Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Chanyang Li

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0212, written 22 Apr 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report22 Apr 2024
Reference2024-0212
DeceasedChanyang Li
CoronerMelanie Lee
Coroner areaInner North London
CategorySuicide (from 2015)
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28:  Prevention of Future Deaths report 

Chenyang Li (died 30 September 2023) 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1.  Scape Living Student Accommodation, Scape Operations 

Ltd, Link Company Matters Limited, Cardale Park, 
Harrogate, North Yorkshire HG3 1RY; cc Neil Smith, 
Managing Director, 6th Floor, 65 Gresham Street, London, 
United Kingdom, EC2V 7NQ 

1 

CORONER 

I am:   Melanie Sarah Lee 
           Assistant Coroner  
           Inner North London 
           St Pancras Coroner’s Court 
           Camley Street 
           London N1C 4PP 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009,  
paragraph 7, Schedule 5, and The Coroners (Investigations) 
Regulations 2013, regulations 28 and 29. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

An investigation was commenced into the death of Chanyang Li, aged 
23 years, on 16 October 2023. The investigation concluded at the end of 
the inquest on 5 April 2024. I made a determination at inquest of suicide. 

4 

CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

At the time of his death, Chenyang was a third year undergraduate 
student on a BSc Statistics, Economics and Finance degree 
programme at UCL. On 30 September 2023 Chenyang returned to 
Scape Bloomsbury at approximately 8.30am. He made his way to the 
6th floor and let himself in to a friend’s apartment. 

Having entered the apartment, Yang went immediately to the window 
and climbed out of it, falling onto the concrete below. He died shortly 
afterwards from multiple severe injuries.  

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 A police investigation described the window as follows: The window 
…is situated within the kitchen/lounge space. Window is metal framed, 
right side hung. The window has a windowsill in front of the interior side 
which is 74ccm from the interior floor, sill width is 38cm from front of sill 
to window. Beneath the window is a small fixed panel window. Window 
is 125cm from the interior floor, 44cm in width, 76cm in height. At the 
time of attendance, the window was open to its widest aperture which is 
55cm. 

The National Code of Standards for Larger Developments for student 
accommodation not managed and controlled by educational 
establishments, under which Scope Bloomsbury is accredited, states at 
paragraph 6.30: All windows above ground-floor level will be fitted with 
stops to prevent over-opening. 

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving 
rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur 
unless  action  is  taken.  In  the  circumstances,  it  is  my  statutory  duty  to 
report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.  

Students falling or jumping from windows is a known risk. Chenyang 
was able to easily jump to death from a 6th story window. Scope 
Bloomsbury is one of a number of is part of Scape Living Student 
Accommodation, a provider of purpose designed, student 
accommodation. The window Chenyang jumped from does not appear 
to have been fitted with any, or sufficient, form of window restrictors at 
all or as required under the National Code of Standards accreditation. 

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In  my  opinion,  action  should  be  taken  to  prevent  future  deaths  and  I 
believe that you and/or your organisation have the power to take such 
action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date 
of this report, namely by 17 June 2024.  I, the coroner, may extend the 
period. 

Your  response  must  contain  details  of  action  taken  or  proposed  to  be 
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain 
why no action is proposed. 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the following. 

•  Family of Chanyang Li 
• 

 Director of Student Support and Wellbeing and 

Safeguarding Lead, UCL  

•  National Code Administrator and Unipol Student Home: 155-157 

Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, LS2 2ED 

•  NUS, 
•  Association for Student Residential Accommodation,  

•  HHJ Thomas Teague QC, the Chief Coroner of England & Wales  

I  am  also  under  a  duty  to  send  a  copy  of  your  response  to  the  Chief 
Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.  
I  may  also  send  a  copy  of  your  response  to  any  other  person  who  I 
believe may find it useful or of interest.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted 
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who 
he  believes  may  find  it  useful  or  of  interest.  You  may  make 
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about 
the release or the publication of your response. 

9 

DATE                                           SIGNED BY ASSISTANT CORONER 
22 April 2024 

3

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Scape Operations Ltd (PDF)
Scape Operations Ltd 

Managing Director 

Assistant Coroner 

Link Company Matters Limited 
6th Floor 
65 Gresham Street 
London 
EC2V 7NQ 

Inner North London 

St Pancras Coroner’s Court 
Camley Street 

London N1C 4PP 

14th May 2024 

Dear Ms Lee, 

Response to Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths dated 22 April 2024 

I am writing to follow up with a response to your report dated 22nd April 2024 in relation to the tragic incident that took place 30th Sept 2023 

at Scape Bloomsbury. 

Firstly we would like to again pass on our deepest condolences to the family of Mr Chenyang Li, our thoughts are with his family and friends. 

We were not an Interested Person at the Inquest so have not had the benefit of seeing the evidence that you have seen. In that context, we 

have reviewed your report and make the following observations regarding window restrictors at Scape Bloomsbury. 

In line with the guidance set out by the National Code of Standards for Larger Developments for student accommodation not managed and 

controlled by educational establishments (the Code), each window at Scape Bloomsbury is fitted with a window restrictor; these were 

installed as part of the complete refurbishment of the building in 2018.  The building will have received an inspection/sign-off from an 

inspector from The National Code at the time. 

Over and above what is prescribed in the Code, the restrictors are periodically inspected every three months {as part of routine inspections 

of the condition of the student accommodation], with [on the rare occasion} any required remedial works undertaken immediately. This 

information is logged quarterly by the maintenance engineers within the building’s Planned Preventative Maintenance (PPM) system. In 

addition to three-monthly inspections of the window restrictors from within the bedroom, the building’s façade is also periodically visually 

inspected (weekly) to identify any remedial works required which would include windows appearing to be open beyond the tolerance 

allowable by the restrictor. Any issues are remediated immediately and logged by the maintenance team. 

The window restrictors in the room in question were last inspected from inside, and formally signed off within the PPM platform as 

functioning correctly on 18th August 2023. 

We do not therefore propose further action. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 One minor point of clarification. The report is addressed to Scape Operations Ltd. The more appropriate entity to address would have been 
Scape UK Management, as this is the entity responsible for managing the building. Scape UK Management have been made aware of the 

report, and they are in agreement with this response. 

I am hopeful that this answers to the recommendations made in the report, however please do not hesitate to contact me should you 
require any further clarification or should you wish to make any additional recommendations. 

Best regards, 

2

Related reports

Other reports by Melanie Lee

See all →

More reports categorised “Suicide (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Suicide (from 2015)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.