Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0228, written 15 May 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 15 May 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0228 |
| Deceased | Gary Ash |
| Coroner | Nadia Persaud |
| Coroner area | East London |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths |
| Organisation named | Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 2 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
MISS N PERSAUD HER MAJESTY’S CORONER EAST LONDON Walthamstow Coroner's Court, Queens Road Walthamstow, E17 8QP REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: • • , Royal College of Anaesthesia , Head of Clinical Quality The Rt Hon Victoria Atkins MP, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 1 CORONER I am Nadia Persaud area coroner for the coroner area of East London 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 3 INVESTIGATION and INQUEST On 28/09/2019 I commenced an investigation into the death of Gary David Ash (aged 62 years). The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 22nd April 2024. The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative conclusion: Mr Ash’s death was contributed to by an adverse drug reaction following a general anaesthetic that he was not correctly consented for, and by an over administration of fluid whilst in the critical care department. 1 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Mr. Gary Ash suffered from long standing ulcerative colitis. In May 2019 he was referred to the two-week-wait surgical clinic, for anaemia and rectal bleeding. He was seen by a surgeon on 31 May 2019 who advised Mr. Ash that the necessary investigations could be carried out under a general anaesthetic. The Trust policy on seeking consent for a general anaesthetic was not followed. On the balance of probability, had Mr. Ash been carefully consented by an anaesthetist, he would have accepted deep sedation as an effective and safer form of anaesthesia. On the 24 June 2019, Mr. Ash underwent the necessary investigations and, in the absence of a valid consent, received a general anaesthetic. Very shortly after the procedure, he developed signs and symptoms of serotonin syndrome. Serotonin syndrome was not recognised by the treating clinicians and the diagnosis has now been made with the benefit of hindsight and the benefit of expert opinion. The primary differential diagnosis of neuroleptic malignant syndrome was made on 24 June 2019. Mr Ash was admitted to critical care on the evening of 24 June 2019. Due to excessive sweating, Mr. Ash was prescribed a large amount of intravenous fluids. These fluids were not carefully monitored and reviewed. The fluids were not reduced when the sweating decreased and the urine output was noted to be low. Additional boluses of fluids were administered by nursing staff, with no clear rationale. By 1230pm on the 25 June 2019, Mr. Ash had a positive fluid balance of 4.9L. This was recorded, but not acted upon as a red flag. The oxygen level in Mr Ash’s blood was decreasing and need for oxygen increasing on the morning of 25 June 2019. Dantrolene was administered to him as an intravenous infusion. This involved additional fluid administration and during the course of the Dantrolene infusion, Mr Ash suffered a cardiac arrest. It is likely that the cardiac arrest was caused by pulmonary oedema and resultant hypoxaemia. Mr. Ash passed away at Queen's Hospital on the 25 June 2019. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: The Inquest heard evidence from an expert (Professor of Anaesthesia), who has a specialist expertise in adverse drug reactions following anaesthesia and specialist expertise in the conditions of neuroleptic malignant syndrome and malignant hyperthermia. The Professor raised concern, which was reflected in the inquest evidence, in relation to general medical knowledge relating to the following: 1. Management of the condition neuroleptic malignant syndrome, including the inappropriate, off licence, use of Dantrolene. 2. The role of Dantrolene in the development of pulmonary oedema in the presence of intravenous fluid overload. 3. The potential interaction between Dantrolene and Labetalol in relation to the reduction of cardiac contractility. 4. The lack of knowledge around the diagnosis of serotonin syndrome and the risk of it developing following the combined use of Fentanyl and Ondansetron as part of anaesthesia. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you [AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 10 July 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 2 Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the family of Gary David Ash, the Care Quality Commission, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals Trust, MHRA and the local Director of Public Health who may find it useful or of interest. I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it useful or of interest. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response. q 15 May 2024 Ms G N Persaud 3
