Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Ruth Eggleton

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0354, written 3 Jul 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report3 Jul 2024
Reference2024-0354
DeceasedRuth Eggleton
CoronerAmanda Bewley
Coroner areaNottingham City and Nottinghamshire
CategoryOther related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

Regulation 28: REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

NOTE:  This form is to be used after an inquest. 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

1  National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 

1  CORONER 

I am Amanda BEWLEY, HM Assistant Coroner for the coroner area of Nottingham City and 
Nottinghamshire 

2  CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and 
regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 10 May 2023, I commenced an investigation into the death of Ruth Diane Eggleton. 

The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 2 July 2024. 

The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative conclusion: 

Ruth Diane Eggleton fell whilst gardening, sustaining a head injury. Rivaroxaban was not withheld 

or reversed, and Mrs Eggleton was discharged from hospital on 2 April 2023, both of which more 

than  minimally,  negligibly  or  trivially  contributed  to  her  death  from  traumatic  subdural 

haemorrhage. 

4  CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

On 2 April 2023, Ruth Diane Eggleton fell in her garden, sustaining a brain injury. A CT head scan 

undertaken  on  2  April  2023  revealed  a  small  subdural  haemorrhage.  Mrs  Eggleton  was 

anticoagulated  with  Rivaroxaban  which  was neither reversed  nor discontinued  on  2 April  2023. 

Mrs Eggleton was discharged from hospital on 2 April 2023. 

Had  Mrs  Eggleton  remained  in  hospital  for  neurological  observations  in  accordance  with  NICE 

guidelines, she would have more than likely survived as those observations would have revealed 

Mrs  Eggleton’s  deterioration  early  on  which  would  have  led  to  reversal  and  cessation  of 

Rivaroxaban,  and  allowed  for  surgical  evacuation  of  the  haemorrhage  before  Diane  was  too 

neurologically  compromised.  The  subdural  haemorrhage  continued  to  ooze,  contributed  to  by 

ongoing anticoagulation with Rivaroxaban. The continuation of Rivaroxaban more than minimally 

contributed to Mrs Eggletons’ death. 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5  CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the investigation my inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. In 
my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken.  In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 
(brief summary of matters of concern) 

1. There is a lack of evidence-based protocol for determining when to withhold and/or reverse 
DOAC, and when to prescribe alternative anticoagulant medication. I heard evidence from 
clinicians that the lack of such a protocol has led to divergence of practice amongst clinicians. 

I am not reassured that necessary actions to address the serious issue identified are in place. 

6  ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you (and/or your 
organisation) have the power to take such action. 

7  YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by August 27, 2024.  I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the 
timetable for action.  Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8  COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons 

Doncaster & Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals 
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals 

I have also sent it to 

Department of Health and Social Care DHSC 
The Royal College of Surgeons 
The Society of British Neurological Surgeons 
Royal College of Pathologists 
British Society of Haematology 
Royal Society of Medicine 
The Royal College of Physicians 
British Cardiac Society 

who may find it useful or of interest. 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all 
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it. 

I may also send a copy of your response to any person who I believe may find it useful or of 
interest. 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form. 
He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of 
interest. 

You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response about the 
release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner. 

9  Dated: 03 July 2024 

Amanda BEWLEY 
HM Assistant Coroner for 
Nottingham City & Nottinghamshire 

Regulation 28 – After Inquest 
Document Template Updated 30/07/2021

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Nice (PDF)
2nd Floor 
2 Redmond Place 
London 
E20 1JQ 
United Kingdom 

22 August 2024 

Ms Amanda Bewley 
Assistant Coroner for Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire 
Nottingham City Council 
Council House 
Old Market Square 
Nottingham 
NG1 2DT 

Sent via email: 

Our ref: 

Dear Ms Bewley, 

I write in response to your regulation 28 report, regarding the very sad death of Mrs 
Ruth Eggleton. I would like to express my sincere condolences to Mrs Eggleton’s 
family.  

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has reflected on the 
circumstances surrounding Mrs Eggleton’s death and the concerns raised in your 
report regarding the lack of an evidence-based protocol for determining when to 
withhold and/or reverse a DOAC, and when to prescribe alternative anticoagulant 
medication. 

We agree that consideration should be given to reversing and withholding 
anticoagulation when a person prescribed these medications experiences significant 
bleeding. The reason for anticoagulation (which is not mentioned in your report) must 
be balanced against the estimated risk of further bleeding. In rare cases, alternative 
anticoagulation may be considered. Unfortunately, there is very little research 
evidence on which guidelines relevant to this complex decision could be based, and 
a high degree of clinical judgement is required in each case.  

NICE has some published guidance relevant to this topic, for example in 
recommendation 1.5.13 of our guideline on head injury: assessment and early 
management [NG232] we cross-reference the MHRA safety advice on DOACs for a 
list of reversal agents and NICE's technology appraisal guidance on andexanet alfa 
for reversing anticoagulation from apixaban or rivaroxaban. However, it is impractical 
for NICE to develop useful and useable guidance in circumstances where high-
quality evidence is lacking, and decisions must be carefully tailored to the individual 
circumstances of each patient.     

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 NICE will continue to monitor new evidence in this area of practice, and will develop 
or update our guidance accordingly. 

Please do let me know if you require any further information and again, I offer my 
sincerest condolences to Mrs Eggleton’s family.  

Yours sincerely, 

Chief Medical Officer, Deputy CEO and Interim Director of the Centre for Guidelines 

                                                                                                                                 Page | 2

Related reports

Other reports by Amanda Bewley

See all →

More reports categorised “Other related deaths”

See all →

Track Amanda Bewley

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Amanda Bewley, and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.