Prevention of Future Deaths reports · 2024

Danny Anderson

Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths, reference 2024-0405, written 25 Jul 2024. A coroner writes one of these when an inquest reveals a risk that could cause further deaths unless something changes.

Date of report25 Jul 2024
Reference2024-0405
DeceasedDanny Anderson
CoronerNadia Persaud
Coroner areaEast London
CategorySuicide (from 2015) · Mental Health related deaths · Community health care and emergency services related deaths
Sourcejudiciary.uk record · original PDF
Responses published1

The report

Text extracted from the PDF text layer. Reproduced verbatim, including the scan's own layout.

MISS N PERSAUD 
HIS MAJESTY’S CORONER 
EAST LONDON 
 Coroner's Court, 124 Queens Road Walthamstow, E17 8QP 
Telephone 020 8496 5000 Email coroners@walthamforest.gov.uk 

REGULATION 28:  REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS (1) 

Ref: 

REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS 

THIS REPORT IS BEING SENT TO: 

, Chief Executive Officer, Essex Partnership University NHS 

Foundation Trust  

1 

CORONER 

I am Nadia Persaud, Area Coroner for the coroner area of East London 

2 

CORONER’S LEGAL POWERS 

I make this report under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 
and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/25/schedule/5/paragraph/7 
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1629/part/7/made 

3 

INVESTIGATION and INQUEST 

On 12 April 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of Danny Jay Anderson  
(aged 35).  The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 23 July 2024. 
The conclusion was that Danny Anderson died as a result of suicide, contributed to by 
neglect.      
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH 

4 

Danny Anderson suffered from chronic mental health difficulties, which first developed 

1 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 around the age of 15. His past psychiatric history included serious incidents of self-
harm and necessary admissions to hospital under the provisions of the Mental Health 
Act. In 2022, Danny required a six-week admission to hospital in February/March 2022, 
due to paranoid and delusional beliefs. In June 2022, Danny again required admission 
under the Mental Health Act for paranoid and delusional beliefs. He received care and 
assessment in hospital under Section 3 of the Mental Health Act. He received a number 
of possible diagnoses during the course of the admission. Evidence is accepted from an 
independent psychiatric expert, that Danny was likely to have been suffering from 
paranoid schizophrenia in 2022. This is based upon his presenting condition, requiring 
the admissions to hospital, and based upon his presentation throughout the six-month 
period in hospital - June to December 2022. Danny’s condition was not correctly 
diagnosed before discharge from hospital. Danny was entitled to Section 117 after-care 
but no significant attention was given to his Section 117 after-care needs. Danny should 
have been assessed for supported accommodation. This was not done and supported 
accommodation was not sought for him. Danny was discharged to grossly inadequate 
hotel accommodation. Danny was discharged from hospital on the 14 December 2022. 
There was no comprehensive assessment of risk prior to discharge. There was no 
comprehensive safety plan put into place for him. Danny had stated his intention to 
stop his anti-psychotic medication before he was discharged from hospital, but no plan 
was put in place to address the clear risks of non-compliance with medication. The 
community mental health team did not communicate to the housing team, the 
importance of Danny being placed within the area of the community mental health 
team. Danny was placed out of area and was not seen face to face by his care co-
ordinator before his discharge from the community team. Telephone contacts between 
Danny and his care co-ordinator raised significant concerns about Danny's mental 
health and living circumstances. Despite this, he was discharged from the community 
mental health team following telephone contact on the 18 January 2023. No 
communication was sent to Danny's GP to inform them of the discharge from mental 
health services. On the 30 March 2023, Danny was found hanging inside his room at 

. Paramedics attended and pronounced his life extinct on scene. 

Police attended and deemed the circumstances as non-suspicious. Danny took his own 
life, whilst suffering from a mental illness, and whilst receiving absolutely no care from 
the mental health services. Danny's death was contributed to by cumulative failures, 
amounting to a gross failure, to provide mental health care to him  

5 

CORONER’S CONCERNS 

During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. 
In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken. In the 
circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you. 

The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: 

There was no evidence of any adequate formulation of risk prior to Danny’s discharge 
from hospital on the 14 December 2022 and no evidence of any adequate risk 
formulation prior to Danny’s discharge from the community mental health team in 
January 2023. 