2 responses published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Our ref: Ms Nadia Persaud Area Coroner East London Coroner’s Court Queens Road Walthamstow E17 8QP By email: Dear Ms Persaud, Minister of State for Health 39 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU 08 August 2024 Thank you for the Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths of 15 May 2024 about the death of Mr Gary David Ash. I am replying as Minister of State for Health (Secondary Care). Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Mr Ash’s death, and I offer my sincere condolences to their family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention. The report raises concerns over: • Management of the condition neuroleptic malignant syndrome, including the inappropriate, off licence, use of Dantrolene; • The role of Dantrolene in the development of pulmonary oedema in the presence of intravenous fluid overload; • The potential interaction between Dantrolene and Labetalol in relation to the reduction of cardiac contractility; • The lack of knowledge around the diagnosis of serotonin syndrome and the risk of it developing following the combined use of Fentanyl and Ondansetron as part of anaesthesia. In preparing this response, Departmental officials have made enquiries with the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), NHS England and the Care Quality Commission (CQC). In your report, you raised a concern regarding the lack of knowledge around the diagnosis of serotonin syndrome and the risk of it developing, following the combined use of Fentanyl and Ondansetron as part of anaesthesia. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is an Executive Agency of the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) with responsibility for the regulation of medicinal products in the UK. The MHRA ensures that medicines are efficacious and acceptably safe, and that any possible side effects which have been recognised to occur with use of a medicine are appropriately described in the authorised product information. Information from MHRA advises that serotonin syndrome and neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) share similar symptoms, and as a result serotonin syndrome has generally been under-diagnosed. Serotonin syndrome is caused by the increased activation of serotonin receptors found in nerve synapses (in which nerve cells connect with other nerve cells), whereas NMS is more closely associated with dopamine activity. Diagnosis of serotonin syndrome was not universally harmonised until 2003 with the introduction of a set of diagnostic criteria known as Hunters Serotonin Toxicity Criteria. The diagnostic criteria include altered mental status, neuromuscular excitation and dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system which controls body systems including the heart, respiratory and urinary systems. These effects can typically occur rapidly within 1 to 6 hours after exposure to a relevant trigger. A similar feature of NMS relating to rigidity is reported only to occur several days after exposure to medication. It can be more difficult to diagnose serotonin syndrome in a patient under general anaesthesia because the signs and symptoms are similar to other perioperative conditions. The MHRA has also provided information regarding Serotonin Syndrome warnings in medicinal product information. The Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) is a summary of a medicinal product’s properties and the conditions for use, written for healthcare professionals and is available online on the MHRA website and in the Electronic Medicines Compendium (EMC). The use of opioids such as fentanyl and the risk of serotonin syndrome when used concomitantly with serotonergic medicines is known and highlighted within the fentanyl Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). The warning was added to the SmPC for fentanyl medicinal products across Europe including in the UK by the European Medicines Agency’s Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) in 2015. Whilst the warning does not specifically refer to a potential for interaction between fentanyl and ondansetron, it should be noted that ondansetron is a serotonin receptor blocker and will prevent the binding of serotonin to its receptor resulting in excess synaptic serotonin. This makes an interaction between fentanyl and ondansetron potentially biologically plausible. A warning is also included in the patient information leaflet provided with all fentanyl medicines advising patients to inform their healthcare professional if they are taking any antidepressants, especially those similar to serotonergic medicines including SSRIs, SNRIs or MAOIs. Patients who are using fentanyl patches are also advised to tell their doctor if they are going to have an operation. This enables health care professionals to be aware of possible signs of serotonin syndrome which can be more difficult to diagnose in a patient under general anaesthesia. The risk of serotonin syndrome when used in combination with serotonergic drugs is also highlighted in the SmPC for ondansetron. One SmPC (PL 04569/0656) for ondansetron that was harmonised with its licence in Ireland in June 2020, contains the additional warning: There are also reports of serotonin syndrome when ondansetron is used concomitantly with opioid/opiate medicines, e.g. buprenorphine. The British National Formulary (BNF) is a joint publication of the British Medical Association and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society and aims to provide prescribers, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals with up-to-date information about the use of medicines. Information is drawn from the manufacturers' product literature, medical and pharmaceutical literature, UK health departments, regulatory authorities, and professional bodies and advice is constructed from clinical literature and reflects, as far as possible, an evaluation of the evidence from diverse sources. The BNF also takes account of authoritative national guidelines and emerging safety concerns, in addition, to receiving advice on all therapeutic areas from expert clinicians to ensure that the BNF's recommendations are relevant to practice. The interaction between fentanyl and ondansetron is included in the BNF under interactions for both ondansetron and fentanyl Ondansetron | Interactions | BNF | NICE. The MHRA’s Yellow Card Scheme primarily acts as an early warning system for the identification of previously unrecognised adverse reactions and also provides valuable information on recognised ADRs, allowing the CHM and MHRA to identify and refine the understanding of risk factors that may affect the clinical management of patients. Up to 21 May 2024, two Yellow Card reports of suspected serotonin syndrome with concomitant use of fentanyl and ondansetron are on the MHRA Yellow Card database. However, neither report provides sufficient information to enable confirmation that the serotonin syndrome resulted from a fentanyl-ondansetron interaction in either patient. The MHRA will continue to undertake signal detection on its database of reports. Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) is a national programme designed to improve the treatment and care of patients through in-depth review of services, benchmarking, and presenting a data-driven evidence base to support change. GIRFT is part of an aligned set of programmes within NHS England. The GIRFT Pre op team have advised that due to the limited information on what anaesthetic was used, what happened and the time scale of the event, it would be difficult to comment. They have also advised that Serotonin syndrome and malignant hyperpyrexia (MH) are both rare. These conditions have similar symptoms. When they precipitate a life-threatening crisis there is no simple test available to make a certain diagnosis. It can be made retrospectively for MH. I understand that the Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust contacted Mr Ash’s next of kin last year, which outlined the progression of actions at that point. Further to this, NHS England has contacted the Trust for any further developments. The Trust has stated that at the time of this incident, they did not have dedicated deep sedation lists for endoscopy. This has now changed, and it now offers deep sedation only for these procedures. There are regular deep sedation lists which are in place since this incident. This is provided by anaesthetists who have the required expertise. There is a deep sedation standard operating procedure in place to ensure this procedure is conducted safely. Additionally, the consent process is more robust and learning from this incident was shared across the division. Following receipt of the Prevention of Future Deaths report for Mr Ash, the CQC also contacted Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust to follow up the concerns raised. The Trust provided an action plan which addressed 22 specific points. The majority of actions related to improvements in clinical governance, such as policies and processes, and these have been completed. There are some actions that remain in progress, and the CQC has, I understand asked the Trust for a further update. The wider questions regarding assurance will be explored through the CQC’s ongoing engagement with the Trust and the CQC will continue to monitor their progress. I hope this response is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention. Yours sincerely, MINISTER OF STATE FOR HEALTH
10 July 2024 Dear Miss Persaud, Re: Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths in the matter of Mr Gary Ash Thank you for sending us a copy of your Regulation 28 Report regarding the sad death of Mr Gary Ash. We have jointly reviewed the information available to us in the report via our Safe Anaesthesia Liaison Group (SALG). SALG is a collaborative project between the Association of Anaesthetists, NHS England’s Patient Safety team and the Royal College of Anaesthetists. One of its core objectives is to analyse anaesthesia- related serious incidents and to share the learning with the specialty across the UK. We have also reviewed the information available with the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine (FICM). Your prevention of future death report raised concerns regarding the general medical knowledge regarding the recognition and treatment of neuroleptic malignant syndrome and serotonin syndrome. While both conditions are very rare, and anaesthetists may expect to go their entire career without treating either condition, we can confirm that anaesthetists and intensivists are taught about these conditions as part of their post-graduate training1,2,3. You specifically highlight knowledge of the “diagnosis of serotonin syndrome and the risk of it developing following the combined use of Fentanyl and Ondansetron as part of anaesthesia.” This combination of drugs is commonly used in anaesthetic practice and the very small risk of developing serotonin syndrome is clearly flagged in many electronic prescription programs, as well as being part of anaesthetic training. SALG publishes regular Patient Safety Updates, which are distributed to all members of the Association of Anaesthetists and Royal College of Anaesthetists. FICM publishes regular Safety Bulletins, which are distributed to all their members. We plan to use both publications to highlight the lessons to be learned from Mr Ash’s death, in particular highlighting educational material relating to the treatment of neuroleptic malignant syndrome and serotonin syndrome. We would be happy to respond to any questions that you might have. Yours Sincerely President, Royal College of Anaesthetists President Association of Anaesthetists Dean Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine References 1. Bartakke, A. et al, Serotonin syndrome in the perioperative period, BJA Education, 20(1): 10e17 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjae.2019.10.003 2. Adnet, P. et al, Neuroleptic malignant syndrome, British Journal of Anaesthesia 85 (1): 129-35 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/85.1.129 3. Baldo, B. and Rose, M., The anaesthetist, opioid analgesic drugs, and serotonin toxicity: a mechanistic and clinical review. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 124 (1): 44e62 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.010
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.