Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Robert Prowse

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0166, written 25 Mar 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report25 Mar 2024
Reference2024-0166
DeceasedRobert Prowse
CoronerGuy Davies
Coroner areaCornwall and the Isles of Scilly
CategoryMental Health related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Information Classification: PUBLIC 

IN THE MATTER OF THE INQUEST  

TOUCHING THE DEATH OF ROBERT ANDREW PROWSE 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

Ms Victoria Atkins MP, Secretary of State for Health & Social Care 

1 

CORONER 

I am Guy Davies, His Majesty’s Assistant Coroner for Cornwall & the Isles of Scilly. 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 
[HYPERLINKS] 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 25 September 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Robert Andrew 
PROWSE. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 18 March 2024.  

The medical cause of death was found to be as follows: 

1a. Urosepsis 

2 Frailty of Old Age 

The four questions - who, when, where and how – were answered as follows: 

Robert Andrew PROWSE died on 19 September 2023 at Royal Cornwall Hospital 
Truro Cornwall from sepsis following an ambulance delay, attributable to a 
systemic failure, which is likely to have contributed to Robert’s death by preventing 
lifesaving treatment. 

The conclusion of the inquest was that Robert died from sepsis contributed to by an 
ambulance delay, attributable to a systemic failure, which likely prevented lifesaving 
treatment. 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Information Classification: PUBLIC 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Robert was 86 years old at the date of his death. His medical history included a diagnosis 
of dementia. 

In the early hours of 19 September 2023 Robert’s neighbour called 999 on his behalf 
advising that Robert had been found breathing but not conscious, and it looked like he had 
had a seizure.  

Following the 999 call South West Ambulance Service Trust (SWAST) determined a 
Category 2 response requirement.  Category 2 identifies potentially serious conditions that 
may require rapid assessment, urgent on-scene intervention and/or urgent transport. The 
national response time as set by the Department of Health is to attend Category 2 
incidents within an average response time of 18 minutes, and at least 90% of incidents 
within 40 minutes 

The ambulance arrived on scene after a delay of three hours and 47 minutes from the time 
of the original 999 call. 

The ambulance arrived at Royal Cornwall Hospital Truro (Treliske) but it was not possible 
to transfer Robert to the emergency department (ED) due to the lack of available space.  
The court heard evidence of crowding within ED which included patients being placed in 
corridors.   

Robert was instead taken from the ambulance to a triage centre adjacent to Treliske ED. 
The triage centre is known as the Rapid Assessment and Treatment Centre.  There it was 
noted that Robert displayed evidence of sepsis but it was determined that his condition 
was not immediately life threatening.  Robert was given fluids but not antibiotics and then 
returned to the ambulance parked outside ED. 

Robert remained in the ambulance attended by the paramedic crew until later transfer to 
ED at 11:05 hours.  The delay in handover between ambulance and Treliske ED was one 
hour, 25 minutes. There is a target for crews to handover the care of their patients within 
15 minutes of arriving at an Emergency Department.  

Robert was then subject to tests and sepsis was identified.  Robert was found deceased at 
13:00 hours.  Antibiotics had been prescribed but Robert died before they could be 
administered. 

 that the ambulance delay, including response 
The court heard evidence from 
delay and handover delay, likely contributed to Robert’s death.   This is because earlier 
treatment of sepsis is likely to avoided Robert’s death.  
treatment of sepsis by way of oxygen, antibiotics and fluids, saves lives and improves 
outcomes.  In Robert’s case earlier treatment is likely to have made a difference to the 
outcome. 

 stated  that early 

The court found that the categorisation of the call by ambulance services was appropriate. 

The court found that the delay was not caused by any individual failing but was attributable 
to a systemic failure discussed in the concerns set out below. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to 
concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is 
taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  –  

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Information Classification: PUBLIC 

1.  Robert’s death followed an ambulance delay, attributable to a systemic failure, 
which is likely to have contributed to Robert’s death by preventing lifesaving 
treatment. 

