Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0132, written 11 Mar 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 11 Mar 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0132 |
| Deceased | Isaac Onyeka |
| Coroner | Nadia Persaud |
| Coroner area | East London |
| Category | Child Death (from 2015) |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
MISS N PERSAUD
HIS MAJESTY’S CORONER
EAST LONDON
Walthamstow Coroner's Court, Queens Road Walthamstow, E17 8QP
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1)
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
•
, National Medical Director, NHS England
1
CORONER
I am Nadia Persaud Area Coroner for the coroner area of East London
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 14 June 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Isaac Onyeka (age 3
years old). The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest, on the 5 March 2024.
The conclusion of the inquest was that Isaac died as a result of natural causes. The
inquest heard that there were non-causal concerns in relation to the treatment provided
to Isaac in the days leading up to his death.
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Isaac Onyeka was a 3-year-old boy, diagnosed with Down's Syndrome. On the 26 May
2023 Isaac showed the first signs of chicken pox. On the evening of 30 May 2023,
Isaac's mother noted that Isaac had a painful swelling under his arm. She called
NHS111 and spoke to a health adviser. On the basis of the information elicited through
the use of the NHS 111 Pathways algorithm, an appropriate disposition was reached, for
Isaac to be assessed by his general practitioner within 24 hours. The following morning,
1
Isaac's mother was asked to provide a photograph of Isaac's swelling to the GP practice.
She immediately uploaded a photograph of the swelling under the arm and also a
swelling in the groin area. In addition, she provided important clinical detail with the
photographs. An ST3 GP registrar viewed the photographs, but did not view the
additional clinical information. The same GP registrar then spoke with Isaac's mother at
around 1030am. Red and amber flags of sepsis were described to the GP registrar, but
the clinical significance of these were missed. In assessing Isaac's risk of a serious
infection, the GP registrar did not consider two applicable risk factors, namely the
immune deficiency associated with Down's Syndrome and the raised risk of Group A
streptococcal infection associated with chicken pox. Isaac should have been directed to
hospital following the consultation. Instead, his mother was advised that the
lymphadenopathy would likely self-resolve. During the afternoon of the 31 May 2023,
Isaac became unresponsive in his home address. Resuscitation efforts were made by
his mother, the ambulance service and the helicopter emergency medical service. Isaac
was taken to Whipps Cross Hospital where sadly his life was pronounced extinct on 31
May 2023. Due to the fulminant nature of Group A streptococcal infection, had Isaac
attended hospital during the morning of 31 May 2023, it is unlikely that his death would
have been avoided. Hospital care would have been required during the evening of the
30 May 2023 for Isaac's death to have been avoided. Application of the current NHS 111
Pathways assessment did not capture all of the necessary background clinical detail,
which could have resulted in the necessary hospital disposition on 30 May 2023.
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows:
(1) There is concern that there is a knowledge gap amongst the public (parents of
children with Down Syndrome in particular), and amongst some healthcare
practitioners in relation to the immune deficiency associated with Down
Syndrome. The paediatric independent expert stated that:
Down Syndrome is the most common genetic disorder associated with immune defects.
Children with Down Syndrome need to be managed with a heightened sense of
awareness in the setting of sepsis.
This was not however known by Isaac’s parents or by the GP registrar.
(2) Health advisers with NHS111 do not have access to GP electronic summaries.
They do not therefore have the background diagnoses of the patient concerned.
The inquest heard that a different disposition would have been reached, had the
health adviser been aware of the diagnosis of Down Syndrome. Had the health
adviser been aware of the diagnosis, Isaac would have been assessed by a
clinician during the evening of the 30 May 2023. Had this happened, Isaac’s
death would have been avoided.
(3) The inquest heard that there is no central resource for assisting families to
recognise signs of sepsis in patients with darker skins.
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you
[AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report,
2
namely by 7 May 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out
the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested
Persons to the Inquest, family of Isaac Onyeka, Forest Practice, Hertfordshire Urgent
Care, to the Care Quality Commission and to the local Director of Public Health who
may find it useful or of interest.
I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.
I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it
useful or of interest.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful
or of interest.
You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about
the release or the publication of your response.
9
11 March 2024
3
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Nadia Persaud
The Coroner’s Court
Queens Road
Walthamstow
E17 8QP
Dear Coroner,
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
30 April 2024
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Isaac Onyeka who died
on 31st May 2023.
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 11th
March 2024 concerning the death of Isaac Onyeka on 31st May 2023. In advance of
responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my
deep condolences to Isaac’s family and loved ones. NHS England are keen to assure
the family and the coroner that the concerns raised about Isaac’s care have been
listened to and reflected upon.
The first concern you raised was that there is a knowledge gap amongst the public
(parents of children with Down’s Syndrome in particular), and amongst some
healthcare practitioners in relation to the immune deficiency associated with Down’s
Syndrome. NHS England manages the NHS website on behalf of the Department for
Health and Social Care. The NHS website for England is the UK's biggest health
website, with more than 50 million visits every month. The NHS website is subject to
governance and assurance processes, ensuring content is regularly reviewed and
represent current medical practice.
The NHS website has information for the public on many conditions, including Down's
syndrome. The pages contain summary information and also signpost patients,
parents, and carers to third sector organisations, such as the Down's Syndrome
Association and Down Syndrome UK, for more comprehensive information about
Down's syndrome, and associated health management. Both the Down's Syndrome
Association and Down Syndrome UK publish public facing information about
vulnerability to infection of people with Down's syndrome. These third-party websites
are not managed by NHS England.
