Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0187, written 3 Apr 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 3 Apr 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0187 |
| Deceased | Meha Carneiro |
| Coroner | Elizabeth Didcock |
| Coroner area | Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire |
| Category | Child Death (from 2015) |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. The Chief Executive, Sherwood Forest Hsopitals NHS Foundation Trust 1 CORONER I am Dr Elizabeth Didcock, Assistant Coroner, for the coroner area of Nottinghamshire 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On the 6th December 2022, I commenced an investigation into the death of Meha Carneiro. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 1st March 2024 The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative as follows: Meha Carneiro died at 14.28 hours on the 5th December 2022 at the age of 5 years and 7 months, from overwhelming sepsis caused by infection with Group A streptococcus. Meha had Down syndrome. The seriousness of her clinical condition was not recognised when she presented to Kings Mill Hospital on 5.12.22 at 07.39 hours. She was managed with oral fluids, and struggled to have more than a very minimal intake, she had continuing diarrhoea, and was not reviewed by a paediatrician, nor a senior doctor in the Emergency Department, as she should have been. She was not provided with intravenous fluids nor antibiotics as she should have been. The lack of repeated observations, the lack of review of the oral fluid challenge, the lack of senior review, leading to the lack of recognition of the seriousness of her condition, all probably made a more than minimal, negligible or trivial contribution to her death. Had intravenous fluids and antibiotics been provided in the morning of 5.12.22, she would on balance have survived. Her death was contributed to by neglect 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Meha died at Kings Mill Hospital on 5.12.22. She had Down syndrome, and was unwell with intermittent fever, cough, abdominal pain and diarrhoea and vomiting over the two to three days prior. She was brought to hospital on the morning of 5.12.22 by her father, and collapsed in cardiac arrest approximately five and a half hours after admission. She could not be resuscitated. Detailed Findings as to how she came by her death are provided in a written Determination dated 1.3.24, appended to this report . 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows – 1. There were insufficient trained Paediatric nurses on duty in the Emergency Department (ED), on the day of Meha’s admission, and there was no effective escalation to senior nursing staff to highlight this 2. There was overall a lack of recognition of how unwell Meha was on admission and over the subsequent hours prior to her death- this included both nursing and medical staff in ED 3. Whilst switching from use of POPS to PEWS in ED, is likely to assist in ensuring repeat observations in a sick child, a PEWS of 6-8 only triggers review by a junior rather than a senior ED Doctor, the former less likely to recognise severity of illness and respond appropriately 4. There was insufficient and ineffective handover between medical staff, with lack of documentation of key information, and agreed clinical plans- between doctors in ED, and between ED and Paediatric staff I am not reassured that necessary actions to address these serious issues identified are in place. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by the 29th May 24. I, the Coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 . COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons: 1. Meha’s family 2. The Care Quality Commission I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 3rd April 2024 Dr E A Didcock H M Assistant Coroner for Nottingham and Nottinghamshire
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Inquest touching the death of Meha Carneiro.
Response of Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust to Regulation
28 report to prevent future deaths.
This is the organisational response from Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation
Trust to the Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths issued by HM Coroner,
following the conclusion of the inquest touching the death of Miss Meha Carneiro.
We reiterate our condolences and apologies to Miss Carneiro's family, and we hope
this response that considers the matters of concern raised by HM Coroner provides
reassurance that the Trust recognises and acknowledges its shortcomings and is
committed to ensuring that we learn from this to prevent future deaths.
Matters of concern raised within the report and responses for each point are as follows:
1}There were insufficient trained Paediatric nurses on duty in the Emergency
Department (ED}, on the day of Meha's admission, and there was no effective
escalation to senior nursing staff to highlight this.
for care applicable
The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) Facing the Future:
Standards for Children in Emergency Care Settings (2018) describe national
to children
standards
in Emergency Care settings.
Recommendation 10 of these standards states that every Emergency Department
(ED) must be staffed with two registered children's nurses on each shift. However, the
Care Quality Commission (CQC) and RCPCH recognise the challenges in recruiting
Registered Children's Nurses (RNC) and are working to support services through
provision of guidance and an audit tool kit.
