Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2023

Harry Colledge

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0096, written 16 Nov 2023. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report16 Nov 2023
Reference2024-0096
DeceasedHarry Colledge
CoronerKate Bisset
Coroner areaLancashire and Blackburn with Darwen
CategoryRoad (Highways Safety) related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Lancashire & Blackburn with Darwen Coroners  

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (pursuant to 
Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013) 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING 
SENT TO: 

1.  Lancashire County Council 
2.  Mr Colledge’s Family 
3.  Chief Coroner 

1. 

Coroner 

I am Kate Bisset, Area Coroner for Lancashire and Blackburn with Darwen. 

2.  

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS  

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 
2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3. 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On the 3rd January 2023 the Coroner’s Office was notified of the death of Harry 
College and an investigation commenced into his death. An inquest was opened 
and adjourned on the 17th January 2023 and a final inquest took place on the 12th 
and 13th October 2023. The conclusion of the inquest was that: 

“Harry COLLEDGE died on the 2nd January 2023 at the Royal Preston Hospital as a 
result of injuries he sustained having been thrown from his bicycle. Mr COLLEDGE 
was an otherwise fit and healthy man who was a keen cyclist. On the 2nd of 
January 2023 he was cycling along Island Lane, Winmarleigh when his bicycle 
entered a crack defect in the carriageway, causing him to be thrown from his 
bicycle. This defect had been identified to the relevant Council in September 2022 
and the subject of highway inspections on the 15th and 26th September 2022, 
involving six highways team operatives. Despite the Council's notification of the 
defect and its approximate location, these inspections did not identify the defect 
which caused Mr COLLEDGE's injuries and thus a dangerous hazard had remained 
on Island Lane from 9th September 2022 to 2nd January 2023.” 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 4. 

Circumstances of the death  

Mr Harry Colledge was a fit and active 84 year old man. On the 2nd January 2023 he 
was cycling his bicycle with a friend, a common activity for Mr Colledge. He was 
riding along Island Lane, Winmarleigh  when his bicycle entered a crack defect in 
the carriageway causing him to be thrown from his bicycle and sustain injuries 
which caused his death. The crack defect in question had been seen by local 
residents and members of the local Parish Council on the 9th September 2022. They 
took photographs of the defect and others on the road, and reported them to the 
Highways department at the Lancashire County Council. The senior manager who 
received the photographs tasked others to inspect the road and repair the defects. 
Four Highways operatives attended the road in two vehicles on the 15th of 
September 2022. The road was driven in its entirety and no defects were noticed or 
repaired. A second, scheduled inspection took place by Highways inspectors on the 
26th of September 2022. This also involved two operatives conducting a driven 
inspection and neither observed the crack defect which caused Mr Colledge’s 
collision. Consequently the crack was not repaired and remained hazardous in the 
roadway at the time of Mr Colledge’s incident and death. 

5. 

CORONER’S CONCERNS  

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to 
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is 
taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 

1.  Highway operatives gave evidence that their inspections primarily consider 

the impact of defects upon cars using that road surface. All gave evidence of 
no specific training or experience with regards to identifying defects which 
present a hazard to bicycle users, when expert evidence indicated that the 
Council’s statutory duty required reasonable steps to protect all road users 
which includes cyclists. The evidence of Council witnesses was unanimous 
that since Mr Colledge’s death, there has been no additional training, 
updates, briefings or policy reviews to offer further knowledge of operatives 
in safely assessing defects which pose risks to cyclists or road users other 
than car drivers. I consider there is a risk of future deaths of all cyclists if 
Highways Operatives and inspectors are not able to identify defects on a 
carriageway which present a risk to cyclists as opposed to simply car users.  