The NHS website has a page about Other health conditions and Down's syndrome
This page signposts people to annual health checks and states "People with Down's
syndrome are more likely to become unwell through an infection..." in the context of
encouraging adherence with vaccination programmes. To support the public, the
“other health conditions” page has been updated to make clearer the risks of increased
susceptibility and consequences of infection. The ‘Who’s most likely to get sepsis’
section of our sepsis pages has also been updated to include genetic disorders such
as Down’s syndrome.
We agree that good understanding and awareness around sepsis amongst parents/
carers and clinicians’ relation to children and young people is crucial. This is
particularly important in respect to infants and young children. Children under five are
at greater risk of sepsis than older children and those with compromised immune
systems, including children with Down’s Syndrome may be at an increased risk of
complications from infections including sepsis.
NHS England’s Learning Disability and Autism Programme will work with allied
stakeholders so that they can help with raising awareness amongst parents/ carers of
autistic children and young people and those with a learning disability or special
educational needs and disabilities (SEND) families about the signs of sepsis as well
as understanding that signs of sepsis may be easier to spot on the palms or feet
amongst children and young people with black or darker skin.
NICE Guidance for varicella zoster chickenpox and complications includes information
about complications that may arise in children as a result of having chickenpox.
Your second concern was that health advisers with NHS111 do not have access to GP
electronic summaries and that they do not therefore have the background diagnoses
of the patient concerned. The NHS Pathways triage system is a clinical decision
support system (CDSS) supporting the assessment of patients presenting to urgent
and emergency services. The system is owned by the Department for Health and
Social Care and delivered by the Transformation Directorate of NHS England. NHS
Pathways supports NHS 111 services nationally by providing a triage system to
assess symptoms of patients over the telephone. It does not seek to diagnose patients
but is instead built around a clinical hierarchy by presenting a series of questions in
order for the most appropriate clinical response or disposition to be determined based
on the presenting symptoms.
Health Advisers in NHS 111 telephone services are trained to use NHS Pathways by
NHS 111 providers. These highly trained, non-clinical staff use the NHS Pathways
system to support assessments so that cases can be triaged and directed to an
appropriate service, within a suitable timeframe.
Where medical terms or diagnoses are volunteered by the caller, non-clinical Health
Advisors are trained to identify these calls as “complex”, being outside their scope of
practice and for transfer to a clinician. This is so that the clinician can exercise clinical
judgement.
GP electronic summaries contain clinical terms. Presenting such information to non-
clinical Health Advisers would be outside the scope of practice for non-clinical staff.
This is because they do not have the clinical training required to interpret the
information held in these records, nor do they have a mandate to apply clinical
judgement. It is the case, however, that Summary Care Records (SCRs) are visible to
clinically trained staff in urgent and emergency care services. This is managed through
local records sharing agreements.
Where appropriate, and in this case, the NHS Pathways system prompts Health
Advisers to seek out from callers whether a pre-existing condition is present that can
make infection very serious, as is the case for Down’s syndrome. Sadly, in this
instance, the question, though presented, was answered in the negative, meaning the
opportunity to reach a higher disposition was missed.
Your third concern was that there is no central resource for assisting families to
recognise signs of sepsis in patients with darker skin. It is well recognised and
publicised that sepsis is hard to diagnose and over the years there have been
numerous initiatives and solutions to try to improve the early recognition and prompt
the treatment of sepsis to prevent complications including death.
Transformation and redesign of the sepsis pages of the NHS website was conducted
in 2022. During this process the team consulted with stakeholders, including the UK
Sepsis Trust. They performed user research and tested the page with users, including
parents of children that had not had sepsis Based on the results of the testing and
consultation, the team opted not to include any images on the page, but instead to
emphasise the need to obtain emergency help from 999/Accident & Emergency (A&E)
or urgent help from 111 if they/their child had any of the symptoms in the care card.
Care cards are visible on relevant pages of the NHS website, prompting further action
by the reader in the presence of symptoms or findings. Based on the outcomes of the
research, the page layout of the sepsis pages differs from those of other conditions.
Because of the nature of this condition, the team found that the care cards - emergency
care card (the red/black card) and an urgent card (red/white card) – should be located
towards the beginning of the page, ahead of more detailed background information.
On most other condition pages these care cards are included towards the end of the
page after background information on the condition.
The NHS website has information for the public on sepsis which emphasises that
sepsis can be hard to spot in babies, young children, and people with learning
disabilities. The first section on the page is titled “Check if it’s sepsis”. The first point
on the emergency care card, highlighted in red and black, says “Call 999 or go to A&E
if:”
“A baby or young child has any of these symptoms of sepsis:
• blue, grey, pale, or blotchy skin, lips, or tongue – on brown or black skin, this
may be easier to see on the palms of the hands or soles of the feet”.
Similarly, the emergency care card (“Call 999 or go to A&E if:”) on the skin rash page
says:
"On brown and black skin, it may be easier to see the rash or colour changes
on the soles of the feet, palms, lips, tongue and inside the eyelids."
More generally, the NHS website Team are committed to include written content and
(where appropriate) images of rashes and skin symptoms on a different range of skin
tones. In 2020, user research interviews with people of colour with skin conditions
were conducted and a skin tone survey was posted on conditions pages for cellulitis,
contact dermatitis and scarlet fever. The learnings around skin tone language were
used to inform changes to the page on Chickenpox, which underwent user testing in
2021. This work continues across many areas of the NHS website.
As a result of your Report the Website Team will review whether to include images
videos on the sepsis page to support identification of visible symptoms of sepsis.
I would also like to provide further assurances on national NHS England work taking
place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed
by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and
other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key
learnings and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both
a national and regional level and helps us pay close attention to any emerging trends
that may require further review and action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
National Medical Director
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Child Death (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.