As a district general hospital recruiting of RNCs is challenging despite active
recruitment. Sherwood Forest Hospital (SFH) acknowledge that it is unable to meet
the workforce standards outlined by the RCPCH. The following mitigations are in place
in line with CQC guidance:
• A profile of when children and young people attend the ED over a 1-year period
has been obtained to ensure that RNCs are rostered on at peak times.
• A minimum set of core competencies that adult nurses must have completed
prior to caring for a child or young person has been agreed as follows:
a. Minimum of 18 months post registration experience
b. Completion of Paediatric intermediate life support training
c. Completion of the internal 2 day paediatric study days
d. Completion of paediatric sepsis e-learning package
e. Following completion of the above, an additional day shadowing a
trained Registered Children's Nurse will be completed.
• RNC staffing within the ED is recorded on the Trust risk register as a significant
risk and is reviewed monthly by the specialty and Trust Risk Committee. This
has led to the development of the rotational post (see below).
1
• Continuous collaborative working between ED and the division of Women and
Children to develop a rotation pathway for RNC's is planned to be in place by
October 2024.
• ED Adult Nurse released to complete Paediatric Nurse Training (18 months)
due to complete in September 2024. This will increase staffing by 1WTE.
The ED senior leadership team have reviewed the escalation processes in place for
proactively reviewing and escalating nursing staffing concerns.
Healthroster, a system for producing rosters which take into account an employee's
skills, is used to proactively maximise the likelihood that each department has the
appropriate number of staff whilst ensuring there is a safe skill mix. The ED children's
area rota is produced by the band 7 lead nurse a minimum of 6 weeks in advance. An
additional Band 5 RN shift has been added to the roster from 4pm-2am to support ED
Children and Young People attendance at peak times. Following the Inquest,
improvements have been made locally to the Healthroster system to highlight specific
nursing shifts for the children's area. This change enables clear identification of where
there are gaps in RNC cover thus enabling the ED leads to ensure adult nurses with
the minimum paediatric competencies are on duty.
It is not possible to predict sickness and short-term unplanned absence therefore
changes to staffing availability may need to be escalated and acted upon at short
notice. At the time of Meha's attendance, the band 7 leads were rostered on day shifts
only and included within the ED staffing figures. A new band 7 supervisory Nurse in
Charge (NIC) role has been implemented within ED to ensure there is now visible
senior support available 24 hours a day for the entire department. At present, the NIC
is included within staffing figures, however from July 2024 this role will be
supernumerary. Within this role the NIC is required to ensure staff allocation for their
shift and the following shift meets the Trust's minimum requirements described above
and are responsible for escalating any concerns to the Division or Duty Nurse Manager
to identify additional workforce from other clinical areas in the Trust to support ED.
2) There was overall a lack of recognition of how unwell Meha was on admission
and over the subsequent hours prior to her death- this included both nursing
and medical staff in ED:
SFH provides medical and nursing colleagues with an appropriate range of training
specific to their individual roles. In relation to recognising an unwell child or young
person there are a number of tools and processes in place to be used alongside clinical
judgement including but not limited to:
Observations recorded and calculated using PEWS on Nervecentre.
At the time of Meha's attendance to ED children and young people's observations
were recorded and calculated manually on paper using the Paediatric Observation
Priority Score (POPS). During the Trust's investigation concerns regarding the
reliability of this were raised and following extensive consultation between Emergency
2
Medicine and Paediatrics this was discontinued. Children and young peoples'
observations are now recorded on
'Nervecentre' a digital system that allows
observations to be recorded and calculated electronically using the Paediatric Early
Warning System (PEWS).
