Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024
Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0386, written 18 Jul 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.
| Date of report | 18 Jul 2024 |
|---|---|
| Reference | 2024-0386 |
| Deceased | Anna Elliot |
| Coroner | Melanie Lee |
| Coroner area | Inner North London |
| Category | Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths · Suicide (from 2015) |
| Source | judiciary.uk record · original PDF |
| Responses published | 1 |
Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.
Regulation 28: Prevention of Future Deaths report
Anna Vivien Elliott (died 24 November 2021)
THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO:
1. East London Foundation Trust (ELFT)
1
CORONER
I am: Melanie Sarah Lee
Assistant Coroner
Inner North London
St Pancras Coroner’s Court
Camley Street
London N1C 4PP
2
CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS
I make this report under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009,
paragraph 7, Schedule 5, and The Coroners (Investigations)
Regulations 2013, regulations 28 and 29.
3
INVESTIGATION and INQUEST
On 30 November 2011 an investigation was commenced into the death
of Anna Vivien Elliott aged 26 years. The investigation concluded at the
end of the inquest on 20 June 2024. The jury made a determination at
inquest Anna suffered from severe and recurrent depression and took
her own life. They also found that her death was contributed to by
neglect.
4
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH
Anna had severe recurrent depression with psychotic features and
autism spectrum disorder. During an inpatient mental health admission
in June and July 2021, Anna had benefitted from ECT treatment. A
further course of ECT was arrange for Anna as an outpatient but this
was postponed on 22 November 2021. This had a negative effect on
Anna, including a deterioration of her mental state.
On 23 November 2021 Anna was detained under s.2 of the Mental
Health Act due to having thoughts and plans to end her life. She was
1
transferred to Roman Ward at the Mile End Hospital in the early hours
of 24 November.
In the afternoon of 24 November 2021 Anna was found with a non-fixed
ligature whilst on general observations. Staff risk assessed her, placed
her on intermittent 15 minute observations and put in place a safety
plan which included locking Anna’s bedroom to ensure she spent the
day in communal areas. The safety plan meant in practical terms that
she was being observed most, if not all of the time, by staff.
The jury found that there was an inadequate handover from day to
night shift. There were also inadequate staffing levels on the night shift
across the mental health unit, including Roman Ward. One of the
support workers allocated to undertake safe and supportive
observations on Roman Ward left to attend two emergency calls on
other wards. Her colleagues were not aware that she had left the ward.
This resulted in a failure of staff to undertake Anna’s observations
between 9.03pm and 9.48pm and 9.48pm and 10.58pm. However, the
observation record was filled out to record that the observations had
been conducted.
A decision was made to let Anna into her room at 9.03pm. The jury
found that there was inadequate consideration given to changing her
safety plan including no conversations had, no questions asked about
Anna’s mood and no risk assessment undertaken. Despite the planned
continuation of 15 minute intermittent observations from day to night
shift, the change in her safety plan meant there was a change in how
Anna was to be observed during the night shift. This was inadequately
appreciated, inadequately considered and not risk assessed.
Anna was found in her room at 10:58pm with non-fixed ligatures made
from nightwear and contraband items. She was pronounced deceased
at 11:57pm.
During the inquest ELFT made candid and helpful admissions.
5
CORONER’S CONCERNS
During the course of the inquest, the evidence revealed matters giving
rise to concern. In my opinion, there is a risk that future deaths will occur
unless action is taken. In the circumstances, it is my statutory duty to
report to you.
The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows.
Concern 1
There were issues with record keeping across the board. Including, a
telephone call from Anna’s mother reporting concerning messages was
not recorded or passed on; an entry relating to a different patient was
2
recorded in Anna’s records; staff were sharing log on details or not
logging off from their account (also raising data protection concerns); and
the written handover document was inadequate, failing to record vital
information.
Concern 2
The Trust’s policy is very clear on what should be recorded on the safe
and supportive observation charts. In addition, all of the witnesses could
explain in evidence, the expectation and what good practice looks like.
However, only one staff member’s entries met this expectation. All of the
other entries that I was taken to simply recorded Anna’s location at the
time of the observation. I heard evidence that observation records are
audited for quality and entries raised with staff if they do not meet
expectations. However, this process of auditing was in place at the time
of Anna’s death and the observation entries of the senior nurses
responsible for that auditing were of the same poor quality.
