Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Arlo Lambert

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0351, written 2 Jul 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report2 Jul 2024
Reference2024-0351
DeceasedArlo Lambert
CoronerLaurinda Bower
Coroner areaNottingham City and Nottinghamshire
CategoryChild Death (from 2015) · Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Organisation namedSherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

NOTE:  This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1  Chief Executive, Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 

1  CORONER 

I am Laurinda BOWER, Area Coroner for the coroner area of Nottingham City and 
Nottinghamshire 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 13 March 2023, I commenced an investigation into the death of Arlo River Phoenix 
Lambert, aged 5 days.  The investigation concluded at the end of an inquest on 3 May 
2024.  The conclusion of the inquest was that Baby Arlo died on 9 March 2023, at the 
Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, as a result of a hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury, 
sustained during the intrapartum period, and caused by mismanagement of his medical 
care at Kingsmill Hospital. His death was contributed to by neglect. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

Baby Arlo’s Mother attended the Kingsmill Hospital for induction of labour due to a 
diagnosis of suboptimal growth, when in fact, the criteria for such had not been met. 
Labour was slow to establish and doctors failed to recognise Arlo’s compound 
presentation. 

The prolonged labour process increased the risk of infection, resulting in a subclinical 
infection within the membranes with fetal inflammatory response. The infection tiggered a 
placental abruption, with frank bleeding noted at 03.40 hours. The commencement of the 
abruption could have occurred at any time from 02.05 hours when CTG monitoring was 
ceased and Mother was left to rest. The slow progress of labour, distress of compound 
presentation, infection and abruption all contributed to Arlo’s hypoxic brain injury from 
which he died. 

There were multiple missed opportunities to have reduced the period of hypoxia by 
delivering Arlo earlier, and before the final fatal placental abruption, by prioritising progress 
of labour at 10.40 hours, by following the induction of labour process at 12.40 hours, at the 
obstetric review at 17.15 hours, or responding to the first episode of blood-stained liquor at 
21.18 hours or on ward review at 21.43 hours. 

These multiple missed opportunities occurred due to systemic failings including 
discrepancies between local and national clinical guidance, a failure to escalate significant 
clinical events, a failure in communication to handover salient information or to review the 
notes at the commencement of care. 

5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken.  In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 
(brief summary of matters of concern) 

1. The Trust’s Antepartum Haemorrhage guideline gives no sense of urgency when staff are 
faced with a bleed –  here, staff failed to appreciate the potential for a sinister cause of 
bleeding both at 21.18 and later at 03.40, and did not appear to appreciate the fact that a 
volume of the bleeding may well be occult, by the external volume representing only a 
small proportion of the actual blood loss. Miss Al-Samarrai accepted that further work was 
likely to be required in this regard. 

2. Failure to ensure early reflective accounts were captured from key staff in response to 
this significant event and others. I consider this to be a Trust wide issue. The Trust cannot 
begin to rectify patient safety issues, if they do not understand exactly what has happened 
and why. This analysis can only properly occur with the input of those involved in care, and 
in circumstances where those individuals have had the opportunity and support of the Trust 
to capture early written accounts. The Trust currently has no clear system in place to 
facilitate this early capture of relevant accounts. 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or 
your organisation) have the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by August 27, 2024.  I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action.  Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested 
Persons 

Baby Arlo’s family 
Sherwood Forest Hospitals (SFH) – to include King's Mill Hospital, Newark & MCH 

I have also sent it to 

Care Quality Commission 
Department of Health and Social Care 

who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all 
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. 

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or 
of interest. 

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. 
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of 
interest. 

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9  Dated: 02/07/2024 

Laurinda BOWER 
Area Coroner for 
Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Trust (PDF)
Please find below the organisational response from Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS 
Foundation Trust to the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths issued by HM 
Area Coroner for Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire following the inquest into the 
death of Arlo River Phoenix Lambert. 

We reiterate our apology and condolences to Arlo’s family, and we hope this response 
and the implementation of actions reassures HM Coroner and Arlo’s family that the 
necessary changes have been implemented. 

Matters of concern raised within the report and responses for each are as follows: 

1.  The  Trust’s Antepartum  Haemorrhage  guideline  gives  no  sense  of  urgency 
when staff are faced with a bleed – here, staff failed to appreciate the potential 
for  a  sinister  cause  of  bleeding  both  at  21.18  and  later  at  03.40,  and  did  not 
appear to appreciate the fact that a volume of the bleeding may well be occult, 
by the external volume representing only a small proportion of the actual blood 
loss. Miss Al-Samarrai accepted that further work was likely to be required in 
this regard. 

The Trust acknowledges that at the time of the incident, the Antepartum Haemorrhage 
guideline did not support staff in assessing the urgency of the evolving clinical picture 
when bleeding was identified on both occasions, which delayed emergency treatment. 

Actions taken: 

The  Trust  has  reviewed  and  updated  its  Antepartum  Haemorrhage  guideline  to 
emphasise the clinical importance of bleeding in pregnancy, and the requirement for 
an immediate assessment of fetal and maternal condition with any degree of bleeding. 
The  guideline  now  informs  staff  that  best  practice  is  to  treat  bleeding  with  an 
expectation of a worse-case scenario and then de-escalate if appropriate, rather than 
treating  it  as  benign.  The  causes  of  Antepartum  Haemorrhage  section  within  the 
guideline has been amended to highlight that bleeding in pregnancy is not normal and 
can  be  unpredictable,  and  the  expectation  around  quantifying  and  documenting 
repeated episodes of bleeding within the patient record has been added to support the 
ongoing risk assessments.   

