Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023

Sienna Barber

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0062, written 3 May 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report3 May 2023
Reference2024-0062
DeceasedSienna Barber
CoronerJoanne Kearsley
Coroner areaManchester North
CategoryChild Death (from 2015) · Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedManchester University NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published3

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO  PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  The Rt Hon Steve Barclay, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 

2. 

3. 

CORONER 

, President of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health 

, Chief Executive of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 

I am  Joanne Kearsley,  Senior Coroner for the Coroner area of Manchester North 

2 

CORONER'S LEGAL POWERS 

I  make  this  report  under  paragraph  7,  Schedule  5,  of  the  Coroner's  and  Justice  Act  2009  and 
Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 
On the 30th  January 2022, I commenced an investigation into the death of Sienna Daisy Barber, date 
of birth 27th  May 2019 who died on the 29th  January 2022 at the Royal Oldham hospital aged 2 years 
and 8 months old. 

The medical cause of her death was confirmed  as  1 a) Acute necrotising bronchopneumonia due to 
1 b) Group A Streptococcus. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF DEATH 

Sienna  was  a  healthy  child  with  no  underlying  medical  conditions.  On  Sunday  23rd  January  she 
developed a high temperature. There were no specific concerns although it was noted she was eating 
less. 

The following day she was taken by her parents to her GP practice where she was examined and a 
suspicion of a viral infection was diagnosed. Parents were advised to continue with Calpol and to re-
attend if there were any concerns. 

The next day Tuesday 25th  January Sienna awoke and was more unwell,  she  had  vomited  and her 
temperature  was  40.2.  Parents  sought  advice  from  111  who  advised  them  to  take  her to  A&E. 
Sienna was then taken to North Manchester General Hospital where she was triaged and examined. 
It was suspected Sienna had a viral respiratory tract infection, her throat was inflamed and whilst her 
temperature remained high, the advice was to take her home and continue with Calpol and ibuprofen. 

Over the next few days Sienna's temperature fluctuated.  Whilst at times her temperature decreased, 
Sienna remained tired and  lethargic and  had a sore throat. 

__....

On Saturday 29th January 2022, Sienna began to be very agitated, flinging her arms and legs around . 
She was taken immediately to Rochdale Urgent Care Centre. Upon arrival she began to present with . 
mottling. 

She  was  immediately treated  and  transferred  to  Royal  Oldham  hospital  where  she  died  later that 
day. 

5 

CORONER'S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern.  In my opinion 
there  is  a  risk  that  future  deaths  will  occur  unless  action  is  taken. 
In  the  circumstances  it  is  my 
statutory duty to report to you. 

 The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:-

1.  The court heard evidence that since 2014 cases of Group A Streptococcus have increased 
annually.  After Sienna's death  in  December 2022 there was a  significant increase of cases 
in  young children. 

Whilst emergency guidance was issued to practitioners in December 2022 this related  to the 
threshold  for the  administration  of treatment  in  cases  where  Group  A  Streptococcus.  This 
guidance  has  itself now  been  withdrawn ..  The  court  heard that unlike  other conditions 
such as Meningitis there is no NICE guidance for practitioners to assist them with how 
to  diagnose  /  treat  Group  A  Streptococcus.  Apparently  there  has  been  previous 
consideration of this but a decision was taken  not to  provide such guidance. The court was 
advised this decision was taken having considered the impact of Group A Streptococcus on 
the whole of the population.  However the court informed that there are three high risk groups, 
these being ; i)  Children under the age of 5,  ii) women who have given birth in the last month 
and  iii) the over 75's. 

In my opinion consideration of guidance targeted towards these three high risk groups should 
be considered. 

2.  The court also heard that in  2019 a  NICE  publication  considering  rapid  antigen testing  was 
published.  This did not recommend rapid antigen testing.  However this publication excluded 
consideration of testing in the high risk group, the under 5's.  Rapid antigen testing is carried 
out in  other countries  such  as  the  USA and  Canada.  The  court heard  Sienna  would  have 
been entirely the sort of patient where such testing would have been appropriate on the 25th 
January 2022 when she was examined at North Manchester and she would have immediately 
been commenced on the treatment for Group A streptococcus,  penicillin. 