2.  The systemic failure was found to be due to issues within healthcare services 

external to SWAST and notwithstanding increases in SWAST staff numbers and 
ambulance numbers. 

3.  Performance data published by SWAST and considered at Inquest, reveals that in 
2023 the two hospitals (in the SWAST region) most impacted by ambulance delays 
are Royal Cornwall Hospital Truro (Treliske) & University Hospital Trust Plymouth 
(Derriford).  These are the two hospitals servicing patients in Cornwall. 

4.  The court heard that at the time of the ambulance delay that contributed to 
Robert’s death, SWAST had 136% resources available to meet anticipated 
demand.  The increased resources were not able to overcome the systemic 
failures impacting SWAST.   

5.  The court considered the findings in the SWAST Patient Safety Incident 

Investigation Report & an associated investigation conducted by the Healthcare 
Services Safety Investigation Branch (HSSIB).  These investigations found that… 

‘…there is a direct link between patients waiting in the hospital for 
discharge to social care, and patients being cared for inside ambulances 
and Emergency Departments.’ 

6. 

In other words, the investigations found that there is a direct link between failings in 
social care provision and ambulance delays.  The failings in social care provision 
were found to have a knock-on effect through healthcare services. It was found 
that at times hospitals were unable to transfer patients from hospital wards into the 
community when clinically indicated. This is because of the difficulty in securing 
sufficient domiciliary or residential care, as and when required.   This leads to 
delayed discharges from hospital of patients deemed medically fit for discharge.   

7.  Furthermore, it was found that delayed discharge can lead to an increase in 

rehabilitation and care needs.  This is an effect of delayed discharge leading to 
further impact upon hospital capacity. 

8. 

It was found that the build-up of patients in wards (patients who are medically fit for 
discharge) means that the hospitals are, at times, unable to transfer patients from 
the emergency department to hospital wards when clinically indicated.   This in turn 
leads to a build up of patients in emergency departments.   

9.  The court heard evidence that Treliske have established a triage centre in the car 

park, known as the Rapid Assessment and Treatment Centre. The primary 
purpose of triage is to identify those patients in immediately life-threatening 
condition.  The triage centre is an attempt to mitigate the risks due to ambulance 
delay and overcrowding in ED. 
 stated that the vast majority of patients 
are now seen in the car park, inside ambulances or in the triage centre, rather than 
in ED. 

10.  The court heard evidence of crowding at Treliske ED with patients being 

accommodated in the corridors.   Evidence was heard from
scientific study by Royal College of Emergency Medicine (published in the 
Emergency Medicine Journal).  This study discussed the adverse impact of 
crowding in ED. The study calculated the estimated number of excess deaths 
occurring across the United Kingdom associated with crowding and extremely long 
waiting times.  The study showed that for every 72 patients waiting between eight- 

 regarding a 

3 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Information Classification: PUBLIC 

and 12-hours from their time of arrival in the Emergency Department there is one 
patient death. 

11.  The court heard evidence that in September 2023 patients had spent a total of 

14,327 hours in Treliske ED when it was clinically appropriate for these patients to 
be discharged or moved to a ward.  This period of time is equivalent to closing 19 
cubicles in Treliske ED for a whole month. Treliske ED has 26 cubicles. 

12.  The build-up of patients in the emergency department leads to handover delays 
between ambulance and hospital, namely ambulance crews being unable to 
transfer patients from ambulances into the emergency department.  It was found 
that there is a strong correlation between ambulance handover delays and 
increasing ambulance response times.  The investigation report stated: 

‘’It is as simple as the longer a patient is waiting in an ambulance outside a 
hospital, the longer the next patient will wait for an ambulance’’.  