2.  Evidence from a Highways Expert, 

, explained that Island Lane 
is part of peat/moss road which is the subject of natural movement when it 
rains. The water is absorbed by the peat/moss and swells caused the tarmac 
to move then it compacts when it dries and the road surface lowers, causing 
cracks. 
these defects rarely get better, only worse. I am concerned that the road 

’ evidence was that there is natural movement but 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 surfacing on Island Lane, Winmarleigh will continue to be the subject of 
natural movement and the present surfacing is hampered by the geography 
of the location including camber of the road. I consider there is a risk of 
future deaths to road users if the surfacing of this road is not adequately 
maintained. Whilst the inspection schedule timescales enacted by the 
Council are considered to be appropriate, I consider there is a risk of future 
deaths due to the present surfacing and underlying geological features of 
this road if inspections are unable to reasonably identify hazardous defects. 

6. 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN  

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you 
have the power to take such action. 

7. 

YOUR RESPONSE  

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this 
report, namely by the 12th January 2024. I, the Coroner, may extend the period and 
to take into account the likely disruption to services caused by Christmas breaks, I 
extend that period of response to the 26th January 2024. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting 
out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is 
proposed. 

8. 

COPIES AND PUBLICATION  

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Person:  

The Family of Mr Harry Colledge 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief 
Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He 
may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or 
of interest. You may make representations to me, the Coroner, at the time of your 
response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief 
Coroner 

3 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 9. 

16.11.2023 

Kate Bisset 
Area Coroner for Lancashire and Blackburn with Darwen 

4

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Lancashire County Council (PDF)
HMC Kate Bisset 

Preston Coroner's Court 

2 Faraday Drive 

Fulwood 

Preston 

PR2 9NB 

Dear Ms Bisset 

Response to Regulation 28 Report 

Inquest into the death of Harry Colledge 

Date: 

18/01/2024 

I am writing in response to your Regulation 28 notice dated 16.11.2023 to outline the actions taken by 

Lancashire County Council (“the Council”) to address your concerns. 

The Council has taken this incident, and your findings, very seriously. The Council took a proactive 

approach in addressing your concerns immediately following the conclusion of the inquest hearing, 

prior to receipt of your Regulation 28 notice. Geotechnical investigations were undertaken prior to the 

inquest to identify whether any short-term actions were required at the accident locus to ensure the 

safety of highway users. I provide further detail below. In addition, the Council took immediate action 

following the conclusion of the inquest on 13.10.2023. 

The following actions have been taken to address your concerns: 

1. 

Inquest Debrief 

Following the conclusion of the inquest, a meeting was arranged between Senior Managers to review 

this case and discuss your findings, which were delivered in Court on 13.10.2023, and ensure steps 

were put in place to address your concerns. 

As a result of the meeting between Senior Managers, a debrief presentation was developed containing 

the key facts of the case, lessons learnt, and operational instructions. This presentation was delivered 

to all Countywide Operational Managers and the Highway Inspection Manager on 18.10.2023. The 

presentation was then shared with all maintenance operational staff and Highway Safety Inspectors in 

a series of team meetings, which were completed by 27.10.2023. The incident debrief has also been 

delivered to wider Highway services to ensure a greater operational awareness. 

In summary, the debrief highlighted: 

Lancashire County Council 
PO Box 100, County Hall, Preston, PR1 0LD 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 2 

 

 

 

 

That it was inappropriate to use Highway Operative staff to identify defects in a "find and fix" 

way, as carried out on 14.09.2022 following the series of defect reports provided by the Parish 

Council, and that this practice would not be used in future. 

That the recording of all defect reporting by the public must be managed through the service 

Highway Asset Management System and that any works done must also be recorded. 

That operational staff and Highway Safety Inspectors must be on notice of surface cracking – 

particularly but not exclusively, on the Moss Road Network. 

That operational staff and Highway Safety Inspectors must be on notice of defects which are a 

hazard to all road users including cyclists and non-motorised users. 

2.  Training 

In addition to the specific learning from this incident delivered through debrief sessions, the Council 

has developed its training programme as follows: 

a)  Highway Safety Inspectors 

The role of a Highway Safety Inspector is to carry out cyclic inspections in line with the inspection 

regime set out in the Council’s Highway Safety Inspection Policy. The policy sets out that this role will 

be responsible for the identification and consequent action relating to maintainable vehicular highway 

defects within the bounds of Section 41 of the Highways Act 1980. 