In my opinion consideration should be given for rapid  antigen testing in the under 5's in such cases. 

w 

ACTION  SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In  my  opinion  action  should  be  taken  to  prevent  future  deaths  and  I believe  each  of you 
respectively have the power to take such action. 

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within  56 days of the date of this report,  namely 26th 
June 2023.  I,  the Coroner,  may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable 
for action.  Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following  Interested Persons namely:-

The parents of Sienna Barber 
Manchester Foundation NHS Trust 
Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board 

I am  also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. 

The Chief Coroner may publish  either or both  in  a complete or redacted or summary from.  He may 
send  a copy of this  report to any person who he  believes may find  it useful or of interest.  You  may 
make  representations  to  me  the  coroner  at  the  time  of  your  response,  about  the  release  or  the 
publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

Date  3rd  May 2023 

Signed(1/LQ~ 

..... 

I 

•

Responses

3 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Department of Health and Social Care (PDF)
From Maria Caulfield MP  
Minister for Mental Health & Women’s Health  

39 Victoria Street  
London  
SW1H 0EU  

13 May 2024 

Joanna Kearsley, Senior Coroner  
The Coroner’s Office  
Newgate House  
Newgate  
Rochdale  
OL16 1AT  

Dear Ms Kearsley,   

Thank  you for  your  Prevention  of  Future Deaths (PFD)  report  dated  3 May 2023  about the 
death of Sienna Barber. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for patient safety.      

Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Sienna’s death 
and  I  offer  my  sincere  condolences  to  her  family  and  loved  ones.  I  am  grateful  to  you  for 
bringing these matters to my attention.   

As  you  may  know,  the  National  Institute  for  Health  and  Care  Excellence  (NICE)  is  the 
independent body responsible for developing evidence-based guidance for the NHS on best 
practice.  NICE’s  methods  and  processes  for  developing  guidelines  are  internationally 
respected  and  NICE  keeps  its  guidelines  under  review  to  ensure  they  reflect  the  latest 
developments in evidence.  

In your report, you raised concerns about the lack of guidance to specifically diagnose and 
treat group A streptococcus infection, as well as around NICE’s publication of guidance in 2019 
which did not recommend rapid tests for group A streptococcal infections in people with a sore 
throat. I am aware that NICE has responded to your report, citing relevant existing guidelines 
and the rationale for the negative recommendation on the rapid tests. I also understand from 
NICE  that  it  engaged  in  discussions  with  both  NHS  England  and  the  UK  Health  Security 
Agency (UKHSA). I hope that the response provided by NICE has sufficiently addressed your 
concerns.  Given  NICE’s  independence,  I  hope  you  will  understand  that  it  would  not  be 
appropriate  for  me  to  comment  further  on  NICE’s  recommendations  or  interfere  in  its 
processes.  

There are two particular actions I wanted to highlight that I feel are relevant to the issues raised 
in your report. Firstly, due to rapidly increasing rates of Group A Streptococcus in children at 

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 the  end  of  2022,  NHS  England  published  interim  clinical  guidance  on  the  diagnosis  and 
treatment of children with Group A Streptococcus on 9 December 2022. We also commenced 
a campaign intended to inform parents and carers about the symptoms of Group A 

Streptococcus in babies and children, what to look out for and what action to take if they are 
concerned.  

Secondly, in February the Government and NHS England announced plans to implement 
Martha’s Rule in at least 100 acute or specialist NHS sites in England by March 2025. 
Martha’s Rule is an initiative that gives patients and their families who are concerned about 
deterioration in their physiological condition the right to initiate a rapid review of their case 24 
hours a day from someone outside of their immediate care team. When requested, this rapid 
review will inform whether any new or additional action needs to be taken to help ensure 
patients receive the most appropriate care and treatment – which may include escalation.    

I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.  