To support the visibility of observations every member of clinical staff now has access
to a handheld device to record and view observations in real time. In addition, as
Nervecentre is used across the organisation for children and young people, the
Paediatric specialty have the ability to review patient's observations remotely.
frequency in real
When considering visibility of observations, a further review was undertaken following
the Inquest and it was recognised that the methodology to monitor whether patients
were receiving observations at the required
time required
improvement. Within both the major's area and children's and young people's area,
large screens which provide a Nervecentre oversight dashboard of a specific task have
been installed. The location of these was carefully considered to ensure there was no
information governance risk, whilst they were
in a location easily visible to
departmental staff. Each screen is set to live observation view which enables staff at
a glance to identify any patient with an elevated PEWS and the time repeat
observations are required in line with PEWS escalation guidance. Each patient's
current PEWS score has a coloured background which automatically updates, White
represents scores 1-5, green is 6-8, amber 9-12 and red 13 and above. In addition,
the time due changes to red if observations become overdue thus facilitating easy
identification of which patients are acutely unwell.
With the introduction of the new supervisory nurse-in-charge role there is now a
designated accountable band 7 lead responsible for ensuring these screens are
effectively utilised and monitored to ensure the staff caring for patients with elevated
PEWS scores are supported by a senior member staff.
Children and young people escalation tool.
In conjunction with changes to visibility of observations, and implementation of a
supervisory NIC role the Children and Young People (GYP) escalation tool has been
reviewed to ensure there is clear guidance on escalation triggers and the actions
required. A copy of the Children and Young People escalation plan within appendix 1
has been circulated to all employees within the ED, however staff have been instructed
this is not to be used in isolation and clinical judgement and parental/carer concerns
should always be taken into consideration. Use of the updated Children and Young
People escalation tool will aid timely escalation of any issues identified, ensure senior
support is available and appropriate plans implemented to maintain patient safety.
Paediatric sepsis e-learning.
The Trust paediatric e-learning training package has been made re-introduced as
mandatory for all medical and nursing staff within the ED from 1st May 2024.
3
Compliance is monitored at divisional level fortnightly and is reported to the Trust
Sepsis Group for assurance.
In addition to the above training currently in place to support staff the Paediatric Sepsis
6 Care Bundle, a document to screen and identify children at risk of sepsis and outline
the appropriate treatment, is under review by Emergency Medicine and Paediatrics to
be completed by August 2024.The proposed changes include specifying that patients
with Trisomy 21 and babies under the age of 3 months are at higher risk of developing
sepsis to ensure this is taken into consideration when deciding whether to trigger
commencement of sepsis treatment.
Implementation of core competencies to care for children and young people.
Recognition of an acutely unwell child is the responsibility of both medical and nursing
staff within the department. As previously set out, a set of core competencies that adult
nurses must have undertaken to care for children and young people is in place. The
Standard Operating Procedure for Children and Young People within the Emergency
Department, (see appendix 2) has been updated to reflect the new minimum training
requirements for medical staff to ensure they have the appropriate skills to effectively
identify an unwell child. Staff who do not meet these criteria are no longer directly
responsible for the care of children and young people in the ED.
Increase in senior staff availability.
At the time of Meha's attendance, there was no supervisory band 7 nurse charge on
shift. This role is now embedded into the Healthroster, with shifts filled for the
preceding six weeks. The NIC role provides 24-hour senior nursing support to staff
caring for children.
Within the action plan review provided to HM Coroner immediately following the
Inquest, reference to a further review of the Paediatric ED staffing with specific
reference to medical cover was made. This took place on the 10th April 2024. The Trust
can confirm that following this review the medical model of clinicians responsible for
the care of Children and Young People has been amended, and a Tier 3 or above
Doctor is now responsible for caring for this cohort of patients with the support of the
consultant in charge.
Senior Review and Out of hours ED Consultant Call Criteria have been produced and
implemented to provide additional guidance as to when a consultant should be
contacted out of hours. This has been shared with all Clinicians. Consultants have
confirmed they are engaged and actively promote and encourage staff to contact them
for support and guidance. These criteria, set out within appendix 3, are not an
exhaustive list and staff are aware that any concerns they feel require discussion with
a Consultant must lead to contact being made.
Location for caring for children when the CYP area is closed out of hours.