Concern 3
In Anna’s case, safe ad supportive observations were missed. This is, at
least, in part due to high acuity on the unit as a whole on the night of
Anna’s death, a support worker undertaking those observations being
called away to an emergency and her colleagues reporting being
unaware that she had left the ward. I heard evidence about steps that
have been put in place to prevent observations being missed but the data
provided by the Trust appeared to show that missed observations are
rising and not decreasing. However, the data provided was out of date
and the PFD witness was unable to interpret what was provided. I heard
evidence about a strong focus on safety, openness and honesty
following Anna’s death. I am therefore unclear whether the data reflects
a true rise in missed observations or whether it is the result of more
honest reporting of missed observations by staff on the ground.
Concern 4
In Anna’s case, observation records were backfilled despite the
observations not having been conducted. All of the witnesses who gave
evidence had received training, were aware of a previous PFD on
missed and falsified observations, could tell me the purpose and
importance of the observations, knew that observations should not be
falsified and knew that if observations were missed, this should be
reported that to the nurse in charge. I was also provided with
screenshots of training which included a message from the Chief Nurse
appearing to be dated May 2024 which refer to “an increase in
occasions where observation records have not been completed but
records falsified to reflect that they had been done”. As the spot checks
described to me only look at the quality and timings of the written
observations, I am not reassured that records are not still being falsified
or about how this is being identified and addressed.
Concern 5
3
A safety plan had been agreed with Anna and put in place in the
afternoon of 24 November 2021. This worked well and was a good
example of staff thinking about Anna’s safety and the best strategy in the
context of least restrictive practice. However, during the night shift, that
safety plan was ended without a formal (or any adequate) risk
assessment taking place. In accordance with the Trust’s policy, safe and
supportive observation levels cannot be decreased without the input of a
doctor. I remain unclear whether the same applies to other measures
contained in safety plans and the PFD witness was unable to confirm the
position.
6
ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN
In my opinion, action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I
believe that your organisations have the power to take such action.
7
YOUR RESPONSE
You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date
of this report, namely by 12 September 2024. I, the coroner, may extend
the period.
Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be
taken, setting out the timetable for action. Otherwise you must explain
why no action is proposed.
8
COPIES and PUBLICATION
I have sent a copy of my report to the following.
• Family of Anna Elliott
• Her Honour Judge Alexia Durran, the Chief Coroner of England &
Wales
• Nursing and Midwifery Council
• CQC
The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted
or summary form. She may send a copy of this report to any person who
she believes may find it useful or of interest. You may make
representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about
the release or the publication of your response.
9
DATE SIGNED BY ASSISTANT CORONER
4
18 July 2024
5
1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.
Office of the Chief Medical Officer Trust Headquarters Robert Dolan House 5th Floor 9 Alie Street London E1 8DE Telephone: Email: Website: http://www.elft.nhs.uk Private & Confidential HMC Melanie Lee By email only: 24 September 2024 Dear Madam RE: REGULATION 28 REPORT 1. This is a formal response to your Regulation 28 report issued on 18 July 2024 where you set out concerns relating to the care of late Ms Anna Elliott under the East London NHS Foundation Trust’s (the ‘Trust’s’) care. 2. I understand that at the inquest into Ms Elliott’s death, you heard evidence from the Trust’s Borough Lead Nurse (‘BLN’) for Tower Hamlets outlining the learning that has taken place because of her death. I understand that you remained concerned about the risk of future deaths in relation to the following areas: Concern 1 – Record Keeping Concern 2 – Quality of Observation Records Concern 3 – Missed Observations Concern 4 – Falsified Observations Concern 5 – Safety Plans 3. I am writing to assure you and the family of Ms Elliott that the Trust has carefully reviewed the issues highlighted within the Regulation 28 Report and has planned the actions outlined below. RESPONSE Concern 1: Record Keeping 4. I was concerned to hear evidence that there were several areas with record keeping issues. I will address these in turn. Chief Executive: Chair: Phone calls to Home Treatment Team regarding patients 5. The Tower Hamlets Crisis Services acknowledge that on 23 November 2021 the calls made by Ms Elliott’s mother to the Home Treatment Team (HTT) were not recorded in the RiO medical records or passed on. 6. Steps are now in place to ensure calls are not missed: the administrators’ office will now be covered with admin staff during the team handover from 14:00 to 16:00 to ensure calls are not missed. 7. 