Yours sincerely,  

MARIA CAULFIELD
Response from Manchester University Foundation Trust (PDF)
Ms Kearsley 
HM Coroner  
Floors 2 and 3 Newgate 
Rochdale  
OL16 1AT 

Sent via email only 

Dear Ms Kearsley,  

  16 November 2023 

Re: Sienna Barber – MFT comments on NICE’s PFD response. 

Thank  you  for  your  giving  Manchester  University  NHS  Foundation  Trust  the 
opportunity to provide further information following receipt of the response received by 
NICE  to  the  Prevention  of  Future  Deaths  report  issued  following  the  inquest  into 
Sienna’s death.  

My  apologies  for  the  delay  in  this  response  being  provided.  I  confirm  that  I  have 
considered NICE’s response and have set out my thoughts below.   

Background 

Group  A  streptococcus  (GAS)  is  a  Gram-positive  bacterium  commonly  found  as  a 
commensal  organism  in  the  nose  and  pharynx  of  healthy  individuals,  particularly 
young children (up to 20% can be asymptomatic carriers). It can cause a variety of 
clinical conditions including tonsillitis, pneumonia, cellulitis, scarlet fever, necrotising 
fasciitis,  and  Streptococcal  Toxic  Shock  Syndrome  (STSS).  The  sequelae  of  GAS 
infections  can  be  long  lasting  and  include  rheumatic  fever,  glomerulonephritis,  and 
PANDAS. A Group A strep infection may become invasive (iGAS), leading to sepsis 
and death. 

Group A strep and scarlet fever are notifiable diseases, meaning the UK Government 
and NHS England have confirmed they are diseases that ‘may present significant risk 
to human health’. 

Management of suspected GAS infections poses a challenge, as the need to identify 
and treat potentially serious infection must be weighed up against the need for good 
antibiotic stewardship and prevention of antibiotic resistance. The UK currently has an 
issue  with  over-prescribing  for  sore  throats  despite  NICE  guidance  on  the 
management of sore throat. 

 History 

A study published in 2020, in Archives of Disease in children stated ‘Infections are still 
responsible for 1 in 5 childhood deaths in England and Wales…  (and) The UK has 
one of the highest childhood death rates (from infection) in Europe’. (1) 

The authors noted ‘that Group A Streptococcus has emerged as a major pathogen... 
reflecting  a  sharp  increase  in  disease  incidence  since  2014  and  reaching  33.2 
cases/100 000 person years by 2016, the highest rate for almost 50 years’. Increased 
risk of GAS infection is also associated with countries who do not vaccinate children 
against varicella, as in the UK. (1) 

A comparison of mortality rates in UK children and young people compared to other 
EU countries showed ‘the UK had the worst- to third worst mortality rank for common 
infection in both sexes and all age groups’ (9) 

While  the  UK  public  and  NHS  staff  have  an  awareness  of  invasive  meningococcal 
disease, there is no such awareness around GAS, despite it being more common and 
with higher mortality, than meningococcus.  

Data  from  autumn  2022  covering  a  ten-week  period  showed  102  notified  cases  of 
invasive meningococcal disease, with a case fatality ratio of 6%; over the same period 
520 cases of invasive Group A strep were notified, with a case fatality ratio of 13.6%. 
Since 2017, the incidence of scarlet fever and iGAS has increased above seasonal 
variation, with 2022-2023 seeing increased mortality in children under 10 (8). 

Current guidance 

There is no easily identified source of guidance on diagnosis and management of the 
different clinical presentations of GAS, and there is no single resource for best practice 
management of mild or serious infections in the UK. 

Due to rapidly increasing rates of GAS infections in children at the end of 2022, NHS 
England (NHSE) published interim clinical guidance in Dec 2022 on the diagnosis and 
treatment  of  children  with  sore  throat.  Various  clinical  scoring  systems  exist  for 
assessing the probability of a sore throat being bacterial. NHSE temporarily reduced 
the clinical score required for prescription of antibiotics for sore throat, overriding the 
current NICE sore throat guidelines, however this was reversed in early 2023.  

