Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Isaac Onyeka

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0132, written 11 Mar 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report11 Mar 2024
Reference2024-0132
DeceasedIsaac Onyeka
CoronerNadia Persaud
Coroner areaEast London
CategoryChild Death (from 2015)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

MISS N PERSAUD 
HIS MAJESTY’S CORONER 

EAST LONDON 

Walthamstow Coroner's Court, Queens Road Walthamstow, E17 8QP 

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:  

• 

, National Medical Director, NHS England   

1 

CORONER 

I am Nadia Persaud Area Coroner for the coroner area of East London 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 14 June 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Isaac Onyeka (age 3 
years old). The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest, on the 5 March 2024. 
The conclusion of the inquest was that Isaac died as a result of natural causes.  The 
inquest heard that there were non-causal concerns in relation to the treatment provided 
to Isaac in the days leading up to his death.    

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Isaac Onyeka was a 3-year-old boy, diagnosed with Down's Syndrome. On the 26 May 
2023 Isaac showed the first signs of chicken pox. On the evening of 30 May 2023, 
Isaac's mother noted that Isaac had a painful swelling under his arm. She called 
NHS111 and spoke to a health adviser. On the basis of the information elicited through 
the use of the NHS 111 Pathways algorithm, an appropriate disposition was reached, for 
Isaac to be assessed by his general practitioner within 24 hours. The following morning, 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Isaac's mother was asked to provide a photograph of Isaac's swelling to the GP practice. 
She immediately uploaded a photograph of the swelling under the arm and also a 
swelling in the groin area. In addition, she provided important clinical detail with the 
photographs. An ST3 GP registrar viewed the photographs, but did not view the 
additional clinical information. The same GP registrar then spoke with Isaac's mother at 
around 1030am. Red and amber flags of sepsis were described to the GP registrar, but 
the clinical significance of these were missed. In assessing Isaac's risk of a serious 
infection, the GP registrar did not consider two applicable risk factors, namely the 
immune deficiency associated with Down's Syndrome and the raised risk of Group A 
streptococcal infection associated with chicken pox. Isaac should have been directed to 
hospital following the consultation. Instead, his mother was advised that the 
lymphadenopathy would likely self-resolve. During the afternoon of the 31 May 2023, 
Isaac became unresponsive in his home address. Resuscitation efforts were made by 
his mother, the ambulance service and the helicopter emergency medical service. Isaac 
was taken to Whipps Cross Hospital where sadly his life was pronounced extinct on 31 
May 2023. Due to the fulminant nature of Group A streptococcal infection, had Isaac 
attended hospital during the morning of 31 May 2023, it is unlikely that his death would 
have been avoided. Hospital care would have been required during the evening of the 
30 May 2023 for Isaac's death to have been avoided. Application of the current NHS 111 
Pathways assessment did not capture all of the necessary background clinical detail, 
which could have resulted in the necessary hospital disposition on 30 May 2023.     

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 

(1)  There is concern that there is a knowledge gap amongst the public (parents of 
children with Down Syndrome in particular), and amongst some healthcare 
practitioners in relation to the immune deficiency associated with Down 
Syndrome. The paediatric independent expert stated that: 

Down Syndrome is the most common genetic disorder associated with immune defects.  
Children with Down Syndrome need to be managed with a heightened sense of 
awareness in the setting of sepsis.    

              This was not however known by Isaac’s parents or by the GP registrar.  

(2)  Health advisers with NHS111 do not have access to GP electronic summaries.  

They do not therefore have the background diagnoses of the patient concerned.  
The inquest heard that a different disposition would have been reached, had the 
health adviser been aware of the diagnosis of Down Syndrome.  Had the health 
adviser been aware of the diagnosis, Isaac would have been assessed by a 
clinician during the evening of the 30 May 2023.  Had this happened, Isaac’s 
death would have been avoided.   

(3)  The inquest heard that there is no central resource for assisting families to 

recognise signs of sepsis in patients with darker skins.      

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you 
[AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 namely by 7 May 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons to the Inquest, family of Isaac Onyeka, Forest Practice, Hertfordshire Urgent 
Care, to the Care Quality Commission and to the local Director of Public Health who 
may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all 
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.   

I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it 
useful or of interest.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful 
or of interest.  

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about 
the release or the publication of your response. 