The statement “Danny does not present with any suicidal ideation or self-harming 
behaviour“ was copied and pasted multiple times throughout the risk assessment 
template on the 14 December 2022.  There was no analysis or formulation of risk for 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 Danny.  

From review of the records throughout the admission, I am concerned that there was 
an over-reliance upon Danny’s answer to questions posed about suicidal ideation and 
intent.  At the point of discharge, there was no evidence of information gathering 
around Danny’s mental state, behaviour, psychiatric history, history of abuse, social 
situation – and evidence that this information was used to form a judgment about the 
likelihood or probability of an adverse or harmful outcome (in accordance with the 
Trust’s risk policy). 

There was no evidence of any consideration of Danny’s historical factors and 
experiences, more recent problems and existing strengths and resources (in 
accordance with the NICE guidelines 2022).  

Witnesses from consultant level to care co-ordinator level, were unable to describe a 
robust risk assessment process. I am concerned that staff do not fully understand how 
to assess and manage risk.   

There was no safety plan on discharge from hospital, or prior to discharge from the 
community team, to address the clear risks that Danny posed.           

6 

ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN 

In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you 
[AND/OR your organisation] have the power to take such action.  

7 

YOUR RESPONSE 

You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report, 
namely by 19 September 2024. I, the coroner, may extend the period. 

Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out 
the timetable for action. Otherwise, you must explain why no action is proposed. 

8 

COPIES and PUBLICATION 

I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner, to the family of Danny Jay 
Anderson, to the other interested persons to the inquest, to the Care Quality 
Commission, and the local Director of Public Health who may find it useful or of 
interest. 

I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all 
interested persons who in my opinion should receive it.   

I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find it 
useful or of interest.  

The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary 
form. He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it 
useful or of interest.  

3 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about 
the release or the publication of your response. 

9 

25 July 2024    

4

Responses

1 response published against this report on judiciary.uk. A response is a body's written reply to the coroner's concerns; publication is at the discretion of the Chief Coroner's office, so an absent response does not mean nobody replied.

Response from Essex Partnership NHS (PDF)
19 September 2024 

Private and Confidential - By Email Only   

Miss Nadia Persaud 
HM Area Coroner for East London  
Coroner’s Court   
124 Queens Road  
Walthamstow   
E17 8QP 

Dear Miss Persaud, 

Danny Jay Anderson (RIP) 

Chief Executive Office
The Lodge 
Lodge Approach 
Wickford 
SS11 7XX 
           Tel: 0300 123 0808 

I write to set out the Trust’s formal response to the report made under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of 
the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) 
Regulations 2013, dated 25th July 2024 in respect of the above, which was issued following the 
inquest into the death of Danny Jay Anderson (RIP). 

I would like to begin by extending my deepest condolences to Danny’s family on behalf of the Trust. 

The matters of concern as noted within the Regulation 28 Report have been carefully reviewed.  I 
will now respond in full to these concerns in the hope that this provides both yourself and Danny’s 
family with comprehensive assurance of changes that have been made at the Trust to address the 
concerns you have raised. For ease of reference, I have added numbering to the concerns raised: 

Concern a)  

There was no evidence of any adequate formulation of risk prior to Danny’s discharge from hospital 
on the 14 December 2022 and no evidence of any adequate risk formulation prior to Danny’s 
discharge from the community mental health team in January 2023.  

Response: 

The Trust have made improvements, at pace in respect of the processes for formulation of risk on 
discharge with the implementation of discharge steps developed by the Trust Patient Flow Team.  
There has also been a change in practice to ensure we hold a discharge planning meeting with the 
Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) before discharge from hospital. Clinical service managers and 
matrons join discharge meetings to ensure a collaborative approach.  

Improvements have also been made to the joint partnership working with community teams for all 
patients, part of this change encouraging transparent conversations, including with friends/family, to 
ensure risks are identified and mitigated 

The Trust recognises that there was confusion around responsibilities of the named nurse, which 
includes risk assessment and formulating risks including plan at point of discharge.  The Trust 
Quality Matron for Fundamentals of Care is leading on an improvement project looking at processes 
for the named nurse which aims to ensure there is consistent understanding of the named nurse role 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
    
     
            
       
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 and responsibility across all inpatient wards and will include the review of the Trust named nurse 
guidelines.   