It is recommended in national guidance set out in Well Managed Highways that Highway Inspectors are 

trained, qualified and competent in the identification of defects. The UK Roads Board sets out 

minimum competency standards and these are delivered through the IHE (Institute of Highways 

Engineers) Training and Certification scheme. Highways Authorities are required to demonstrate that 

Highway Safety Inspectors have been assessed against these standards. 

The core modules of the training undertaken by Highway Inspectors employed by the Council include: 

an understanding of highway law, inspection policies and procedures (including maintenance 

priorities, road hierarchies, inspection frequency, methods, levels, and response criteria), material 

recognition and measuring techniques, hazard and defect recognition (including types of defects, 

techniques of defect repair), health and safety, and safety inspection and assessment. 

The Council currently employs 13 cyclic Highway Safety Inspectors. Existing highway safety inspectors 

are required to refresh their formal training every 5 years and there were a number of new inspectors 

who required foundation training. This training is in line with national standards as set out by IHE. It is 

accredited by CABWI and is identified as a mandatory training requirement including refresher training 

for all Lancashire County Council Highway Inspectors. Refresher training was completed on 

31.10.2023. Foundation training was delivered over 3 sessions on 13.11.2023, 11.12.2023 and 

08.01.2024. The final course was completed on 12.01.2024. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 3 

On-going development and ensuring that Highway Safety Inspectors are up to date with any national 

changes, is delivered through targeted additional accredited training and through regular team 

meetings which are held monthly. 

b)  Highway Technicians for Countrywide Maintenance 

The role of Highway Technicians as part of the Countywide Maintenance Team includes the 

responsibility to reactively respond to publicly reported defects on the maintainable vehicular highway. 

This role will assess and validate the reported defect in line with the Council's Highway Safety 

Inspection Policy and manage the delivery of a permanent repair within the response times set out in 

the policy. 

As part of a review of the role and the responsibilities required for the validation and assessment of 

highway defects, it was identified that to ensure Highway Technicians were suitably trained and 

competent in this part of their role, they should also be trained to the same standard as the Highway 

Safety Inspectors through on-the-job and formal accredited training. It was also identified that their 

operational line manager, the Assistant Operations Engineer, should also undertake formal training. A 

further 26 countywide staff have completed this training over 4 sessions which concluded in January 

2024. The same training sessions delivered to Highway Safety Inspectors, as highlighted above, have 

also been delivered to Highway Technicians. 

c)  Highway Operative 

The role of Highway Operatives is to drive and operate vehicles and plant to prepare and lay materials 

to maintain and improve the highway network as directed by the Countywide Maintenance Team 

compliant with site plans, and Health and Safety Legislation and completing records on hand-held IT 

equipment. 

Highway Operatives are trained to use the vehicles, plant and tools required to carry out highway 

defect repairs safely. They are specifically trained in the method of repair required for the wide range 

of highway defects that they are directed to repair. Highway Operatives work in crews of 2 or 3 and 

crews are made up of a Chargehand and Operative, the Chargehand having supervisory responsibility 

over the Operative. Chargehand are usually more experienced highway workers and have a wide and 

comprehensive experience of highway repairs. 

Highway Operatives are not required to identify or assess any defect as set out in the Highway Safety 

Inspection Policy, however they are given the scope to repair additional defects they may see within 

the area of highway contained in any traffic management already in place. 

The delivery of the inspection regime set out in the Highway Safety Inspection Policy is the primary 

responsibility of the Highway Safety Inspectors and Highway Technicians and not that of the Highway 

Operatives. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 4 

As outlined above, there is an instruction in place that Highway Operatives are not to be used for 

defect identification through the "find and fix" method of working, their capacity being limited to 

repairing additional defects to those directed where they can be seen within existing traffic 

management arrangements. 

