Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0606, written 4 Nov 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 4 Nov 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0606 |
| Deceased | Jagjeet Singh |
| Coroner | Melanie Lee |
| Coroner area | Inner North London |
| Category | Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: Prevention of Future Deaths report
JAGJEET SINGH (died 8 March 2024)
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1. Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Department of Health
and Social Care
2. Chief Executive, NHS England
1
CORONER
I am: Melanie Sarah Lee
Assistant Coroner
Inner North London
St Pancras Coroner’s Court
Camley Street
London N1C 4PP
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009,
paragraph 7, Schedule 5, and The Coroners (Investigations)
Regulations 2013, regulations 28 and 29.
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 18 March 2024 an investigation was commenced into the death of
Jagjeet Singh (age 52 years). The investigation concluded at the end of
the inquest on 29 October 2024. The medical cause of death was 1a.
acute respiratory depression, 1b. fatal morphine and methadone
toxicity, 2. emphysema and bronchopneumonia. The conclusion at
inquest was drug related.
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Jagjeet Singh had a long history of intravenous substance misuse,
associated physical health problems and a mental health diagnosis of
EUPD. He spent long and numerous periods in hospital for his physical
health, self-harm and suicide attempts, drug overdoses and as a
mental health patient. Between 20 August 2023 and 6 March 2024 he
was an inpatient on a mental health ward but spent periods on medical
wards. Following his discharge from hospital, on 7 March 2024 Mr
Singh went to Mr Singh’s home were they drank beer together and Mr
Singh injected heroin. Mr Singh was alive when his friend left the
1
property that evening but when he returned the following day, Mr Singh
was deceased on the kitchen floor with a syringe next to him.
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving
rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur
unless action is taken. In the circumstances, it is my statutory duty to
report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.
Mr Singh was an inpatient on a mental health ward at the Homerton
Hospital from 20 August 2023 until 6 March 2024, initially under s.2 of
the Mental Health Act and then as an informal patient. On three
occasions he spent time on medical wards for infected leg ulcers, arising
from his IV drug use. During these periods his mental health bed was,
understandably, allocated to other patients. However, on discharge from
the medical ward, there was no mental health bed available for him and
he either went home or, as his property was uninhabitable for a period of
time, was accommodated in a Travel Lodge at the cost of the Trust,
returning to the mental health ward for meals and medication. Mr Singh
did not like the Travel Lodge and on one occasion was evicted. He
therefore slept on a coach in the mental health ward and appears to have
spent at least one night sleeping rough.
I heard that a bed on the mental health ward should have been available
for Mr Singh when he was discharged from the medical wards but that
there is a chronic shortage of mental health beds and not just in London
but nationally. It was described to me as a crisis.
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I
believe that you and/or your organisation have the power to take such
action.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date
of this report, namely by 30 December 2024. I, the coroner, may extend
the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain
why no action is proposed.
2
8 COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the following.
•
•
, the Chief Coroner of England & Wales
I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief
Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.
I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I
believe may find it useful or of interest.
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted
or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who
he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about
the release or the publication of your response.
9
DATE SIGNED BY ASSISTANT CORONER
4 November 2024
3
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for
Patient Safety, Women’s Health and Mental Health
39 Victoria Street
London SW1H 0EU
23 December 2024
Our Ref:
Melanie Sarah Lee
Assistant Coroner
Inner North London St
Pancras Coroner’s Court
Camley Street
London
N1C 4PP
Dear Ms Lee
Thank you for your Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths dated 4 November
2024 about the death of Jagjeet Singh. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility
for mental health and patient safety.
Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Jagjeet’s
death and I offer my sincere condolences to his family and loved ones. The
circumstances your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for
bringing these matters to my attention.
I understand your concerns about a bed on the mental health ward not being available
for Mr Singh when he was discharged from the medical wards. I note that you have
also addressed these matters of concern to the Chief Executive of NHS England. I
look forward to seeing her response and working with NHS England where
appropriate, to avoid a repetition of the tragic events of this case.
I recognise the impact that a suitable bed not being available can have on a patient’s
care, as exemplified in Jagjeet’s case.
