Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2025
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2025-0080, written 17 Dec 2025. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 17 Dec 2025 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2025-0080 |
| Deceased | Anthony Binfield |
| Coroner | Laurinda Bower |
| Coroner area | Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire |
| Category | Suicide (from 2015) · State Custody related deaths |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
REGULATION 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 1. , HMP Lowdham Grange, Nottingham 1 CORONER I am Miss Laurinda Bower, Area Coroner, for the coroner area of Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire 2 CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 3 INVESTIGATION On 7 March 2023, I commenced an investigation into the death of Anthony Binfield. The inquest has not yet completed. 4 CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH Anthony Binfield died as a result of ligature asphyxiation inside his cell on H wing, Houseblock 2, at HMP Lowdham Grange, Nottinghamshire, at 22.19 hours on Monday 6 March 2023. At 21.23 hours, while undertaking an NPS log check, a prison officer found that Anthony had covered his cell observation panel from the inside. Contrary to the expected policy and guidance in place at the time, the officer left the cell after gaining no response to knocking and returned to the office to collect the inundation unit key. He returned to Anthony’s cell and attempted to remove the inundation unit from the door but was unable to do so. He returned to the office again and arranged for a member of the security team to assist him with removing the inundation unit. Eventually, after 11 minutes, the obstruction was moved by officers via the inundation hole, whereupon they discovered Anthony was hanging from a ligature. He could not be resuscitated. There was an 11-minute delay between prison staff learning Anthony was unresponsive to knocking and banging, and subsequently entering his cell. This delay is unacceptable and contrary to local policy and guidance. It will be for the jury to determine whether this delay probably more than minimally contributed to his death. 5 CORONER’S CONCERNS During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows. – (1) Prison staff failing to manage the covering of cell observation panels in a 1 safe way that is compliant with the policy and guidance issued by the prison over many years. I am taking the exceptional step of writing to you formally before the conclusion of the inquest as I am so concerned by the evidence called to date regarding the custom and practice of officers when discovering obscured cell observation panels at night. There is a dangerous culture of staff assuming the prisoner has obscured the observation panel for privacy purposes or as a form of protest against the regime. This neglects the obvious and very real risk that the prisoner is seeking to harm themselves, without detection. The HMPPS Safety Nudge, issued in February 2018, made clear that cell observation panels are a vital tool in keeping prisoners safe and must be kept clear at all times in order to preserve life. The custom and practice of seeking to visualise the prisoner via the inundation unit hole (and other means, such as the side of the door) has developed over time and is now an embedded culture accepted by many officers as a response to this occurrence. This practice leads to delay in entering the cell, risks lives and is contrary to policy. This is not a new issue for the prison and hence my concern that the prison has failed to tackle this issue over many years. In August 2020, a prisoner died at HMP Lowdham Grange as a result of drug use. When officers conducted a welfare check they found his cell observation panel to be obscured. Contrary to policy and guidance, Prison staff delayed entering the cell while they fetched the inundation unit key to attempt to observe inside the cell. The Prison and Probation Ombudsman made a recommendation to the Prison Director that they should ensure that observation panels are kept clear, and that staff actively challenge prisoners who cover them. In response, the Prison Director issued a notice to staff in January 2021 reminding staff of the need to treat any prisoner as unresponsive if they fail to acknowledge the officer, and to call a code blue. A similar notice was issued in April 2021, reminding staff of the need to perform a dynamic risk assessment and enter the cell in a quick and safe manner when there is no response to asking the prisoner to remove the offending item. The notice was re-issued in November 2021, and after the inquest in approximately April 2023. Despite these multiple notices, a number of witnesses who remain members of staff at the prison (now under HMPPS employ) reported being unaware of the expected procedure when faced with an obscured cell observation panel until attending Anthony’s inquest in December 2024. It is clear that the issuing of staff notices has not addressed the problem of prisoners covering their cell hatches, nor the unsafe custom and practice of staff leaving the cell and thereby delaying safe entry. 6 ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion urgent action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action. 7 YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 11 February 2025. I, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 8 COPIES and PUBLICATION I am delaying the publication of this report until the conclusion of the inquest so as not to prejudice the jury who are currently empanelled. I shall send a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the Interested Persons. 2 I am also under a duty to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response. The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. She may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 9 17 December 2024 Miss Laurinda Bower, HM Area Coroner 3
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Director General Operations
HM Prison and Probation Service
8th Floor Ministry of Justice
102 Petty France
London
SW1H 9AJ
14 February 2025
Miss Laurinda Bower
HM Area Coroner
Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire
The Council House
Old Market Square
Nottingham
NG1 2DT
Dear Miss Bower,
Thank you for your Regulation 28 report of 17 December 2024 addressed to the Governor
of HMP Lowdham Grange following evidence heard at the inquest into the death of Mr
Anthony Binfield who died at the prison on 6 March 2023 when the prison was managed by
Sodexo. I am responding on behalf of His Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS)
as Director General of Operations.
I know that you will share a copy of this response with Mr Binfield’s family, and I would like
to express my condolences for their loss. Every death in custody is a tragedy and the safety
of those in our care is my absolute priority.
Following evidence heard at the inquest you have raised a concern about blocked
observation panels and how staff manage this challenge, and I share your concern. The
covering of observation panels represents a threat to the safety of prisoners, the safety of
staff and the security of the prison.
It is crucial that staff carry out regular safety checks on prisoners when they are locked in
their cells. Every time staff approach a prisoner’s cell they must ensure that the observation
panel is clear of obstruction in case of an emergency situation. The obscuring of
observation panels is a constant challenge across the prison estate as prisoners continue to
cover and block observation panels for a variety of reasons, including for privacy and
decency. However, HMPPS has a clear stance on the issue and all prisons must set out to
staff what action should be taken if an observation panel is found to be covered or blocked.
I have received assurances from the Governing Governor of HMP Lowdham Grange that
since the prison formally became a public sector prison in August 2024, action has been
taken to increase staff confidence, skills and understanding of relevant policies and
procedures. The prison recognises the inherent risks of blocked observation panels and has
taken a number of proactive steps to ensure that staff and prisoners understand the
importance of the panels remaining uncovered at all times. There is now a specific
reference made to the blocking of observation panels within the Incentives Policy
Framework. This means that prisoners who continue to block observation panels may
receive warnings, loss of privileges; or other formal sanctions awarded by a governor grade
during a formal adjudication process.
It has been made clear to staff and prisoners that the covering of observation panels is
unacceptable. This message is regularly communicated to staff through face-to-face
briefings where staff have been reminded of the action that must be taken in circumstances
where a response cannot be elicited from a prisoner and where visual observations of the
inside of the cell cannot be made. This issue was the subject of notices to staff and a
Governor’s order on a number of occasions last year, and the most recent reminder was
published in January 2025. In addition to regular reminders, all new staff and Operational
Support Grades (OSGs) at the prison now receive a briefing on observation panels during
their induction period.
It is vital that prisoners also recognise the importance of observation panels remaining clear
and the consequences they could face if they choose to block them. This message has
been conveyed to the prisoner population through video messages over the last 12 months,
with the most recent video message published in January 2025.
In recognition of the fact that blocked observation panels have featured in previous deaths
in custody at the prison, a new local prevention of future deaths (PFD) meeting has been
established to ensure that matters of concern are kept under review and the enforcement of
messages and action from continued learning are discussed regularly.
Thank you again for bringing your concerns to my attention. I trust that my response
underscores a commitment to reducing the prevalence of this behaviour and provides
assurance that action is being taken by the Governing Governor to address this matter at
the prison.
Yours sincerely
Director General of Operations
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.