The organisations recognises that the quality of the narrative used in risk assessment is essential for 
staff to understand risk.  This will always be dependent on the staff member completing this.  The 
Trust has clinical risk assessment training in place and a clinical risk policy to guide staff.  For 
ongoing support the Trust has implemented review of risk assessments and documentation 
completed as part of staff members’ clinical supervision, this enables discussion and immediate 
learning support for each staff member. 

The Trust is on an ongoing journey for improved documentation, which has included training 
sessions and a specific focus on this within supervision reviews.  Work has been undertaken to 
update the discharge letter template to include discharge planning prompts and the incorporation of 
carer involvement in the Care Programme Approach review documentation. Discharge letters have 
been reviewed by the Service User Network Group to review content and tone of correspondence.   

Additional training has been undertaken Trust wide in Community Mental Health Teams to support 
enhanced transition care planning. 

Concern b)  

The statement “Danny does not present with any suicidal ideation or self-harming behaviour“ was 
copied and pasted multiple times throughout the risk assessment template on the 14 December 
2022. There was no analysis or formulation of risk for Danny. 

Response: 

The Trust recognises that copying and pasting and the quality of documentation continues to be an 
area for improvement.  A number of improvement initiatives have been completed including copying 
and pasting safety alert being issued, enhanced documentation training and having a robust 
process in place which ensures records auditing (including checking for copying and pasting), where 
this is found the staff member is contacted and asked to complete a reflective piece.  

Our next steps on this improvement journey is the roll out of the new inpatient operating model 
which will include quality focus on key learning areas including copying and pasting and focus on the 
expectations of roles and responsibilities. 

A professional standard of record keeping is part of qualified staff professional registration.  The 
Trust expects that this standard of record keeping is met by all staff; again this is reviewed and 
discussed as part of supervision review meetings directly with staff. 

We are taking action to further strengthen response when staff are found to have copied and pasted 
in patient records and are exploring options with Human Resources. 

Concern c)  

From review of the records throughout the admission, I am concerned that there was an over-
reliance upon Danny’s answer to questions posed about suicidal ideation and intent. At the point of 
discharge, there was no evidence of information gathering around Danny’s mental state, behaviour, 
psychiatric history, history of abuse, social situation – and evidence that this information was used to 
form a judgment about the likelihood or probability of an adverse or harmful outcome (in accordance 
with the Trust’s risk policy).  

Response: 

The Trust has established a new oversight system to enable managers to identify any gaps in risk 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 formulation and crisis summary.  This is part of a clinical dashboard which shows if these key parts 
are missing.  This dashboard is available to staff and is reviewed by the nurse in charge and ward 
manager to ensure any gaps can be addressed. 

As part of all staff one to ones, supervisors work with inpatient named nurses/ community care 
coordinators reviewing their care plans and risk assessment to check quality of the clinical entries. 

There is medical oversight at point of discharge from inpatient services and this feeds into discharge 
summaries 

In addition the Trust has clinical audit processes which include a record keeping audit and a 
‘matron’s records audit’ which includes review of risk formulation and crisis summary.  Audit results 
are taken back to staff and highlighted through discussed in team meetings. The audit process has 
been reviewed and the Trust now has a person centred audit undertaken were possible with the 
names nurse to review an individual’s care and documentation thereafter.  

Within Trust community teams, key information is included in the discharge Care Programme 
Approach (CPA) review. 

The Trust has two main electronic records systems for mental health services (Mobius/Paris) means 
that information can be recorded in two difference places.  To enable staff in information gathering 
across the two systems the trust has implemented the Health Information Exchange (HIE) to provide 
one place for staff to review key information. 

There are further plans to move to one central electronic records system as part of the Trust digital 
strategy which will further enhance the records systems.  

The Trust is seeking further improvements in this area through the new operating model which 
reinforces safe discharge. The operating model launch date commences on the 26th September 
2024 and will be underpinned by a series of standard operating procedures co designed with staff. 

Concern d)  

There was no evidence of any consideration of Danny’s historical factors and experiences, more 
recent problems and existing strengths and resources (in accordance with the NICE guidelines 
2022).  

Response: 

The Trust has implemented a new processes of 1:1 engagement forms that are completed daily with 
each patient.  

Trust care plans have been improved to ensure they are personalised and historic factors, 
experiences and risks are pulled through into care planning. 

The Trust is transforming its approach to providing trauma informed care which aims to create a 
fundamental paradigm shift to considering what has happened to a person rather than what is wrong 
with a person. 