I am sure you will appreciate that the number of mental health inpatient beds required
to support a local population is dependent on both local mental health need and the
effectiveness of the whole local mental health system in providing timely access to
care and supporting people to stay well in the community, therefore reducing the
likelihood of an inpatient admission being necessary.
I expect individual trusts and local health systems to effectively assess and manage
bed capacity, the ‘flow’ of patients being discharged or moving to another setting and
the availability of specialist personality disorder rehabilitation units. I recognise that
mental health services have been under significant strain in recent years due to the
rise in demand.
Over the past few years, the NHS has been developing the community mental health
framework with the aim of improving community support for people with severe mental
illness, thus avoiding the need for an inpatient admission where possible and freeing
up more beds.
NHS England’s 2024/25 priorities and operational planning guidance reinforces this
focus on improving patient flow as a key priority – with local health systems directed
to reduce the average length of stay in adult acute mental health wards to deliver more
timely access to local beds. And in areas where there is a clear need for more beds,
this has been addressed in part through investment in new units.
It is also important that when people are discharged, this happens in a way that
considers their needs on discharge and any risks to their safety. To help support safe
and timely discharge decisions, the Department published statutory guidance on
Discharge from mental health inpatient settings in January 2024 and which is available
at: Discharge from mental health inpatient settings - GOV.UK
(www.gov.uk). This sets out how health and care systems should work together to
support safe discharge from all mental health and learning disability and autism
inpatient settings for children, young people and adults.
As part of our mission to build an NHS fit for the future, we will make sure more mental
health care is delivered in the community, close to people’s homes, through new
models of care and support, so that fewer people need to go into hospital.
I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my
attention.
Yours sincerely,
Ms Melanie Sarah Lee
Assistant Coroner
Inner North London
St Pancras Coroner’s Court
Camley Street
London
N1C 4PP
Dear Coroner,
National Medical Director
NHS England
Wellington House
133-155 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8UG
24 December 2024
Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Jagjeet Singh who died
on 8 March 2024
Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 4
November 2024 concerning the death of Jagjeet Singh on 8 March 2024. In advance
of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express
my deep condolences to Jagjeet’s family and loved ones. NHS England are keen to
assure the family and the Coroner that the concerns raised about Jagjeet’s care have
been listened to and reflected upon.
Your Report raises concerns over a chronic shortage of inpatient mental health beds,
both within the London region and nationally. In relation to Jagjeet’s care, you have
raised that a bed on the mental health ward should have been available for him when
he was discharged from the medical ward.
The number of mental health beds required to support a local population is dependent
on both local mental health need and the effectiveness of the whole local mental health
system in providing timely access to care and supporting people to stay well in the
community, therefore reducing the likelihood of an admission being necessary.
In some local areas there is a need for more beds, this is being addressed in part
through investment in new units and additionally as part of a whole system
transformation approach. This was supported by the NHS Long Term Plan (LTP),
which saw an additional £2.3 billion funding invested in mental health services from
2019/20 – 2023/24, around £1.3 billion of which was for adult community, crisis and
acute mental health services to help people get quicker access to the care they need
and prevent avoidable deterioration and hospital admission. NHS England’s 2024/25
priorities and operational planning guidance reinforces this focus on improving patient
flow as a key priority – with systems directed to reduce the average length of stay in
adult acute mental health wards in order to deliver more timely access to local beds.
To address the wider system issues that impact on health services, a further £1.6
billion has been made available via the Better Care Fund from 2023-25. This funding
can be used to support mental health inpatient services as well as the wider system
which should help to reduce pressures on local inpatient services, so that those who
need to access beds can do so quickly and locally.
This is being supplemented by a further £42 million recurrent investment from 2024/25
for all Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) in the country to recommission inpatient care, in
line with local models that provide the best evidence of therapeutic support.
My Clinical Quality regional colleagues in London are engaging with North East
London Integrated Care Board on the concerns raised in your Report and system
arrangements for mental health inpatient beds.
I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work
taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are
discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical
Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This
ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of
Jagjeet, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us
to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and
action.
Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please
do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Yours sincerely,
Professor Sir Stephen Powis
National Medical Director
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.