NICE  GAS  guidelines  are  focused  on  the  management  of  an  outbreak  and 
chemoprophylaxis, rather than treatment of the individual patient. In the absence of 
formal  clinical  guidelines,  when  GAS  cases  began  to  rise  in  late  2022,  additional 
guidance and learning modules were published by RCPCH, RCEM, UKHSA and NHS 
England (2, 6, 7). However much of this material was directed at patients and families 
rather than clinicians.  

Certain  treatments  for  GAS  are  associated  with  increased  survival  rates  if 
implemented early but are not widely known. For example, the addition of clindamycin 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (12)  to  broad  spectrum  antibiotics  may  improve  mortality,  and  IVIG  can  be 
administered  for  STSS  (13).  However,  this  information  is  difficult  to  source  outside 
specialised clinical teams, and is not common knowledge among clinicians, leading to 
delays or missed treatments in a disease that requires time critical identification and 
treatment. 

The only guidance for UK clinicians for managing an infection in an individual is CKS 
and UKHSA guidance for scarlet fever (3, 4); the CKS guidance was outdated at the 
time of the surge in cases. There is no easily accessible guidance that summarises 
the  different  presentations  of  GAS;  unlike  in  other  developed  countries,  including 
Scotland,  who  have  easily  accessible  advice  for  clinicians  (10,  11,  14).  The  USA 
Center for Disease Control (CDC) has a dedicated website for clinicians, covering the 
range of possible GAS presentations, diagnosis, and management. 

Rapid antigen testing 

5-30% of sore throats are likely to be GAS, but it is very difficult to clinically differentiate 
these from viral pharyngitis. Rapid antigen detection testing (RADT) is a bedside test 
which  detects  the  presence  of  GAS  from  a  throat  swab  within  a  few  minutes. 
Developed countries have differed in their adoption of this test. Countries such as the 
UK,  Netherlands,  and  Belgium  do  not  currently  use  routine  testing,  although  it  is 
carried out in some centres. Other countries such as the USA, Finland, and France, 
advocate testing for suspected GAS disease. 

The decision to adopt rapid antigen testing is complicated by asymptomatic carriage 
in children, sensitivity and specificity of the test and the need for clear guidance on 
appropriate  patient  cohort  for  testing.  A  review  by  NICE  in  2019  failed  to  show  a 
definite  benefit  for  use  in  sore  throat,  however  this  review  was  based  on  whole 
population assessment of patients over 5 years, which included low risk parts of the 
population.  

Patients at higher risk of invasive GAS include children under 10 years, mothers and 
babies in the first 28 days after birth, and patients over 75 years. Other groups who 
may be at higher risk include alcoholic patients, children with varicella, obese patients 
and immunocompromised patients. Review of benefit versus cost for the highest risk 
populations, in context of UK child mortality and the role GAS plays, would establish 
whether the cost benefit ratio was altered.  

Given the rate of asymptomatic carriage of GAS, there is a concern that RADT will 
result in an increase in antibiotic prescribing. However, it is acknowledged that there 
is currently significant over-prescribing of antibiotics for sore throats in both primary 
and  secondary  care.  Evidence  from  the  USA  has  shown  that  use  of  a  RADT  in 
conjunction with clinical scoring systems can actually reduce inappropriate antibiotic 
prescribing. 

Some NHS Trusts have already introduced GAS RADT and these include Alder Hey 
Children’s Hospital in Liverpool, Derby Hospital and Northwick Park, Harrow. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Conclusion 

MFT are concerned at the need for better clinician awareness and understanding of 
the ways in which GAS can present, and its optimal management. We have liaised 
with Greater Manchester Sudden Unexpected Death of a Child team, Public Health 
England, and Greater Manchester Child Death Overview Panel to raise our concerns. 
Given  the  incidence  of  iGAS  is  five  times  that  of  meningococcal  disease,  the  case 
fatality  ratio  is  double,  the  incidence  is  increasing  year  on  year  (other  than  during 
lockdown),  and  the  wide  variety  of  ways  it  can  present,  there  is  a  need  for 
comprehensive, nationwide guidance for clinicians on the condition.  