8. In addition, HTT staff will be offering carers and significant others a check-in/follow up call for support as needed. An escalation process has been put in place to improve communication within and outside of the team. It is now the case that the shift co-ordinator has the patient/carer phone at all times or allocates it to a named staff member whose identity is then documented on a log for reference. Patient progress notes 9. There will inevitably be cases of human error where entries may be recorded incorrectly. Currently, the Management of Incorrect Entries Policy sets out how to remove an incorrect entry. Members of staff detecting an incorrect entry should take steps to correct it as per the policy. 10. The Trust has a robust Clinical Record Keeping Policy in place. The auditing functions behind a RiO progress note entry contain detailed information on who made a note, on behalf of whom, when they made it as well as the same details for any update to that note. This effectively serves as an electronic signature on that note. Smartcards 11. I was concerned to learn that some staff members were not following data protection guidelines through sharing log in details with other staff members and leaving smartcards unattended. When joining the Trust, staff are issued a smartcard and they will receive information on how to keep their smartcard safe; this includes never allowing anyone else to use it. This message is further reiterated in RiO training sessions. 12. Data Security Awareness training also covers managing devices. As of 3 September 2024, Tower Hamlets training compliance with this training is currently 94.27%. The Directorate has since reminded staff on how to keep smartcards safe (via email on 2nd September 2024) with a plan for Matrons to reiterate this message at Away Days (team meetings) by the 30th of November 2024. Chief Executive: Chair: Handover documentation 13. Tower Hamlets is currently working on creating a standardised handover template. This project is being led by the Deputy Borough Lead Nurse. The aim is to have a running document over a 24- hour period. The handover template has been tested on some of the wards and is currently being rolled out to the remaining wards. Roll out should be completed by the end of September 2024. The Matron responsible for ward will be responsible for the initial audit daily, this will be audited by the Lead Nurses quarterly. 14. In addition, the Trust will continue to use Safety Huddles as a way of discussion and decision making during a shift. Safety Huddle discussions will be documented on the handover template. This will ensure vital information during a shift is captured in the handover documentation. Concern 2: Quality of Observation Records 15. The expectations of recording entries in safe and supportive observation charts has been brought up at the Directorate’s safety discussions. 16. The issues with the quality of observations have also been discussed with Ward Matrons in governance meetings. 17. The Directorate has now adjusted spot check data to be specific around quality of observations. It will begin collecting data from September 2024. 18. It is mandatory for inpatient nursing staff to attend online training on intermittent observations on ELA (ELFT Learning Academy). It is part of a suite of essential training and also includes Honesty in Documentation training. Compliance is monitored via individual staff ELA records or monthly training reports. 19. The Trust is currently developing a new E-observations (e-obs) platform which has in-built prompts to ensure staff capture the location of a patient, what they observe and their interactions with a patient. Daily spot checks will be undertaken by the clinical nurse manager or the most senior nurse on shift out of hours. It is hoped that this will be in place in the coming six months. Chief Executive: Chair: Concerns 3 and 4: Missed and falsified Observations 20. I apologise that the most up to date data was not provided during the inquest hearing in relation to missed observations. It has come to my attention that the data from an old presentation was used. Going forward we are using power BI (a Microsoft data application) to capture up-to-date information in a consistent and easily accessible fashion. 21. The Trust has undertaken (and continues to undertake) a significant amount of work in relation to both missed and falsified observations. Tables setting this out are provided below. Improvement work already undertaken at the time of writing Overarching theme Therapeutic engagement and observation improvement work undertaken Staffing/ availability resource Staff establishment reviews were undertaken in 22/23 and 23/24. Correct and agreed investments have gone into teams, increasing staff on each shift by one unregistered Band 3. Additional investment has been made for a Band 4 Life Skills Recovery Worker on Mondays to Fridays 9am to 5pm to increase the delivery of activities and opportunities for meaningful engagement. A proactive recruitment campaign has been ongoing with services moving to zero registered vacancies and a review of the unregistered workforce (correct band and skill). Staffing rotas for the wards have been reviewed and updated to reflect safer staffing requirements; senior approval of rotas is required six weeks in advance of the current period and quarterly rota monitoring meetings are in place. Escalation protocols have been developed for use to guide staff when there are not sufficient resources in place to meet care needs. Chief Executive: Chair: Staff competency The Inpatient Safety Suite of training is now ‘live’ and classed as essential for