9 

 11 March 2024      

3

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from NHS England (PDF)
Nadia Persaud 
The Coroner’s Court 
Queens Road 
Walthamstow  
E17 8QP 

Dear Coroner, 

National Medical Director  
NHS England  
Wellington House 
133-155 Waterloo Road  
London 
SE1 8UG 

30 April 2024 

Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Isaac Onyeka who died 
on 31st May 2023.  

Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 11th 
March 2024 concerning the death of Isaac Onyeka on 31st May 2023. In advance of 
responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my 
deep condolences to Isaac’s family and loved ones. NHS England are keen to assure 
the  family  and  the  coroner  that  the  concerns  raised  about  Isaac’s  care  have  been 
listened to and reflected upon.   

The first concern you raised was that there is a knowledge gap amongst the public 
(parents  of  children  with  Down’s  Syndrome  in  particular),  and  amongst  some 
healthcare practitioners in relation to the immune deficiency associated with Down’s 
Syndrome. NHS England manages the NHS website on behalf of the Department for 
Health  and  Social  Care.    The  NHS  website  for  England  is  the  UK's  biggest  health 
website, with more than 50 million visits every month.  The NHS website is subject to 
governance  and  assurance  processes,  ensuring  content  is  regularly  reviewed  and 
represent current medical practice.    

The NHS website has information for the public on many conditions, including Down's 
syndrome.  The  pages  contain  summary  information  and  also  signpost  patients, 
parents,  and  carers  to  third  sector  organisations,  such  as  the  Down's  Syndrome 
Association  and  Down  Syndrome  UK,  for  more  comprehensive  information  about 
Down's syndrome, and associated health management. Both the Down's Syndrome 
Association  and  Down  Syndrome  UK  publish  public  facing  information  about 
vulnerability to infection of people with Down's syndrome.  These third-party websites 
are not managed by NHS England.   

The NHS website has a page about  Other health conditions and Down's syndrome 
This page signposts people to annual health checks and states "People with Down's 
syndrome are more likely to become unwell through an infection..." in the context of 
encouraging  adherence  with  vaccination  programmes.  To  support  the  public,  the 
“other health conditions” page has been updated to make clearer the risks of increased 
susceptibility  and  consequences  of  infection.  The  ‘Who’s  most  likely  to  get  sepsis’ 
section of our sepsis pages has also been updated to include genetic disorders such 
as Down’s syndrome. 

                                                                                                                       
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
  
 We agree that good understanding and awareness around sepsis amongst parents/ 
carers  and  clinicians’  relation  to  children  and  young  people  is  crucial.  This  is 
particularly important in respect to infants and young children. Children under five are 
at  greater  risk  of  sepsis  than  older  children  and  those  with  compromised  immune 
systems,  including  children  with  Down’s  Syndrome  may  be  at  an  increased  risk  of 
complications from infections including sepsis.  

NHS  England’s  Learning  Disability  and  Autism  Programme  will  work  with  allied 
stakeholders so that they can help with raising awareness amongst parents/ carers of 
autistic  children  and  young  people  and  those  with  a  learning  disability  or  special 
educational needs and disabilities (SEND) families about the signs of sepsis as well 
as  understanding  that  signs  of  sepsis  may  be  easier  to  spot  on  the  palms  or  feet 
amongst children and young people with black or darker skin.  

NICE Guidance for varicella zoster chickenpox and complications includes information 
about complications that may arise in children as a result of having chickenpox. 

Your second concern was that health advisers with NHS111 do not have access to GP 
electronic summaries and that they do not therefore have the background diagnoses 
of  the  patient  concerned.  The  NHS  Pathways  triage  system  is  a  clinical  decision 
support system (CDSS) supporting the assessment of patients presenting to urgent 
and  emergency  services.  The  system  is  owned  by  the  Department  for  Health  and 
Social Care and delivered by the Transformation Directorate of NHS England.  NHS 
Pathways  supports  NHS  111  services  nationally  by  providing  a  triage  system  to 
assess symptoms of patients over the telephone. It does not seek to diagnose patients 
but is instead built around a clinical hierarchy by presenting a series of questions in 
order for the most appropriate clinical response or disposition to be determined based 
on the presenting symptoms. 

Health Advisers in NHS 111 telephone services are trained to use NHS Pathways by 
NHS  111  providers.  These  highly  trained,  non-clinical  staff  use  the  NHS  Pathways 
system  to  support  assessments  so  that  cases  can  be  triaged  and  directed  to  an 
appropriate service, within a suitable timeframe. 