13.  The investigation report states 

‘…SWAST is experiencing by far the highest levels of handover delays 
seen in the Trust’s history. Handover delays result in multiple ambulance 
resources being held at hospitals for extended periods, thereby limiting the 
number of resources on the road to respond to waiting incidents. With 
fewer resources on the road, the response times to patients inevitably 
increases… 

….The impact of the delays …is devastating¸ most significant¸ and most 
immediately evident to patients and their families and carers. Less evident 
is the secondary¸ detrimental effect these delays can bring to the service 
as a whole. This investigation found that delays are having an additional 
profound impact on staff morale and their mental wellbeing.’’  

14.  The court considered SWAST performance data for 2023 in connection with 

handover delays between ambulances and hospitals.  There is a target for crews 
to handover the care of their patients within 15 minutes of arriving at an 
Emergency Department. Anything above this constitutes a delay which impacts on 
the availability of resources.  The data revealed that in September 2023, handover 
delays (in excess of 15 minutes), cost the ambulance service 2,981 hours at 
Treliske. This is equivalent to 271 ambulance crew shifts. At Derriford in the same 
month, handover delays (in excess of 15 minutes) cost the ambulance service 
6,359 hours, which is equivalent to 581 ambulance crew shifts.   

15.  The court considered data for 2023 showing total operational resource hours lost 
to handover delays in excess of 15 minutes. The total lost by SWAST at Treliske 
was 35,583 hours. At Derriford the total lost in 2023 was 53,080 hours. 

16.  The court noted that two reports have been issued by this court in November 2023 
addressed to the Health Secretary raised the same concerns regarding ambulance 
delays.  A response to those reports is still awaited.  

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you [AND/OR 
your organisation] have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 

4 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Information Classification: PUBLIC 

namely by 20 May 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons: the family, SWAST and Royal Cornwall Hospital Truro (Treliske). 

I have also sent a copy to University Hospital Trust Plymouth (Derriford), 
, and Cornwall Council who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. 
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of 
interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, 
about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9 

25 March 2024                                              Guy Davies, HM Assistant Coroner 

5

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Department of Health and Social Care (PDF)
From Minister Helen Whately  
Minister of State for Care 
39 Victoria Street 
London 
SW1H 0EU 

HM Assistant Coroner Guy Davies 
Cornwall Coroners' Service 
Pydar House, Pydar Street 
Truro 
TR1 1XU 

 22 May 2024 

Dear Mr Davies,  

Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report of 25 March to the Secretary of State for Health and 
Social  Care  regarding  the  death  of  Robert  Andrew  Prowse.  I  am  replying  as  Minister  with 
responsibility for urgent and emergency services.  

Firstly, I would like to say how deeply sorry I was to read the circumstances of  Mr Prowse’s 
death and I offer my sincere condolences to his family. It is vital we learn from Regulation 28 
reports where they raise matters of concern so NHS care can be improved. I am grateful to 
you for bringing these matters to my attention.  

Your report raised concerns about ambulance response times by South Western Ambulance 
Service  NHS  Foundation  Trust  (SWAST),  in  particular  how  this  is  impacted  by  handover 
delays and issues with discharging patients from hospital.  

You  have appropriately shared  your report  and concerns  with SWAST  and  Royal  Cornwall 
Hospital Trust (RCHT), who are best placed to respond on the specific action they are taking 
locally to reduce handover delays and improve ambulance response times. 

I recognise the significant pressure the urgent and emergency care system is facing. That is 
why we published our ‘Delivery plan for recovering urgent and emergency care services’ which 
aims to deliver sustained improvements in waiting times. Our ambition for this year is to reduce 
Category  2  ambulance  response  times  to  30  minutes  on  average.  The plan  is  available  at 
https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/B2034-delivery-plan-for-
recovering-urgent-and-emergency-care-services.pdf   

Your report highlights that  SWAST were responding to high demand at the time of this sad 
event, affecting the service provided to Mr Prowse.. A primary aim of our delivery plan is to 
boost ambulance capacity. Ambulance services received £200 million of additional funding in 
2023/24  to  expand  capacity  and  improve  response  times,  and  we  are  maintaining  this 
additional capacity in 2024/25. This is alongside the delivery of new ambulances and specialist 
mental health vehicles. With more ambulances on the road, patients will receive the treatment 
they need more swiftly.     