4
Previously, children who required care within ED outside the hours of 09:00-02:00
were cared for in various locations across the department. This practise has been
reviewed and out of hours all children are now cared for within a designated area within
Majors. Caring for children and young people in a specific area enables the Tier 3
doctor responsible to have improved oversight and promotes visibility of the patients.
3) Whilst switching from use of POPS to PEWS in ED, is likely to assist in
ensuring repeat observations in a sick child, a PEWS of 6-8 only triggers review
by a junior rather than a senior ED Doctor, the former less likely to recognise
severity of illness and respond appropriately.
Following the Inquest, the Trust acknowledged the additional concerns raised by HM
Coroner and in conjunction the ED team and Paediatric specialty reviewed national
guidance regarding whom a child or young person should be escalated to based upon
their PEWS score. The Trust PEWS escalation guidance now states a patient with a
PEWS between 6-8 or a single observation in one parameter that scores a 3 will trigger
a review by a minimum of a Tier 3 or above Doctor will be made aware within 30
In addition to acting on PEWS scores and clinical concerns,
minutes of escalation.
staff are empowered to escalate parental or carer concerns. This has been reflected
in the ED Paediatric Triage Documents. Upon completing the review if the Doctor feels
additional support and guidance is required there is always a consultant on call
accessible. Additionally, the paediatric team can be contacted for specialist support.
Implementation of the new medical model providing minimum Tier 3 cover to oversee
the care of children and young people enables these changes to be effectively
implemented. The updated PEWS escalation guidance has been cascaded to all
medical and nursing staff working within the ED and paediatrics.
4) There was insufficient and ineffective handover between medical staff, with
lack of documentation of key information, and agreed clinical plans- between
doctors in ED, and between ED and Paediatric staff.
During the Inquest it was acknowledged that ineffective verbal handovers between
Doctor's and missed opportunities
to provide contemporaneous medical
documentation directly impacted the care provided to Meha.
The additional information submitted by the Trust to HM Coroner following the Inquest
detailed information regarding use of SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment and
Recommendation) for handovers. SBAR is a recognised method for medical handover
and training on structured handovers is routinely provided to all medical and nursing
staff. All Sherwood Forest clinical staff are required to utilise a structured handover to
ensure effective and assertive communication. In addition, use of a structured
handover ensures clear recommendations are provided preventing ambiguity through
information back to the provider to confirm
encouraging staff to repeat the
understanding.
5
The ED Registered Nurse local induction covers SBAR and accountability handover
and staff are provided with examples of how to use SBAR effectively. Whilst SBAR
must be used for any verbal handover there was no documentation requirement to
confirm whether this had taken place at the time of Meha's attendance to the ED. The
ED Paediatric triage document has been updated and nurses are now required to
confirm an SBAR verbal handover has been provided:
IEIMAS cal.I sign:
EMAS ,pin:
I S8AR
A$slqned
Nur!e E.O. {Pr nt)
Assigned
Nurr.e E.D . (Pnnt)
Siglll!d
Signed
O;i e
/T,me.
OMe
/Ti~
lruualS
lninal~
Compliance with staff signing the accountability handover is to be monitored via the
Emergency Department Quality and Safety Assurance Paediatric Monthly Audit
registered on AMAT (clinical audit assurance software) and any omissions are
escalated in a timely manner to the appropriate managers. The first cycle of audit is
June 2024.
in ED have been
All clinical staff working
that accurate and
contemporaneous record keeping is mandatory, in
line with Sherwood Forest
Hospitals Clinical Record Keeping Standards Policy (2023). To gain assurance that
medical documentation is being completed contemporaneously to a high standard,
regular reviews are undertaken, and feedback, education and support provided to any
individuals as deemed required.
instructed
The changes to the medical model previously described means that there is a
designated Tier 3 or above Doctor overseeing the care of all children. The Tier 3 or
above doctor will lead and manage handovers between specialities and at shift
change, thus reducing the number of handovers required and improving continuity of
care.
6
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Child Death (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.