Strong and consistent family and carer engagement is essential for the Trust, as this supports 
understanding of historical risks.  This is being encouraged through the new operating model with 
engagement throughout admission and at discharge.   

The Trust has recently launched a programme for quality of care; focusing on the key element of 
safety, effectiveness and experience. This programme has important Trust wide quality priorities, 
one of which is suicide prevention, one of the current year’s focus areas is enhancing the training 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 and development of our staff with the new Skills Training on Risk Management (STORM) training. 
This is an evidence-based training methodology given to frontline team members who have the 
opportunity to practice, reflect, and give and receive feedback on skills in a safe and supportive 
learning environment. It uses the highest standard level of skills development, which includes filmed 
skills practice for the more advanced courses. The focus is on the person, collaboration, 
assessment, and safety planning, and they are joined by new skill sets including Suicide and self-
harm – exploring the similarities and differences for assessment.  We aim to have 60% of all 
registered practitioners across all urgent care pathways trained by end of 2024.  Achievement of this 
training roll out is over seen by the Trust’s suicide prevention quality priority group. In addition, the 
Trust’s transformation programme ‘Time To Care’ has recognised the importance of enhancing 
clinical education within the clinical environment and has therefore invested in the introduction of six 
Professional Nurse Educators; this role has been developed for our in inpatient mental health wards 
following a national pilot of the role  

The ‘Time to Care’ programme involves a complete transformation of the way in which we operate 
our mental health inpatient wards, with the overriding aim to free up more clinical time to spend on 
direct patient care. The Time to Care Programme has redesigned how we deliver inpatient mental 
health services, based upon learning from the past, the latest national and international expert 
guidance for best practice, and most importantly input from our patients, their families and carers. 

Working alongside patients, staff and partners we have created a model of care that will offer every 
patient personalised care to support their long term recovery. We will also ensure our care takes into 
consideration how traumatic events affect a person’s behaviour and health, so that we can best 
support them in their recovery. 

At all ward MDTs there is a review to look back at the person’s history.  This also ensures that there 
has been a review of both systems / HIE. 

Concern e) 

Witnesses from consultant level to care co-ordinator level, were unable to describe a robust risk 
assessment process. I am concerned that staff do not fully understand how to assess and manage 
risk.  

Response: 

Please see previous responses re programme of workforce training and records monitoring. 

In addition we have re-shared the clinical risk policy with staff supported with poster for wards on 
safety discharge steps  

Work has been undertaken by the Director NE Essex Community Services, Trust Wide Perinatal, 
Children`s Learning Disability and Allied Health Professionals Operations to review the role and 
responsibilities of care coordinators and ongoing quality improvement for risk assessment is part of 
the Trust Disengagement Safety Improvement Programme 

Concern f) 

There was no safety plan on discharge from hospital, or prior to discharge from the community 
team, to address the clear risks that Danny posed.  

Response: 

Action is already underway as part of the Safety Action Plan to ensure there are clear documented 
actions agreed at discharge meetings and that the MDT outcome form is completed for each person 
clearly stating any actions and an overview of relapse signatures and recorded in the patient record.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 This is being monitored through Matron auditing of patient records.  Staff having been provided with 
a quick reference guide for Discharge and Transfer.   

I hope that I have provided reassurances around the steps that we have taken to address the issues 
of concern contained within your report. We are focused and committed to ensure that our quality 
improvements and transformation are consistent and sustained, and that we will continue to embed 
a culture of learning to support this. We will monitor the impact and delivery of the above provisions 
to ensure these are contributing to our overall aim of keeping patents safe and delivering therapeutic 
care. 

Please do let me know if you require any further information at this stage, including copies of any of 
the documents referred to above. 

We Trust that your Court will share, as standard, a copy of this reply with Danny’s family 

Yours sincerely, 

Chief Executive

Related reports

Other reports by Nadia Persaud

See all →

More reports categorised “Suicide (from 2015)”

See all →

Track Suicide (from 2015)

See every Prevention of Future Deaths report matching Suicide (from 2015), and how often a new one appears.

What would an alert for this have sent me? Search the full text

Free to try — the preview shows the real matches and how many arrived in the last 12 months. Your first email alert is free.

These reports are published by the Chief Coroner's office at judiciary.uk and are © Crown copyright. The text here is reproduced from the published PDF so it can be searched. If something on this page is wrong, or you are a person named in it and want it reviewed, email drcjar@gmail.com and we will act promptly.