The  amended  guideline  received  a  multidisciplinary  review  including  the  obstetric 
service leads, midwifery matrons, and midwifery staff prior to ratification through the 
Maternity and Gynaecology Clinical Governance Meeting.  

Following  ratification  of  the  guideline,  the  updates  have  been  shared  with  all  staff 
members. The guideline updates have been shared via email and in person on shift 
handovers, and all staff have been asked to sign a registration sheet as evidence that 
they have read and understood the amendments. Additional support and training will 
be provided on an individualised basis to staff that do not understand the changes, 
this will be supported by their line manager and the practice development midwives.  

1 

 
 
 
 2.  Failure  to  ensure  early  reflective  accounts  were  captured  from  key  staff  in 
response to this significant event and others. I consider this to be a Trust wide 
issue.  The  Trust  cannot  begin  to  rectify  patient  safety  issues,  if  they  do  not 
understand exactly what has happened and why. This analysis can only properly 
occur with the input of those involved in care, and in circumstances where those 
individuals have had the opportunity and support of the Trust to capture early 
written accounts. The Trust currently has no clear system in place to facilitate 
this early capture of relevant accounts. 

The Trust acknowledges the importance of capturing the early recollection of events 
from staff involved in incidents / significant events and also acknowledges that at the 
time of this incident, a Trust wide process was not in place. The Trust also agree that 
the implementation of a process to capture early accounts need not conflict with any 
MNSI or Patient Safety Incident Response Framework. 

Actions taken: 

The Trust have put in place a system of capturing early Factual Recollection of Events, 
which are a description of involvement in an incident at the time it occurred but are not 
a replacement for the medical record.  

We have designed a template to capture these recollections and a guidance 
document  that provides useful information and support to staff when completing the 
template.  The  guidance  requires  staff  to  review  the  patient’s  notes  when  writing  
the  Factual  Recollection   of   Events,   ensuring   the   report   is   based   on   factual  
evidence   as  documented and reminding them that they should also describe things 
that are not in the notes that might help the investigators understand what happened 
and what can be  learned.  The  guidance  also  describes  how to  store  and  share  
completed  Factual  Recollection of Events templates ensuring that staff understand 
that they will form part of the disclosure bundle as required. 

Robust governance processes around implementation of this new system have been 
followed and include consulting with Divisional Clinical Chairs, Divisional Leadership 
teams and Clinical Governance colleagues, discussion at Patient Safety and Quality 
Committees and a pilot of the process with real time incidents. We have implemented 
an ongoing programme of engagement with staff to ensure that they understand when 
they should complete a Factual Recollection of Events template, the reason behind 
the  request  for  capturing  early  accounts,  and  how  to  access  additional  support 
available  to  assist  in  the  writing  of  the  recollection.  We  have  added  an  additional 
question into our Rapid Review and After Action Review templates, to ensure we are 
sighted to the need to consider the capture of early recollection of event at the time a 
review of the incident is conducted. 

2 

 
 
 
 
 Additional information: 

The Trust’s Maternity department, supported by the Professional Midwifery Advocates, 
are reviewing the immediate responses taken following an incident as defined within 
the  Trusts  Incident  Reporting  Policy  and  are  planning  to  introduce  the  Edinburgh 
Emergency Medicine ‘STOP 5’ moments for ‘Hot Debriefs’. This will enable clinicians 
involved  in  an  incident  to  have  a  5-minute  team  debrief  immediately  following  an 
incident.  During  this  team  debrief,  the  need  to  complete  a  Factual  Recollection  of 
Events will be highlighted to relevant staff and will provide the clinicians with a space 
to  discuss  what  went  well  and  the  opportunities  to  improve.  The  debrief  will  be 
documented and saved on the Incident reporting system, 

In addition to the Trust guideline changes explained above, a telephone assessment 
section  has  been  included  within  the  Antepartum  Haemorrhage  guideline.  This 
includes the need to consider transfer into hospital by ambulance and highlights the 
need  to  prepare  the  midwifery  coordinator  and  obstetric  staff  in  preparation  for  an 
incoming admission.   

Antepartum Haemorrhage cases will continue to be reviewed through our ‘triggers’  
incident  review  meeting,  to  ensure  that  the  recommendations  within  the  updated  
guideline  are  being  followed.  ‘Triggers’  is  a  weekly  multidisciplinary  case  review  
meeting where there are set criteria for cases to be reviewed and membership 
includes  Obstetricians,  Matron  for  Maternity  Governance,  specialist  midwives  
including  the  Fetal Monitoring Lead, Audit Lead and Clinical Governance Midwives, 
incidents are  then escalated in line with the Incident Reporting Policy. The Triggers 
meeting is an  open forum for staff members to attend for their own learning, and 
aims to identify  learning  from  incidents,  along  with  identification  of  cases  further  
escalation  and  investigation. Cases will also be escalated into regional and national 
conversations as  appropriate. 

The Maternity team are currently developing an Antepartum Haemorrhage scenario 
video that includes role play of a phone call in progress whilst a midwife completes the 
Birmingham  Symptom  Specific  Obstetric  Triage  System (BSOTS) 
telephone 
proforma. This consists of a prompt and brief assessment (triage) of women when they 
present  with  unexpected  problems  or  concerns,  and  then  a  standardised  way  of 
determining the clinical urgency in which they need to be seen. This will be available 
for staff members to access anytime and has been included within our BSOTS Training 
Needs Analysis (TNA). 

August 2024 

3

Related reports

Other reports by Laurinda Bower

See all →

More reports categorised “Child Death (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.