Where medical terms or diagnoses are volunteered by the caller, non-clinical Health 
Advisors are trained to identify these calls as “complex”, being outside their scope of 
practice and for transfer to a clinician. This is so that the clinician can exercise clinical 
judgement. 

GP electronic summaries contain clinical terms. Presenting such information to non-
clinical Health Advisers would be outside the scope of practice for non-clinical staff. 
This  is  because  they  do  not  have  the  clinical  training  required  to  interpret  the 
information  held  in  these  records,  nor  do  they  have  a  mandate  to  apply  clinical 
judgement. It is the case, however, that Summary Care Records (SCRs) are visible to 
clinically trained staff in urgent and emergency care services. This is managed through 
local records sharing agreements. 

 
  
 Where  appropriate,  and  in  this  case,  the  NHS  Pathways  system  prompts  Health 
Advisers to seek out from callers whether a pre-existing condition is present that can 
make  infection  very  serious,  as  is  the  case  for  Down’s  syndrome.  Sadly,  in  this 
instance, the question, though presented, was answered in the negative, meaning the 
opportunity to reach a higher disposition was missed. 

Your  third  concern  was  that  there  is  no  central  resource  for  assisting  families  to 
recognise  signs  of  sepsis  in  patients  with  darker  skin.  It  is  well  recognised  and 
publicised  that  sepsis  is  hard  to  diagnose  and  over  the  years  there  have  been 
numerous initiatives and solutions to try to improve the early recognition and prompt 
the treatment of sepsis to prevent complications including death. 

Transformation and redesign of the sepsis pages of the NHS website was conducted 
in 2022. During this process the team consulted with stakeholders, including the UK 
Sepsis Trust. They performed user research and tested the page with users, including 
parents of children that had not had sepsis Based on the results of the testing and 
consultation, the team opted not to include any images on the page, but instead to 
emphasise the need to obtain emergency help from 999/Accident & Emergency (A&E) 
or urgent help from 111 if they/their child had any of the symptoms in the care card. 

Care cards are visible on relevant pages of the NHS website, prompting further action 
by the reader in the presence of symptoms or findings. Based on the outcomes of the 
research, the page layout of the sepsis pages differs from those of other conditions. 
Because of the nature of this condition, the team found that the care cards - emergency 
care card (the red/black card) and an urgent card (red/white card) – should be located 
towards the beginning of the page, ahead of more detailed background information. 
On most other condition pages these care cards are included towards the end of the 
page after background information on the condition. 

The  NHS  website  has  information  for  the  public  on  sepsis  which  emphasises  that 
sepsis  can  be  hard  to  spot  in  babies,  young  children,  and  people  with  learning 
disabilities. The first section on the page is titled “Check if it’s sepsis”. The first point 
on the emergency care card, highlighted in red and black, says “Call 999 or go to A&E 
if:” 

“A baby or young child has any of these symptoms of sepsis: 
•  blue, grey, pale, or blotchy skin, lips, or tongue – on brown or black skin, this 

may be easier to see on the palms of the hands or soles of the feet”. 

Similarly, the emergency care card (“Call 999 or go to A&E if:”) on the skin rash page 
says:  

"On brown and black skin, it may be easier to see the rash or colour changes 
on the soles of the feet, palms, lips, tongue and inside the eyelids." 

More generally, the NHS website Team are committed to include written content and 
(where appropriate) images of rashes and skin symptoms on a different range of skin 
tones.  In 2020, user research interviews with people of colour with skin conditions 
were conducted and a skin tone survey was posted on conditions pages for cellulitis, 

 
 
 
 
  
 
 contact dermatitis and scarlet fever. The learnings around skin tone language were 
used to inform changes to the page on Chickenpox, which underwent user testing in 
2021.  This work continues across many areas of the NHS website. 

As a result of your Report the Website Team will review whether to include images 
videos on the sepsis page to support identification of visible symptoms of sepsis. 

I would also like to provide further assurances on national NHS England work taking 
place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed 
by  the  Regulation  28  Working  Group,  comprising  Regional  Medical  Directors,  and 
other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key 
learnings and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both 
a national and regional level and helps us pay close attention to any emerging trends 
that may require further review and action.   

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please 
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.  

Yours sincerely,  

National Medical Director

Related reports

Other reports by Nadia Persaud

See all →

More reports categorised “Child Death (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Child Death (from 2015)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Child Death (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.