However, in light your findings, the Council recognises that Highways Operatives would benefit from 

awareness training in the form of a toolbox talk to include general defect types and impacts on all 

types of highways users is to be delivered to all operatives. The presentation has been drafted and 

approved in readiness for countrywide delivery and will be delivered over a 2 week period starting on 

22.01.2024. This will also set out a clear process for reporting defects to Highways Inspectors and 

Highways Technicians for assessment should they be seen whilst carrying out their general duties. 

d)  Awareness Training – front line highway teams 

The Council has carefully considered how, in addition to formal training, continued development and 

awareness can be delivered to front line highway teams. 

The Council intends to deliver an annual workshop for highway staff who are responsible for the 

inspection and assessment of highway defects to ensure compliance with the Highway Safety 

Inspection Policy, to deliver a consistent countywide approach and to update staff on any national 

guidance changes and learning from operational activities. This will be arranged in April 2024 and 

annually thereafter. 

3.  Development and promotion of “LoveCleanStreets” 

In April 2022, the Council launched “LoveCleanStreets”, a new public reporting system to replace its 

web-based reporting tool. LoveCleanStreets has significant advantages over the original reporting 

tool, in that it can be used both as an App and in a web-based form. It also allows customers to pin 

the location of a defect onto a map and attach photographs. This allows the receiving maintenance 

team to be directed correctly to the exact location so defects can be assessed within the 2-day 

response time set out in the Highways Safety Inspection policy. LoveCleanStreets passes all provided 

information directly into the County's Highway Asset Management system where it is managed by the 

Countywide Teams. 

In April 2023 the Council’s web-based reporting system was replaced by LoveCleanStreets and all 

digital requests are now received via this system. 

Whilst the Council remains open to other forms of defect reporting for example through telephone 

calls, the use of LoveCleanStreets is being actively promoted as the most efficient and accurate way in 

which customers can advise of highway defects. Where reports are received by telephone or other 

means, the Customer Access Team will now create a LoveCleanStreets report to ensure that any 

defects are mapped accurately and can be responded to effectively. 

4.  Highway Safety Inspection Policy Review 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 5 

The Council has identified that in addition to the current requirement set out in the Policy to review it 

as and when necessary, but especially when changes to either legislation or national guidance are 

introduced, an annual review of the whole policy should also be carried out. The Policy has been 

updated and republished to include this change. 

The Council has also identified that a peer review of the Highway Safety Inspection Policy could assist 

in identifying any changes or improvements to the current policy. The original policy was written in 

2018 and was compared with other local authorities at that time. A peer authority has been 

commissioned and the review will start on 22.01.2024. It is anticipated that this review will take up to 

8 months to complete. 

Although this review will consider all aspects of the Council’s Highway Safety Inspection Policy, the 

Council will highlight the outcome of this case and ask the reviewer to consider this as a matter of 

priority to ensure any additional learning or recommendations can be progressed. 

5.  Moss Road Strategy 

In light of Mr Colledge’s accident, the Council commissioned a full Geotechnical Survey of Island Lane, 

which was disclosed prior to the inquest. 

Research into increasing the longevity of moss roads is ongoing within the Council.  New and 

innovative techniques and products (including the use of geosynthetic materials) have been trialled in 

several locations with varying degrees of success. 

Where cracking in the carriageway surface is reported, the area will be inspected by a qualified 

Highways Inspector to determine the depth of the cracking. If the cracking is shallow and only 

penetrates the surface course, the affected area can be cut out and resurfaced. Where the cracking 

penetrates down the superficial deposits, the affected road surface area could be cut out and the 

underlying road construction excavated and replaced. Alternatively, it may be possible to inject/pour 

material into the crack to fill the void to avoid excavating large sections of the road. 

Awareness of common defects on peat moss roads has been raised through the post-incident debrief, 

which is set out above. 

The Council’s current Moss Road Strategy will be reviewed by the Council’s Asset Management Team. 

It is anticipated that this review will be completed by April 2024. The strategy will also be re-published 

with any updates and will be reviewed annually from 2024. 

Yours sincerely, 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 6 

Director of Highways and Transport

Related reports

Other reports by Kate Bisset

See all →

More reports categorised “Road (Highways Safety) related deaths”

See all →

Track Road (Highways Safety) related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Road (Highways Safety) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.