all inpatient nursing staff. This gives the ability to have oversight of compliance via Trust-wide training reporting. This suite includes training on observations and honesty in documentation. Honesty in Documentation training was developed in Dec 2023 and rolled out face to face across all inpatient services over the period from December 2023 to April 2024. A pilot of Trust-wide clinical induction started in August 2024. Prior to this, comprehensive clinical inductions were being done in directorates. This Trust-wide approach supports consistency of material and ensures core learning on commencement of clinical roles. Non substantive staff (bank staff) are booked to attend and have access to protected study time to achieve the same competencies as substantive staff. Trust-wide learning lessons seminars open to all staff focus on areas of learning and improvement from incidents or identified areas of good practice. Safety discussion sessions are facilitated weekly in directorates for all inpatient staff to review observation data, reflect on gaps in practice and disseminate learning. Time to Think forums in directorates are well established. These are held monthly in directorates, led by lead nurses and are open to all staff within the inpatient service. They are a protected resource for teams to reflect on their practice, understand work as it happens using data and clinical examples, and generate discussions to inform learning and next steps. Chief Executive: Chair: Quality improvement A Trust-wide Quality Improvement programme which involved all 54 wards, their staff teams and service users across the Trust, and ran over a period of 18 months, was undertaken from September 2022 and led to three agreed interventions. The aim was to improve consistency of completed observations and shift the culture of observation practice. The three change ideas agreed to move into standard practice were: Board relay- this idea is based on the concept of a baton relay – you never let go of the baton until you pass it onto the next person. The board relay is related to general observations and intermittent observations only and aims to reduce the risk of observations being missed and improve handover of clinical information between staff undertaking the observations Twilight shifts- this shift pattern adds an extra member of staff to requirements for a shift. The hours reflect periods where there is reduced structured activity (after 5PM) and covers the early part of a night shift. Staff undertaking these shifts lead on offering therapeutic interventions in the form of activities to service users on the ward. Zonal observations- zonal observations allows an alternative method of observation, which involves designating the ward into different zones where allocated staff observe and engage with patients individually and as groups for set periods of time. This is to allow for continuous engagement with patients and monitor environment and patient dynamics over a 12hour shift. Zonal observations can be plotted against certain times or functions dependent on the ward layout and key tasks relevant to the service user group A digital application to document observations (using Microsoft PowerApps) has been developed and is in the testing phase. It is planned that this will be piloted from October 2024 on four wards and then scaled across all inpatient units. Standards of Expected standards of practice have been communicated to staff, with frequent updates professional practice on improvement work since 2021 to date. In 2023, this specifically addressed accountability and responsibility for accurately documenting observations. It included the importance of honesty in documentation and gave guidelines for staff to follow for occasions when observations were missed. The Trust-wide Quality Improvement programme described above has introduced the observation relay board to reduce incidents of observations being left or not handed over. Audit and monitoring The Standard Observation Measurement (SOM) Tool was developed for oversight of rates of completion of all observations. Individual ward teams and directorates can access and use their data to drive continued improvement. Local governance systems exist to ensure changes to practice are embedded. Night visits are undertaken by senior staff in directorates to monitor practice through spot check audits and observing work as it happens. Chief Executive: Chair: Inpatient Ward Since 2023 a new safety culture self-assessment process has been incorporated into the Safety Culture Improvement Work Quality Assurance annual review process for each in-patient team across ELFT. Annually, staff complete an anonymous survey based on each component safety culture element. A bespoke team report on the safety culture results is then shared back to directorates and teams (where enough responses are received) with advice/signposting to where steps can be taken to strengthen safety culture. The survey tool results are then discussed in team away-days and meetings with teams, enabling local leaders to focus on areas where improvements need to be made. All of our mental health inpatient wards have been participating in this process, with good engagement and over 800 responses have been collected from across all directorates and wards. Next steps are to seek service user perspectives to triangulate and strengthen the safety culture intelligence available to the teams. The Trust is involved in the Cavendish Square community of practice attended by Chief Nurses and are