Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Paul Frear

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0041, written 26 Jan 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report26 Jan 2024
Reference2024-0041
DeceasedPaul Frear
CoronerJoanne Lees
Coroner areaBlack Country
CategoryRoad (Highways Safety) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  Sandwell Highways 
2.  National Highways Agency  

1 

CORONER 

I am Mrs Joanne Lees Area Coroner for the coroner area of the Black Country.  

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice 
Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 
2013. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5 
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 4/10/23 I commenced an investigation into the death of PAUL ANDREW 
FREAR aged 45 years who died on 22/9/23. The investigation concluded at the 
end of the inquest on 23/1/24.  The conclusion of the inquest was Road Traffic 
Collision. 

The medical cause for the death of Mr Frear was  

1a) Multiple Injuries 
1b) Road Traffic Collision 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

On 22/9/23 Mr Frear passed away at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham 
from injuries sustained in a road traffic collision on 21/9/23.  The collision 
occurred on the A457 Tollhouse Way, Smethwick at the junction with the B4135 
Rolfe Street.  CCTV revealed that Mr Frear was a pedestrian waiting at a crossing 
area, when he entered the carriageway whilst the pedestrian lights were 
showing red and collided with a vehicle travelling in lane 2.  

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless 
action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.   

1.  During  the  inquest  I  received  evidence  from  the  West  Midlands  Police 
Serious  Collision  Investigation  Unit.  Tollhouse  Way  is  classified  as  the 
A457 and runs parallel to the B4169 High Street, Smethwick.  Tollhouse 
Way is a dual carriageway and runs in a general north to south direction.  
The majority of the carriageway consists of two lanes in both directions 
and  it  is governed by a  40mph speed limit.   The collision took place  in 
the northbound carriageway at a set of traffic lights at the junction with 
the B4135 Rolfe Street where Mr Frear was waiting to cross the road as 
a pedestrian. 

2.  At the point of the collision the northbound carriageway separates in to 
three distinctive marked lanes.  Lanes 1 and 2 are for traffic intending to 
continue straight on and lane 3 is for traffic intending to turn right in to 
Rolfe  Street.    On  the  day  of  and  immediately  preceding  the  collision,  
traffic in lane 3, immediately next to Mr Frear was stationary and held by 
a red filter traffic light situated directly above Mr Frear.  However, traffic 
travelling in lanes 1 and 2 were able to continue straight ahead and were 
directed by a green traffic light. 

3.  Mr  Frear  entered  the  carriageway  when  the  pedestrian  control  panel 
next to him was showing red indicating ‘do not cross’ and collided with a 
vehicle in lane 2 travelling correctly in accordance with a green light. 
4.  It  is  accepted  that  Mr  Frear  may  have  been  distracted  by  using  his 
mobile  phone  and/or  influenced  by  pedestrians  crossing  from  the 
opposite direction. 

5.  My  concern  is  that  the  design  of  this  junction  means  that  it  is  not 
obvious to a pedestrian that the only place to look for left for indications 
as  to  whether  it  is  safe  to  cross  the  road  is  to  their  left.  There  are  no 
such  indicators  on  the  opposite  side  of  the  carriageway  which  is 
ordinarily  where  a  pedestrian  would  be  looking.    The  signals  were 
situated immediately to the left of where Mr Frear was stood/where any 
pedestrian would be standing. 

6.  Within the police report the collision investigator (who visited the scene) 
states as follows; I do however find the layout very confusing with the 
right  turn  filter  lane  (lane  3)  not  being  separated  from  the  main 
carriageway  a  pedestrian  is  faced  with  stationary  traffic.    If  a 
pedestrian chose to look up to their right they would be presented with 
a red traffic light and the only indication that it is still not safe to cross 
is the pedestrian controls to  their immediate  left.  The  green light for 
lanes  1  and  2  is  not  visible  to  pedestrians  and  there  is  no  pedestrian 
light indication on the opposite side.’  I share this concern. 

7.  Coroner  understands  from  the  police  that  there  were  two  previous 
incidents at this location which occurred prior to the changes resulting in 
the  current  road  layout.  Coroner  also  understands  Sandwell  Highways 

2 

 
 
 
 have  completed  safety  reviews  and  processes  throughout  the  design, 
implementation and post installation of the junction design. 

8.  Whilst  the  current  road  layout  may  be  legal,  the  death  of  Mr  Frear 
highlights  the  safety  issue  for  pedestrians  present  at  this  junction 
crossing from BOTH sides and highlights that the signage for pedestrians 
in not clear enough and there is a risk of further deaths now and in the 
future.   

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you 
AND/OR your organisation have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this 
report, namely by 1/4/24. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, 
setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action 
is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I  have  sent  a  copy  of  my  report  to  the  Chief  Coroner  and  to  the  following 
Interested Persons 
Serious Collision Investigation Unit  who may find it useful or of interest. 

. I have also sent it to West Midlands Police 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and 
all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.   

I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may 
find it useful or of interest.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or 
summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he 
believes may find it useful or of interest.  

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response. 

9 

26/1/24  

Joanne Lees, Area Coroner for the Black Country  

3

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Sandwell Council (PDF)
Mrs J Lees 
Black Country Coroner’s Office 

: 

 : 

Date: 

28th  March 2024 

Dear Mrs Lees 

Death of Paul Andrew Frear 

Following receipt of the HM Coroner’s report Sandwell Council has noted the 
unforeseen combination of circumstances which contributed to the accident and 
have investigated the concerns raised by the Coroner. 

Although the current layout meets all current design standards, the Council is keen 
to do all it can to prevent any future incidents occurring. 

Therefore, as an additional reminder to pedestrians, the Council intends to 
introduce ‘Look Left’ or ‘Look Right’ road markings in appropriate places and to 
relocate two of the existing traffic signal heads. 

The proposed works will be subject to an independent road safety audit and 
contingent on any findings, are planned to be completed by the end of August 
2024. 

Yours sincerely 

Director of Borough Economy 

[IL0: UNCLASSIFIED] 
Borough Economy 
Sandwell Council House, Freeth Street, Oldbury, West Midlands, B69 3DE 
www.sandwell.gov.uk

Related reports

Other reports by Joanne Lees

See all →

More reports categorised “Road (Highways Safety) related deaths”

See all →

Track Road (Highways Safety) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Road (Highways Safety) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.