NICE  has  produced  comprehensive  guidance  on  recognition  and  management  of 
meningococcal disease since 2010. This guidance includes the symptoms and signs, 
diagnosis  and  management  of  acute  and  long-term  presentations,  as  well  as 
recommendations  for  further  research.  We  recommend  the  development  of  similar 
guidelines for GAS.  

Any national guideline should include a section on RADT, with recommendations for 
research.  This  should  include  consideration  of  targeted  testing  of  high-risk 
populations, and use of rapid antigen testing during an outbreak. 

I  hope  this  response  is  helpful,  please  do  not  hesitate  to  contact  us  for  any  further 
information and/ or clarification.  

Yours Sincerely  

Paediatric ED Consultant  

Patient Safety Manager – Risk Team
Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (PDF)
Ms Joanne Kearsley 
Senior Coroner 
Manchester North 

Dear Ms Kearsley 

Re: RCPCH Response to the Inquest Touching the Death of Sienna Daisy Barber 
A Regulation 28 Report – Action to Prevent Future Deaths 

Thank you for sharing your Report with us regarding the tragic and untimely passing of 
Sienna Daisy Barber. We were saddened to read the circumstances surrounding Sienna’s 
death and have discussed with senior colleagues within the RCPCH and the Association of 
Paediatric Emergency Medicine, as well as sharing the information for learning with the 
British Paediatric Allergy, Immunity and Infection Group. 

We have read your report carefully and would like to offer a response to both of your 
concerns, and other areas where the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health will bear 
most impact.   

1.  NICE guidance for practitioners to assist them with diagnosing and treatment Group 

A Streptococcus.  

It was the case that interim guidance was withdrawn following the spike in Group A 
Streptococcus in December 2022, and replaced by the reinstatement of the NICE Sore 
Throat (Acute) NG84 guideline for all age groups1.  

The RCPCH endorsed this decision alongside the Royal College of Emergency Medicine, 
Royal College of General Practice, and NICE following a review by the NHS England Clinical 
Advisory Group and UKHSA Group A Strep Incident Management team, which assessed the 
overall clinical risk-benefit, including antimicrobial utilisation and potential for resistance and 
harms2.  

Young children are unlikely to present to emergency departments with sore throat symptoms 
alone. Therefore, children under five who present with fever (with or without sore throat) are 
assessed and managed as outlined in the NICE guideline on fever in under-fives3. This is 
viewed as a robust clinical guideline by paediatricians working in emergency care and 
supports decision making on the appropriate use of antibiotics.  

1 https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng84  
2 https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/group-a-streptococcus-communications-to-clinicians/  
3 https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng143  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 2.  Rapid antigen testing for under-fives 

Paediatricians would welcome an effective tool to help with the identification of Group A 
Strep, and there is a need for more research relating to their validity, including the 
appropriate levels of sensitivity and specificity in their performance for testing under-fives.  

Whilst there may be benefits of recommending rapid antigen testing in times of heightened 
cases, there are risks around possible over prescribing as it is possible to carry the bacteria 
in the throat without it being the cause of illness. Without further work to validate these tests, 
it is possible that false reassurances are given to patients and their families. On a population 
level, there are also risks around missed cases and reporting, and therefore consideration 
on the cost effectiveness of these tests as a public health tool is required.  

The other element to consider is how the health system would be able to a) provide testing 
capability and b) respond to these results. A rigorous consultation with health providers and 
professionals would be needed to inform the most appropriate way forward in this respect, 
and the College would be happy to contribute thinking if asked.  

3.  Sharing information and learning for quality improvement  

The College will be sharing information and suggestions for local improvement from your 
report with our paediatric members via its patient safety portal. The information within your 
report, and anticipated response from NICE, will also be shared for discussion with the 
RCPCH Clinical Quality in Practice group in October, where further actions may be 
identified.   

Thank you for seeking our views and reminding us of the importance of this work. Our 
sincere condolences are with Sienna’s family.  

Yours sincerely 

RCPCH President

Related reports

Other reports by Joanne Kearsley

See all →

More reports categorised “Child Death (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.