish to refer to the Medicines and Healthcare
products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) as the UK’s regulator of medicines regarding
your concerns, as they would be the more appropriate organisation to respond on the
insulin doses currently available to patients.
Any risks associated with the prescription of insulin must be weighed against the risk
of a person with Type 1 diabetes running out of their insulin supply, or being issued
with less than required, as this can result in the onset of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA),
an acute hyperglycaemic emergency, that can potentially be life-threatening. DKA can
also be precipitated when insulin is missed or withheld, whatever the mode of insulin
delivery.
Insulin can be delivered to people in two ways, either via self-administration with an
insulin pen, or with an automated insulin pump, a small electronic device that releases
the regular insulin the patient’s body needs throughout the day and night. In general,
and in line with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
guidelines, the NHS only prescribes insulin pumps to adults with Type 1 diabetes who
cannot get to their target HbA1C (average blood glucose levels for the last two or three
months) without having severe hypoglycaemia (low blood sugar level) or whose
HbA1c remains high despite carefully trying to manage their diabetes.
Because of the risk of DKA, it is a general rule of thumb that people with Type 1
diabetes should always have access to an insulin pen, even where an insulin pump is
being used, as the insulin pen is an essential back-up in the case of pump failure.
Insulin therapy should however be individualised, according to the specific needs of
the person with diabetes. An individualised insulin regimen takes account of many
factors, including individual preference, the time action profile required to best fit the
individual’s glucose profile, lifestyle, activity and various other factors, the amount or
dose of insulin required, the device required for administration, as well as several
additional personal and medical factors.
There are some insulin pens available that do allow for half unit dosing. These are
more commonly used in paediatric care, as they allow for smaller incremental
adjustments. However, the total amount of insulin available within the prescription is
still 300 units.
Integrated Care Board (ICB),
My regional colleagues for governance and assurance in the North West have also
the
engaged with Cheshire and Merseyside
commissioner of services provided by Cheshire and Wirral Partnership NHS
Foundation Trust regarding the concerns raised in your Report. We are advised that
the Head of Patient Safety and Quality - Medicines Optimisation at Cheshire and
Merseyside ICB has contacted the ICB’s Heads of Medicines Optimisation for
Cheshire and the Safety Pharmacist to highlight the PFD Report and the Coroner’s
concerns. Your Report will also be included for discussion by the Cheshire and
Merseyside Patient Safety Community of Practice. The purpose of the Community of
Practice is to provide opportunities to build on the work carried out around patient
safety and to ensure a learning focused community.
Further discussion has also taken place between Cheshire and Merseyside ICB’s
Head of Patient Safety and Quality - Medicines Optimisation, the Medicines
Optimisation Pharmacist, Head of Medicines Management and the Head of Quality
and Safety within the Cheshire Place Team. In relation to the Coroner’s concerns,
NHS England is advised that the following actions will be undertaken:
• There will be a recommendation to ensure that when the annual medication
review is undertaken, consideration is given to the patient’s mental health and
wellbeing if high risk medicines are being prescribed (insulin being one of those
following this case).
• There will be a review of the prescription quantities to ensure that there is no
over-supply, to reduce the risk of accumulation (stock piling) of high-risk
medicines.
• The team plan to discuss this case with the GP concerned to establish any
learning as a result of this case, and any useful information will be shared.
It would not be appropriate for NHS England to provide further comment or clinical
opinion on Alex’s case, based on the organisation’s remit and the information provided
in your Report.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work
taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are
discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical
Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Alex,
are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay
close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.