applying to enrol in a new NHS England 90-day collaborative around Enhanced Therapeutic observations. Further planned improvement work Areas for further development Recommended improvement work Staffing/ resource availability Continue to review escalation protocols to senior staff on site in response to changes in acuity or demand or if there are staff shortages on a shift. This is to include: Task prioritisation and allocation; A mechanism for swift deployment of resources to meet demand and robust reporting where care delivery is compromised. knowledge Staff and capability To improve the robustness and governance of systems for the temporary/bank nursing workforce. This would include better oversight of training compliance and support offered (supervision and reflective practice). Continued work on honesty in documentation. Chief Executive: Chair: Professional practice Review and relaunch use of SOM tool and outputs to impact on practice. Further explore possible tools for assurance against falsification of observation that does not rely on CCTV, although this may be difficult to design. This should include a review of national improvement workstreams. A review of night-shift culture engaging staff and service users and observing work as done. Design standards for night shift practice and a mechanism for assurance including senior night visits. A review of findings from the service user experience of observations qualitative audit tool. The introduction of the Loop App will ensure that only staff with the required competencies for each clinical area are able to book onto bank shifts. Building on the Quality Improvement work around therapeutic engagement and observations, in June 2024 ELFT commissioned an external Human Factors and Patient Safety Consultant to undertake an analysis of observations practice on our mental health In-Patient Wards to better understand observations practice from a human factors/systems approach, and to provide redesign ideas to address any gaps, pain points and workarounds that exist. Once the work has been completed, senior leadership review of the findings and suggested improvements of the Human Factors Analysis work. Communication To continue the Trust-wide campaign and consistent program of communications to staff discouraging the falsification of observations, encouraging honest reporting and improving staff awareness of reporting requirements for missed observations. Observation practice To maintain involvement in the Cavendish Square community of practice attended by Chief Nurses to develop new approaches and adopt learning Developing the second phase of quality improvement work to include collaborative work with the whole MDT to identify alternatives to observations during working hours. This would require a significant cultural shift away from observations, which will require a significant project to be undertaken Trust-wide. Learning system To develop a learning system that includes learning from incidents and improvement work internally, but that also links in with national work in relation to observations practice. To design an internal governance process for the review of reported cases of missed observations and learning that arises from this,that will report into the Patient Safety and Quality Assurance committees. An Executive-led improvement board will monitor actions and agreed plans. Chief Executive: Chair: Standardised processes To develop a consistent approach to supporting staff to learn from incidents involving poor observations practice through reflection, personal accountability and if indicated onward referral to regulatory body. This will be followed in parallel to the Trust Disciplinary process. Electronic Observations The e-obs platform being developed will support with improving completion of observations as the system will record any delayed observations records that are entered, reducing the risk of falsification. All entries will be time stamped. It will alert staff on the shift once prescribed observations are overdue by 5 or more minutes; reducing the risk of missed observations. Each staff member will have their own log in for the app and any observations they complete will reflect this- staff should not be able to use other people's log in to falsely record observations completed. On the app each patient's observation care plan will be linked to their record of observation. This ensures continuity of care. Any reviews in level of observations will require an entry to be made verifying the escalation and decision-making process. Concern 5: Safety Plans 25. In Tower Hamlets the Trust has introduced Dialog+ Plus and Safety Planning training facilitated by Trust Matrons. We have a monthly schedule where inpatient staff in Tower Hamlets must attend Training covering Dialog+ care planning, safety plans and risk formulations. Staff have an opportunity to practice using scenarios in groups. Conclusion 26. I hope this response provides sufficient reassurances to you and to the family of Ms Elliott about the additional learning that has taken place at the Trust because of her sad death. 27. I would like to offer my sincere and heart-felt condolences to her family at this difficult time. Yours sincerely Chief Medical Officer Chief Executive: Chair:
See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths, and how often a new one appears.
What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text
Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.
These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.