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 Your report also highlights that Royal Cornwall Hospital was experiencing high demand with 
long handover delays. I recognise that ambulance trusts work within a health and care system 
and  issues  such  as  delayed  patient  handovers  to  hospitals,  as  you  rightly  identify  in  your 
report, can impact on capacity and response times. That is why a key part of the delivery plan 
is about improving patient flow and bed capacity within hospitals. We achieved our 2023/24 
ambition  of  delivering  5,000  more  staffed,  permanent  hospital  beds  this  year  compared  to 
2022/23 plans, backed by £1 billion of dedicated funding, and we will maintain this capacity 
uplift in 2024/25. We have also achieved our target of scaling up virtual ward bed capacity to 
over 10,000 ahead of winter 2023/24, and there are now over 12,000 beds available nationally. 

We are also investing an additional £1 billion this year through the Discharge Fund, to support 
the  NHS  and  local  authorities  to  ensure  timely  and  effective  discharge  from  hospital.  This 
funding  follows  £600  million  last  year  and  £500  million  in  2022/23.  The  NHS  and  local 
authorities are using this funding to help provide people with the right care in the right place 
when  they  are  discharged  from  hospital.  We  have  also  ensured  every  acute  hospital  has 
access to a care transfer hub, bringing together professionals from the NHS and social care 
to manage discharges for people with more complex needs who need extra support with a 
view to promoting early planning and timely discharge. These measures are helping improve 
patient flow through hospitals, reducing delays in patient handovers so ambulances can swiftly 
get back on the roads.    

SWAST, NHS Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly ICB, and NHS Devon ICB are all in Tier 1 for 
support for their urgent and emergency care performance. This means that NHSE provides 
bespoke support to them to help improve performance and reduce variation with issues such 
as handover delays.  

The report referenced University Hospital Trust Plymouth being one of the most impacted by 
ambulance delays in the SWAST region. In the longer term, a new emergency care hospital 
for the University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust will be delivered by 2030 as part of the New 
Hospital Programme. This will improve services by providing a new integrated emergency care 
hospital, bringing all urgent care into one emergency care hospital, with dedicated areas for 
children  and  frail  patients. Further,  locally  Cornwall  Partnership  NHS  Foundation  Trust 
received £3 million in 2023/24 as part of £250 million of capital funding provided nationally to 
help increase NHS urgent and emergency care capacity.  

Since  publication  of  the  recovery  plan  in  January  2023,  we  have  seen  significant 
improvements  in  performance.  Nationally  in  2023/24,  average  Category  2  ambulance 
response times (including for serious conditions such as heart attacks and strokes) were over 
13 minutes faster compared to the previous year, a reduction of 27%. For SWAST, average 
Category 2 response times were over 26 minutes faster  over the same time period, a 38% 
reduction. Regarding handover delays in SWAST, there has been notable improvement with 
handovers almost 20 minutes faster on average in April than October 2023 (information on 
ambulance  handover  times  has  been  published  since  October  2023).  At  Royal  Cornwall 
Hospitals NHS Trust which RCHT sits, 4-hour trust performance of patients being admitted, 
transferred, or discharged within four hours of arrival was 79.0% by April 2024. This is 4.6ppt 
higher than the national average in this period. 

However, I recognise there is still more to do to reduce patient waiting times further, and the 
Government will continue to work with NHSE to achieve this. 

Thank you once again for bringing these concerns to my attention. 

Yours,  

 
    
  
 
 
  
 
 HELEN WHATELY

Related reports

Other reports by Guy Davies

See all →

More reports categorised “Mental Health related deaths”

See all →

Track Mental Health related deaths

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Mental Health related deaths, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.